Research Proposal

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Research Proposal

Graffiti

Graffiti, which dates back to the late 1960s, has left an unforgettable effect on countless

people and has given birth to many known artists (Aquilani, 2023). It emerges from a history of

adversity as a strategy of expressing one's voice and demanding respect in the face of

suppression or discrimination. Graffiti art has always been regarded as a kind of vandalism, a

confusing issue, and a threat to society (Hughes, 2009). However, graffiti is a dynamic method

of communication and self-expression that goes beyond standard conceptions of "text". It blends

a lot of elements of visual design, typography, and personal narratives. It is rooted in creativity

and often takes shape on public surfaces. Viewers of graffiti often analyze the text and its visual

features, frequently interpreting hidden meanings and unique symbols. This interactive feature

reduces the barriers between traditional reading and art entertainment, making the experience

more engaging. This creative text technology increases voices, captures the spirit of the streets,

and promotes meaningful conversations about culture, identity, and social issues, making it a

very important and powerful part of modern communication.

Sources:

1. Avramidis, K., & Tsilimpounidi, M. (2017). Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and

Representing the City. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585765

This is a paper on graffiti and street art that looks at how various art forms have changed our

perception of urban scenes from nature. The presentation discusses the processes of graffiti

composition, emphasizing the similarities between scholarly and graffiti writing. It provides a

conceptual framework, historical context, and fills gaps in existing literature, all while
recognizing the shared efforts of the project's experts. The source is credible because it contains

important details regarding my specific topic (graffiti) and is published on ResearchGate, where

many academics post the majority of their works.

2. Hughes, M. (2009). Street Art & Graffiti Art: Developing an understanding (thesis).

Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

This thesis looks at the differences between street art and graffiti in urban culture. Although

not a practitioner, the author seems sincerely interested in these art forms and their motivations.

The study explores into the history of graffiti and its evolution into street art, highlighting its

expanding importance in popular culture. This source is credible because it is a thesis that was

most likely closely supervised by scholars, was written for an academic audience, and was

thoroughly researched.

3. MacDowall, L. (2008). The graffiti archive and the digital city. Place: Location and

Belonging in New Media Contexts, 134-46.

This study examines at the history and impact of graffiti art. It explores important people

such as Brassa and Michel de Certeau, as well as their contributions in transforming graffiti from

a minor urban art form to a cultural phenomenon. The author also analyzes how graffiti affects

urban environments and interacts with other forms of media. This research demonstrates the

author's complete understanding of the issue as well as its current relevance, ensuring the paper's

credibility. It was also found from an academic source on Google Scholar.


References

Aquilani, R. (2023, April 23). Can graffiti be considered art essay?. Medium.

https://medium.com/@ruthaquilani/can-graffiti-be-considered-art-essay-76bf8c7e5d25

Avramidis, K., & Tsilimpounidi, M. (2017). Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and

Representing the City. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585765

Hughes, M. (2009). Street Art & Graffiti Art: Developing an understanding (thesis). Georgia

State University, Atlanta, GA.


MACDOWALL, L. (2008). The Graffiti Archive and the Digital City. In Butt, Paul & Bywater

(Eds.) Place: Local Knowledge and New Media Practice (1 ed., pp. 134-146) Cambridge

Scholars Press.

You might also like