Professional Documents
Culture Documents
American Journal of Audiology 2003 - Vol 12 Index
American Journal of Audiology 2003 - Vol 12 Index
Author index
Subject Index
Title index
Department index
Henry, P., & Ricketts, T. The effects of changes Simon, S. D. See Miller-Hansen et al., 12(2).
Author Index in head angle on auditory and visual input for 106-113.
omnidirectional and directional microphone Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C. Estimation of
Aarts, N. L.. Adams, E. M., & Duncan, K. R. hearing aids. 12(1), 41-51. hearing loss in children: Comparison of
Older adult performance on an altered ver- Hinman, R. T., Lupton, E. C., Leeb, S. B.. auditory steady-state response, auditory
sion of the SSI test. 12(2), 137-145. Avestruz, A.-T., Gilmore, R., Paul, D., & brainstem response, and behavioral test
Adams, E. M. See Aarts et al., 12(2), 137-145. Peterson, N. Using Talking Lights illumina- methods. 12(2), 125-136.
Andersson, G. See Baguley & Andersson, 12(1), tion-based communication networks to Tharpe, A. M. See Schmida et al., 12(1), 35-40.
31-34. enhance word comprehension by people who Updike, C. D. See Hemeyer et al., 12(2), 71-75.
Avestruz, A.-T. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22. are deaf or hard of hearing. 12(1), 17-22. Walton, J. H. See Mendel et al., 12(2), 114-124.
Baguley, D. M., & Andersson, G. Factor analysis Holmes, A. E., & Griffiths, S. K. Doctor of Widen, J. E. See Miller-Hansen et al., 12(2),
of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. 12(1), Audiology program at the University of 106-113
31-34. Florida. 12(2), 66-70.
Besing, J. See Roberts et al., 12(2), 96-105. Kidd, G. D. Jr., Cox, L. C., & Matthies, M. L.
Blevins, J. S. See Fagelson et al., 12(2), 84-90. Boston University Doctor of Science degree
Blumsack, J. T. Audiological assessment, reha- program: Clinical doctorate in audiology.
bilitation, and spatial hearing considerations 12(1), 3-6. Subject Index
associated with visual impairment in adults: Koehnke, J. See Roberts et al., 12(2), 96-105.
An overview. 12(2), 76-83. Lee, D. J. See Cox et al., 12(1), 11-16. Hearing
Carey, J. P. See Cox et al., 12(1), 11-16. Lee, R. B. See Helfer et al., 12(1), 23-30. Nature of Hearing and Its Disorders
Church, G. T. The AuD degree program at Leeb, S. B. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22.
Central Michigan University. 12(1), 7-10. Lupton, E. C. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22. Normal Auditory Systems
Coffin, D. J. See Hemeyer et al., 12(2), 71-75. Maris, D. C. See Helfer et al., 12(1), 23-30. Effects of noise and reverberation on the prece-
Cox, K. M., Lee, D. J., Carey, J. P.. & Minor, Matthies, M. L. See Kidd et al., 12(1), 3-6. dence effect in listeners with normal hearing
L. B. Dehiscence of bone overlying the Mendel, L. L., Roberts, R. A., & Walton, J. H. and impaired hearing. Roberts, R. A.,
superior semicircular canal as a cause of an Speech perception benefits from sound field Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. 12(2), 96-105.
air—bone gap on audiometry: A case study. FM amplification. 12(2), 114-124. Internet application to tele-audiology—“Nothin’
12(1), 11-16. Miller-Hansen, D. R., Nelson, P. B.. Widen, J. E.. but Net.” Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S.
Cox, L. C. See Kidd et al., 12(1), 3-6. & Simon, S. D. Evaluating the benefit of 12(2), 59-65.
Duncan, K. R. See Aarts et al., 12(2), 137-145. speech recoding hearing aids in children. Speech perception benefits from sound field FM
Elangovan, S. See Givens & Elangovan, 12(2), 12(2), 106-113. amplification. Mendel, L. L., Roberts, R. A..
59-65. Minor, L. B. See Cox et al., 12(1), 11-16. & Walton, J. H. 12(2), 114-124.
Emmer, M. B., & Silman, S. The prediction of Murnane, O. D. See Fagelson et al., 12(2). Wanted: A national standard for early hearing
hearing loss in persons with cerebral palsy 84-90). detection and intervention outcomes data.
using contralateral acoustic reflex threshold Nelson, P. B. See Miller-Hansen et al., 12(2), Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., &
for broad-band noise. 12(2), 91-95. 106-113. Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30.
Fagelson, M. A., Noe, C. M., Murnane, O. D., & Noe, C. M. See Fagelson et al., 12(2), 84-90.
Blevins, J. S. Predicted gain and functional O'Rourke, C. See Stueve & O'Rourke, 12(2), Auditory and Other Otic Pathologies
gain with transcranial routing of signal 125-136. Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior
completely-in-the-canal hearing aids. 12(2), Paul, D. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22. semicircular canal as a cause of an air—bone
84-90). Peterson, H. J. See Schmida et al., 12(1), 35-40. gap on audiometry: A case study. Cox, K. M..
Gilmore, R. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22. Peterson, N. See Hinman et al., 12(1), 17-22. Lee, D. J., Carey, J. P., & Minor, L. B. 12(1),
Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S. Internet applica- Ricketts, T. See Henry & Ricketts, 12(1), 41-51. 11-16.
tion to tele-audiology—*Nothin’ but Net.” Roberts, R. A. See Mendel et al., 12(2), 114-124. Effects of noise and reverberation on the prece-
12(2), 59-65. Roberts, R. A., Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. Effects dence effect in listeners with normal hearing
Griffiths, S. K. See Holmes & Griffiths, 12(2), ° of noise and reverberation on the precedence and impaired hearing. Roberts, R. A.,
66-70. effect in listeners with normal hearing and Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. 12(2), 96-105.
Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., & impaired hearing. 12(2), 96-105. Internet application to tele-audiology—“Nothin’
Shields, A. R. Wanted: A national standard Schmida, M. J., Peterson, H. J.. & Tharpe, A. M. but Net.” Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S.
for early hearing detection and intervention Visual reinforcement audiometry using 12(2), 59-65.
outcomes data. 12(1), 23-30. digital video disc and conventional reinforc- Wanted: A national standard for early hearing
Hemeyer, T. F., Coffin, D. J., & Updike, C. D. ers. 12(1), 35-40. detection and intervention outcomes data.
Ball State University’s AuD degree. 12(2), Shields, A. R. See Helfer et al., 12(1), 23-30. Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., &
71-75. Silman, S. See Emmer & Silman, 12(2), 91-95. Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30.
Index 147
Hearing Loss and Deafness Schmida, M. J., Peterson, H. J.. & Tharpe, Wanted: A national standard for early hearing
Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and A. M. 12(1), 35-40. detection and intervention outcomes data.
spatial hearing considerations associated with Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., &
visual impairment in adults: An overview Acoustic Immittance Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30.
Blumsack, J. T. 12(2), 76-83. Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior
Effects of noise and reverberation on the prece- semicircular canal as a cause of an air—bone Hearing Aids and Other Prostheses
dence effect in listeners with normal hearing gap on audiometry: A case study. Cox, K. M., Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and
and impaired hearing. Roberts, R. A.. Lee, D. J., Carey, J. P.. & Minor, L. B. 12(1), spatial hearing considerations associated with
Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. 12(2), 96-105. 11-16 visual impairment in adults: An overview.
Evaluating the benefit of speech recoding hearing Blumsack, J. T. 12(2), 76-83.
aids in children. Miller-Hansen, D. R.. Nelson, Behavioral The effects of changes in head angle on auditory
P. B., Widen, J. E.. & Simon, S. D. 12(2), Estimation of hearing loss in children: Compari- and visual input for omnidirectional and
106-113 son of auditory steady-state response, audi- directional microphone hearing aids. Henry.
Internet application to tele-audiology—"Nothin’ tory brainstem response, and behavioral test P., & Ricketts, T. 12(1), 41-51.
but Net.” Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S$ methods. Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C. Evaluating the benefit of speech recoding hear-
12(2), 59-65 12(2), 125-136. ing aids in children. Miller-Hansen, D. R.,
Older adult performance on an altered version of Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital Nelson, P. B., Widen, J. E.. & Simon, S. D.
the SSI test. Aarts, N. L.. Adams, E. M., & video disc and conventional reinforcers. 12(2), 106-113.
Duncan, K. R. 12(2), 137-145. Schmida, M. J., Peterson, H. J., & Tharpe. Predicted gain and functional gain with trans-
Wanted: A national standard for early hearing A. M. 12(1), 35—40. cranial routing of signal completely-in-the-
detection and intervention outcomes data canal hearing aids. Fagelson, M. A., Noe,
Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., & Bone Conduction C. M., Murnane, O. D., & Blevins, J. S.
Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30 12(2), 84-90.
Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior
semicircular canal as a cause of an air—bone Speech perception benefits from sound field FM
gap on audiometry: A case study. Cox, K. M.. amplification. Mendel, L. L., Roberts, R. A.,
Assessment of Hearing & Walton, J. H. 12(2), 114-124.
Lee, D. J.. Carey, J. P.. & Minor, L. B. 12(1),
Psychoacoustics 11-16.
Using Talking Lights illumination-based com-
Effects of noise and reverberation on the prece- Predicted gain and functional gain with trans- munication networks to enhance word
dence effect in listeners with normal hearing cranial routing of signal completely-in-the- comprehension by people who are deaf or
and impaired hearing. Roberts, R. A.. canal hearing aids. Fagelson, M. A., Noe. hard of hearing. Hinman, R. T., Lupton, E. C..
Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. 12(2), 96-105. C. M., Murnane, O. D., & Blevins, J. S. Leeb, S. B., Avestruz, A.-T.. Gilmore, R..
12(2), 84-90. Paul, D., & Peterson, N. 12(1), 17-22.
Acoustical Instruments, Measurements, Wanted: A national standard for early hearing
and Standards detection and intervention outcomes data.
Electrophysiologic
Internet application to tele-audiology—* Nothin’ Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., &
Estimation of hearing loss in children: Compari- Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30.
but Net.” Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S. son of auditory steady-state response, audi-
12(2), 59-65 tory brainstem response, and behavioral test
Speech perception benefits from sound field FM Assistive Technology
methods. Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C.
amplification. Mendel, L. L., Roberts, R. A.., 12(2), 125-136. Using Talking Lights illumination-based com-
& Walton, J. H. 12(2), 114-124. Wanted: A national standard for early hearing munication networks to enhance word
detection and intervention outcomes data. comprehension by people who are deaf or
Screening Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., & hard of hearing. Hinman, R. T., Lupton, E. C.,
The prediction of hearing loss in persons with Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30 Leeb, S. B., Avestruz, A.-T., Gilmore, R.,
cerebral palsy using contralateral acoustic Paul, D., & Peterson, N. 12(1), 17-22.
reflex threshold for broad-band noise. Em- Pediatric
mer, M. B., & Silman, S. 12(2), 91-95. Estimation of hearing loss in children: Compari- Dual Sensory Loss
Wanted: A national standard for early hearing son of auditory steady-state response, audi-
detection and intervention outcomes data. Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and
tory brainstem response, and behavioral test
Helfer, T. M., Lee, R. B., Maris, D. C., & spatial hearing considerations associated with
methods. Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C.
Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30. visual impairment in adults: An overview.
12(2), 125-136.
Blumsack, J. T. 12(2), 76-83.
Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital
Diagnostic Audiology—General video disc and conventional reinforcers.
Estimation of hearing loss in children: Compari- Schmida, M. J., Peterson, H. J.. & Tharpe. Spatial Hearing
son of auditory steady-state response, audi- A. M. 12(1), 35-40. Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and
tory brainstem response, and behavioral test Wanted: A national standard for early hearing spatial hearing considerations associated with
methods. Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C. detection and intervention outcomes data. visual impairment in adults: An overview
12(2), 125-136. Helfer, T. M., Lee. R. B.. Maris, D. C., & Blumsack, J.T. 12(2), 76-83.
Internet app cation to tele-audiology—‘Nothin’ Shields, A. R. 12(1), 23-30.
but Net.” Givens, G. D., & Elangovan, S$
Speech Perception
12(2), 59-65. Speech
Older adult performance on an altered version of Speech perception benefits from sound field FM
Specific Diagnostic Techniques and the SSI test. Aarts, N. L., Adams, E. M., & amplification. Mendel, L. L., Roberts, R. A..
Approaches Duncan, K. R. 12(2), 137-145. & Walton, J. H. 12(2), 114-124.
Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior
semicircular canal as a cause of an air—bone Intervention Tinnitus
gap on audiometry: A case study. Cox, K. M.,
Factor analysis of the Tinnitus Handicap Inven-
Lee, D. J., Carey, J. P.. & Minor, L. B. 12(1), Habilitation, Rehabilitation, and
tory. Baguley, D. M., & Andersson, G. 12(1),
11-16. Education 31-34
Estimation of hearing loss in children: Compari- Audiological assessment, rehabilitation, and
son of auditory steady-state response, audi- spatial hearing considerations associated with
Training
tory brainstem response, and behavioral test visual impairment in adults: An overview.
methods. Stueve, M. P., & O'Rourke, C Blumsack, J. T. 12(2), 76-83. Boston University Doctor of Science degree
12(2), 125-136. Factor analysis of the Tinnitus Handicap Inven- program: Clinical doctorate in audiology.
Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital tory. Baguley, D. M., & Andersson, G. 12(1). Kidd, G. D. Jr., Cox, L. C., & Matthies, M.
video disc and conventional reinforcers. 31-34. L. 12(1), 3-6.
Index 149