Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalisation 6Th Edition Manson Test Bank Full Chapter PDF
Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalisation 6Th Edition Manson Test Bank Full Chapter PDF
Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalisation 6Th Edition Manson Test Bank Full Chapter PDF
TRUE/FALSE
1. Evidence suggests that acquisitions usually lead to favourable financial outcomes, especially for
the acquiring firm.
2. A merger is a strategy through which two firms agree to integrate their operations on a relatively
coequal basis.
3. Most acquisitions are friendly transactions, whereas mergers include hostile unfriendly deals.
4. A takeover is a special type of acquisition wherein the target firm does not solicit the acquiring
firm’s bid; thus, takeovers are friendly acquisitions.
5. Most acquisitions that are designed to achieve greater market power entail buying a competitor, a
supplier, a distributor or a business in a highly related industry.
7. Horizontal acquisitions increase a firm’s market power by exploiting cost-based and revenue-based
synergies.
8. Research suggests that horizontal acquisitions of firms with dissimilar characteristics result in
higher performance levels.
9. Acquisitions intended to increase market power are not subject to regulatory review, but they are
subject to analysis by financial markets.
10. The higher the barriers to market entry, the greater the probability that a firm will acquire an
existing firm to overcome those barriers.
12. Despite relaxed regulations, the amount of cross-border acquisition activity between nations within
the European Union is on the decline.
13. Acquisitions are a risk-free alternative to entering new markets through internally developed
products.
14. Less than perhaps 20 per cent of all mergers and acquisitions are successful.
15. Some finance scholars believe that high levels of debt always have a positive effect on a firm’s
management.
16. Junk bonds are a financial option through which acquiring and acquired firms can increase the
likelihood of creating private synergy of acquisition.
17. Research has shown that maintaining a low or moderate level of firm debt is critical to the success
of an acquisition, except when substantial leverage was used to finance the acquisition itself.
18. Because of additional information processing, firms using an unrelated diversification strategy
often become overdiversified compared to firms adopting a related diversification strategy.
19. When a firm becomes highly diversified through acquisitions, managers often focus on financial
controls rather than on strategic controls.
20. Firms often use downsizing as a responsive management strategy to attain better economies of
scale.
22. Downscoping generally leads to more positive outcomes than downsizing in the long term but not
in the short term.
23. Downscoping generally leads to more positive outcomes than leveraged buyouts both in the long
term and the short term.
MULTIPLE CHOICE
6. Cross-border acquisitions are becoming more popular because they allow an acquiring firm to:
A. market a broader range of products and negotiate better contracts with distributors
B. increase profits, better serve customers and gain market control
C. overcome barriers to entering a new market while gaining more control over foreign
operations relative to the control offered by alliances
D. exploit resources in the acquired firm, gain new technical knowledge and access new
sources of capital
7. ________ are more frequent than internal product development processes in high-technology
industries, as returns are more predictable.
A. Mergers and leveraged buyouts
B. Acquisitions and bidding wars
C. Leveraged buyouts and alliances
D. Acquisition and alliances
8. According to recent research, acquisitions remain the quickest route companies have to:
A. new markets and new capabilities
B. synergy within a portfolio of businesses
C. financial economies of scale
D. expanded economies of scope
9. In the long run, entering new markets with internally developed products can be less risky than
entering through acquisition, especially if the latter becomes a substitute for:
A. innovation
B. risk analysis
C. international diversification
D. strategic planning
10. Which one of the following is not a challenge in relations to post-acquisition integration?
A. Exercising good financial control
B. Melding two disparate corporate cultures
C. Building effective working relationships
D. Linking different financial and control systems
ANS: A PTS: 1 DIF: Moderate REF: Integration difficulties
14. The expenses incurred by firms trying to create private synergy through acquisition are called:
A. acquisition costs
B. participation costs
C. transaction costs
D. interaction costs
18. One problem with firms becoming too large is that they:
A. become too easy to manage
B. often adopt a decentralised decision-making philosophy
C. gain increasing efficiencies
D. usually increase bureaucratic controls
25. The best long-term outcomes are typically associated with which restructuring activity?
A. Downsizing
B. Downscoping
C. Leveraged buyout
D. Acquisitions
ESSAY
1. Identify and explain the seven reasons firms engage in an acquisition strategy.
ANS:
• Increased market power: Market power is derived from the size of a firm and its resources and
capabilities to compete in the marketplace. Firms use horizontal, vertical and related
acquisitions to increase their market power.
• Overcoming of entry barriers: When acquiring another firm, firms can overcome barriers to
entry and gain immediate access to a market with an established product that has consumer
loyalty.
• Cost of new product development: Developing new products and ventures internally can be
very costly and time-consuming, without any guarantee of success. Acquisitions can decrease
this risk.
• Learning and developing new capabilities: Acquisitions offer a much quicker path to a new
market than internal development.
• Lower risk compared to developing new products: Acquisitions provide a means to avoid
internal ventures, which many managers perceive to be highly risky.
• Increased diversification: Firms can diversify their product lines or business lines that are in
new markets more easily through acquisitions.
• Reshaping competitive scope: Firms can move more easily into new markets as a way to
decrease their dependence on a market that has high levels of competition.
2. Define vertical acquisition. How does vertical acquisition lead to increased market power?
ANS:
Vertical acquisition refers to a firm acquiring a supplier or distributor of one or more of its goods
or services. Through a vertical acquisition, the newly formed firm controls additional parts of the
value chain, which is how vertical acquisitions lead to increased market power.
3. Why are acquisitions seen as an alternative to new product development? What impediments exist
in undertaking internal product development?
ANS:
Developing new products internally and successfully introducing them into the marketplace often
requires significant investment of a firm’s resources, including time, making it difficult to quickly
earn a profitable return. Because an estimated 88 per cent of innovations fail to achieve adequate
returns, firm managers are also concerned with achieving adequate returns from the capital
invested to develop and commercialise new products.
Acquisitions are another means firms can use to gain access to new products and current
products that are new to the firm. Compared with internal product development processes,
acquisitions provide more predictable returns as well as faster market entry. Returns are more
predictable because the performance of the acquired firm’s products can be assessed prior to
completing the acquisition.
ANS:
• Integration difficulties: It may be difficult to effectively integrate the acquiring and acquired
firms because of differences in corporate cultures, financial and control systems, management
styles and the status of executives in the combined firms.
• Inadequate evaluation of target: Acquirers that fail to complete due diligence are likely to
develop incorrect evaluations of a target firm’s value.
• Large or extraordinary debt: Mounting debt may preclude the type of investments (e.g. R&D
allocations) required for long-term success.
• Inability to achieve synergy: Acquiring firms often prepare inaccurate (i.e. overly optimistic)
estimates of synergy potential between acquiring and acquired companies.
• Too much diversification: Acquisition strategies may create a firm that is too diversified, given
its core competencies and environmental opportunities.
• Managers overly focused on acquisitions: Firms that become heavily involved in acquisition
activity often create an internal environment in which managers devote increasing amounts of
their time and energy to analysing and completing additional acquisitions. As a result, they
choose to avoid decisions that may have a bearing on the long-term performance of the firm.
• Too large: Acquisitions may lead to a combined firm that is too large, requiring extensive use
of bureaucratic controls rather than strategic controls.
5. Discuss the pitfalls of too much diversification and, more specifically, overdiversification.
ANS:
The level at which overdiversification occurs varies across companies because each firm has
different capabilities to manage diversification. As related diversification requires more
information processing than unrelated diversification, related diversified firms often become
overdiversified with a smaller number of business units than do firms using an unrelated
diversification strategy. However, regardless of the type of diversification strategy,
overdiversification can result in reduced performance, after which business units are often
divested.
Even when a firm is not overdiversified, a high level of diversification can have a negative
effect on the firm’s long-term performance. For example, the scope created by additional amounts
of diversification often causes managers to rely on financial rather than strategic controls to
evaluate business units’ performances. Top-level executives often rely on financial controls to
assess the performance of business units when they do not have a rich understanding of business
units’ objectives and strategies. Use of financial controls causes individual business-unit managers
to focus on short-term outcomes at the expense of long-term investments. When long-term
investments are reduced to increase short-term profits, a firm’s overall strategic competitiveness
may be harmed.
Another problem resulting from too much diversification is the tendency for acquisitions to
become substitutes for innovation. Typically, managers do not intend acquisitions to be used in
that way. However, a reinforcing cycle evolves. Costs associated with acquisitions may result in
fewer allocations to activities, such as R&D, that are linked to innovation. Without adequate
support, a firm’s innovation skills begin to atrophy. Without internal innovation skills, the only
option available to a firm to gain access to innovation is to make more acquisitions. Evidence
suggests that a firm using acquisitions as a substitute for internal innovations eventually encounters
performance problems.
ANS:
Although potentially problematic, acquisitions can contribute to a firm’s strategic competitiveness
in the following ways:
• The acquired firm has assets or resources that are complementary to the acquiring firm’s
core business.
• Acquisition is friendly.
• The acquiring firm conducts effective due diligence to select target firms and evaluate the
target firm’s health (financial, cultural and human resources).
• The acquiring firm has financial slack (cash or a favourable debt position).
• The merged firm maintains a low to moderate debt position.
• The acquiring firm manages change well and is flexible and adaptable.
ANS:
Restructuring refers to changes in a firm’s set of businesses and/or financial structure. There are
three general forms of restructuring: downsizing, downscoping and leveraged buyouts. Downsizing
involves reducing the number of employees, which may include decreasing the number of
operating units and may change the composition of business units. Downscoping entails divesting,
spinning off or eliminating businesses that are not related to the core business. It often occurs
simultaneously with downsizing. A leveraged buyout occurs when a party (e.g. managers,
employees or an external party) buys the assets of a business, takes it private and finances the
buyout with debt.
ANS:
Downsizing is a set of actions that reduces the number of a firm’s employees and hierarchical
levels. In contrast, the goal of downscoping is to reduce the firm’s level of diversification. Often,
downscoping is accomplished by divesting unrelated businesses. The firm and its top-level
managers are then able to refocus on core businesses. Firms sometimes downsize and downscope
simultaneously, a comprehensive process that yields more positive results than downsizing does on
its own.
9. What is a leveraged buyout (LBO) and what have been the results of such activities?
ANS:
An LBO is a restructuring strategy through which a firm is purchased so that it can become a
private entity. LBOs are usually financed largely through debt. There are three types of LBOs:
management buyouts (MBOs), employee buyouts (EBOs) and whole-firm buyouts. Because
MBOs provide clear managerial incentives, they have been the most successful.
EBOs have the potential to improve cooperation throughout a firm, but power struggles are
also a possibility. These struggles are more likely when significant change is required for a firm to
improve its performance.
Whole-firm LBOs, where an external company buys all of a focal firm rather than a part of it,
have met with mixed success. Often, the intent is to improve the firm’s efficiency and performance
to the point where it can be sold successfully within five to eight years. However, the cost of debt
incurred to finance the whole-firm LBO makes it difficult for companies to perform in ways that
make them attractive buys.
ANS:
Downsizing does not commonly lead to a higher firm performance. Research has shown that
downsizing contributes to lower returns for both US and Japanese firms, and stock markets in these
nations have evaluated downsizing negatively. Investors have concluded that downsizing has a
negative effect on companies’ ability to achieve strategic competitiveness in the long term.
Investors also seem to assume that downsizing occurs as a consequence of other problems in a
company. This assumption may be caused by a firm’s diminished corporate reputation when a
major downsizing is announced.
Downsizing tends to result in a loss of human capital in the long term. Losing employees with
many years of experience with the firm represents a major loss of knowledge. Thus, in general,
downsizing may be of more tactical (or short-term) value than strategic (or long-term) value.
However, it should be noted that in free-market-based societies, downsizing has generated an
incentive for individuals who have been laid off to start their own businesses in order to live
through the disruption in their lives. Accordingly, downsizing has generated a host of
entrepreneurial new ventures.
Downscoping generally leads to more positive outcomes than downsizing or leveraged buyouts
in both the short and long term. Downscoping’s desirable long-term outcome of higher
performance is a product of reduced debt costs and the emphasis on strategic controls derived from
concentrating on the firm’s core businesses. Refocusing the firm should increase its ability to
compete.
While whole-firm LBOs have been hailed as a significant innovation in the financial
restructuring of firms, they do involve some negative trade-offs. First, the resulting large debt
increases a firm’s financial risk. Sometimes, the owners’ intent to increase the efficiency of the
bought-out firm and then sell it within five to eight years creates a short-term and risk-averse
managerial focus. As a result, these firms may fail to invest adequately in R&D or take other major
actions designed to maintain or improve the company’s core competence. Research also suggests
that, in firms with an entrepreneurial mind-set, buyouts can lead to greater innovation, especially if
the debt load is not too great. However, because buyouts more often result in significant debt, most
LBOs have taken place in mature industries where stable cash flows are possible. This enables the
acquiring firm to meet the recurring debt payments required to keep the business afloat in its new
form.
Language: English
The cover image was restored by Thiers Halliwell and is placed in the
public domain.
See end of this transcript for details of corrections and other changes.
BITS FROM BLINKBONNY.
The Artists Bit.
BITS FROM BLINKBONNY
OR
BY
JOHN STRATHESK
TORONTO
WILLIAM BRIGGS, 78 & 80 KING ST. EAST
July 1882.
CONTENTS.
——◆——
CHAPTER I.
THE MANSE.
PAGE
CHAPTER II.
A QUIET EVENING AT THE MANSE.
Bell’s Sliding Scale—Her Pattens—The Hospitality of the
Manse—Be judeecious—James and his Skates—
Mrs. Barrie’s Experiences—Mr. Barrie’s Illness—The
Good Samaritan—A Startling Proposal, 22
CHAPTER III.
THE MARRIAGE AND THE HOME-COMING.
“The Books”—P.P.C.—Marriage Presents—“The
Confession of Faith”—Toasts—“The Frostit
Corn”—“The Country Rockin’”—Auntie Mattie—“The
Farmer’s Ingle”—Peggy Ritchie on the Churchyard—
A Lamb Leg and a Berry Tart—Mathieson’s Heid, 41
CHAPTER IV.
THE TWO SIDES OF THE CHURCH QUESTION.
Coming Events—Bell and the Seed Potatoes—Her Idea 58
of the Government—Knowe Park—Spunks—The
Town-Clerk of Ephesus—Bell’s summing up—Daisy
—The Eve of Battle—Sir John McLelland’s Opinions
on the “Evangelicals”—Patronage—Preaching
Competitions—Little Gab—Non-Intrusion and Voting,
CHAPTER V.
BLINKBONNY AND THE DISRUPTION.
Bell’s Opinion of Knowe Park—Mr. Barrie’s Return—The
Deputation’s Visit to the Manse—Mr. Barrie’s
Statement—Mr. Taylor’s Views—George Brown on
the Crisis—His Covenanting Relics, 85
CHAPTER VI.
THE DISRUPTION AND BLINKBONNY.
The Meeting in Beltane Hall—The End of the Ten Years’
Conflict—George Brown’s Exercises—The Bellman’s
Difficulty—Sabbath Services at the Annie Green
—“Thae Cath’lics”—The Secession Church—Mr.
Barrie’s Successor—Bell and Smoking—“Hillend” on
Doctors and Ministers—A Man amang Sheep, 99
CHAPTER VII.
OUT OF THE OLD HOME AND INTO THE NEW.
Leaving the Manse—Dr. Guthrie and the Children—
Nellie’s Tibby—Well settled—Bell’s Experiment with
the Hens—Dan Corbett—Braid Nebs—Babbie’s Mill, 126
CHAPTER VIII.
BLINKBONNY FREE CHURCH.
The Disruption of 1843—Hardships—Scotch Villages and
Church Matters—The New Church—The Session
and Deacons—The Beadle, Walter Dalgleish—The
Precentorship—Psalms and Hymns—Mr. Barrie’s
New Life—Foreign Missions—The Assembly’s
Decision—The Living Child—Saxpence—“Gude Siller
gaun oot o’ the Country”—Reminiscences of Dr. Duff, 154
CHAPTER IX.
BELL AT HOME IN KNOWE PARK.
The Three Ministers of Blinkbonny—Mr. Walker—The Ten
Virgins—The finest o’ the Wheat—Bell’s Fee—Alloa
Yarn—Bell’s Cooking—Sheep’s-head—Mr. Kirkwood
and the Potato-Soup—Dan in the Kitchen—Mr.
Gordon o’ the Granaries and the Smugglers—Dan at
Nellie’s Grave—Mr. Barrie’s Visit to Dan, 177
CHAPTER X.
INCIDENTS IN BLINKBONNY.
Miss Park on Dan—The Sweep’s dead—Mrs. Gray’s
Elegy on her Husband—The Coffin for naething—The
New School-master—The Roast Beef in the Lobby—
The Examination Committee—“Hoo’ to get there”—
George Brown’s Death—Scripture References—Mrs.
Barrie and Mr. Corbett—Dan and the Pictures—Dan’s
Bath—His Dream—Dan at Church—His Visit to
Babbie’s Mill—Colonel Gordon’s First Visit—Sir John
McLelland at the Soiree—“The Angel’s Whisper”
(Samuel Lover), 205
CHAPTER XI.
CHANGES AT KNOWE PARK.
The Dorcas Society—The Morisonian Controversy—
Colonel Gordon’s Second Visit—A Real Scotch
Dinner—Champagne—Dan an’ the Duke o’ Gordon—
The Smuggler’s Log-book—Colonel Gordon’s Will—
Dan’s Bank—The Call to Edinburgh—No-Popery
Agitation—David Tait o’ Blackbrae—The Sow and the
Corinthians—Bell woo’d—Mrs. Barrie breaks the Ice
—Bell won—Found out and congratulated, 230
CHAPTER XII.
ANOTHER MARRIAGE AND HOME-COMING.
The Forms of Procedure—Reception of the News of Bell’s 259
Marriage by Mr. Taylor, and by Sir John McLelland
—“Her Weight in Gold”—Bell’s Presents—“Hook ma
Back”—Mr. Walker’s Violin—Bell’s Marriage and
Home-coming—The Infar Cake—Creeling—Dan,
“Burke,” and the Noisy Convoy—The Vexing Pig—
The “Kirkin’,”
CHAPTER XIII.
CONCLUSION.
The Packing at Knowe Park—The Bachelor Umbrella—
Nellie’s Box—Dan and Rosie—Dan on Evangelical
Effort—On “The Angel’s Whisper”—Bell in Edinburgh
—Home to Blackbrae—Andrew Taylor’s Criticisms, 284
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
——◆——