Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.2a Bridge Construction Methods
5.2a Bridge Construction Methods
Construction Division
Comprehensive Training
for DPWH Field Engineers
Module II - Bridge
CONSTUCTION METHODS
COURSE OUTLINE
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHODS
Part I- Introduction
Part II- Classification of Bridges
Part III- Construction of Bridge Foundation
A. Accessibility
B. Construction of Bridge Foundation
1. R. C. /Prestressed Concrete Piles
2. Steel Piles
3. Cofferdam
4. Bored Piles
5. Footing/Shaft/Coping
C. Construction of Bridge Superstructure
1. Reinforced Concrete Deck Girder
2. PSC Girders
3. Steel Bridges
4. Cable Stayed Bridges
5. Ach Bridges
6. Bailey Bridges
Part IV – Common Problems in Bridge
Construction
Part V – Safety Measures
I. INTRODUCTION
I.1
a) Main Bridge Components
a.1) Superstructure
Horizontal portion of the bridge which spans the
obstacle.
a.2) Substructure
Supports the superstructure and transmits the
dead and live loads to the foundation. It
accommodates adequate resistance to
vertical and lateral loads.
I.2
b. Types of Bridge Foundation
b.1)Spread Footing
A large water tight chamber within which work is done under water, as on
the bridge pier.
I.3
Parts of An Abutment
wingwall
backwall
bridge seat
footing
I.4
Common Types of Abutments
Diaphragm Gravity
I.5
Piers
I.6
Common Types Of Pier
I.8
Part II. Classification of Bridges
II.1
TYPE OF BRIDGE ACCORDING TO
USAGE
o Temporary Bridge
o Permanent Bridge
II.2
Types of Bridge Based on
Materials Used
o Timber Bridge
o Steel Bridge
o Concrete Bridge
II.3
Types of Timber Bridge
– Timber Trestle
– Log Bridge
64.00
meter clear
METERS
II.4
Types of Concrete Bridge
• CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
BRIDGE
II.5
Sample of Cast-in-place Concrete
Bridges
II.6
Sample Section Of Pre-cast
Concrete Girder Bridges
II.7
Types of Bridge Based on System of
Design or according to types of
supporting structure used
• Simple span-Consisting of a separate
beam for each span, supported at one
end by fixed bearing and the other
end by expansion bearing.
II.9
Samples of Steel Bridges
– Bailey Bridge
II.10
Sample Simply Supported Span
M F M F M F M F
II.11
Sample Continuous Span
M F F F F F F M
II.12
Sample Cantilever Bridge
II.13
Sample Cable-stayed Bridge
II.14
Types of Bridge Based on
Roadway Location
Deck Type
Bailey Panels
Through Type
II.15
Types of Bridge according to
Form and Structural Stresses
II.16
BAMBAN – Nielsen Bridge,
TARLAC
II.17
PART III- Construction of Bridge
Foundation
A. ACCESSIBILITY
III-A.1
a. Embankment Craneway
III-A.2
TIMBER CRANEWAY
Equipment used are in driving Timber Piles is Diesel Hammer and Chain Saw
for cutting piles. Vibratory
III-A.3
Structural Steel
Craneway
III-A.4
c. River Re-channelization
Abut. "A"
Applied if working on a wide river bed with low level of water flowing
occupying a narrow area.
III-A.5
d. Timber Craneway
III-A.6
B. BRIDGE FOUNDATION
1. Types of Pre-cast
Concrete Piles
8 PCS
25 MM RSB
4 PCS
7 WIRE
STRANDS
III-B.1a
Driving Equipment
o Drop Hammer
o Single Acting Hammer
o Double Acting Hammer
o Diesel Hammer
o Vibratory Hammer
III-B.1b
Drop Hammer
Disadvantages- 1) slow rate of driving
2)Cannot be used underwater,3)danger
of damaging piles,4)heavy vibration
III-B.1c
The Importance of Test Piles
TEST PILE DATA
III-B.1d
Single acting hammer
Is a freely falling weight
Disadvantages-1)require more
investment
2)More complicated/high
maintenance cost
3)More time to set up/take down,
4)require large operating crew
III-B.1e
Double acting hammer
III-B.1f
1. R. C. / Prestressed
Concrete Pile
a.) Fabrication of Piles:
After the result of test pile is reviewed and
evaluated by the Engineer as well as the
issuance of instruction on the fabrication
length of the piles, fabrication and casting of
piles shall commence.
Reinforcing steel bars shall be pre-assembled
at steel fabrication area and shall be installed
using suitable lifting equipment assisted by
manpower.
Concrete to be poured shall be in accordance
with the required specification. Curing of piles
shall be done by continuous watering or by
continuously wet burlap covering the exposed
surface of the piles.
Stockpiling of piles shall be limited to 3 layers
and shall be supported by wood block in
between the piles. Only designated lifting
points shall be used in lifting the piles.
III-B.1g
a. Photo showing the
Fabrication of R.C. Piles
III-B.1h
b. Lifting of R. C. Piles
III-B.1i
c. Delivery of Fabricated
Concrete Piles
III-B.1j
d. Pile Driving
III-B.1k
d) Pile Driving
(Continuation)
Pile guide shall be constructed to
maintain the verticality of the piles
during driving. Pile guides or leads
are made of steel or wood
materials, vertically positioned
beside the piles to be driven.
III-B.1l
f. Proper Sequence of Driving Each
III-B.1m
Methods of Splicing Piles
0.40 x 0.40 m.
R.C. Piles
4 meters
o Splice Can
o Build-up
0.40 m.
o Structural Epoxy
Male/Female
0.40 x 0.40 m.
R.C. Piles
III-B.1n
Equipment: Diesel Hammer
III-B.1p
g. Importance of Driving Each Pile
Continuously
III-B.1o
TEST PILE DATA
TEST PILE DATA
III-B.1q
Summary of Pile Driving Data
MARK GROUND DATE TOTAL TOTAL AVE. FALL OF COMPUTED FINAL TIP PAY TOP OF
PENETRATION BEARING
OF PENETRATION PENETRATION LENGTH PILE
FOR LAST 20 POWER,
PILE ELEV. (M) DRIVEN (M) BLOWS (mm) (MM/BLOW) RAM (mm) (KN) ELEV. (M) L.M. ELEV.(M)
1-A 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 362 18.08 1,600.00 352.50 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-B 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-C 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
1-D 1.00 10/25/02 17.47 336 16.79 1,500.00 346.40 -16.47 18.00 1.53
III-B.1r
2. STEEL PILES
Common Types of Steel Piles
• H-Pile
• Monotube Piles
III-B.2a
Typical H-Pile Section
Flange
Width =
0.30 mm.
III-B.2b
Structural Steel H-pile Driving
III-B.2c
Driving of Tubular Piles
III-B.2d
COMPLETED DRIVING OF
H-PILES
III-B.2e
Types of Monotube Piles
Tapering Uniform
Diameter
III-B.2f
DRIVEN MONOTUBE PILES
III-B.2g
3. COFFERDAM
III-B.3a
STEEL COFFERDAM
III-B.3b
Steel Cofferdam
III-B.3c
Excavation Works
III-B.3d
Shoring/timbering Works
III-B.3e
Timber Cofferdam
III-B.3f
Exercise Number 1
III-B.4a
Disadvantages
o Requires specialized
personnel
o Risk of disturbed soil
around the pile
o Risk of poor contact at the
base
o Frequently difficult to keep
site clean
III-B.4b
Drilling Rig
III-B.4c
Bored Pile Attachments
III-B.4d
FABRICATED STEEL
CASING FOR BORED PILES
III-B.4e
Steel Casing for Bored Pile
foundation (Calibrated)
III-B.4f
Driving of steel casing
with adequate falsework.
III-B.4g
Driving of Steel Casing
III-B.4j
An Auger
III-B.4l
III-B.4m
Drilling using auger
III-B.4n
Sounding Cable to determine
the actual depth of borehole
III-B.4i
Soil Penetration Test Is Measured
and No of Blows Counted.
III-B.4j
No of Blows Is the N Value
III-B.4k
Installation of Rebar Cage
III-B.4l
Desanding of Contaminated
Bentonite Suspension
III-B.4m
Are Also Used to Secure a Clean
Borehole Bottom
III-B.4n
Installation of tremie Set
III-B.4o
Concreting Stage
o Cleaning of Borehole Bottom
o Assembly /Installation of Tremie
Set
o Concreting
o Depth Monitoring
o Shortening of Tremie Pipe
o Overpouring of Dirty Concrete
III-B.4p
Concrete Pourin of Bored Pile
III-B.4.q
Concrete Pouring
III-B.4.r
Shortening of tremie Set
III-B.4.s
Concreting During The Night
III-B.4.t
Newly Completed Bored Pile
III-B.4.u
First Stage
Drilling Works
Drilling
Bucket Temporary/Permanent Steel
Casing, 10mm thk.
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
pw
ps
III-B.4.v
Second Stage
Reinforcement Cage
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
Cage Bar
Vertical Spacer @
2.50m to 3.0m on
center, spacer shall
be carefully welded
to the longitudinal
bars
0.20 –
0.30m
p
pw
ps
The Bentonite / Super Mud must be checked before the cage is positioned
III-B.4.w
Third Stage
Pouring of Concrete
Concrete Funnel
Mud
Ground Slurry
Level Level
Water
Table 1.50m
Tremie
Pipe
2.50m minimum
pw
ps
III-B.4.x
Methods of Testing Completed Bored
Piles
III-B.4.y
By Crosshole Logging Method
III-B.4.z
Low Strain Dynamic Testing Requires Only the
Impact Caused by a Small Hand Held Hammer
III-B.4.x
Striking Hammer Lifted and Then
Dropped to the Top of the Pile
III-B.4.y
High Strain Dynamic Testing Force and Velocity
Records Are Continuously Viewed From the PDA
Monitor for Each Blow to Evaluate Data Quality, the
Maximum Hammer Energy Delivered to the Pile,
Pile Integrity, Pile Stresses and Other Pertinent
Information.
III-B.4.z
III-B.4.aa
III-B.4.bb
III-B.4.cc
5. CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE FOOTING
III-B.5.a
CONCRETE POURING OF BRIDGE FOOTING
III-B.5.b
Installation Reinforcing Steel
Bars for Footing.
• Types of Rebars
• Handling and Storage
III-B.5.c
Installation of Forms for Footing
III-B.5.d
Concreting of Footing
III-B.5.e
Installation of Rebars For Column
III-B.5.f
Installation of Rebars for Coping
Beam
III-B.5.g
Installation of Forms For Coping
Beam
III-B.5.h
Constructed Substructure
III-B.5.i
Exercise Number 2
o Girder
o Diaphragm
o Deck Slab
o Bridge Railing and
Sidewalk
III-C.1a
C. BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURES
C – 1. Falsework Construction
for RCDG Bridge
III-C.1b
Concrete Pouring of Girders
III-C.1c
Forms for Girders
III-C.1d
Installation of Side Forms
III-C.1e
Installation of RSB Deck Slab
III-C.1.f
2. PSC GIRDERS
• Preparation of Casting Bed
III-C.2.a
Cleaning/Aligning of Moulds
III-C.2.b
Cutting/Bending and
Assembly of Rebars
III-C.2.c
Securing a Duct Tube
III-C.2.d
Typical Duct Joint Detail
III-C.2.e
III-C.2.f
Mixing/placing of Concrete
III-C.2.g
Introduction to Pre-stressed Concrete
III-C.2.h
Placing of Anchorage
Assembly
III-C.2.j
Laminated Elastomeric Bearing Pad
Elastomer Layers
III-C.2.k
Erection
III-C.2.l
Installation of Forms and
Bracings for Deck Slab
III-C.2.m
Why Use T-girder Instead of I-
girder?
III-C.2.n
Preparation for Deck Slab Pour
III-C.2.o
Concrete Pouring of Deck Slab
III-C.2.p
Slump and Cylinder Tests
III-C.2.q
Concrete Finishing
III-C.2.r
Pouring Sequence
III-C.2.t
Pre-cast Bridge Railings
III-C.2.u
Types of Concrete Finishing
III-C.2.v
III-C.3 Steel Bridges
III-C.3.a
Shear Studs for Composite Action
III-C.3.b
III-C.3.c
Transport
III-C.3.d
Splice Plate Used to Splice the
Joints in Steel Girders
III-C.3.f
Sample Steel Truss Bridge
III-C.3.g
Concrete Pouring.
III-C.3.i
Bridge Drain
for Steel Girder Bridge
III-C.3.j
Expansion Dam
• Strip seal
• Sliding Plate
• Finger Type
III-C.3.k
Finger Type
III-C.3.l
Strip seal
III-C.3.m
Pre Molded Joint Filler
III-C.3.n
Bridge Bearings
It provides an allowance in the bridge for all
anticipated movements which will usually be
in the longitudinal direction
III-C.3.o
Classification of Bearings
• Fixed
• Expansion
III-C.3.p
Types of Bearing
III-C.3.q
Neoprene Bearing Pad
III-C.3.q
Setting of Anchor Bolts
III-C.3.r
Pot Bearings
III-C.3.s
Spherical Bearings
III-C.5.t
Sliding Plates
III-C.3.u
III - C.4 SUSPENSION
BRIDGE/CABLE-
STAYED BRIDGE
• The cable-stayed bridge is optimal
for spans longer than
cantilever bridges, and shorter
than suspension bridges. This is
the range where cantilever
bridges would rapidly grow
heavier if the span were
lengthened, and suspension
bridge cabling would not be more
economical if the span were
shortened.
III-C.4.c
III-C.4 CABLE-STAYED
BRIDGE
• A cable-stayed bridge has one or
more towers (or pylons), from
which cables support the bridge
deck.
• There are two major classes of
cable-stayed bridges: harp and fan.
• In the harp design, the cables are
nearly parallel so that the height
of their attachment to the tower is
proportional to the distance from
the tower to their mounting on
the deck.
III-C.4.a
III-C.4 CABLE-STAYED
BRIDGE
• In the fan design, the cables all connect
to or pass over the top of the towers.
The fan design is structurally superior
with minimum moment applied to the
towers but for practical reasons the
modified fan is preferred especially
where many cables are necessary. In
the modified fan arrangement the
cables terminate near to the top of the
tower but are spaced from each other
sufficiently to allow better termination,
improved environmental protection,
and good access to individual cables for
maintenance.
III-C.4.b
SUSPENSION BRIDGE
III-C.4.b
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE,
FAN DESIGN
III-C.4.c
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
HARP DESIGN
III-C.4.d
III - C.5 Arch Bridge
III-C.5.b
IV. COMMON PROBLEMS IN
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
CAUSES
1. INADEQUATE LATERAL SUPPORT
2. SQUARE HOLES NOT ALIGNED VERTICALLY
3. PILE TIP STRIKE A BOULDER
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVE AND REPLACE OR CONSULT THE
DESIGNER
IV-1
A. PLUMBNESS OF PILES BEYOND
TOLERANCE
GROUND LINE
IV-2
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
CAUSES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REPAIR THE PILE BUTT
IV-3
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
CAUSES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REPAIR THE PILE BUTT
IV-4
B. BREAKING OF PILE BUTT
DURING DRIVING
GROUND LINE
IV-5
C.BREAKING / FRACTURING OF PILES
CAUSES
1. LACK OF LATERAL SUPPORT
2. EXCESSIVE DRIVING
3. OVERWEIGHT HAMMER
4. WEAK CONCRETE
5. IMPROPER LIFTING OF PILES
REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. REMOVE AND REPLACE
IV-6
C.BREAKING / FRACTURING OF PILES
GROUND LINE
IV-7
D. FAILURE OF PILE TO PENETRATE THE
REQUIRED PENETRATION
CAUSES
1. PRESENCE OF HARD STRATA
2. HAMMER USED IS VERY LIGHT
3. USED OF INAPPROPRIATE TYPE OF PILES
4. USED OF INAPPROPRIATE TYPE DRIVING
EQUIPMENT
POSSIBLE REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. CHANGE THE FOUNDATION DESIGN
2. USED APPROPRIATE TYPE OF PILES AND
EQUIPMENT
IV-8
D. FAILURE OF PILE TO PENETRATE THE
REQUIRED PENETRATION
GROUND LINE
HARD STRATA
IV-9
E. FAILURE TO PASS THE LOAD TEST
CAUSE
1. UNDERLYING STRATA IS SOFT
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. SPLICE THE PILES
IV-10
E. FAILURE TO PASS THE LOAD TEST
GROUND LINE
SOFT STRATA
IV-11
BORED PILE CONSTRUCTION
DRILLING WORKS
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTION
IV-12
PERMANENT STEEL CASING CAN NOT
PENETRATE
VIBRO HAMMER
CRANE
STEEL CASING
GROUND LINE
OBSTRUCTION
IV-13
CAVE-IN DURING DRILLING
CAUSES
1. PRESENCE OF COLLAPSIBLE MATERIALS
SUCH AS LOOSE SOIL AND COHESSIONLESS
MATERIALS
2. APPROPRIATE PROPERTIES OF STABILIZING
MUD WAS NOT USED
3. HEAD PRESSURE OF STABILIZING MUD
WAS NOT MAINTAINED DURING DRILLING
4. EARTH MOVEMENT DUE TO TREMOR OR
VIBRATION BY HEAVY EQUIPENTS.
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. EXTEND THE DEPTH OF PERMANENT STEEL
CASING
IV-14
CAVE-IN DURING DRILLING
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-15
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF THE TIP OF THE PERMANENT STEEL CASING
2. LARGE VOLUME OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS OVER THE DRILLING
BUCKET
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. UNDERWATER CUTING OF STEEL CASING
2. REMOVAL OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS
3. ADJUST THE POSITION OF PILE
IV-16
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF THE TIP OF THE PERMANENT STEEL CASING
2. LARGE VOLUME OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS OVER THE DRILLING
BUCKET
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. UNDERWATER CUTING OF STEEL CASING
2. REMOVAL OF CAVE-IN MATERIALS
3. ADJUST THE POSITION OF PILE
IV-17
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-18
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT BE RAISED
UP / REMOVED
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-19
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT PENETRATE
CAUSE
1. DEFORMATION OF STEEL CASING
2. PRESENCE OF HARD STRATA OR EXISTING
STRUCTURES
REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. REMOVAL & REINSTALLATION OF STEEL
CASING
2. USE APPROPRIATE DRILLING TOOLS
IV-20
DRILLING BUCKET CANNOT PENETRATE
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
HARD STRATA
IV-21
BREAKING / CUTTING-OFF OF KELLY
BAR
CAUSE
1. DEFECTIVE OR OVERSTRESSED
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. OFFSETTING THE POSITION OF PILES
2. RETRIEVE THE CUT PORTION USING DIVERS
IV-22
BREAKING / CUTTING-OFF OF
KELLY BAR
KELLY BAR
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
DRILLING BUCKET
IV-23
REBAR CAGE INSTALLATION
1. REBAR CAGE CANNOT BE LOWERED
AT GRADE ELEVATION CAUSES
2. BOREHOLE IS NOT STRAIGHT
3. REBAR CAGE ARE NOT STRAIGHT &
SPLICING OF REBAR CAGE NOT
VERTICALLY STRAIGHT
4. OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
IV-24
REBAR CAGE CANNOT BE
LOWERED AT GRADE ELEVATION
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
CAGE BAR
IV-25
FALLING-OFF REBAR CAGE
CAUSES
1. WEAK/ABSENCE OF STIFINING RING
SUPPORT
2. INSUFFICIENT WELDING AND TIE WIRE AT
SPLICE SECTION
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
IV-26
FALLING-OFF REBAR CAGE
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
CAGE BAR
IV-27
CONCRETE POURING
1. OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
CAUSES
1. HEAD PRESSURE OF STABILIZING MUD NOT MAINTAINED
DURING POURING
2. STRONG EARTH VIBRATION CAUSE BY EARTH TREMOR
AND MOVEMENTS OF HEAVY EQUIPMENTS.
IV-28
OCCURRENCE OF CAVE-IN
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
TREMIE PIPES
CAGE BAR
1. OCCURENCE OF CAVE-IN
IV-29
DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
CAUSE
1. BREAKDOWN OF BATCHING PLANT
IV-23
DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
GROUND LINE
STEEL CASING
TREMIE PIPES
CAGE BAR
2. DISCONTINUITY OF CONCRETE
IV-24
CLOGGING OF TREMIE PIPES
CAUSES
1. CONSISTENCY OF CONCRETE NOT PROPERLY MONITORED
2. RATE OF DISCHARGE OF CONCRETE IS VERY FAST
3. PRESENCE OF WATER INSIDE THE TREMIE PIPES
4. OVERSIZED AGGREGATES
REMEDIAL MEASURE
1. REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF TREMIE PIPES
IV-25
PILE INTEGRITY SHOWS
DISCONTINUITY OR DIRTY CONCRETE
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF SEDIMENTS DUE TO
ABSENCE OR INSUFFICIENT
CLEANING OF BOREHOLE
2. CAVING OCCURS DURING CONCRETE
POURING
3. POURING INTERUPTIONS
IV-26
PILE BEARING CAPACITY SHOWS
BELOW THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT
CAUSE
1. PRESENCE OF SEDIMENTS AT THE
BASE OF PILE DUE TO ABSENCE OR
INSUFFICIENT CLEANING OF
BOREHOLE
2. LOW SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
(FAILURE TO CONDUCT SPT TEST
PRIOR TO POURING OF CONCRETE)
POSSIBLE REMEDIAL MEASURES
1. ADDITIONAL PILES
2. REINFORCE THE EXISTING PILES
IV-27
Exercise Number 3
BRIDGE SITE
Safety Measures:
Safety Measures:
Concluding Remarks