Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

RPMS-IPCRF 2021

Name of Employee: RAMIL G. GONZALES, PhD Name of Rater: ARIEL C. LANSANG

Position: Public Schools District Supervisor Position: Chief, CID
Review Period: January-December 2021 Date of Review: January 07, 2022
Bureau/Center/Division: CID, SDO Olongapo City
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
WEIGHT RATING
MFO PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL AVERAGE
SCORE
Basic KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE OBJ. RESULTS RATING
Educ’n. QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T
Services I. 1.5
SUPPORTING
CURRICULUM
MANAGEMENT
AND
IMPLEMENTATION
(30%)
Strand 1.1 1.1.2 Supported January 10% 5- Four (4) of 5- 100% 5- Objectives Conducted 42 5 5 5 5 x 0.10=
Curriculum curriculum 2021- the assigned accomplished achieved on or class 0.5
Implementation implementation December schools were the target, and before the observations
through the 2021 with 42 COTs
monitored on provided TA to target date
management of and other
programs, their PPAs and four (4) 4- Objectives supplementary
projects and conducted 41- assigned achieved two observation tools
activities 50 class schools in the (2) days after designed for
aligned with observations. management of the target date MDL and ODL
curriculum 4- Three (3) of PPAs aligned 3- Objectives classes.
standards. the assigned with the achieved three
Monitored a total
schools were curriculum (3) days after
Page 1 of 27
monitored on standards. the target date of 20 school
their PPAs and 4- 90% 2- Objectives PPAs and
conducted 31- accomplished achieved four provided TA for
further
40 class the target, and (4) days after
improvement
observations. provided TA to the target date
3- Two (2) of three (3) 1- Objectives
the assigned assigned achieved a
schools were schools in the week after the
monitored on management of target date
their PPAs and PPAs aligned
conducted 21- with the
30 class curriculum
observations. standards.
2- One (1) of 3- 80%
the assigned accomplished
schools were the target, and
monitored on provided TA to
their PPAs and two (2)
conducted 11- assigned
20 class schools in the
observations. management of
1- One (1) of PPAs aligned
the assigned with the
schools were curriculum
monitored on standards.
their PPAs and 2- 60%
conducted 5- accomplished
10 class the target, and
observations. provided TA to
one (1)
assigned school
in the
management of
PPAs aligned
with the
curriculum
standards.
1- 50%
accomplished
the target, and
provided TA to

Page 2 of 27
 one (1)
assigned school
in the
management of
PPAs aligned
with the
curriculum
standards.
Strand 1.4 1.4.2 January (5%) 5- Four (4) of 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Conducted 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Learning Resource Conducted 2021- the assigned accomplished achieved on or district 0.25
Development activities such December schools were the monitoring before the presenation of
as sharing of 2021 Adjusted BE-
coached and tasks, and target date
one’s expertise, LCP and LDM2
writing mentored on provided TA to 4- Objectives Portfolio of 4
instructional the needs four (4) achieved two School Heads
materials, assessment assigned (2) days after and 16 MTs
capacity that support schools in the target date (LAC Leaders)
building and learning support of 3- Objectives
needs resource learning achieved three Assisted 3
assessment that teachers on
management resource (3) days after
support learning developing IMs
resource through development the target date like “Bidyo
development in onsite/online 4- 81-90% 2- Objectives Kasaysayan”,
SDO/district/sch approaches accomplished achieved four Script Writing
ool and or 4- Three (3) of the monitoring (4) days after and Lesson
learning the assigned tasks, and the target date Exemplar
centers. were coached provided TA to 1- Objectives
Conducted
and mentored three (3) achieved a
needs
on the needs assigned week after the assessment to
assessment schools in target date 20 teachers on
that support support of their instructional
learning learning needs
resource resource
Monitor the
management development
crafting of IPCRF
through 3- 71-80% of 10 teachers at
onsite/online accomplished NEBES and
approaches the monitoring provided TA for
3- Two (2) of tasks, and further
the assigned provided TA to improvement.
schools were two (2)
coached and assigned
mentored on schools in
the needs support of

Page 3 of 27
 assessment learning
that support resource
learning development
resource 2- 61-70%
management accomplished
through the monitoring
onsite/online tasks, and
approaches provided TA to
2- One (1) of one (1)
the assigned assigned school
schools was in support of
coached and learning
mentored on resource
the needs development.
assessment 1- 51-60%
that support accomplished
learning the monitoring
resource tasks, and
management provided TA to
through one (4)
onsite/online assigned
approaches schools in
1- One of the support of
assigned learning
schools was resource
coached and development.
mentored but
not on the
needs
assessment
that support
LRM.
Strand 1.5 1.5.2 Applied January (5%) 5- Four (4) of 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Provided 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Learning Resource relevant 2021- the assigned accomplished achieved on or technical 0.25
Management processes to December schools the monitoring before the services to 15
support learning 2021 teachers using
established the tasks, and target date
resource their own or
management in LRM in provided TA to 4- Objectives original IMs
SDO/district/sch accordance four (4) achieved two during post
ool and or with the assigned (2) days after conference.
learning prescribed schools in the target date
centers. requirements support of 3- Objectives

Page 4 of 27
4- Three (3) of learning achieved three
the assigned resource (3) days after
schools manage-ment the target date
established the 4- 81-90% 2- Objectives
LRM in accomplished achieved four
accordance the monitoring (4) days after
with the tasks, and the target date
prescribed provided TA to 1- Objectives
requirements three (3) achieved five
3- Two (2) of assigned (5) days after
the assigned schools in the target date
schools support of
established the learning
LRM in resource
accordance manage-ment
with the 3- 71-80%
prescribed accomplished
requirements the monitoring
2- One (1) of tasks, and
the assigned provided TA to
schools two (2)
established the assigned
LRM in schools in
accordance support of
with the learning
prescribed resource
requirements manage-ment
1- One (1) of 2- 61-70%
the assigned accomplished
schools the monitoring
established the tasks, and
LRM but not in provided TA to
accordance one (1)
with the assigned school
prescribed in support of
requirements learning
resource
manage-ment
1- 51-60%
accomplished
the monitoring

Page 5 of 27
 tasks, and
provided TA to
one (4)
assigned school
in support of
learning
resource
manage-ment
Strand 1.6 Utilized results Jan.-Dec. 10% 5- Conducted 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Utilized results of 5 5 5 5 x 0.10=
Learning Outcomes of learning 2021 5 intervention completed the were achieved the quarterly 0.5
Assessment outcomes strategies to monitoring task on or before report on
assessment in Classification of
improve with TA the target date
developing Grades by
intervention learning provision to 4- Objectives Learning Area
strategies to outcomes assigned were achieved and Grade Level
support 4- Conducted schools in the two days after by
divisions/district 4 intervention utilization of the target date recommending
s/schools/ strategies to results of 3- Objectives 5-10
and/or learning improve learning were achieved interventions thru
centers. submission of
learning outcomes three days
Weekly CID
outcomes assessment. after the target Update Sheets.
3- Conducted 4- 81-90% date
3 intervention completed the 2- Objectives
strategies to monitoring task were achieved
improve with TA four days after
learning provision to the target date
outcomes assigned 1- Objectives
2- Conducted schools in the were achieved
2 intervention utilization of a week after
strategies to results of the target date.
improve learning
learning outcomes
outcomes assessment.
1- Conducted 3- 71-80%
1 intervention completed the
strategy to monitoring task
improve with TA
learning provision to
outcomes assigned
schools in the
utilization of
results of

Page 6 of 27
 learning
outcomes
assessment.
2- 61-70%
completed the
monitoring task
with TA
provision to
assigned
schools in the
utilization of
results of
learning
outcomes
assessment.
1- 51-60%
completed the
monitoring task
with TA
provision to
assigned
schools in the
utilization of
results of
learning
outcomes
assessment
II. 1.25
STRENGTHENING
SHARED
ACCOUNTABILITY
(25%)
Strand 2.1 Conducted Jan.-Dec. 10% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Conducted two 5 5 5 5 x 0.10=
Educational programs, 2021 assigned completed the were attained major activities 0.5
Development Plan projects and schools monitoring task across four for school heads
Operationalization activities (LDM2 and BE-
conducted with TA quarters
aligned with the LCP) and
educational programs, provision to 4- Objectives monitored
development projects and assigned were attained various school
plan. activities schools in the across three programs with
aligned with conduct of quarters TA.
the educational PPAs aligned 3- Objectives
with the were attained
Page 7 of 27
plan. educational across two
4- Three of the plan. quarters
assigned 4- 81-90% 2- Objectives
schools completed the were attained
conducted monitoring task across one
programs, with TA quarter
projects and provision to 1- Objectives
activities assigned were attained
aligned with schools in the every quarter
the educational conduct of but with delay
plan. PPAs aligned
3- Two of the with the
assigned educational
schools plan.
conducted 3- 71-80%
programs, completed the
projects and monitoring task
activities with TA
aligned with provision to
the educational assigned
plan. schools in the
2- One of the conduct of
assigned PPAs aligned
schools with the
conducted educational
programs, plan.
projects and 2- 61-70%
activities completed the
aligned with monitoring task
the educational with TA
plan. provision to
1- One of the assigned
assigned schools in the
schools conduct of
conducted PPAs aligned
PPAs but not with the
aligned with educational
the educational plan.
plan 1- 51-60%
completed the
monitoring task

Page 8 of 27
 with TA
provision to
assigned
schools in the
conduct of
PPAs aligned
with the
educational
plan.
Strand 2.2 Demonstrated Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Utilized results of 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Technical knowledge and 2021 assigned completed the were achieved evaluation e.g., 0.25
Assistance understanding schools were monitoring task on or before SBM, SMEA,
Provision of the provision AIP, OBE,
provided with with TA the target date
of technical Brigada
assistance technical provision to 4- Objectives Eskwela, etc.
based on quality assistance assigned were achieved and provided 20
assurance, and based on schools on the two days after TA to the four
monitoring and quality adoption and the target date assigned schools
evaluation assurance, implementation 3- Objectives in the district.
results. and M&E of various were achieved
results DepEd PPAs three days
4- Three of the after the target
assigned 4- 81-90% date
schools were completed the 2- Objectives
provided with monitoring task were achieved
technical with TA four days after
assistance provision to the target date
based on assigned 1- Objectives
quality schools on the were achieved
assurance, adoption and a week after
and M&E implementation the target date.
results of various
3- Two of the DepEd PPAs
assigned 3- 71-80%
schools were completed the
provided with monitoring task
technical with TA
assistance provision to
based on assigned
quality schools on the
assurance, adoption and
and M&E implementation

Page 9 of 27
 results of various
2- One of the DepEd PPAs.
assigned 2- 61-70%
schools were completed the
provided with monitoring task
technical with TA
assistance provision to
based on assigned
quality schools on the
assurance, adoption and
and M&E implementation
results of various
1- Schools DepEd PPAs
provided with 1- 51-60%
TA were not completed the
based on QA monitoring task
and &E results with TA
provision to
assigned
schools on the
adoption and
implementation
of various
DepEd PPAs
Strand 2.3 Conducted Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- 10-9 of the 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Applied or 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Policy Review and review and 2021 policies from accomplished were achieved adopted 10 0.25
Recommendation recommendatio National, the target, and on or before policies from
n of national, different DepEd
Regional and provided TA to the target date
regional and/or Offices to the
division policies Division were four (4) 4- Objectives four assigned
to ensure adopted in the assigned were achieved schools in the
relevance within district. schools. two days after district and
the context of 4- 8-7 of the 4- 81-90% the target date collect feedbacks
one’s area of policies from accomplished 3- Objectives on the impact to
concern. National, the target, and were achieved school operation.
Regional and provided TA to three days
Division were three (3) after the target
adopted in the assigned date
district. schools. 2- Objectives
3- 6-5 of the 3- 71-80% were achieved
policies from accomplished four days after
National, the target, and the target date

Page 10 of 27
 Regional and provided TA to 1- Objectives
Division were two (2) were achieved
adopted in the assigned a week after
district. schools. the target date.
2- 4-3 of the 2- 61-70%
policies from accomplished
National, the target, and
Regional and provided TA to
Division were one (1)
adopted in the assigned
district. school.
1- 2-1 of the 1- 51-60%
policies from accomplished
National, the target, and
Regional and provided TA to
Division were one (1)
adopted in the assigned
district. school.
Strand 2.4 Supported the Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Monitored the 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Disaster management of 2021 assigned Completed the were attained four assigned 0.25
Preparedness, disaster schools were monitoring task across four schools in
Mitigation and preparedness, preparing the
monitored in with TA quarters
Resiliency Support. mitigation and school during
resiliency in the support to the provision to 4- Objectives emergency and
division/district/s disaster schools in were attained pandemic using
chools and/or preparedness, support to the across three the monitoring
learning centers mitigation and disaster quarters form/tool.
to ensure resiliency to preparedness, 3- Objectives
delivery of basic ensure delivery mitigation and were attained
education.
of basic resiliency to across two
education ensure the quarters
4- Three of the delivery of basic 2- Objectives
assigned education. were attained
schools were 4- 81-90% across one
monitored in Completed the quarter
support to the monitoring task 1- Objectives
disaster with TA were not
preparedness, provision to attained in any
mitigation and schools in of the quarter
resiliency to support to the
ensure delivery disaster
of basic preparedness,

Page 11 of 27
education mitigation and
3- Two of the resiliency to
assigned ensure the
schools were delivery of basic
monitored in education.
support to the 3- 71-80%
disaster Completed the
preparedness, monitoring task
mitigation and with TA
resiliency to provision to
ensure delivery schools in
of basic support to the
education disaster
2- One of the preparedness,
assigned mitigation and
schools were resiliency to
monitored in ensure the
support to the delivery of basic
disaster education.
preparedness, 2- 61-70%
mitigation and Completed the
resiliency to monitoring task
ensure delivery with TA
of basic provision to
education schools in
1- No sign or support to the
evidence of disaster
support preparedness,
mitigation and
resiliency to
ensure the
delivery of basic
education.
1- 51-60%
Completed the
monitoring task
with TA
provision to
schools in
support to the
disaster

Page 12 of 27
 preparedness,
mitigation and
resiliency to
ensure the
delivery of basic
education.
III. 1.05
FOSTERING A
CULTURE OF
CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT
(22.5%)
Strand 3.1 Applied Jan.-Dec. 10% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% 5- Completed Conducted 5 5 5 5 x 0.10=
Support for appropriate 2021 assigned Completed the the objective support 0.5
Instructional instructional schools were monitoring task within the mechanism like
Leadership leadership clinical
provided with with TA target date
support supervision to 2
strategies to feedbacks, provision to 4- Completed teachers, regular
help coached and schools to the objective KAMUSTAHAN
division/district/s mentored to improve two days after to the 4 school
chools and/or improve teaching- the target date heads, feedback
learning centers teaching and learning 3- Completed mechanism in
with the learning process. the objective the 4 schools
continuous during their flag
process 4- 81--90% three days
improvement of ceremony, with
the teaching- 4- Three of the Completed the after the target proper
learning assigned monitoring task date documentation
process. schools were with TA 2- Completed like recorded
provided with provision to the objective video, monitoring
feedbacks, schools to four days after form and
coached and improve the target date pictures of the
activity.
mentored to teaching- 1- Completed
improve learning the objective a
teaching and process. week after the
learning 3- 71-80% target date
process Completed the
3- Two of the monitoring task
assigned with TA
schools were provision to
provided with schools to
feedbacks, improve
coached and teaching-
mentored to learning
improve process.
Page 13 of 27
 teaching and 2- 61-70%
learning Completed the
process monitoring task
2- One of the with TA
assigned provision to
schools were schools to
provided with improve
feedbacks, teaching-
coached and learning
mentored to process.
improve 1- 51- 60%
teaching and Completed the
learning monitoring task
process with TA
1- With only provision to
one or two schools to
evidences improve
(MOVs) of teaching-
support to one learning
of the schools process.
Strand 3.2 Utilized relevant Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- With five 5- Four of the 5- Completed Make use of 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Technology-based technology- 2021 evidences of assigned school the objective available social 0.25
Innovation including based utilization of were monitored within the platforms like
ICT innovations Messenger,
technology- and provided target date
including ICT in Facebook,
the effective based TA five (5) 4- Completed Gmail, Google
delivery of roles innovation times through the objective Drive and SDO-
and functions to including ICT the use of two days after based apps like
support in the effective technology- the target date RMS, WFH app,
division/district/s delivery to based 3- Completed GCs in doing
chools and/or support the innovation the objective everyday
learning transactions to
district/ including ICT in three days
centers. school heads
Schools the effective after the target and teachers.
4- With four delivery of roles date
evidences of and functions to 2- Completed
utilization of assigned the objective
technology- schools. four days after
based 4- Four of the the target date
innovation assigned school 1- Completed
including ICT were monitored the objective a
in the effective and provided week after the
delivery to TA four (4) target date

Page 14 of 27
support the times through
district/ the use of
Schools technology-
3- With three based
evidences of innovation
utilization of including ICT in
technology- the effective
based delivery of roles
innovation and functions to
including ICT assigned
in the effective schools.
delivery to 3- Four of the
support the assigned school
district/ were monitored
Schools and provided
2- With two TA three (3)
evidences of times through
utilization of the use of
technology- technology-
based based
innovation innovation
including ICT including ICT in
in the effective the effective
delivery to delivery of roles
support the and functions to
district/ assigned
Schools schools.
1- With one 2- Four of the
evidences of assigned school
utilization of were monitored
technology- and provided
based TA two (2)
innovation times through
including ICT the use of
in the effective technology-
delivery to based
support the innovation
district/ including ICT in
schools the effective
delivery of roles
and functions to

Page 15 of 27
 assigned
schools.
1- Four of the
assigned school
were monitored
and provided
TA through
the use of
technology-
based
innovation
including ICT in
the effective
delivery of roles
and functions to
assigned
schools.
Strand 3.3 Utilized findings Jan.-Dec. 2.5% 5- Conducted 5- 91-100% 5- Objectives Provided 2 2 2 2 x .25=
Culture of Research of research 2021 full blown accomplished were achieved technical 0.05
undertaken research with the target with on or before services to 3
and/or adopted teachers and 1
utilization of utilization & the target date
to improve school head on
practice. findings in the implementation 4- Objectives research
district of research were achieved
4- Conducted findings to two days after Approved Action
full blown improve the the target date Research:
research with practices of 3- Objectives
no evidence of assigned were achieved 1) Eloisa A.
Elemento,
utilization of schools. three days
Barretto II ES
findings in the 4- 81-90% after the target
district accomplished date 2) Froilan N.
3- Provided 3 the target. 2- Objectives Rivas,
technical 3- 71-80% were achieved Principal II,
services to accomplished four days after Barretto II ES
teachers on the target. the target date
3) Melanie S.
making 2- 61-70% 1- Objectives
Berrame, MT-
research accomplished were achieved II, Mabayuan
2- Provided 2 the target. a week after ES
technical 1- 51-60% the target date.
services to accomplished
teachers on the target.
making

Page 16 of 27
 research
1- Provided at
least 1
technical
service to
teachers on
making
research
Strand 3.5 Used Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% of 5- Completed Use of GCs, 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Use of communication 2021 assigned the assigned the objective Gmail, fb Live, 0.25
Communication platforms schools school improved within the SMS in the
Platforms including print submission of
improved their their basic target date
and non-print reports,
media to basic education 4- Completed information
support education services with the objective dissemination,
division/district/s services the use of two days after monitoring and
chools and/or through the different the target date meetings to
learning centers use of different communication 3- Completed school heads,
in improving communication platforms the objective teachers and
basic education fellow SDO
platforms 4- 81-100% of three days
services employees
4- Three of the the assigned after the target
assigned school improved date
schools their basic 2- Completed
improved their education the objective
basic services with four days after
education the use of the target date
services different 1- Completed
through the communication the objective a
use of different platforms. week after the
communication 3- 71-80% of target date
platforms the assigned
3- Two of the school improved
assigned their basic
schools education
improved their services with
basic the use of
education different
services communication
through the platforms.
use of different 2- 61-70% of
communication the assigned
platforms school improved

Page 17 of 27
 2- One of the their basic
assigned education
schools services with
improved their the use of
basic different
education communication
services platforms.
through the 1- 51-60% of
use of different the assigned
communication school improved
platforms their basic
1- No evidence education
of MOVs services with
presented the use of
different
communication
platforms.
IV. 1.0
DEVELOPING
SELF AND
OTHERS (20%)
Strand 4.1 Ensured the Jan.-Dec. 10% 5- Four of the 5- 91-100% 5- Completed Regularly 5 5 5 5 x 0.10=
Learning and delivery of 2021 assigned completed the the objective conducted 0.5
Development different schools were monitoring task within the meetings and
learning and monitoring
monitored on with TA target date
development school activities
interventions to the delivery of provision to 4- Completed like LAC session,
support different schools on the the objective FGD/Kamustaha
division/district/s learning and delivery of two days n to monitor the
chools and/or development different before the learning
learning centers intervention learning and target date progress esp.
programs and development 3- Completed those with
difficulties in
recommended intervention the objective
reading and
interventions to programs and three days ‘rithmetics’
address the recommended before the
gap interventions to target date
4- Three of the address the 2- Completed
assigned gap. the objective
schools were 4- 81-90% four days
monitored on completed the before the
the delivery of monitoring task target date
different with TA 1- Completed

Page 18 of 27
learning and provision to the objective a
development schools on the week after the
intervention delivery of target date
programs and different
recommended learning and
interventions to development
address the intervention
gap programs and
3- Two of the recommended
assigned interventions to
schools were address the
monitored on gap.
the delivery of 3- 71-80%
different completed the
learning and monitoring task
development with TA
intervention provision to
programs and schools on the
recommended delivery of
interventions to different
address the learning and
gap development
2- One of the intervention
assigned programs and
schools were recommended
monitored on interventions to
the delivery of address the
different gap.
learning and 2- 61-70%
development completed the
intervention monitoring task
programs and with TA
recommended provision to
interventions to schools on the
address the delivery of
gap different
1- One of the learning and
assigned development
schools were intervention
monitored on programs and
the delivery of recommended

Page 19 of 27
 different interventions to
learning and address the
development gap.
intervention 1- 51-60%
programs but completed the
no monitoring task
recommendati with TA
ons provision to
schools on the
delivery of
different
learning and
development
intervention
programs and
recommended
interventions to
address the
gap.
Strand 4.2 Participated Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- Participated 5- 5 personal 5- Objectives Attended DepEd 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Professional actively in 2021 in five INSETS and were achieved Live 0.25
Networks professional conducted in professional on or before StreamingEXEC
networks to OM, CID
the national, development the target date
enhance Meetings,
knowledge and region and goals were 4- Objectives Unmute, online
skills in division levels, adequately were achieved seminar and
improving e.g., trainings, achieved. two days after regular updates
practice (DepEd Live 4- 4 personal the target date on SDO GCs.
Stream) and 3- Objectives
EXECOM, CID professional were achieved
meetings and development three days
the like goals were after the target
4- Participated adequately date
in four INSETS achieved. 2- Objectives
conducted in 3- 3 personal were achieved
the national, and four days after
region and professional the target date
division levels, development 1- Objectives
e.g., trainings, goals were were achieved
(DepEd Live adequately a week after
Stream) achieved. the target date.
EXECOM, CID 2- 2 personal

Page 20 of 27
meetings and and
the like professional
3- Participated development
in three goals were
INSETS adequately
conducted in achieved.
the national, 1- 1 personal
region and and
division levels, professional
e.g., trainings, development
(DepEd Live goals were
Stream) adequately
EXECOM, CID achieved.
meetings and
the like
2- Participated
in two INSETS
conducted in
the national,
region and
division levels,
e.g., trainings,
(DepEd Live
Stream)
EXECOM, CID
meetings and
the like
1- Participated
in one INSET
conducted in
the national,
region and
division levels,
e.g., trainings,
(DepEd Live
Stream)
EXECOM, CID
meetings and
the like

Page 21 of 27
Strand 4.5 Supported the Jan.-Dec. 5% 5- Recognized 5- 91-100% of 5- Objectives Recognized 5 5 5 5 x 0.5=
Support for Rewards implementation 2021 five school the were achieved exemplary 0.25
and Recognition of rewards and personnel, recommended on or before performance of
Mechanisms recognition two teachers as
teaching or reward & the target date
mechanisms in demo teachers,
acknowledging non-teaching recognition 4- Objectives 3 learning
the outstanding for their were properly were achieved resource
performance of outstanding or implemented two days after developers and
personnel in exemplary 4- 81- 90% of the target date resource
regions/division performance in the 3- Objectives speakers.
s/districts/schoo the school, recommended were achieved
ls and/or
division and/or reward & three days
learning
centers. regional levels recognition after the target
4- Recognized were properly date
four school implemented 2- Objectives
personnel, 3- 71-80% of were achieved
teaching or the four days after
non-teaching recommended the target date
for their reward & 1- Objectives
outstanding or recognition were achieved
exemplary were properly a week after
performance implemented the target date.
in the school, 2- 61-70% of
division and/or the
regional levels recommended
3- Recognized reward &
three school recognition
personnel, were properly
teaching or implemented
non-teaching 1- 51-60% of
for their the
outstanding or recommended
exemplary reward &
performance recognition
in the school, were properly
division and/or implemented
regional levels
2- Recognized
two school
personnel,
teaching or
non-teaching

Page 22 of 27
 for their
outstanding or
exemplary
performance
in the school,
division and/or
regional levels
1- Recognized
five school
personnel,
teaching or
non-teaching
for their
outstanding or
exemplary
performance
in the school,
division and/or
regional levels
V. 1) Participant- SEAMEO INNOTECH SUPEReXCELS Program for 5 x .025= 0.125
PLUS FACTOR Supervisors of DepEd Region III, October 2021-February 2022 0.125
(2.5%) 2) Regional Accredited Level 3 Schools:
 Mabayuan ES
 Nellie E, Brown ES
3) Level 3 SBM Implementers:
 Top 1- Nellie E. Brown ES
 Top 4- Mabayuan ES
TOTAL: 4.925

Descriptive Outstanding (O)

Rating:

SUMMARY:

No. KEY RESULT AREAS (KRAS) WEIGHT SCORE

I. Supporting Curriculum Management and Implementation . . . . . . . . 30% 1.5

Page 23 of 27
 II. Strengthening Shared Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25% 1.25
III. Fostering a Culture of Continuous Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.5% 1.05
IV. Developing Self and Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20% 1.0
V. Plus Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5% .125
TOTAL: 100%
4.925

_______________________________
RAMIL G. GONZALES PhD.
Public Schools District Supervisor
Ratee

____________________________ ____________________________ _____________________________

Dr. ELEONOR C. CAYABYAB ARIEL C. LANSANG SECUNDINA BELEN U. ARAGON
Chief, S G O D/ PMT Member Chief, C I D/Rater/PMT Member AO V/PMT Member

____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________

RODEL MARTINEZ RICARDO EDNAVE MICHELLE ANN SARTE
Planning Officer/PMT Member PMT Member Accountant II/PMT Member

___________________________________
MAYLENE M. MINIMO, EdD., CESE
OIC-ASDS/PMT Chair

___________________________________
LEILANI SAMSON-CUNANAN, CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority

PART II- COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Teamwork LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES
5 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. Leading People
Self-Management 5 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal 5 Uses basic persuasion techniques in a discussion or presentation e.g., staff

Page 24 of 27
5 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development
5 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
5 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
24/5=4.8
Professionalism and Ethics
5 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and
Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
5 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
5 Maintains a professional image: being trust-worthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs,
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
24/5=4.8
Result Focus
5 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
5 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
5 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of
work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
5 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or
inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower
cost,
more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting
any specific goal. 25/5=5
accomplishment across the organization.
5 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
25/5=5
Service Orientation
5 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
5 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
issues and concerns.
5 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
5 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based
on DepEd strategies and directions.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
25/5=5
Innovation
5 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new
ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
efficiency).
5 Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on
improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
5 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
solutions.
5 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the
work unit and organization.
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates
resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
25/5=5
mobilization, appeals to reason and/or emotions, uses data and examples, visual
aids
5 Persuades, convinces or influences others, in order to have a specific impact or
effect.
4 “Sets a good example”, is a credible and respected leader; and demonstrates
desired behavior.
5 Forwards personal, professional and work unit needs and interests in an issue.
5 Assumes a pivotal role in promoting the development of an inspiring, relevant vision
for the organization and influences others to share ownership of DepEd goals, in
order to create an effective work environment.
24/5=4.8
People Performance Management
5 Makes specific changes in the performance management system or in own work
methods to improve performance (e.g. does something better, faster, at a lower
cost, more efficiently; improves quality, customer satisfaction, morale, revenues).
5 Sets performance standards and measures progress of employees based on office
and departments targets.
5 Provides feedback and technical assistance such as coaching for performance
improvement and action planning.
5 States performance expectations clearly and checks understanding and
commitment.
5 Performs all the stages of result-based performance management system
supported by evidence and required documents/forms.
25/5=5
People Development
5 Improves the skills and effectiveness of individuals through employing a range of
development strategies.
5 Facilitates workforce effectiveness through coaching and motivating/developing
people within a work environment that promotes mutual trust and respect.
5 Conceptualizes and implements learning interventions to meet identified training
needs.
5 Does long-term coaching or training by arranging appropriate and helpful
assignments, formal training, or other experiences for the purpose of supporting a
6person’s learning and development.
5 Cultivates a learning environment by structuring interactive experiences such as
looking for future opportunities that are in support of achieving individual career
goals.
25/5=5

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4,925

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES 4.93

OVERALL RATING 4.96

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (PHASE 3- Review and Evaluation)
Page 25 of 27
 PART III SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Ratings Descriptive Rating

Accomplishments of KRA’s and Objectives 4.925 Outstanding

Employee-Superior Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee Name of Rater

RAMIL G. GONZALES, PhD ARIEL C. LANSANG

Signature Signature

Date Date
January 13, 2022 January ____ , 2022

PART IV- DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Page 26 of 27

STRENGTHS
 Result Focus
 Service Orientation
 People Development
ARIEL C. LANSANG
Chief, Education Supervisor
Rater
ACTION PLAN
DEVELOPMENT NEEDS TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED
(Recommended
Developmental Intervention)
 Self-Management  Seek coaching or counseling Amazon.com
 Professionalism and Ethics services from someone I trust
 Leading People and respect
 Read the book of Dale January-December 2022 Immediate superiors
Carnegie “How to Win Friends (Chiefs, OSDS and co-
and Influence People” and “One supervisors)
Minute Manager” by Ken
Blanchard
RAMIL G. GONZALES, PhD MAYLENE M. MINIMO EdD., CESE
Public Schools District Supervisor OIC- Assistant. Schools Division Superintendent
Ratee Approving Authority
Page 27 of 27