‘THE POSTNATIONAL CONDITION ==
South Asia? West Asia?
Pakistan: Location, Identity
While Pakistan’s geographical
location has not shifted in the last
38 years, there has been a marked
shift in terms of its identity and
associations. In the past, what is
now Pakistan was closer to, and
more part of the larger south
Asian or “Indian subcontinental”
identity, butit has now “corrected
its direction” (apna qibla durust
kar liya hat). In some ways, the
Pakistani identities of the Muslim
and the south Asian/Indian are
competing identities, often
mutually exclusive. A secular
India with a Mustim minority
would not wish for a stronger
Muslim south Asian identity while
‘a Muslim Pakistan may not want
to belong to an idea or union, in
which it would be marginalised
and subservient to a power which
it sees as its nemesis.
S Akbar Zaidi okharsaidi@xootemail. com) i
Sola scents based in Keracs
36
snever some ministry or de-
partment of the government of
Pakistan organises an event for
the benefit of foreigners — officials, tourists
oF fovestors~ it publishes brochures andl
flyers which claim, proudly, that Pakistan
1s located at a particularly important and
profitable geographical location, at the
confluence of at least three (but oceaston-
ally fous) civilisations or regional group-
ings. This publicity material talks about
Pakistan's historic and ancestral links with
the Muslim workd in west Asia (or the Gulf
‘or middle east) as part of a larger Islamic
and Muslim civilisation and identity, both
historical and contemporary, and also in-
‘ludesa second region, that ofthe central
‘Asian republics, many of which also have
“slarnie” or “Muslim” markers and have
belonged to a much broader Islamic civili-
sation of some centuries ago, The third
region to which Pakistanis also claimed
tobelong —for which the term ‘cvilisation”
‘would cause great problems fr the off-
cials who welte such publicity blurbs, and
hence is not used — is thet of south Asia, 2
‘name primarily fora pre-Partition (or, 8
cording to one view, postindependence,
Greater) India, from which Pakistan was
born. Both central and west Asiahave had
‘an undeniably formative impact on this
third region, now known as south Asia,
Depending on the political mood of the
times and on the audience, a fourth site
through which an association is claimed,
is that of the ancient Chinese civilisation
with references to the Silk Route, and 2
‘more contemporary relationship is also
fnvoked with western China's large
‘Muslim population,
‘These references are not merely geo-
graphical or locational, but often con
scious choices, which suggest that far
‘mote is at work than merely a lesson in
geography. The selling pola inthis act of
public rlationing is che underiying claim
that the state of Pakistan belongs to maul:
tiple and often conflicting regions and
identities, but anyone who can pay the
right price, ean use this location to their
advantage, o whatever purpose, ranging
from those related to trade, invescment,
‘or even as bases for military exploits ito
neighbouring counties. A¥ longs You
ay, you get your way. While many, such
as those who belong tothe institutions of
the state, celebrate this eclececism which
results in muk-polar identities being
created for the purpose of profit, one
oul, in fact, argue that this lack ofro0t-
edness causes a condition which results
in uncertain, uid and schizophrenic be-
haviour. To make matters moze interest
ing, this desire not to belong to any one
particular region ~ despite geography, Io-
cation and history ~ in other words, the
conscious chofoe to remain unrooted, may
bbe a consequence of a very rational
thought process,
Many of the questions which one can
raise about the location and identity of a
‘country, are difficlt to answer. What con-
stitutes “county”? Is it merely the nation
sate which represents what 2 country is?
Ina country where the state is strong, over-
Geveloped, and unrepresentative, who
“speaks for that country”? It might be pos.
sible to examine the nature ofa particular
state ~ its clase and ethnie composition,
its forms, institutions, polities, and the
practice of power and the ability to use it
to do violence — but is this the same as
‘uying to understand the identity of a
country particularly with regard to Rs 1o-
cation? Rather than try to grapple with
‘these questions directly, this paper looks
at what one can make of “Pakistan's”
identity i terms of culture, politics and
institutions, with regard 10 ies Jocation
‘and relationship with and in the spaces
surrounding it. In fact, to put it more
squarely the question one can askis: Does
Pakistan “belong” to south Asia?
1 ‘Creation’ of South Asia
‘The term and notion of "South Asia” re-
placed the older and muci used "Indian
subcontinent”, soon after being coined by
the us state department when itbowed the
‘word into diferent regions so that is of
ficials could get a quick and uncomplicated
rasp of global geography. This regionali
sation of many parts of the world forced
the peaple who were ing so classified, to‘THE POSTNATIONAL CONDITION
“belong to” apartcularregion. Pechapsin Two sharper and more discordant views While the Pakistani state (he military,
some regions there was a natural affinity would be dificult co find, and neither is more carreel) is not willing o play the
and shared culrural history co want to be- fully aware of, or understands, how the south Asia gome and makes a conscious
long, perhaps even on the basis of equal ar other feels. In Pakistan too, there are choice ro optout, that stil doesnot answer
shared power. Where many similarsized those for whom this birth, the moment of the question posed earlier, whether Paki-
countries were clubbed into a region-one—independence;-has-litte-meaning,-but-it—sean-belongs-