This document discusses social inequality and how governments address it. It defines social inequality as unequal opportunities and rewards based on social position. It examines two approaches to explaining poverty: blaming the poor, which says lack of motivation causes poverty, or blaming society, which argues structural factors like lack of jobs cause poverty. The document also defines three types of poverty: absolute, relative, and subjective poverty.
This document discusses social inequality and how governments address it. It defines social inequality as unequal opportunities and rewards based on social position. It examines two approaches to explaining poverty: blaming the poor, which says lack of motivation causes poverty, or blaming society, which argues structural factors like lack of jobs cause poverty. The document also defines three types of poverty: absolute, relative, and subjective poverty.
This document discusses social inequality and how governments address it. It defines social inequality as unequal opportunities and rewards based on social position. It examines two approaches to explaining poverty: blaming the poor, which says lack of motivation causes poverty, or blaming society, which argues structural factors like lack of jobs cause poverty. The document also defines three types of poverty: absolute, relative, and subjective poverty.
Lesson4 Government Programs and Initiatives in Addressing Social
Inequalities
Inequality is the unequal access to resources and
opportunities. Equality is the equal or even distribution of tools and assistance. Equity is customizing materials to address the inequality of the situation. Justice is fixing the system to offer equal access to both people or among people with the opportunities and tools. This lesson focuses on the social inequality and how the government address these inequalities.
SOCIAL INEQUALITY is the existence of unequal opportunities and
rewards for different social positions or statuses within a group or society.
Social inequality has several important dimensions. Income is
the earnings from work or investments, while wealth is the total value of money and other assets minus debts. Other important dimensions include power, occupational prestige, schooling, ancestry, and race and ethnicity.
Let's examine the two prevailing explanations of poverty:
blaming the poor and blaming society.
One approach to explain poverty is blaming the poor - that
the poor are responsible for their own poverty. There is some evidence to support this theory because the main reason people are poor is the lack of employment. According to this view, society has plenty of opportunities for people to realize their dream, and people are poor because they lack the motivation, skills, or schooling to find work. Another approach to explain poverty is blaming the society - that society is responsible for poverty. While it is true that unemployment is a main contributor to poverty, the reasons people don't work are more in line with this approach. Loss of jobs is a major contributor to poverty. There simply isn't enough work to support families.
Income /Poverty Inequality
Income, affluence, and poverty are also important factors that define social inequality. Those belonging to the upper class un society have larger and steadily increasing incomes compared to the lower classes, who have low incomes. The distribution of wealth and income remains highly unequal in many societies, and globalization contributed to widening the gap between rich and poor. The Philippines records 25% of Filipinos are poor. Poverty can be defined accordingly.
Absolute poverty refers to the lack of basic resources like
food, clean water, safe housing, and access to health care services needed to maintain a quality lifestyle. Relative poverty refers to the ability to obtain basic necessities, but unable to maintain for average standard of living. Subjective poverty refers to the individual's evaluation and perception of his or her actual income against expectations.