Greenway 2006 Virus Induced Obesity

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290: R188 –R189, 2006;

Editorial Focus doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00607.2005.

Virus-induced obesity
Frank Greenway
Louisiana State University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

THE HUMAN ADENOVIRUS-36 (Ad-36) was first described in 1980, Table 1. Adenoviruses effects in human and animal models
about the time that the prevalence of obesity began to increase
Virus Ad-36 Ad-37 Ad-31 Ad-2 Ad-5
(15). Prevalence of obesity increased by 30% between 1980
and 1990 and by 61% between 1990 and 2000 with no Differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells Yes Yes Yes No ?
indication that this increase is lessening (12). The reason for Obesity in animal model Yes Yes No No Yes
this epidemic increase in obesity is not clear, but dietary Differentiation in human adipocytes Yes ? ? No ?
Human antibodies higher in obese Yes No No No ?
changes, such as an increase in dietary fructose derived from
corn syrup (2), increased food intake (10), and decreased Only adenovirus (Ad)-36 has been shown to accelerate differentiation in
3T3-L1 preadipocytes, cause obesity in animal models, accelerate differenti-
physical activity (11) have all been suggested as potentially ation in human preadipocytes, and have a higher antibody prevalence in obese
playing a role. Infectious agents such as viruses are another humans. Other human adenoviruses have the potential to do some of these
possible contributing factor (3). things, but only Ad-36 has been shown to stimulate human preadipocyte
Support for Ad-36 being a contributor to the obesity epi- differentiation and have a higher antibody prevalence in obese humans. ?,
demic has been accumulating over several years. Ad-36 has Unknown.
been shown to cause obesity in chickens, mice, and nonhuman
primates (4, 5, 8). Obese humans have a higher prevalence of
serum neutralizing antibodies to Ad-36 (30%) than lean hu- obesity in chickens. Furthermore, they report the development
mans (11%), and the antibody-positive obese or nonobese of obesity in chickens inoculated with Ad-37, a virus that did
subjects are heavier compared with their antibody negative not show a correlation with human obesity (16). This obser-
counterparts (1). Similarly, when human twins are discordant vation suggests that the development of obesity in chickens is
for antibodies to Ad-36 antibodies, the antibody-positive twin not necessarily predictive of a human adenovirus causing
has a higher body mass index (24.5 ⫾ 5.2 vs. 23.1 ⫾ 4.5 obesity in humans (16).
kg/m2, P ⬍ 0.03) (1). Obese humans positive for antibodies to In addition to Ad-37 causing obesity in chickens, Ad-5 was
SMAM-1, an adipogenic avian virus (6), are heavier compared recently shown to cause obesity in mice (13). Adenovirus Ad-2
with their seronegative obese counterparts (7). However, be- does not cause adiposity in animals and does not enhance
cause avian viruses are not thought to infect humans, this differentiation of 3T3-L1 or human preadipocytes (14). Ad-37,
observation has been interpreted as a cross-reaction to a human Ad-31, and Ad-5 have not been tested for increased differen-
virus that is antigenically similar (7). tiation in human adipocytes. The experience with Ad-36 sug-
The mechanism by which Ad-36 causes obesity has been gests that 3T3-L1 cells function as a good model for defining
the mechanisms by which human adenoviruses induce obesity
explored. Ad-36 accelerates differentiation of preadipocytes to
in humans, if the virus in question stimulates adipocyte differ-
adipocytes in 3T3-L1 cells, and this has been confirmed in
entiation in human cells. Thus it is possible that human adipo-
human preadipocytes, as well (14). When the open reading
cyte differentiation may be a viable in vitro assay to screen for
frame E4orf1 from the Ad-36 virus was inserted into 3T3-L1
human adenoviruses capable of inducing obesity in humans
cells, C/EBP-␤, PPAR␥-2, and glycerol 3-phosphate dehydro-
(Table 1).
genase were all stimulated compared with the control 3T3-L1 Antibody testing in humans suggests that the development of
cells, suggesting that the viral gene E4orf1 is responsible for obesity in chickens is not an effective screening tool to identify
the stimulation of adipocyte differentiation (9). human adenoviruses capable of causing obesity in humans.
If Ad-36 is responsible for a significant portion of human The prevalence of antibodies to Ad-2 was not different in 145
obesity, the logical therapeutic intervention would be to de- obese human subjects compared with 52 lean controls. The
velop a vaccine to prevent future infections. If a vaccine were prevalence of antibodies to Ad-31 in 152 obese human subjects
to be developed, one would want to ensure that all the sero- was not different compared with 49 lean controls. Because
types of human adenoviruses responsible for human obesity there were only 5 of 198 people positive for the Ad-37 virus,
were covered in the vaccine. If one could predict the potential its role in the etiology of human obesity seems remote, despite
of an adenovirus to cause human obesity by using an in vitro its demonstrated ability to cause obesity in chickens. This may
assay or even by animal testing, screening of the ⬃50 human be due to a lower potential for this virus to cause infection.
adenoviruses might be accelerated, shortening the time re- Infectivity of Ad-36 was 100% in studies when chickens were
quired for vaccine formulation. The article by Atkinson et al. in inoculated with this virus, because all animals developed
this issue of the American Journal of Physiology–Regulatory, antibodies to Ad-36 (5) but only 71% of the chickens inocu-
Integrative and Comparative Physiology (16), suggests that the lated with Ad-37 developed antibodies (16).
increased differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells caused by adenovirus At this point, it appears that Ad-36 is the only human
type 31 does not necessarily correlate with the development of adenovirus associated with human obesity based on human
antibody titers. If virus infections are partially responsible for
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Greenway, Lou- the human obesity epidemic, it will be important to define all
isiana State Univ., Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA the adenovirus serotypes responsible in formulating a vaccine.
(e-mail: greenwfl@pbrc.edu). Screening of large populations for the differential prevalence
R188 0363-6119/06 $8.00 Copyright © 2006 the American Physiological Society http://www.ajpregu.org
Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpregu (152.058.202.037) on October 16, 2023.
Editorial Focus
R189
of antibodies to all 50 or more human adenoviruses to define 3. Dhurandhar N, Atkinson R, and Ahmed A. Obesity of infectious
those associated with human obesity is a daunting task. origin–a review. Growth Genet Horm 20: 33–39, 2004.
4. Dhurandhar NV, Israel BA, Kolesar JM, Mayhew G, Cook ME, and
Clearly, an in vitro assay would make the screening process Atkinson RL. Transmissibility of adenovirus-induced adiposity in a
much more efficient. chicken model. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: 990 –996, 2001.
The article by Atkinson and colleagues (16) suggests that 5. Dhurandhar NV, Israel BA, Kolesar JM, Mayhew GF, Cook ME, and
3T3-L1 cells are not an adequate in vitro model and that Atkinson RL. Increased adiposity in animals due to a human virus. Int J
Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 989 –996, 2000.
chickens are not an adequate in vivo model for screening 6. Dhurandhar NV, Kulkarni P, Ajinkya SM, and Sherikar A. Effect of
adipogenic potential of adenoviruses to induce obesity in adenovirus infection on adiposity in chicken. Vet Microbiol 31: 101–107,
humans. Human adipocyte differentiation in vitro may hold 1992.
promise, because to this point only Ad-36 has been shown to 7. Dhurandhar NV, Kulkarni PR, Ajinkya SM, Sherikar AA, and At-
kinson RL. Association of adenovirus infection with human obesity. Obes
be active in that assay (Table 1). Res 5: 464 – 469, 1997.
In summary, evidence is accumulating that Ad-36 plays a 8. Dhurandhar NV, Whigham LD, Abbott DH, Schultz-Darken NJ,
role in human obesity by stimulation of adipocyte differentia- Israel BA, Bradley SM, Kemnitz JW, Allison DB, and Atkinson RL.
tion. Other adenoviruses cause obesity in animals and stimulate Human adenovirus Ad-36 promotes weight gain in male rhesus and
marmoset monkeys. J Nutr 132: 3155–3160, 2002.
3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation, but neither of these find- 9. Fusinski K, Shaw M, and Leff T. Adenovirus-36 transcription factor
ings correlate with the antibody prevalence in obese and lean E4orf1 accelerates preadipocyte differentiation (Abstract). Obes Res 12,
humans shown with Ad-36. Therefore, human antibody prev- Suppl: A2, 2004.
alence in obese and lean human populations appears to be the 10. Goldberg JP, Belury MA, Elam P, Finn SC, Hayes D, Lyle R, St Jeor
only reliable method to screen adenoviruses for their potential S, Warren M, and Hellwig JP. The obesity crisis: don’t blame it on the
pyramid. J Am Diet Assoc 104: 1141–1147, 2004.
to cause obesity in humans at the present time. An in vitro 11. Hill JO and Wyatt HR. Role of physical activity in preventing and
assay that correlates with human antibody prevalence would treating obesity. J Appl Physiol 99: 765–770, 2005.
accelerate screening of adenovirus serotypes for their potential 12. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, and
to induce human obesity. Identifying such an in vitro assay will Koplan JP. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the
United States. JAMA 286: 1195–1200, 2001.
be important to efficient vaccine development. 13. So PW, Herlihy AH, and Bell JD. Adiposity induced by adenovirus 5
inoculation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 29: 603– 606, 2005.
REFERENCES 14. Vangipuram SD, Sheele J, Atkinson RL, Holland TC, and
Dhurandhar NV. A human adenovirus enhances preadipocyte differen-
1. Atkinson RL, Dhurandhar NV, Allison DB, Bowen RL, Israel BA, tiation. Obes Res 12: 770 –777, 2004.
Albu JB, and Augustus AS. Human adenovirus-36 is associated with 15. Wigand R, Gelderblom H, and Wadell G. New human adenovirus
increased body weight and paradoxical reduction of serum lipids. Int J (candidate adenovirus 36), a novel member of subgroup D. Arch Virol 64:
Obes Relat Metab Disord 29: 281–286, 2005. 225–233, 1980.
2. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, and Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose 16. Whigham LD, Israel BA, and Atkinson RL. Adipogenic potential of
corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J multiple human adenoviruses in vivo and in vitro in animals. Am J Physiol
Clin Nutr 79: 537–543, 2004. Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290: R190 –R194, 2006.

AJP-Regul Integr Comp Physiol • VOL 290 • JANUARY 2006 • www.ajpregu.org


Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpregu (152.058.202.037) on October 16, 2023.

You might also like