Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MBBR-BOD Removal-Nitrification-S.I.
MBBR-BOD Removal-Nitrification-S.I.
This workbook is provided "as is", without warranty of any kind, express or
implied.
Four worksheets are provided to carry out basin sizing and aeration calculations for the
following MBBR processes: 1. Single-Stage BOD Removal, 2. Two-Stage BOD Removal,
3. Two-stage BOD Removal and Nitrification, and 4. Single Stage Tertiary Nitrification.
In order to achieve an adequate nitrification rate in an MBBR reactor, the BOD level in
the wastewater entering the nitrification MBBR basin must be quite low. This is the
reason for carrying out BOD removal and nitrification in separate MBBR reactors.
Basin sizing is based on a carrier surface area loading rate (SALR). For BOD removal, the
design SALR value is selected by the user based on the treatment objective (e.g. high rate
BOD removal, normal rate BOD removal, or low rate BOD removal. Typical SALR values
are provided on the worksheets. For nitrification, the design SALR is calculated from a
kinetic model based on the D.O. level to be maintained in the reactor and the target
effluent ammonia nitrogen concentration.
Note that the estimated effluent BOD concentration from each BOD removal stage is
calculated by using an estimated value for the SARR/SALR (surface area removal rate/surface area
loading rate). The estimated value for the SARR/SALR is based on an appropriate graph or table
from one of the references as shown on the worksheets.
The basin sizing calculations require values for several MBBR carrier properties: (specific
surface area in m2/m3 and % void space). Values to be used in the design calculations
should come from your carrier supplier.
The aeration/blower calculations are made for a coarse bubble diffuser system.
Coarse bubble diffusers are typically used, because they work better
with the suspended carrier media.
MBBR Process Design Calculations - S.I. units
Single-Stage Process for BOD Removal
Instructions: Enter values in blue boxes. Spreadsheet calculates values in yellow boxes
1. General Inputs
Data points for SARR/SALR vs SALR
Design ww Flow Rate, Q = 76 m3/d SALR (g/m2/d): 7.5 15.0
Prim. Effl. BOD, So = 160 mg/L SARR/SALR: 0.925 0.875
Peak Hour Factor = 4 (default values above are based on the table of typical
Min Design Temp., T = 12 o
C values of % BOD removal vs SALR at the right)
Calculations
Inputs: (Values of "Rule of Thumb" Constants for Calculations - see notes at right)
Calculations
Estimation of SARR/SALR Ratio: Default data points for derivation of a SARR vs SALR
equation are provided for each stage. They may be replaced by values from user data if such
data is available.
1. The typical AOR/SOR (or AOTE/SOTE) is 0.50 for a coarse bubble aertion system.
(or 0.33 for a fine bubble aeration system)
2. The typical SOTE is 2.5% per meter of diffuser submergence for a coarse bubble system
(or 6.6 % per meter of diffuser submergence for a fine bubble system)
3. Air weighs 1.275 kg/m3 (at 0oC and 1 bar) and contains 23% oxygen by weight, thus:
5. For biological treatment with SRT from 5 to 10 days, kg oxygen required /kg BOD removed
is typically in the range from 0.92 - 1.1 kg O2/kg BOD. Higher SRT results in a higher value
of kg O2 required/kg BOD removed. (For a very high SRT, as is typical for an MBBR process,
this value would be about 1.5 kg O2/kg BOD removed.)
1. Odegaard, Hallvard, "Compact Wastewater Treatment with MBBR." DSD International Conference
Hong Kong, 12. 11-14-2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/ppt/Presentation_(B4-1).pdf
2. Odegaard, H., "The Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor," in Igasrashi, T, Watanabe, Y., Asano, T. and
Tambo, N., Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, Hokkaido Press 1999, p 250-305.
http://netedu.xauat.edu.cn/jpkc/netedu/jpkc2009/szylyybh/content/wlzy/7/3/The%20Moving%20Bed%20Biofilm%
3. Steichen & Phillips, H., M, Black & Veach, Process and Practical Design Considerations for
IFAS and MBBR Technologies, Headworks International Presentation, 03/18/2010
http://www.headworksinternational.com/userfiles/file/Webinar/BV_Webinar_Slides.pdf
4. McQuarrie, J.P. and Boltz, J.P., Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications,
Design and Performance, Water Environment Research, Vol 83, No. 6. June 2011.
5. Metcalf & Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Resource Recovery", 5th Ed, McGraw-Hill, 2014
cGraw-Hill, 2014
MBBR Process Design Calculations - S.I. units
Two-Stage Process for BOD Removal
Instructions: Enter values in blue boxes. Spreadsheet calculates values in yellow boxes
II. Carrier Parameter and Tank Shape Inputs for both First and Second Stages
Carrier Spec. Surf. Area = 500 m2/m3 Click on green box and then on
(value from carrier mfr/vendor) arrow to Select Tank Shape: rectangular
Liquid Depth in Tank = 2.4 m Carrier % Void Space = 60%
Tank L:W ratio = 1.5 (from carrier mfr/vendor - only needed to
(target L:W - only used if tank is rectangular) calculate hydraulic detention time)
III. Calculation of Carrier Volume and Required Tank Volume & Dimensions
1. First Stage Calculations (BOD Removal) (Carrier fill % is typically between 30% and 70%. Lower
values are more conservative, allowing future capacity
Design Carrier Fill % = 50% (for first stage) expansion or reduction of SALR by adding more carrier.
BOD Daily Loading = 4200.0 kg/day
4200000 g/day Calculated Tank Volume = 1050.0 m3
Carrier Surf. Area needed = 262500.0 m2
Calculated Carrier Volume = 525.000 m3 Calculated Tank Width = 17.1 m
Tank Liquid Volume = 840.0 m 3
Calculated Tank Length = 25.6 m
Nominal Hydraulic Retention Time at
Estimate of BOD Surface Area Design Average Flow = 40 min
Removal Rate, SARR = 13.63 g/m2/d Peak Hourly Flow = 10 min
Est. of BOD Removal Rate: 3579000 g/day Calculated Effl BOD Conc.: 21 mg/L
(from First Stage)
Estimate of BOD Surface Area Calculated Effl BOD Conc.: 1.0 mg/L
Removal Rate, SARR = 4.22 g/m2/d (from Second Stage)
Est. of BOD Removal Rate: 590713 g/day If the calculated Effl. BOD conc. is too high for either
1st stage tank volume - stage, the design value of SALR should be reduced
- 2nd stage tank volume = 490.5 for that stage.
To make the 2nd stage tank volume the same as the first
stage tank volume, use Excel's Goal Seek process to set
cell C65 equal to zero by changing the value in cell C54.
1. Inputs: (Values of "Rule of Thumb" Constants to be used in Calculations - See notes at right)
Press. Drop across Diffuser = 0.030 bar Atmospheric Pressure = 1.014 bar
(from mfr/vendor) Air Density at NTP = 1.275 kg/m3
O2 Content in Air = 0.2930 kg/m3
2. First Stage Calculations:
Oxygen Requirement = 5368.5 kg/day AOTE = 2.9%
Blower Outlet Pressure = 1.27 bar absolute Des. Air Flow Rate, m3/hr = 20629 m3/hr
Blower Outlet Pressure = 1.3 bar absolute Des. Air Flow Rate, m3/hr = 3405 m3/hr
cylindrical
rectangular
Typical Design Values for Carrier Surface Area Loading Rate (SALR):
(from References (2) below)
Estimation of SARR/SALR Ratio: Default data points for derivation of a SARR vs SALR
equation are provided for each stage. They may be replaced by values from user data if such
data is available.
The equations used are the same as those shown above for the First Stage BOD Removal,
Removal, except that the value for So used to calculate the BOD Daily Loading is the
Effluent BOD concentration from the First Stage.
1. The typical AOR/SOR (or AOTE/SOTE) is 0.50 for a coarse bubble aertion system.
(or 0.33 for a fine bubble aeration system)
2. The typical SOTE is 2.5% per meter of diffuser submergence for a coarse bubble system
(or 6.6 % per meter of diffuser submergence for a fine bubble system)
3. Air weighs 1.275 kg/m3 (at 0oC and 1 bar) and contains 23% oxygen by weight, thus:
5. For biological treatment with SRT from 5 to 10 days, kg oxygen required /kg BOD removed
is typically in the range from 0.92 - 1.1 kg O2/kg BOD. Higher SRT results in a higher value
of kg O2 required/kg BOD removed. (For a very high SRT, as is typical for an MBBR process,
this value would be about 1.5 kg O2/kg BOD removed.)
1. Odegaard, Hallvard, "Compact Wastewater Treatment with MBBR." DSD International Conference
Hong Kong, 12. 11-14-2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/ppt/Presentation_(B4-1).pdf
2. Odegaard, H., "The Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor," in Igasrashi, T, Watanabe, Y., Asano, T. and
Tambo, N., Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, Hokkaido Press 1999, p 250-305.
http://netedu.xauat.edu.cn/jpkc/netedu/jpkc2009/szylyybh/content/wlzy/7/3/The%20Moving%20Bed%20Biofilm
3. Steichen & Phillips, H., M, Black & Veach, Process and Practical Design Considerations for
IFAS and MBBR Technologies, Headworks International Presentation, 03/18/2010
http://www.headworksinternational.com/userfiles/file/Webinar/BV_Webinar_Slides.pdf
4. McQuarrie, J.P. and Boltz, J.P., Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications,
Design and Performance, Water Environment Research, Vol 83, No. 6. June 2011.
5. Metcalf & Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Resource Recovery", 5th Ed, McGraw-Hill, 2014
cGraw-Hill, 2014
MBBR Process Design Calculations - S.I. units
Two-Stage Process for BOD Removal & Nitrification
Instructions: Enter values in blue boxes. Spreadsheet calculates values in yellow boxes
I. User Inputs
Influent NH4-N Conc. = 25 mg/L Target Effl NH4-N Conc, NH4-Ne = 3.3
Min Design Temp., T = 12 o
C Click on cell H26 and on arrow to select D.O Conc.
II. Carrier Parameter and Tank Shape Inputs for both First and Second Stages
Carrier Spec. Surf. Area = 500 m2/m3 Click on green box and then on
(value from carrier mfr/vendor) arrow to Select Tank Shape: rectangular
Liquid Depth in Tank = 2.4 m Carrier % Void Space = 60%
Tank L:W ratio = 1.5 (from carrier mfr/vendor - only needed to
(target L:W - only used if tank is rectangular) calculate hydraulic detention time)
III. Calculation of Carrier Volume and Required Tank Volume & Dimensions
1. First Stage Calculations - BOD Removal (Carrier fill % is typically between 30% and 70%. Lower
values are more conservative, allowing future capacity
Design Carrier Fill % = 40% expansion or reduction of SALR by adding more carrier.
BOD Daily Loading = 12.2 kg/day
12160 g/day Calculated Tank Volume = 10.1
Carrier Surf. Area needed = 2026.7 m 2
Calculated Tank Width = 1.7
Calculated Carrier Volume = 4.053 m 3
Calculated Tank Length = 2.5
Tank Liquid Volume = 8.5 m3 Nominal Hydraulic Retention Time at
Design Average Flow = 161
Estimate of BOD Surface Area Peak Hourly Flow = 40
Removal Rate, SARR = 5.61 g/m /d2
Calculated Effl BOD Conc.: 10
Est. of BOD Removal Rate: 11370 g/day (from First Stage)
If the calculated Effl. BOD conc. is too high, the design value of the SALR should be reduced in cell C18.
Inputs: (Values of "Rule of Thumb" Constants for Calculations - see notes at right)
O2 needed per lb BOD = 1.50 kg O2/kg BOD Depth of Diffusers = 2.3
SOTE as Function of Depth = 2.50% % per m depth Normal Temperature = 0
AOTE/SOTE = 0.5 Normal Pressure = 1.000
Press. Drop across Diffuser = 0.030 bar Atmospheric Pressure = 1.014
(from mfr/vendor) Air Density at NTP = 1.275
O2 Content in Air = 0.2930
Calculations
Inputs:
Std O2 transf effic, SOTE = 5.6% Des. Barom. Press., Patm = 1.014
(from diffuser mfr or vendor) (ambient pressue at site)
Diffuser Fouling Factor, F = 0.8 Ratio of D.O. saturation in WW to that in clean
Ratio of oxygen transfer rate in wastewater water at same T & P, B = 1.0
to that in clean water, a = 0.6 Pressure drop across
Depth of diffuser, ddiff = 2.5 m diffuser, DPdiff = 0.021
Norm. Air Density, rair = 1.275 kg/m 3 (from diffuser mfr or vendor)
(at 0 C, 1 bar)
o
Calculations
Calculations
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
llow boxes
mg/L as CaCO3
Typical Design Values for Carrier Surface Area Loading Rate (SALR):
15.0 (from Reference (2) below)
0.875
sed on the table of typical
vs SALR in Worksheet 3)
-0.007
0.975
0.935
f. Area Loading Rate)
Nitrification SARR:
mg/L D.O. SARRmax N @ SARRmax The values in the table at the left come from Figur
g/m2/d mg/L g/m2/d mg/L Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Resourc
g/m /d
2
2 0.61 0.5 The N values at SARRmax were read from Figu
g/m /d
2
3 0.88 0.8 values were calculated for those N values using E
5. For biological treatment with SRT from 5 to 10 days, kg oxygen required /kg BOD removed
is typically in the range from 0.92 - 1.1 kg O2/kg BOD. Higher SRT results in a higher value
Nm /hr 3
of kg O2 required/kg BOD removed. (For a very high SRT, as is typical for an MBBR process,
m /hr3
this value would be about 1.5 kg O2/kg BOD removed.)
bar
W to that in clean
bar
1. Odegaard, Hallvard, "Compact Wastewater Treatment with MBBR." DSD International Conference
Hong Kong, 12. 11-14-2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/ppt/Presentation_(B4
2. Odegaard, H., "The Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor," in Igasrashi, T, Watanabe, Y., Asano, T. and
g/equiv. Tambo, N., Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, Hokkaido Press 1999, p 250-305.
http://netedu.xauat.edu.cn/jpkc/netedu/jpkc2009/szylyybh/content/wlzy/7/3/The%20Moving%
3. Steichen & Phillips, H., M, Black & Veach, Process and Practical Design Considerations for
IFAS and MBBR Technologies, Headworks International Presentation, 03/18/2010
http://www.headworksinternational.com/userfiles/file/Webinar/BV_Webinar_Slides.pdf
4. Rusten, B and Paulrud, B., Improved nutrient Removal with Biofilm Reactors,
Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Center, Oslo, Norway.
5. McQuarrie, J.P. and Boltz, J.P., Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications,
Design and Performance, Water Environment Research, Vol 83, No. 6. June 2011.
6. Metcalf & Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Resource Recovery", 5th Ed, McGraw-Hill,
7. Salvetti, R., A. Azzellino, R. Canziani, and L. Bonomo (2006), "Effect of Temperature on Tertiary
Nitrification SARR:
s in the table at the left come from Figure 9-25 in Metcalf & Eddy,
er Engineering, Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Ed.
values at SARRmax were read from Figure 9-25. The SARRmax
ere calculated for those N values using Eqn 9-48 from Metcalf & Eddy,
iquid Depth
)*Carrier Volume)
val Rate)/Qo
Removal Rate)/Qo
er/cirkulationspumpar/documents/san3.pdf
bubble aertion system.
ne bubble aeration system)
e for a coarse bubble system
ergence for a fine bubble system)
ir )(24 hr/day)]
Biofilm Reactors,
0, 15, 298-2993.
esign Calculations,
Instructions: Enter values in blue boxes. Spreadsheet calculates values in yellow boxes
Influent Alkalinity = 140 mg/L as CaCO3 D.O Conc. in Reactor = 3.0 mg/L
Inputs
Carrier Spec. Surf. Area = 500 m2/m3 Liquid Depth in Tank = 2.4 m
(value from carrier mfr/vendor) Tank L:W ratio = 1.5
(target L:W - only used if tank is rectangular)
Calculations
NH3-N Daily Loading = 1.9 kg/day Calculated Tank Volume = 11.1 m3
1900 g/day Calculated Tank Width = 1.8 m
Carrier Surf. Area needed = 2219 m 2
Calculated Tank Length = 2.6 m
Calculated Carrier Volume = 4.439 m3 Nominal Hydraulic Retention Time at
Tank Liquid Volume = 9.3 m 3
Design Average Flow = 177 min
Peak Hourly Flow = 44 min
BOD Surf. Loading Rate (SALR): 0.51 g/m2/d
(should be < 0.5 g/m2/d in order to achieve a good nitrification rate)
Std O2 transf effic, SOTE = 5.6% Des. Barom. Press., Patm = 1.014 bar
(from diffuser mfr or vendor) (ambient pressue at site)
Diffuser Fouling Factor, F = 0.8 Ratio of D.O. saturation in WW to that in clean
Ratio of oxygen transfer rate in wastewater water at same T & P, B = 1.0
to that in clean water, a = 0.6 Pressure drop across
Depth of diffuser, ddiff = 2.5 m diffuser, DPdiff = 0.021 bar
Norm. Air Density, rair = 1.275 kg/m3 (from diffuser mfr or vendor)
(at 0oC, 1 bar)
Calculations
temp. and 1 atm, Cs = 10.8 mg/L Blower Outlet Pressure, PB2 = 1.28 bar
(Derivation of equation for sat'n D.O. vs T is shown on worksheet 6)
5. Alkalinity Requirement
Calculations
cylindrical
rectangular
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
t D.O Conc.
D.O. SARRmax N @ SARRmax The values in the table at the left come from Figure 9-25 in
mg/L g/m2/d mg/L Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Resource Recove
2 0.61 0.5 The N values at SARRmax were read from Figure 9-25. T
3 0.88 0.8 values were calculated for those N values using Eqn 9-48 fr
4 1.03 1 5th Ed: SARR = [N/(2.2 + N)]*3.3, where N is the bulk liq
1. Odegaard, Hallvard, "Compact Wastewater Treatment with MBBR." DSD International Conference
Hong Kong, 12. 11-14-2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/ppt/Presentation_(B4-1).pdf
2. Odegaard, H., "The Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor," in Igasrashi, T, Watanabe, Y., Asano, T. and
Tambo, N., Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, Hokkaido Press 1999, p 250-305.
http://netedu.xauat.edu.cn/jpkc/netedu/jpkc2009/szylyybh/content/wlzy/7/3/The%20Moving%20Bed%20B
3. Steichen & Phillips, H., M, Black & Veach, Process and Practical Design Considerations for
IFAS and MBBR Technologies, Headworks International Presentation, 03/18/2010
http://www.headworksinternational.com/userfiles/file/Webinar/BV_Webinar_Slides.pdf
4. Rusten, B and Paulrud, B., Improved nutrient Removal with Biofilm Reactors,
Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Center, Oslo, Norway.
5. McQuarrie, J.P. and Boltz, J.P., Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications,
Design and Performance, Water Environment Research, Vol 83, No. 6. June 2011.
6. Metcalf & Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Resource Recovery", 5th Ed, McGraw-Hill, 2014
7. Salvetti, R., A. Azzellino, R. Canziani, and L. Bonomo (2006), "Effect of Temperature on Tertiary
Nitrification in Moving-Bed Biofilm Reactors," Water Res., 40, 15, 298-2993.
99, p 250-305.
%20Moving%20Bed%20Biofilm%20Reactor.pdf
d, McGraw-Hill, 2014
Derivation of Equation for Saturation DO Concentration at WW Temperature:
Sat'n DO
T, C
o
mg/L
0 14.62 Saturation DO Conc. vs Water Temperature
10 11.29
2
11 11.03
12 10.78 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
13 10.54 Water Temperature, degrees C
14 10.3
15 10.08
16 9.87
17 9.66 Source for DO vs T data: USGS website at:
18 9.47
19 9.28 http://water.usgs.gov/software/DOTABLES/
20 9.09
21 8.92
22 8.74
23 8.58
24 8.42
25 8.26
26 8.11
27 7.97
28 7.83
29 7.69
30 7.56
31 7.43
32 7.30
33 7.18
34 7.06
35 6.95
WW Temperature:
emperature
10 12