Professional Documents
Culture Documents
@PO Taken ATP Advance Variance Analysis - Pgs.18
@PO Taken ATP Advance Variance Analysis - Pgs.18
OVERVIEW
Objectives
To calculate materials mix and yield variances and sales mix and quantity
variances.
Mix Yield
variance variance
The mix variance shows the effect of changing the proportions of the mix of inputs into
the process.
The yield variance shows the difference between the actual and the expected output or
yield of the process.
The price variance, mix variance and yield variance can be most easily determined
using a standard table for the calculation.
A G H J K
B L M N P
—— —— —— —— —— —— —— ——
W X Y Z
Usage variance
Notation
In the standard table the figure W represents the sum of G and L. X, Y and Z are found
in a similar fashion.
The difference between W and X is the total price variance. As we are dealing with
cost if W > X, then it is an adverse variance and vice versa. The other variances are
found in a similar fashion.
Example 1
3 kg 8
_____ –––
The actual production was 5,000 units and the materials used were:
Required:
Calculate the total materials cost variance, materials price variance, materials usage
variance, mix variance and yield variance.
Solution
–––––
Total sales
variance
Mix Quantity
variance variance
The mix and quantity variances are most easily found using a table.
Z
——— ——— ——— ——— ——— ———
x x x
Volume variance
* Margin means profit (absorption costing) or contribution (marginal costing).
BQ = Budget sales quantity.
Example 2
Products
Budget Q P R
Unit sales 200 100 100
Price £20 £25 £30
Margin £3 £4 £6
Actual
Unit sales 180 150 170
Price £22 £22 £26
Margin £4 £3 £5
Required:
Solution
Price variance £
Q
P
R
_______
_______
3 CAUSES OF VARIANCES
Operational factors may indicate that the process is out of control, and it is these which
are considered below.
Favourable Adverse
Different supplier
Different material
Change in quality
Favourable Adverse
Change in quality
Response to competitors
Pass on cost changes
Frequently two or more opposing variances will be caused by the same operational
factor.
It is necessary to consider the overall effect when considering any course of action.
3.3.1 Examples
Actual vs Expected
performance performance
If the actual environment differs from that which was anticipated then actual
performance should be compared with a standard which reflects the changed conditions
(ex post standard).
Even if the environment has not changed, with hindsight (looking back) it might be
realised than an unrealistic standard was used eg ideal standard.
Actual performance should be compared with a realistic standard for control and
appraisal purposes – this variance is known as the Operating Variance. The difference
between the ex ante and ex post targets is known as the Planning Variance.
4.2 Calculations
Use the following table to separate out PLANNING and OPERATING variances.
£
ORIGINAL FLEXED BUDGET
(EX ANTE) X PLANNING
VARIANCE
(UNCONTROLLABLE)
REVISED FLEXED BUDGET
(EX POST) X
OPERATING
VARIANCE
ACTUAL RESULT X (CONTROLLABLE)
Note – the examiner sometimes calls planning variances budget revision variances.
Example 3
With hindsight a better standard would have been 3.75 kg per unit at £2.80 per kg.
Required
Solution
£
Original flexed budget Planning variance
Operating variance
Actual result
£
Operating price variance
–––––
Total operating variance
–––––
This revised analysis still indicates inefficiency on the part of the buying department
and that there could be better use of materials.
Compare this with the traditional analysis which suggested a more serious inefficiency
in buying ie £43,000 adverse price variance, coupled with efficient use of materials.
The PLANNING VARIANCE can also be split into price and usage, but it is
questionable whether it provides useful information or not.
Example 4
Materials budget
3.4kg/unit
£2/kg
Actual
2,000 units produced
7,000 kg purchased and used, costing £2.20 per kg.
Required
Solution
kg
Traditional usage variance
2,000 units should use
Actual usage
–––––
=
–––––
Example 4 (Contd)
The purchasing manager is furious when he receives a variance report criticising him.
He produces evidence to suggest the average market price during the period was £2.30.
The production manager points out that the usage standard was an ideal standard and
totally unrealistic. He calculates the current standard as 3.6kg/unit.
Required
(b) Calculate
Solution
Operational
Actual result variance
£
Operational price variance
Kg
Operational usage variance
2,000 units should use
Actual usage
–––––
kg @
––––
––––
the size of the market was different from expected – a change in the external
environment
Sales volume
variance
Caused by Caused by
external factors internal factors
£
Budgeted profit/contribution for
original budgeted sales X
market volume
Budgeted profit/contribution for revised variance
budget sales X
(revised market volume X budget market share)
market share
Budgeted profit/contribution for variance
actual sales X
Example 5
Acme Ltd has a Sales Budget of 1,795 units at a unit contribution of £20.00. This is
based on the company maintaining a 5% market share. Total sales volume for the
industry was estimated to be 35,900 units.
Required:
Solution
£
Budgeted contribution for Market volume
Original budgeted sales variance
Market share
Budgeted contribution for variance
Actual sales
4.4.1 Advantages
4.4.2 Disadvantages
Managers may claim all adverse variances have external causes and all
favourable variances internal causes ie manipulation of revised standards.
FOCUS
EXAMPLE SOLUTIONS
£
Standard cost of actual production (5,000 units × £8) 40,000
Actual cost of actual production (27,000 + 11,000) 38,000
_____
2,000 F
–––––
Price variance £
Q £(20 − 22) × 180 360 F
P £(25 − 22) × 150 450 A
R £(30 − 26) × 170 680 A
_______
770 A
_______
Solution 3 – Materials
£
Original flexed budget Planning variance
22,000 × 4 × £2.50 220,000 £11,000 Adv
£
Operating price variance
(2.80 – 3.00) 86,000 17,200 Adv
Solution 4 – Materials
kg
Traditional usage variance
2,000 units should use (2,000 × 2.4) 6,800
Actual usage (7,000)
–––––
(200) kg @ £2
= £(400) A
–––––
Kg
Operational usage variance
2,000 units should use (2,000 × 3.6) 7,200
Actual usage (7,000)
–––––
200 kg @ 2.30 £460 F
––––
£1,160 F
––––
Solution 5 – Sales
£
Budgeted contribution for Market volume
Original budgeted sales 35,900 variance
1,795 × £20 £1,600 Fav