Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optimizing Efficiency and Viability in Automatic Clay Brick Production
Optimizing Efficiency and Viability in Automatic Clay Brick Production
Optimizing Efficiency and Viability in Automatic Clay Brick Production
The heart of the Automatic Clay Brick The synergy between the substantial
Production Plant project lies in its annual production capacity and the
impressive production capacity and strategic pricing strategy translates into
strategic pricing approach. This section a remarkable revenue potential for the
unveils the remarkable capacity of the project. At a selling price of Tk. 9.50 per
proposed plant, its pricing strategy, and brick, the projected total revenue from
the substantial revenue potential it auto brick sales is estimated to reach an
holds, thereby underscoring its valuable impressive Tk. 342 million annually.
contribution to the brick manufacturing
industry. This significant revenue stream not only
contributes to the project's financial
3.1 Annual Production Capacity viability and sustainability but also
makes a meaningful impact on the brick
The envisioned project is poised to manufacturing industry. The project's
deliver a staggering annual production capacity to produce high-quality auto
capacity of 36 million units of auto bricks at scale is expected to address the
bricks. These bricks, encompassing industry's demands, potentially
various forms including solid and influencing market dynamics and
hollow designs, will be manufactured setting new standards for production
through an innovative process that efficiency and product quality.
embraces advanced kiln technology and
full automation. This capacity sets a new In conclusion, the Automatic Clay Brick
benchmark within the industry and Production Plant's production capacity
positions the project as a major player in and pricing strategy stand as key pillars
addressing the growing demand for of its viability and potential impact on
quality bricks. the industry. By efficiently producing
millions of bricks annually and
3.2 Pricing Strategy strategically pricing them, the project is
poised to not only achieve financial
A pivotal element in the project's success success but also leave an indelible mark
lies in its pricing strategy. The proposed on the brick manufacturing landscape.
selling price for each brick is set at Tk.
9.50. This pricing approach has been
strategically determined to strike a
balance between affordability for
customers and sustainable profitability
for the project. By offering competitive
pricing, the project aims to secure a
strong foothold in the market, attract a
The success of any ambitious project hinges on a meticulous evaluation of its costs and
investment structure. In the case of the Automatic Clay Brick Production Plant, a
comprehensive breakdown of project costs and the intricacies of investment are
essential to ensure not only the project's feasibility but also its long-term sustainability.
The above table provides a comprehensive overview of the project's fixed costs,
including land, building, machinery, equipment, and other associated expenses. It also
details the working capital required to ensure smooth operations.
The financial projections presented below offer insights into the anticipated
performance of the Automatic Clay Brick Production Plant project over a five-year
horizon. These projections take into account sales revenue, cost of goods sold (COGS),
gross profit, and net profit. The table illustrates the expected financial performance year
by year:
The financial ratios play a pivotal role in assessing the project's financial health and
efficiency. Here, we analyze three key ratios: Gross profit to sales, operating profit to
sales, and net profit to sales. These ratios provide insights into the project's profitability
and effectiveness in generating earnings relative to revenue. The following table
illustrates the calculated ratios for each year:
The Break-Even Analysis is a critical tool to assess the point at which the project's total
revenue equals its total costs, resulting in neither profit nor loss. This analysis aids in
determining the minimum level of sales required for the project to cover its expenses.
The Break-Even Point (BEP) is calculated as follows:
25.21
The Pay-Back Period represents the time it takes for the initial investment to be
recovered through generated profits. It is a key indicator of the project's ability to
generate returns within a reasonable timeframe. The Pay-Back Period for the Automatic
Clay Brick Production Plant project is:
5.5 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) revenue, gross profit, and net profit
demonstrate a promising outlook, with
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a favorable financial ratios highlighting
fundamental measure of a project's the project's efficiency. The Break-Even
profitability, indicating the annualized Analysis, Pay-Back Period, and Internal
rate at which the project's net cash flows Rate of Return collectively affirm the
equate to zero. A higher IRR signifies a project's viability and potential for
more attractive investment substantial returns, making it an
opportunity. For the Automatic Clay attractive proposition in the realm of
Brick Production Plant project: brick manufacturing.
8. References:
1. Tsega, E., Mosisa, A., & Fufa, F. (2017). Effects of firing time and temperature on
physical properties of fired clay bricks. American Journal of Civil Engineering,
5(1), 21-26.
2. Laefer, D. F., Boggs, J., & Cooper, N. (2004). Engineering Properties of Historic
Brick: Variability Considerations as a Function of Stationaryversus Nonstationary
Kiln Types. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 43(3), 255-272.
3. Naveen, S. (2016). Production and marketing network chain of brick kiln product:
A case study of Hyderabad City. International Journal of Managing Value and
Supply Chains, 7(1), 27-37.
4. Schmidt, C. W. (2013). Modernizing artisanal brick kilns: A global need.
5. Joseph, S., McGarry, B., Sajjakulnukit, B., & Sopchokchai, O. (1990). A study of brick
production in Thailand. TDRI Q. Rev, 5(2), 11-15.
6. Hossain, M. A., Zahid, A. M., Arifunnahar, M., & Siddique, M. N. A. (2019). Effect of
brick kiln on arable land degradation, environmental pollution and consequences
on livelihood of Bangladesh. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment
Informatics, 6(02), 474-488.
7. Darain, K. M., Rahman, A. B. M. S., Ahsan, A., Islam, A. B. M. S., & Yusuf, B. (2013).
Brick manufacturing practice in Bangladesh: A review of energy efficacy and air
pollution scenarios. Journal of Hydrology and Environment Research, 1(1), 60.
8. Haque, M. I., Nahar, K., Kabir, M. H., & Salam, A. (2018). Particulate black carbon
and gaseous emission from brick kilns in Greater Dhaka region, Bangladesh. Air
Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 11, 925-935.
9. Aniyikaiye, T. E., Edokpayi, J. N., Odiyo, J. O., & Piketh, S. J. (2021). Traditional
brick making, environmental and socio-economic impacts: A case study of
Vhembe District, South Africa. Sustainability, 13(19), 10659.
10. Abdullah, C. S., Omar, W. M. S. W., & Sintok, U. U. M. (2007). The Status and
Development of Malaysian Brick Industry. Prosiding Kebangsaan Awam’07. Pusat
Pengajian Kejuruteraan Awam, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 283-294.