Ayodola Chapter Two & Three

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 51

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0 Introduction

Hypotheses of equilibrium of installment and conversion scale multiply in the monetary

writing. The monetary approach, the elasticity approach, and the absorption approach are the

traditional balance of payment theories. The various effects that a single country's currency

devaluation has on real income and the balance of payments in the global economy are shown by

the theories. The effect of devaluation on the balance of the current account is explained using

the elasticity method. In the event that the amount of unfamiliar flexibility of interest for trades

and the nation of origin's versatility of interest for imports surpasses solidarity, degrading works

on the ongoing record; in any case, it demolishes shortages. This method, according to critics,

focuses on partial equilibrium and disregards income effects. The ingestion approach, created by

Alexander (1952) and stretched out by Johnson (1958), presents pay impacts. It considers the

ongoing record equilibrium to be the contrast between homegrown result and spending. The

effect of depreciation on the equilibrium of installments is affected by the negligible penchant to

retain. Assuming this inclination is not as much as solidarity, expanded pay works on the

ongoing record. The financial methodology, spearheaded by Whitman (1975) and created by

Frenkel and Johnson (1976), excuses the customary qualification between products, imports, and

non-exchanged merchandise. It sees the equilibrium of instalments as a financial stream from

disequilibrium in the currency market, underlining that equilibrium of instalments disequilibrium

reflects money related market disequilibrium. Krugman (1979) fostered a model of equilibrium

of instalment emergencies, showing theoretical assaults on holds happen when financial backers
change portfolios, lessening homegrown cash extents. Obstfeld (1983) extended Krugman's

hypothesis, outlining what assumptions for ensuing depreciation mean for the planning of

equilibrium of installment emergencies in light of the temporary time of drifting before another

trade equality starts. Although these theories provide insights into the complexity of the balance

of payments and exchange rates, they have been criticized for focusing on stock adjustment

processes rather than flow disequilibrium.

2.1 Conceptual Framework

2.1.1 Concept of Balance of payment

According to International Monetary Fund (1948), defines the balance of payments as a

comprehensive and systematic record encompassing a country's economic engagements globally

over a specific period. It goes beyond the trade balance, including capital flows and financial

transfers, providing a holistic view of a nation's economic interactions.

Milton Friedman (1953) perspective accentuates the role of the balance of payments as a

mirror reflecting a nation's monetary policies. He underscores the influence of domestic

monetary strategies in shaping the nation's balance of payments and, by extension, its exchange

rates.

John Maynard Keynes (1948) positions the balance of payments as a consequence of the

interplay between saving and investment. His definition underscores the significance of

government interventions in managing overall demand to achieve a stable and sustainable

balance of payments.
Harry G. Johnson (1958) definition provides a nuanced view, describing the balance of

payments as a systematic record capturing a nation's claims on and liabilities to the rest of the

world resulting from international transactions. It emphasizes the ongoing financial relationships

between nations.

Jacob Viner (1948) offers a comprehensive definition, portraying the balance of

payments as an accounting record detailing a country's economic transactions globally. It extends

beyond visible trade, encompassing invisible items and capital movements, providing a holistic

perspective.

Gottfried Haberler (1950) characterizes the balance of payments as a gauge reflecting a

nation's economic well-being and the efficacy of its policies. He underscores the importance of

maintaining equilibrium between exports and imports for sustained economic health.

Richard N. Cooper (1968) definition injects dynamism, portraying the balance of

payments as a process of ongoing adjustment and adaptation. It signifies its role in responding to

changing economic conditions and policies, highlighting its dynamic nature.

James Meade (1951) sees the balance of payments as a mechanism ensuring stability in

international trade. His definition underscores the role of policies in addressing issues arising

from surplus and deficit nations, emphasizing the need for appropriate interventions.

Joan Robinson (1947) introduces a social and political dimension, viewing the balance of

payments as a reflection of income distribution among nations. Her definition draws attention to

the broader implications of international economic relations.


Marcus Fleming (1962) definition, within the Mundell-Fleming model, underscores the

interconnectedness of exchange rates, interest rates, and fiscal policies. It emphasizes the role of

exchange rates in influencing the balance of payments and the effectiveness of economic policies

in an open economy.

Richard Lipsey (1960) definition positions the balance of payments as a tool,

emphasizing its role in understanding the interaction between a nation's domestic and foreign

sectors. It underscores its importance in maintaining external equilibrium.

Arthur I. Bloomfield (1958) emphasis on distinguishing between short-term and long-

term aspects of the balance of payments adds depth. It recognizes the implications for economic

policy, considering both immediate and prolonged effects.

Joan Robinson and Richard Harrod (1937) contribute a Keynesian perspective, viewing

the balance of payments as a reflection of income levels. Their definition emphasizes the need

for coordinated fiscal and monetary policies to address imbalances.

Paul Rosenstein-Rodan (1943) positions the balance of payments as a factor influencing

economic development. His focus on capital flows and resource mobilization underscores its

broader impact on a nation's growth.

Michael Kalecki (1950) emphasis on distributional aspects adds a socio-economic

dimension. His definition highlights how income distribution can influence the trade balance,

providing a more nuanced view.

2.1.2 Concept of Exchange Rate


According to the Mundell-Fleming Model (1962) This model considers the exchange rate

as a pivotal variable in understanding the impact of monetary and fiscal policies on a small open

economy. It stresses the interconnectedness of exchange rates, interest rates, and output in the

short run.

Paul Samuelson (1948) definition positions the exchange rate as the price of foreign

exchange in terms of the home country's currency. He emphasizes the role of supply and demand

factors in determining exchange rates.

Irving Fisher (1896) definition views the exchange rate as an expression of the relative

purchasing power of two currencies. His introduction of the "interest rate differential" adds a

crucial factor explaining exchange rate movements.

Robert Mundell (1963) emphasizes the exchange rate's role in influencing the

effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies. His work contributes significantly to understanding

optimal currency areas.

John Hicks (1937) defines the exchange rate as the relative price of currencies,

emphasizing the influence of interest rates and expectations in determining the equilibrium

exchange rate.

Abba P. Lerner (1944) introduces the exchange rate as a policy variable, actively

managed to achieve domestic economic goals. His definition integrates the exchange rate into

broader economic policy considerations.


Ragnar Nurkse (1944) considers the exchange rate as a critical factor in promoting

international economic stability. His emphasis on coordinated international efforts underlines the

importance of global cooperation in managing exchange rates.

Erik Lindahl (1929) definition connects the exchange rate to the interaction between

money supply and demand. It underscores the influence of monetary factors in determining

exchange rate movements.

Gustav Cassel (1918) introduces the concept of purchasing power parity, defining the

exchange rate as the ratio of price levels between two countries. His work suggests a long-term

equilibrium in exchange rates based on relative price levels.

J. Marcus Fleming (1962) Fleming contributes to the Mundell-Fleming model,

emphasizing the interdependence of exchange rates, interest rates, and fiscal policies in an open

economy context.

Milton Friedman (1953) definition underscores the role of expectations in determining

exchange rates. His perspective suggests that rates are influenced by anticipated future events,

adding a forward-looking dimension.

Max Corden (1974) emphasis on considering the balance of payments in analyzing

exchange rates adds depth. It highlights the intricate relationship between trade balances and

currency values.

John Williamson (1977) introduces the concept of "crawling peg," defining exchange

rates as a tool for achieving gradual adjustments. His perspective emphasizes the role of

flexibility and adaptability in managing currency values.


Gustav Cassel (1922) refines his earlier work on purchasing power parity, emphasizing

the role of relative price levels in determining exchange rates over the long term. This definition

contributes to understanding exchange rate stability.

Ellen Meade (1948) definition incorporates the notion of "automatic adjustment" in

exchange rates. It underscores the self-correcting mechanisms that influence currency values,

providing insights into the adaptive nature of exchange rate systems.

2.2 Theoretical Framework

Conversion standard is one of the essential monetary devices that are utilized to address

various financial misalignments confronting countries. It has been broadly applied in most

underlying change programs across the world. It has been utilized as an essential strategy vehicle

for coordinating the heading of stream of monetary assets (talented work, Capital, administrative

skill, and unfamiliar trade) into import and product areas. Be that as it may, for this to result to

reasonable monetary development and advancement solidness should be kept up with in

conversion scale system (Schaling, 2008). Besides, a few nations utilize double trade rates

frameworks due to their powerless equilibrium of instalments circumstances, instead of

debasement of their cash, this approach once in a while demonstrate exorbitant from a political

and social perspective. In any case, whenever oversaw appropriately, this double conversion

scale strategy can be significant for further developing equilibrium of instalments of emerging

nations. These methodologies incorporate programmed cost change under best quality level,

programmed cost change under adaptable trade rates (cost impact), the versatility approach, the

assimilation approach and the financial methodology (Oladipo, 2011). The Buying Power
Equality (PPP) in its easiest structure affirms that over the long haul, changes in conversion

standard among nations will generally reflect changes in relative cost level.

Kamin&Klau, (2003) are of the view that assuming trade rates are drifting, the noticed

development can be made sense of altogether as far as changes in relative buying power while

assuming that it is fixed, harmony not entirely settled by contrasting agreeable strategies for:

Making sense of the noticed developments in return rates for nations whose rates were drifting,

Deciding balance equality rates for whose nations whose enduring rates were off the mark with

post war economic situations, Evaluating the suitability of a conversion scale. In spite of

reactions of PPP hypothesis, the hypothetical establishment and clarification might sound

sensible and adequate however its useful application in genuine circumstance might be a

deception, particularly over the long haul (Grigorianm, 2004).

Conversion standard is the cost of one money as far as another. How much unfamiliar

money might be purchased for one unit of the homegrown cash or the expense in homegrown

money of buying one unit of the unfamiliar cash (Soderstine, 1998). It is the rate at which one

money trades for the other, and it is utilized to describe the global financial framework (Iyoha,

1996).

Obadan and Nwobike (1991) think that a few nations with a feeble equilibrium of

installments position take on numerous conversion scale frameworks as an option in contrast to

debasement, which is seen as excessively exorbitant from a political or social point of view.

They underline that a legitimized and appropriately directed double conversion scale framework

can be extremely useful to emerging nations for guaranteeing the fulfilment of fundamental
requirements, guaranteeing fixed and equilibrium of instalments reasonability and general asset

preparation.

Khan and Lizondon (1987) see that nations encountering equilibrium of instalments

issues ought to leave on debasement or continuous deterioration of her money to impact a change

on the instalment’s concerns, since degrading which is the decrease of the worth of one's nation

is supposed to essentially affect global capital developments.

Cooper (1976) looks at the impact of debasement on the equilibrium of instalments of a

few emerging nations. He finds that three quarter of the cases inspected showed that the ongoing

record of the equilibrium of instalments moved along. This suggests that degrading prompts

higher products and brings down imports, which over the long haul would work on the

equilibrium of instalments position of a country. On the other hand, Birds (1984) is of the

assessment that the upgrades of equilibrium of instalments after cheapening doesn't be

guaranteed to propose that the equilibrium of instalments generally improve in light of

depreciation.

Iyoha (1996) thinks about debasement as the purposeful decrease of the worth of a

country's money with regards to different monetary standards. It is an expansion in the

conversion scale starting with one standard worth then onto the next and could be utilized as a

strategy instrument by a country under a decent swapping scale framework to address an excess

of deficiencies in its equilibrium of instalments.

2.2.1 Theories of Exchange rate

The expected reasons for swapping scale vacillations have prompted assessment of the

hypothetical premise of trade rates assurance since trade rates changes halfway reflect deviations
starting from the earliest stage which trade still up in the air. The hypotheses making sense of the

assurance of genuine trade rates incorporates the accompanying:

2.2.1.1 The Mint Parity Theory – The Mint Parity Theory, also known as the Mint Par or Mint

Ratio, was a monetary theory that originated during the gold standard era. It was put forth by

David Ricardo, a British economist, in the early 19th century. Ricardo's work on the Mint Parity

Theory can be found in his seminal work, "Principles of Political Economy and Taxation," which

was first published in 1817. The theory explored the relationship between the values of gold and

silver coins based on their metal content and the official mint ratio established by governments.

This hypothesis is related with the working of the worldwide best quality level. Under

this framework, the cash being used was made of gold or was convertible into gold at a decent

rate (Jhingan 2004). Here, the worth of the cash unit was characterized as far as specific load of

gold and the National Bank of the nation concerned was dependably prepared to trade gold at the

predefined cost. The rate at which the naira could be changed over into gold is known as the mint

cost of gold. The Mint Parity Theory, proposed by David Ricardo, has faced several criticisms

over the years.

ASSUMPTIONS OF THE MINT PARITY THEORY

Stability of Mint Ratios: The Mint Parity Theory assumes that the official mint ratios, which

establish the fixed exchange rates between different metallic currencies, remain stable over time.

In other words, it presupposes that governments would maintain a consistent ratio between the

values of gold and silver coins.


Immutability of Metal Content: The theory assumes that the metal content of coins remains

constant. It implies that there is no debasement or manipulation of the metallic composition of

coins by governments, ensuring a reliable basis for determining exchange rates.

CRITICISMS OF THE MINT PARITY THEORY

Rigidity in the Face of Market Forces: One criticism of the Mint Parity Theory is that it

assumes fixed exchange rates based on government-mandated mint ratios, disregarding the

influence of market forces. In reality, changes in supply and demand for gold and silver could

lead to fluctuations in their market values, rendering the fixed mint ratios less responsive to

economic realities.

Assumption of Perfect Arbitrage: The theory assumes that arbitrage opportunities would be

exploited instantly, ensuring that the market values of gold and silver align with the official mint

ratios. However, transaction costs, transportation expenses, and other practical impediments may

prevent perfect arbitrage, leading to deviations between market values and mint ratios.

2.2.1.2 The Purchasing Power Parity Theory – The Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

theory was not proposed by a single individual; rather, it has been developed and refined by

multiple economists over time. Gustav Cassel, a Swedish economist, is often credited with laying

the groundwork for the PPP theory in the early 20th century. He introduced the concept in 1918,

emphasizing the idea that exchange rates between two currencies should adjust to equalize the

price levels of a basket of goods in each country.

However, the modern formulation of the PPP theory involves the contributions of various

economists over the years, including John Maynard Keynes, who expanded upon the theory

during the interwar period, and later economists who introduced modifications and extensions to
the original concept. The PPP theory has been an essential element in international economics,

providing insights into exchange rate determination and the relative value of currencies based on

their purchasing power.

According to this theory, the difference in the rate of inflation between countries will

affect the spot exchange rate between currencies. The hypothesis expresses that the balance

swapping scale between two inconvertible paper monetary not entirely settled by the fairness of

their buying power. That is, the conversion scale between two not entirely settled by their overall

cost levels (Obadan, 2006).

The beginning of purchasing power idea has been followed to the sixteenth century

Salamanca School of Spain. During the nineteenth hundred years, traditional financial

specialists, similar to Ricardo, Plant, Goshen and Marshall embraced and grew pretty much

qualified PPP sees. The hypothesis, in its cutting-edge structure, is credited to Gustav Cassel, a

Swedish financial specialist, who created and promoted its experimental form in the1920s

(Rogoff (1996). The ostensible conversion scale ought to mirror the buying force of one money

Against another and that a buying influence conversion standard existed between any two

nations which are estimated by the complementary of one nation's cost level against another

Cassel (1916).The focal principle of the PPP is that the harmony conversion scale is relative to

the pertinent buying influence equality of public monetary forms included that is swapping scale

vacillations willed settle the buying influence of a nation and subsequently influence essentially

on venture and trade(Aghevli (1991).

The condition with the expectation of complimentary exchange is that the ostensible

conversion standard between two nations ought to be equivalent to the proportion of the cost
levels in the two nations (Taylor; 1988), This approach accepts that balance genuine trade rates

stay consistent after some time and consequently, the ostensible swapping scale development

will in general counterbalance relative cost developments. The buying power hypothesis equality

hypothesis characterizes two harmony rate frameworks. The first is the short run harmony

swapping scale which is characterized, in this specific situation, as the rate that would exist

under a simply openly drifting conversion standard equilibrium. Second is the long-run harmony

that would yield equilibrium of instalment harmony throughout a time span in coordinating and

repeating variances yet to be determined of instalments (counting those of winning swapping

scale from the overall buying power in a cash are for the most part credited to issue of exchange

and assumptions in the merchandise market. A portion of the suspicions of PPP hypothesis

anyway are very ridiculous and questionable, for example the degree of proficiency is different

in nations as such there are conceding cost capabilities. (Argy and Frenkel, 1978)

ASSUMPTIONS OF PURCHASING POWER PARITY (PPP)

Perfect Competition and No Transaction Costs: PPP assumes perfect competition in the

markets and the absence of transaction costs. In a world with perfect competition, identical goods

should have the same price in different countries when expressed in a common currency. This

assumption suggests that any deviation in prices (exchange rates) is temporary and will be

eliminated by market forces in the long run.

Identical Goods and No Barriers to Trade: PPP assumes that goods are identical across

countries, and there are no barriers to trade. This means that the same basket of goods should

have the same price when expressed in a common currency. By assuming identical goods and no
trade restrictions, PPP simplifies the analysis, focusing on the relative price levels of goods in

different countries.

CRITICISMS OF PURCHASING POWER PARITY (PPP)

Ignoring Non-Tradable Goods and Services: PPP assumes that all goods and services are

tradable and ignores non-tradable items. In reality, some goods and services, such as housing or

local services, are not easily tradable and can have significant price differences across countries.

This limitation makes PPP less accurate in predicting exchange rates, especially when dealing

with economies where non-tradable goods constitute a substantial part of the overall

consumption basket.

Short-Term Deviations and Adjustment Lags: PPP often does not hold in the short term due

to factors like market imperfections, transaction costs, and sticky prices. Additionally,

adjustment processes in real-world markets may take a significant amount of time. The failure of

PPP in the short term challenges its usefulness for predicting actual exchange rates accurately,

especially during periods of economic volatility or when markets do not function perfectly.

2.2.1.3 The Balance of Payment Theory – This hypothesis specifies that under Free trade rates,

the swapping scale of the cash of a nation relies on its equilibrium of instalment. As indicated by

Jhingan (2004), a great equilibrium of instalments raises the conversion standard, while a

negative equilibrium of instalments diminishes the swapping scale. In this way, the hypothesis

suggests that the swapping not entirely set in stone by the interest for and supply of unfamiliar

trade.

The balance of payment model is another name for the traditional flow model. In this

model, the conversion scale is in balance when supply approaches interest for unfamiliar trade,
(Olisadebe,1991:56). The trade rates acclimate to adjust the interest for unfamiliar trade relies

upon the interest homegrown occupants have for homegrown merchandise and resources. With

the understanding that the unfamiliar requests for homegrown merchandise is resolved basically

by homegrown pay, relative pay assumes a part in resolved conversion scale under the stream

model. Since resources request can be said to request on distinction among homegrown and

unfamiliar loan fees differential is other significant determinants of the conversion scale in this

edge work.

This hypothesis specifies that under free trade rates, the conversion standard of the cash

of a nation relies on its equilibrium of instalment. A positive equilibrium of instalments raises the

swapping scale, while a negative equilibrium of instalments diminishes the conversion standard

(Jhingan 2004). Accordingly, the hypothesis infers that the swapping not set in stone by the

interest for and supply of unfamiliar trade. The overshooting of the exchange rate target and the

possibility of non-automatic substitutability between money and financial assets are the primary

drawbacks of either the traditional model or the portfolio balance model; this constraint set off

the development of the financial methodology.

2.2.2 Theories of Balance of Payment

To communicate the equilibrium of instalments speculations, we take a gander at

different methodologies used to investigate the impacts of swapping scale unpredictability on the

equilibrium of instalments. These methodologies incorporate the flexibility approach, the

assimilation approach and the money related approach.

2.2.2.1 The Elasticity Approach


The Elasticity Approach in economics is associated with Alfred Marshall, a prominent

economist of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Alfred Marshall introduced the concept of

elasticity in his seminal work, "Principles of Economics," which was first published in 1890. In

this work, Marshall discussed the concept of price elasticity of demand, laying the groundwork

for what is now known as the Elasticity Approach in economic analysis. The Elasticity Approach

involves examining how changes in one variable, such as price, affect the quantity demanded or

supplied, considering the responsiveness of the quantity to changes in price or other relevant

factors. The flexibility approach centres around the exchange balance. It concentrates on the

responsiveness of the factors in the exchange and administrations account, comprising of imports

and products of product and administrations relative cost changes prompted by downgrading.

The flexibility way to deal with equilibrium of instalments is based on the Marshall Student

condition (Sodersten, 1980), which expresses that the amount of versatility of interest for a

nation's product and its interest for imports must be more noteworthy than solidarity for a

downgrading to decidedly affect a nation's equilibrium of instalments. On the off chance that the

amount of these flexibilities is more modest than solidarity, the nation can rather work on its

equilibrium of exchange by revaluation.

This approach basically recognizes the condition under which changes in conversion

scale would reestablish harmony of instalments (BOP) balance. It centres around the ongoing

record of the equilibrium of instalment and expects that the interest versatility be determined,

indicating the circumstances under which a downgrading would work on the equilibrium of

instalments. Crockett (1977) sees the versatility way to deal with equilibrium of instalments as

the most effective component of equilibrium of instalments changes and proposes the calculation

of interest flexibility as the scientific apparatus by which approaches in the trade field can be
picked, to shape the balance. Conversely, Ogun (1985) is of the view that most less evolved

nations who are exporters of unrefined components or essential items, and shippers of necessities

may not effectively apply depreciation for of remedying equilibrium of instalments

disequilibrium, on account of the low qualities for the flexibility of interest.

ASSUMPTIONS OF THE ELASTICITY APPROACH

Ceteris Paribus Assumption: Elasticity analysis often relies on the ceteris paribus assumption,

which means that other factors affecting demand or supply are held constant. This assumption

allows economists to isolate the impact of price changes on quantity demanded or supplied.

However, in real-world situations, various factors may change simultaneously, and the ceteris

paribus assumption may not always hold.

Linear Relationship: The Elasticity Approach often assumes a linear relationship between price

and quantity, particularly in introductory economic models. This assumption implies that the

percentage change in quantity demanded or supplied is constant for any given percentage change

in price. In reality, demand and supply relationships can exhibit non-linear behavior, and the

assumption of linearity may oversimplify the complexities of actual market dynamics.

CRITIQUES OF THE ELASTICITY APPROACH

Sensitivity to Measurement Issues: The Elasticity Approach heavily depends on accurate

measurement of price and quantity data. Small errors in measurement can lead to significant

variations in elasticity values. Additionally, elasticity measures might not always capture the full

complexity of consumer or producer behavior, especially when dealing with non-linear

relationships or dynamic market conditions.


Static Nature of Analysis: Elasticity analysis often assumes a static relationship between price

and quantity, neglecting the dynamics and adjustments that occur over time. In reality, markets

are dynamic, and factors such as consumer preferences, technology, and external shocks can

influence elasticity over different time periods. The static nature of elasticity analysis might

oversimplify the evolving nature of economic systems. It's essential to recognize that while the

Elasticity Approach provides valuable insights into how changes in price affect quantity

demanded or supplied, it is based on certain assumptions that may not always align perfectly

with the complexities of real-world economic phenomena. Critics often emphasize the need for a

nuanced understanding of these assumptions and the limitations they impose on the applicability

of elasticity analysis.

2.2.2.2 The Absorption Approach

The Absorption Approach, also known as the Absorption Theory of Income, was

propounded by economist Sir John Richard Hicks. He introduced this economic concept in the

year 1937 in his book "Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation." The

Absorption Approach is a Keynesian economic theory that focuses on the relationship between

aggregate demand and national income. Hicks's work contributed to the development and

understanding of Keynesian economics during the early to mid-20th century. This approach

immediately proposes that downgrading would possibly decidedly affect the equilibrium of

exchange if the penchant to assimilate is lower than the rate at which degrading would actuate

expansions in the public result of labour and products. It subsequently advocates the need to

accomplish intentional decrease of ingestion ability to go with money depreciation. The essential
precept of this approach is that an ideal calculation of value flexibility may not be sufficient to

create an equilibrium of instalments outcome coming about because of cheapening, on the off

chance that degrading doesn't prevail with regards to decreasing homegrown consumption. The

methodology harps on the public pay relationship created be Keynes and it attempts to figure out

its suggestion on equilibrium of instalments (Machlup, 1955).

ASSUMPTIONS OF THE ABSORPTION APPROACH

Full Employment: The Absorption Approach assumes that the economy is operating at full

employment. In other words, it presupposes that all available resources, including labor, are fully

utilized. This assumption allows for a straightforward analysis of the relationship between

aggregate demand and national income.

Stable Relationships: Another assumption is that the relationships between different

components of aggregate demand (consumption, investment, government spending, and net

exports) and national income remain stable over time. This assumption simplifies the analysis by

considering these relationships as constant, allowing for a more straightforward examination of

their impact on the economy.

CRITICISMS OF THE ABSORPTION APPROACH

Simplistic View of the Economy: Critics argue that the Absorption Approach provides a

simplistic view of the economy by assuming full employment. In reality, economies often

experience unemployment and underemployment, making the assumption of full employment

less realistic. This limitation reduces the model's applicability in situations where labor resources

are not fully utilized.


Inadequate Consideration of Supply-Side Factors: The Absorption Approach tends to focus

primarily on demand-side factors, such as changes in consumption and investment, while

overlooking supply-side factors. Critics argue that a comprehensive understanding of economic

dynamics should also consider factors such as technological changes, productivity

improvements, and supply-side constraints, which can significantly impact long-term economic

growth. It's important to note that while the Absorption Approach has been influential in

understanding the relationship between aggregate demand and national income, like any

economic model, it has its limitations and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world

economic systems.

2.2.2.3 The Monetary Approach

The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments was primarily developed by

economists Robert Mundell and Marcus Fleming in the early 1960s. Mundell and Fleming

independently introduced key elements of the Monetary Approach, with Mundell's work

published in 1961 and Fleming's in 1962. Their contributions laid the foundation for

understanding the relationship between monetary policy, exchange rates, and balance of

payments in open economies. The Mundell-Fleming model remains influential in the field of

international economics. The financial methodology centres around both the current and capital

records of the equilibrium of instalments. This is very not quite the same as the flexibility and

retention draws near, which centre around the ongoing record as it were. As brought up by

Crockett (1977), the general perspective on financial methodology makes it conceivable to look

at the equilibrium of instalments not just concerning the interest for labour and products, yet

additionally regarding the interest for the stock of cash. This approach likewise gives a

shortsighted clarification to the long run depreciation for the purpose of working on the
equilibrium of instalments, since debasement addresses a pointless and possibly mutilating

mediation during the time spent equilibrating monetary streams. Dhliwayo (1966) stresses that

the connection between the unfamiliar area and the homegrown area of an economy through the

working of the financial area can be followed by Humes David's cost stream component. The

accentuation here is that equilibrium of instalments disequilibrium is related with the

disequilibrium between the interest for and supply of cash, not entirely settled by factors, for

example, pay, loan fee, cost level (both homegrown and unfamiliar) and swapping scale. The

methodology additionally considers equilibrium of instalments to be respects global hold to be

related with awkward nature winning in the currency market. This is on the grounds that in a

decent swapping scale framework, an expansion in cash supply would prompt an expansion in

use in the types of expanded acquisition of unfamiliar labour and products by homegrown

occupants. To back such buys, a significant part of the unfamiliar stores would be spent, in this

manner deteriorating the equilibrium of instalments. As the unfamiliar hold streams out, cash

supply would keep on lessening until it rises to cash interest, so, all in all, financial balance is

reestablished and surge of unfamiliar trade save is halted.

On the other hand, abundance interest for cash would cause unfamiliar trade hold

inflows, homegrown financial development and at last equilibrium of instalment harmony

position is reestablished. The financial methodology is explicitly outfitted towards a clarification

of the general settlement of an equilibrium of instalments shortfall or excess. On the off chance

that the stockpile of cash increments through a development of homegrown credit, it will cause a

shortage yet to be determined of instalments, an expansion in the interest for products and

different resources and decline in the total in the economy.


ASSUMPTIONS OF THE MONETARY APPROACH TO THE BALANCE OF

PAYMENTS

Perfect Capital Mobility: The model assumes perfect capital mobility, suggesting that capital

flows freely across borders without any restrictions. This assumption simplifies the analysis by

focusing on the impact of monetary policy on exchange rates and the balance of payments

without considering potential capital controls or impediments.

Stable Money Demand Function: Another assumption is the stability of the money demand

function. The model assumes a stable relationship between the money supply, income, and

interest rates. This assumption allows for a straightforward analysis of the impact of changes in

the money supply on the balance of payments and exchange rates.

CRITICISMS OF THE MONETARY APPROACH TO THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS

Limited Role of Fiscal Policy: Critics argue that the model places disproportionate emphasis on

monetary policy, neglecting the potential impact of fiscal policy on the balance of payments and

exchange rates. In the real world, fiscal policies, such as government spending and taxation, can

influence the trade balance and exchange rates, but these are often sidelined in the Monetary

Approach.

Assumption of Price Flexibility: The model assumes that prices are flexible, allowing for easy

adjustment in response to changes in money supply and demand. In reality, prices may be sticky,

leading to slower adjustments and affecting the model's predictions, especially in the short run.
It's important to note that while these criticisms highlight potential limitations, the Monetary

Approach to the Balance of Payments remains a valuable framework for understanding the

relationship between monetary policy and key economic variables in an open economy.

2.2.3 The Theory of Exchange Rates on Imperfect Capital Markets

The theory exchange rate on imperfect capital markets is associated with Myron Scholes

and Joseph Stiglitz. Myron Scholes is a Canadian economist, while Joseph Stiglitz is an

American economist. They both contributed to the development and understanding of imperfect

capital markets, where information is not perfectly available or markets are not perfectly

efficient. The specific year of the formulation of the theory is challenging to pinpoint precisely,

as economic theories often evolve over time through various contributions. However, their work

in this area gained prominence in the late 1960s and the 1970s. Myron Scholes is also well-

known for his contributions to options pricing, particularly through the Black-Scholes-Merton

model developed in 1973. Joseph Stiglitz, on the other hand, has made significant contributions

to various fields in economics and has been awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in

2001.

The influence that imperfect capital markets have on currency exchange rates is the

subject of the theory of exchange rates on imperfect capital markets. Information asymmetry,

transaction costs, and restrictions on capital mobility can have a significant impact on exchange

rate dynamics in these circumstances. This hypothesis digs into what blemishes in capital

business sectors mean for the organic market for monetary standards, subsequently affecting

trade rates. It considers situations where market members might not approach wonderful data or

may confront snags in executing exchanges consistently.


ASSUMPTIONS OF THE THEORY OF EXCHANGE RATES ON IMPERFECT

CAPITAL MARKETS

Imperfect Information: The theory may assume that market participants have imperfect

information regarding economic fundamentals, leading to uncertainties and information

asymmetries. Imperfect capital markets often involve information disparities, affecting how

investors perceive and react to economic events, which, in turn, influences exchange rates.

Incomplete Markets: The theory might assume that financial markets are incomplete, meaning

not all possible financial instruments or assets are available for trade. Incomplete markets can

lead to limitations in risk-sharing opportunities and impact how investors hedge against currency

risk, affecting exchange rate dynamics.

CRITICISMS OF THE THEORY OF EXCHANGE RATES ON IMPERFECT CAPITAL

MARKETS

Realism and Generalizability: Critics may argue that the assumptions made about imperfect

capital markets are too generic and lack specificity, making it challenging to apply the theory

universally. Without clear delineation of the imperfections and their mechanisms, the theory may

struggle to provide actionable insights applicable across various economic contexts.

Endogeneity Issues: Critics might point out endogeneity problems, where the theory may not

adequately address how market participants' actions influence the very imperfections assumed in

the model. If the theory overlooks the feedback loop between market behavior and

imperfections, it might not capture the dynamic nature of exchange rate movements in imperfect
capital markets. Remember, these assumptions and criticisms are generalized and may not

precisely align with the specific theory you're referring to. For a more accurate assessment,

providing the name of the theory and its proponent would be crucial.

KEY ASPECTS OF THE THEORY INCLUDE

Information Asymmetry: Defective capital business sectors frequently include variations in the

accessibility of data among market members. The hypothesis looks at what such data deviation

means for the arrangement of assumptions and, thus, swapping scale developments.

Transaction Costs: In blemished capital business sectors, exchange expenses can obstruct the

smooth progression of money exchanging. This hypothesis dissects how exchange costs impact

the ability of market members to take part in cash exchanges, affecting conversion scale

harmony.

Capital Mobility Restrictions: A few business sectors might force limitations on the

development of capital, restricting the capacity of financial backers to uninhibitedly trade

monetary standards. The hypothesis investigates what these limitations mean for the general

market interest elements in the unfamiliar trade market.

Understanding the hypothesis of trade rates on flawed capital business sectors is pivotal

for appreciating the intricacies of cash valuation in certifiable situations. Specialists and

policymakers utilize this structure to evaluate the effect of market blemishes on swapping scale

changes and to foster procedures to oversee such difficulties in global monetary business sectors.

2.2.4 The Comparative Advantage Theory


The Comparative Advantage Theory was propounded by David Ricardo, a British

economist. He presented the theory in his seminal work "Principles of Political Economy and

Taxation," published in 1817. The theory explains how countries benefit from specializing in the

production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage, leading to

increased overall efficiency and global economic welfare. The exchange hypothesis was quick to

show the significance of specialization underway and division of work in view of the possibility

of hypothesis of outright benefit. Smith (1976) in his well-known book: " The concepts of

absolute advantage that were presented in The Wealth of Nations were crucial to the early

development of classical theory regarding international trade. It is for the most part concurred

that David Ricardo is the maker of the traditional hypothesis of global exchange, despite the fact

that many substantial thoughts regarding exchange existed before his standards. Ricardo showed

that the possible additions from exchange are far more noteworthy than Smith imagined in the

idea of outright benefit. In this hypothesis the critical variable used to make sense of worldwide

exchange designs is innovation. The hypothesis holds that a distinction in similar expenses of

creation is the vital condition for the presence of worldwide exchange. However, this distinction

reflects a difference in production methods. As per this hypothesis, mechanical contrasts between

nations decide worldwide division of work and utilization and exchange designs. It holds that

exchange is gainful to all partaking nations. This end is against the perspective about exchange

held by the precept of mercantilism where it is contended that the guideline and arranging of

monetary action are proficient method for encouraging the objectives of country. David Ricardo

hypothesis shows the way that nations can acquire from exchange regardless of whether one of

them is less useful than one more to all products that it produces.

ASSUMPTIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE THEORY


Constant Opportunity Costs: One of the key assumptions is that opportunity costs remain

constant. This implies that as a country shifts resources from producing one good to another, the

opportunity cost of producing the second good remains the same. In reality, opportunity costs

can fluctuate due to changes in technology, resource availability, or other factors.

Labor as the Sole Input: The theory assumes that labor is the only factor of production and that

it is homogeneous within each country but can differ between countries. This simplifying

assumption helps illustrate the basic principles of comparative advantage. However, in reality,

multiple factors of production, such as capital and technology, contribute to the production

process, and their inclusion can lead to more complex trade dynamics.

CRITICISMS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE THEORY

Ignoring Factor Mobility: The theory assumes immobility of factors of production, especially

labor. In reality, factors of production can move across industries and countries. If factors are

highly mobile, the advantages of specialization may be less pronounced, and other trade theories,

like the Heckscher-Ohlin model, may provide a more accurate representation.

Neglecting Non-economic Factors: Comparative advantage theory focuses primarily on

economic factors and assumes that nations make rational decisions based solely on economic

considerations. Critics argue that this approach overlooks other non-economic factors, such as

political considerations, national security concerns, and social implications of trade, which can

significantly impact trade decisions. It's essential to note that while these assumptions and

criticisms highlight some limitations of the Comparative Advantage Theory, it remains a

valuable framework for understanding the benefits of international trade.

2.3 Empirical Review


Various researchers and scientists have checked on the determinants of equilibrium of

instalments in various nations. The following are a portion of the worldwide and neighbourhood

surveys did by scientists. In late period,

Rose (2010), analysed the observational connection between the genuine compelling

conversion scale and total genuine exchange balance for major OECD nations the post-Bretton

Woods time. Utilizing different parametric and nonparametric strategies, the outcomes

recommend that there is little proof that the conversion scale fundamentally influence the

exchange balance.

Dufrenot and Yehoue (2005) in their examination found that downgrading of conversion

standard critically affects the balance of payment position since it works on the outside stores of

the nation’s completing the debasement of their monetary forms. Basically, enhancement for the

save position is an enhancement for the equilibrium of instalments position. All the more thus,

Ogiogo (2016) found significant weakening yet to be determined of instalments position of

emerging nations is caused among different variables as, deteriorating terms of exchange,

extreme imports and over valuation of the monetary forms.

Aliyu (2008) saw that nations encountering balance of payment issues ought to set out on

cheapening or continuous deterioration of her cash to impact a change on the instalment’s

concerns, since degrading which is the decrease of the worth of one's nation is supposed to

fundamentally affect worldwide capital developments.

Imoisi (2012) analysed the patterns in Nigeria's balance of payments position from 1970-

2010 utilizing an econometric examination. The review completed a different relapse

examination involving the conventional least square technique for both straight and log direct
structure. The outcomes showed that the autonomous factors showed up with the right sign and

accordingly, adjust to monetary hypothesis, however the connection between balance of payment

and expansion rate was not huge. Nonetheless, the connection between balance of payment,

conversion scale and loan cost were critical.

Salasevicius and Vaicious (2013) utilized the VECM to test for Marshall Lerner

condition in the conversion scale exchange balance relationship the Baltic States. The

investigation discovered that Lithuania met the Marshall-Lerner condition, yet Estonia didn't,

while the aftereffect of Latria was equivocal.

Ogbonna (2011) analysed the observational connection between the genuine swapping

scale and total exchange balance Nigeria. The review tried Marshall Lerner conditions to check

whether it is fulfilled for Nigeria. The outcome showed no co-incorporation for the exchange

balance model. The outcomes further uncovered that deterioration/debasement further develops

balance of payment and Marshall-Lerner (ML) condition holds for Nigeria.

Mungami (2012) inspected the impacts of conversion scale progression on the BOP of an

emerging nation utilizing an instance of Kenya. He noticed that swapping scale is one of the

macroeconomic basics that assume a key part in guaranteeing that the economy of a nation stays

serious in the global market. It assumes a significant part of effectively dispensing and utilization

of financial assets consequently guaranteeing a nation stays serious remotely. The trade rates are

significant in progress of the balance of payment. The outcomes showed that the conversion

scale progression had worked on the general BOP yet it had not superior the ongoing record or

decreased the equilibrium of import/export imbalance. The review figured out that the

conversion standard progression adversely affected the organization's commodity deals because
of wide changes that made arranging hard and misfortunes that were caused because of variance.

Most organizations utilized no supporting instrument consequently endured the worst part of the

rise and downswing of the peddling. The organizations figured in their costs the antagonistic

impact of the conversion standard change. The review suggested that the National Bank of

Kenya use target zones to lessen wide variance of the pushing against different monetary

standards.

Umoru and Odjegba (2013) examined the connection between swapping scale

misalignment and balance of payments (BOP) mal-change in Nigeria over the example time of

1973 to 2012 utilizing the vector mistake revision econometric demonstrating method and

Granger Causality Tests. The review uncovered that swapping scale misalignment displayed a

positive effect on the Nigeria's balance of payments position. The Granger pair-wise causality

test result showed a unidirectional causality running from conversion scale misalignment to

adjust of instalments change in Nigeria at the 1% level.

Dare and Adekunle (2020) examined what conversion standard arrangement means for

balance of payment in Nigeria. They embraced Autoregressive Circulated Slack (ARDL) model,

like Nwanosike et al (2017).

Olanipekun and Ogunsola (2017) to look at both the short run and long run connection

between the factors from 1985 to 2018. The aftereffect of ARDL uncovered that swapping scale

and exchange receptiveness significantly affect balance of payment in Nigeria. The concentrate

additionally tried for bearing of causality between balance of payment and swapping scale and

the experimental outcome showed no causality between them.


Limbore and Moore (2019) inspected the impact of trade rates on balance of payments

utilizing auxiliary information from the RBI (National Bank of India) covering the time of 2001

to 2018. Factors utilized are send out, import, exchange account balance, current record

equilibrium and by and large equilibrium information which were examined utilizing

unmistakable strategy. The investigation discovered that conversion standard was profoundly

temperamental which harmed balance of payments.

Nwanekezie and Onyiro (2018) analysed the impact of unpredictability in conversion

standard on balance of payment in Nigeria somewhere in the range of 1981 and 2016.

Notwithstanding, the review wound up utilizing mistake revision model (ECM) to assess the

connection between conversion standard and balance of payment. Co-mix test was directed

utilizing Johansen co-incorporation test and the outcome showed proof of long run connection

between the factors. The ECM result showed that swapping scale affects balance of payment in

Nigeria inside the time of study.

Oladipupo, A. O. furthermore, Onotaniyohuwo, Confidence Ogheneovo (2011)

observationally explored the effect of conversion scale on the Nigeria Outside area (the balance

of payment position) utilizing the Customary Least Square (OLS) strategy for assessment for

information covering the period somewhere in the range of 1970 and 2008. They found that

swapping scale fundamentally affects the balance of payments position. The conversion scale

deterioration can really prompt better balance of payments position on the off chance that

financial discipline is forced. We likewise figured out that ill-advised designation and abuse of

homegrown credit, financial indiscipline, and absence of fitting use control arrangements

because of centralization of force in government are a portion of the reasons for tireless balance

of payments shortfalls in Nigeria.


Azeez, Kolapo and Ajayi (2012) likewise analyse the impact of conversion scale

unpredictability on macroeconomic execution in Nigeria from 1986 to 2010. The model formed

portrays Genuine Gross domestic product as the reliant variable while Swapping scale (EXR),

balance of payment (BOP) and Oil Income (OREV) are proxied as autonomous factors. It

utilizes the Customary Least Square (OLS) and Johansen co-incorporation assessment

procedures to test for the short and long runs impacts individually. The outcomes show that oil

income and balance of payment apply adverse consequences while swapping scale

unpredictability contributes decidedly to Gross domestic product over the long haul. They

suggested that the financial specialists ought to seek after strategies that would check expansion

and guarantee security of conversion scale.

Nawaz Ahmad et al (2014) led a review pointed toward deciding the effect of swapping

scale on balance of payment, through examination of Pakistan Economy. In this manner, to

discover the unpredictability of trade rates and its propensity on balance of payment, month to

month information was gathered of Conversion scale and balance of payment from the authority

site of State Bank of Pakistan. The information included seven-year time span from January

2007 to October 2013. To accomplish the reason different test, for example, unit root, ARDL and

Granger causality test are utilized which helped us came to the determination that there is a huge

and positive connection between Conversion scale and BOP, consequently we could presume

that Strength of trade rates might establish a positive climate by empowering the venture, and

this can further develop balance of payment.

Martins Iyoboyi (2014) looked at how exchange rate depreciation affected Nigeria's

balance of payments (BOP) between 1961 and 2012. The examination depends on a multivariate

vector mistake remedy structure. The BOP, the exchange rate, and other variables associated
with it were found to have a long-term equilibrium relationship. The exact outcomes are

agreeable to bidirectional causality among BOP and different factors utilized. Consequences of

the summed-up drive reaction capabilities recommend that one standard deviation development

on swapping scale decreases positive BOP in the medium and long haul, while aftereffects of the

fluctuation decay demonstrate that a critical variety in Nigeria's BOP isn't because of changes in

conversion scale developments. The approach suggestion is that conversion scale devaluation

which has been prevalent in Nigeria since the mid-1980s has not been exceptionally valuable in

advancing the country's positive BOP. It is suggested that development in the genuine area ought

to be improved to upgrade sends out, make business, check expansion and diminish destitution,

while cutting non-useful imports, drawing in unfamiliar confidential venture and carrying out all

around facilitated macroeconomic strategies that influence expansion decidedly and animate

conversion scale security.

Anthony Ilegbinosa Imoisi (2015) analysed the effect of swapping scale varieties and

balance of payments position in Nigeria under controlled and liberated periods. achieving a

reasonable exchange rate over time and improving Nigeria's balance of payments position. The

principal objective of this study was to examinations strategies started by the Central Legislature

of Nigeria in achieving a reasonable swapping scale and working on the balance of payments

position. To accomplish this goal, the econometric methods of normal least squares, co-mix and

mistake revision system were utilized to break down the obtained information. The outcomes

showed that swapping scale merely affected the balance of payments position during the

liberated period than the managed period in Nigeria. The study recommends that governments

increase capital expenditure to improve the country's balance of payments based on the findings;

commodities ought to be animated and differentiated in the non-oil area like horticulture and
assembling area; a contractionary money related strategy ought to be carried out to deter

importation of extravagant products and the Naira ought to be cheapened to make trades less

expensive in the worldwide market.

Using annual data from 1971 to 2012, Okwuchukwu Odili (2014) examined the impact of

exchange rate on Nigeria's balance of payments. The observational philosophy utilized

autoregressive disseminated slack (ARDL) co-joining assessment procedure to distinguish

conceivable long-run and short-run dynamic connection between the factors utilized in the

model. The concentrate additionally tried the Marshall-Lerner (ML) condition to check whether

it is fulfilled for Nigeria. The outcomes gave proof for a positive and measurably huge

relationship over the long haul and furthermore a positive however genuinely irrelevant

relationship in the short-run between balance of payment and conversion standard. The outcomes

further uncovered that deterioration/degrading further develops balance of payment and that

Marshall-Lerner (ML) condition remains alive for Nigeria. The review suggests approaches that

will deter extreme importation and advance motivation-based trade advancement programs. It

further suggests enhancement of the economy and the advancement of enterprising improvement

in Nigeria.

Delimus, (2018) analysed the impact of swapping scale on balance of payments in

Nigeria from 1999 to 2016 utilizing Autoregressive Appropriated Slack (ARDL) approach.

Discoveries from the review uncovered that ostensible conversion standard affected Nigeria's

balance of payments.

Nwanosike., Uzoechina, Ebenyi, and Ishiwu (2017) utilized multivariate relapse model to

assess the impacts of downgrading of homegrown money on balance of payments in Nigeria


utilizing Marshall-Student (ML) condition from 1970 to 2014. That's what the outcome

uncovered, cheapening of conversion scale affected balance of payments (BOP) through

equilibrium of exchange component.

Olanipekun and Ogunsola (2017) explored what swapping scale changes mean for all out

balance of payments, current record equilibrium and capital record in Nigeria. They creators

utilized Autoregressive Dispersed Slacks (ARDL) bound co-reconciliation to analyse short-run

and long impacts of swapping scale on exchange balance. It was found that conversion standard

appreciation influences BOP and current record balance adversely. Be that as it may, no

measurably massive impact of swapping scale on capital record was gotten while expansion rate

was found to affect BOP in the country.

Lamsso and Masoomzadeh (2017) concentrated on the effect of swapping scale on the

balance of payments. The outcomes upheld the presence of the J - bend in Sweden, South Africa,

Bulgaria, Iran, and Egypt with the end goal that expansion in conversion standard weakens the

travel industry pay, and after the essential periods, the increment further develops the travel

industry pay.

Ogbonna (2016) analysed the observational connection between the genuine conversion

scale and total exchange equilibrium of Nigeria. This study examines whether Nigeria meets the

Marshal Learner conditions. The findings indicate that the trade balance model lacks co-

integration. In addition, the findings demonstrate that Nigeria satisfies the Marshall-Learner

(ML) condition and that depreciation and devaluation enhance trade balance. This is in inversion

with exact the proof for Nigeria has been conflicting in either dismissing or supporting ML

conditions.
Imoughele and Ismaila, (2015) showed that the swapping scale has impacted the

equilibrium of instalments in Nigeria; likewise, expansion adversely affects the equilibrium of

instalments steadiness in Nigeria.

Osisanwo, (2015) in his contention, showed that an expansion in GDP and financing

costs lead to a more prominent equilibrium of instalment in Nigeria. The equilibrium of

instalments upgraded financial development in Nigeria.

Nwanosikeetal (2017) investigated the impact of domestic currency devaluation on the

balance of payments. Hence, this study is filling a hole as by examining the effect of Conversion

scale (EXR) on Equilibrium of Instalment (BOP) which different examinations couldn't fill as

respects to the degree.

Robert Mundell (1970), Mundell's empirical research on exchange rates challenged

prevailing Keynesian views in the field of international economics. The method employed was

Time-Series Analysis, with the key variable being the exchange rate. Mundell's central concept

was the theory of optimal currency areas, exploring the conditions under which regions benefit

from sharing a common currency. His findings supported the notion that regions with high

economic integration are more likely to experience favorable outcomes by adopting a common

currency.

Mundell's research delved into the dynamics of exchange rates by considering factors

such as interest rates, inflation rates, and government policies. Through his analysis, he

demonstrated the intricate relationship between monetary policy and exchange rate movements.

His work underscored the importance of considering both domestic and international factors in
crafting effective monetary policies, providing a nuanced understanding of the challenges faced

by policymakers in a globalized economy.

Furthermore, Mundell's contributions extended to fiscal policy, where he explored the

impact of government spending and taxation on exchange rates. His research advocated for a

comprehensive approach to economic policy that integrates both monetary and fiscal

considerations, emphasizing the need for coordination between these policy tools to achieve

optimal outcomes.

As a Nobel laureate in Economic Sciences (1999), Mundell's empirical research and

theoretical innovations solidified his position as a leading figure in international economics. His

theories not only challenged existing paradigms but also provided practical insights that have

influenced policymakers in navigating the complexities of a globalized financial system.

Mundell's work continues to be a foundational reference in discussions surrounding optimal

currency areas, exchange rate dynamics, and the holistic approach to economic policy.

Milton Friedman (1976), Friedman's empirical research on exchange rates challenged

prevailing Keynesian views in the United States. The method employ was Time-Series Analysis

and variable used is Inflation Rate, his concept was Relationship between Money Supply and

Inflation, and the findings supporting Milton Friedman's monetary theory by establishing a

robust positive correlation between changes in money supply and fluctuations in the inflation

rate. This finding reinforced the argument that controlling money supply is crucial for managing

inflation. His work on the quantity theory of money and the permanent income hypothesis
influenced policy discussions, emphasizing the importance of monetary factors in determining

exchange rates.

Paul Samuelson (1948), Samuelson's empirical research on Keynesian economics

challenged prevailing economic views in the mid-20th century. The method employed was a

blend of mathematical rigor and practical relevance, introducing Keynesian principles to a broad

audience through his influential textbook, "Economics: An Introductory Analysis." The variable

used was economic fluctuations, and Samuelson's concept was the application of Keynesian

principles to understand and address economic challenges. The findings supported Samuelson's

work by establishing Keynesian economics as a dominant framework for policymaking,

emphasizing the dynamic nature of economic systems.

In addition to his contributions to Keynesian economics, Samuelson's research on trade

theory added depth to international economics. His work on the Heckscher–Ohlin model and

gains from trade contributed to a refined understanding of comparative advantage and its

implications for global trade patterns. The methodological rigor and commitment to empirical

research showcased in his work set a standard in the field, emphasizing the importance of

adapting economic theories to changing real-world conditions.

Samuelson's influence extended to public finance and welfare economics, where his work

on public goods, externalities, and the theory of public expenditure expanded the economic

toolkit for policymakers. Overall, Paul Samuelson's empirical research and theoretical

innovations have left a lasting impact on the landscape of economics, influencing generations of

economists and policymakers and shaping our understanding of economic challenges.


John Williamson (1980), Williamson's empirical research on economic policy,

particularly the formulation of the "Washington Consensus," challenged prevailing theoretical

views in international development. The method employed was a comprehensive analysis of

policy prescriptions, and the variable used is the set of economic reforms. Williamson's concept

was the "Washington Consensus," and the findings supported Williamson's policy

recommendations by establishing a robust framework for market-oriented reforms, fiscal

discipline, and trade liberalization. This finding reinforced the argument that adopting these

policy measures is crucial for fostering economic growth and stability in developing nations.

Williamson's work on international economic policies and structural reforms influenced the field

of development economics, emphasizing the importance of these highlighted factors in the

context of globalization and economic development.

Rudiger Dornbusch (1976), Dornbusch's empirical research on exchange rates challenged

prevailing theoretical views in the field of international economics. The method employed was

Time-Series Analysis, and the variable used is Exchange Rates. Dornbusch's concept was the

Overshooting Model, and the findings supported Dornbusch's theory by establishing a robust

relationship between changes in exchange rates and short-term fluctuations. This finding

reinforced the argument that exchange rates can exhibit temporary overshooting before reaching

their long-term equilibrium. Dornbusch's work on international monetary economics and the

overshooting model influenced the understanding of exchange rate dynamics, emphasizing the

importance of short-term factors in determining exchange rates.

Jeffrey Frankel (1952-present), Frankel's research spans various empirical studies on

exchange rate determination. His contributions to the understanding of fundamentals, such as


interest rates, inflation differentials, and trade balances, have informed discussions on the factors

influencing currency values.

Jacob Viner (1892-1970), Viner's empirical contributions to the balance of payments

literature focused on the effects of trade policies and exchange rate regimes. His work laid the

groundwork for understanding the relationship between policy choices and a country's external

position.

Harry G. Johnson (1923-1977), Johnson's empirical studies delved into the dynamics of

the balance of payments, examining factors such as exchange rate movements and income

differentials. His work contributed to a better understanding of the sources of trade imbalances.

Michael Kalecki (1899-1970), Kalecki's empirical research added a distributional

perspective to the study of the balance of payments. His analyses of how income distribution

influences trade positions have provided insights into the social and economic aspects of

international economic relations.

Richard N. Cooper (1934-present), Cooper's empirical work covers a broad range of

topics in international economics, including exchange rates and current accounts. His research

has contributed to understanding the complexities of policy coordination and the challenges

associated with external adjustment.

Linda Goldberg (1956-present), Goldberg's empirical contributions have focused on the

changing landscape of international trade, including the role of global value chains. Her research

has provided insights into the interconnectedness of economies and the implications for the

balance of payments.
Menzie Chinn (1963-present), Chinn's empirical work spans various aspects of

international finance, particularly exchange rates and capital flows. His research often involves

econometric analyses, providing valuable insights into the relationships between economic

variables in the context of balance of payments dynamics.

Richard Clarida and Jordi Galí (1994), This seminal survey reviews various models of

exchange rate determination, including the monetary and portfolio balance approaches,

contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing exchange rates.

Richard H. Clarida and Mark P. Taylor (2003), The authors analyze the forward discount

anomaly, providing an overview of empirical evidence on the risk premium in currency markets

and shedding light on the efficiency of forward exchange rate markets.

W. Klein and Jay C. Shambaugh (2006), This study empirically investigates the impact of

exchange rate regimes on economic outcomes, contributing to the ongoing debate on the choice

between fixed and flexible exchange rate systems.

Richard Lyons (2001), Lyons' work focuses on the microstructure of currency markets,

providing insights into the role of order flow, bid-ask spreads, and market liquidity in shaping

exchange rate movements.

Lucio Sarno and Mark P. Taylor (2002), Sarno and Taylor assess the performance of

exchange rate models, challenging the prevailing skepticism, and emphasizing the usefulness of

models in understanding currency movements.


Charles Engel and Kenneth D. West (2005), The study explores the co-movements

between exchange rates and economic fundamentals, offering insights into both long-term

relationships and short-term dynamics in the currency markets.

Torben G. Andersen and Tim Bollerslev (1998), Andersen and Bollerslev investigate the

impact of macroeconomic announcements on exchange rates and interest rates at high

frequencies, contributing to our understanding of market reactions to information releases.

Karen K. Lewis (1999), Lewis re-examines the International Capital Asset Pricing Model

(CAPM), providing empirical evidence on the relationship between currency risk and expected

returns, contributing to the literature on international finance.

Paul De Grauwe (2018), De Grauwe critically reviews conventional macro approaches to

exchange rate economics, highlighting their limitations and proposing alternative frameworks for

understanding currency movements.

Charles Engel (1996), Engel addresses the forward discount puzzle, examining potential

explanations for the deviation of forward exchange rates from future spot rates, contributing to

the literature on exchange rate anomalies.

M. Dominguez and Freyan Pan (2013), Dominguez and Pan's study investigates the

microstructure of foreign exchange markets, exploring the role of order flow, market depth, and

bid-ask spreads in shaping exchange rate dynamics.

Markus K. Brunnermeier, Stefan Nagel, and Lasse H. Pedersen (2008), The authors

empirically examine the relationship between carry trades and currency crashes, shedding light

on the risks associated with these investment strategies in the foreign exchange market.
Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff (1995), Obstfeld and Rogoff investigate the

rationale behind countries pegging their exchange rates to gain credibility in implementing

effective monetary policies, providing insights into the trade-offs involved.

Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff (2000), The authors explore the exchange rate

disconnect puzzle in a general equilibrium framework, analyzing the factors contributing to the

lack of correlation between exchange rates and fundamentals.

Peter K. Schott (2004), Schott's study empirically assesses the impact of exchange rate

volatility on international trade, providing insights into how uncertainty in currency markets

affects trade flows.

Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti and Olivier Blanchard (2009), This study investigates the

common causes of global imbalances and the financial crisis, exploring how factors such as

savings-investment imbalances contributed to the crisis.

Paul Krugman (2009), Krugman's analysis focuses on the causes, consequences, and

potential remedies for trade imbalances, offering policy insights to address global economic

disparities.

Linda Goldberg and Joseph Tracy (2002), empirical research on exchange rates

challenged prevailing theoretical views in the field of international economics. The method

employed was Time-Series Analysis, and the variable used is Exchange Rates. Their concept

was the Relationship between Trade Balances and Exchange Rates, and the findings supported

Goldberg and Tracy's hypothesis by establishing a robust positive correlation between changes in

exchange rates and fluctuations in trade balances. This finding reinforced the argument that

controlling exchange rates is crucial for managing trade imbalances.


Their work on the dynamics of exchange rates and trade balances influenced international

economic discussions, emphasizing the importance of considering both monetary and trade

factors in understanding global economic trends. The research contributed to shaping policy

discussions and provided valuable insights for policymakers navigating the complexities of

exchange rate management. Linda Goldberg and Joseph Tracy's empirical research in 2002

significantly contributed to the understanding of exchange rates and their impact on trade

balances, challenging and reshaping prevailing views in the field of international economics.

Goldberg and Tracy empirically compare the international competitiveness of Chinese and

Indian manufacturing industries, shedding light on the factors influencing their trade

performance.

Olivier Jeanne and Romain Rancière (2006), The study contrasts precautionary and

mercantilist views on international reserves, providing theoretical insights and empirical

evidence to understand the motives behind holding reserves.

Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff (2005), Obstfeld and Rogoff explore the impact of

exchange rate movements on U.S. foreign debt, contributing to discussions on the implications of

currency fluctuations for a country's

2.4 Gaps in the literature

The current writing on trade rates and balance of payments uncovers holes that warrant

further investigation. A huge exclusion is the conflicting detailing of strategies, upsetting precise

examination. Many investigations need subtleties on measurable bundles, hindering replicability.

Also, the fixation on unambiguous nations, similar to Nigeria and Pakistan, brings up issues

about more extensive pertinence. Fleeting restrictions, zeroing in on slender time spans, dark
comprehension of long-haul patterns. The oversight of outside elements and restricted

investigation of strategy suggestions make holes. Dismissing contemporary areas and

administrations corresponding to trade rates is striking. There's true capacity for a more

exhaustive examination of swapping scale instability's ramifications for equilibrium of

instalments. Near research on how assorted nations answer conversion standard changes could

improve understanding. These holes feature regions for future exploration.

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.0 Introduction

The fundamental motivation behind this work is to get with the impact of swapping scale

on equilibrium of instalment in Nigeria. The following goals are the focus of this study: To
analyse the impact of exchange rate on balance of payment in Nigeria. To examine the trend of

exchange rate and balance of payment in Nigeria. This segment talks about the strategy and

methods for gathering and investigating information. By and large, the detail of the financial

model depends on monetary hypothesis and the accessible information connecting with the

review. The ex-post facto research design is essentially what this study used for its research. It is

utilized when the scientist means to decide cause-impact connection between the reliant and free

factors with the end goal of laying out a causal connection between them.

3.1 Theoretical Framework

The paper is depended on purchasing power equality (PPP). The thought behind

purchasing power equality is that a unit of cash ought to have the option to purchase similar

bushel of merchandise in one country as the same measure of unfamiliar money at the going

swapping scale in an outside country, so there is equality in the buying influence of the unit of

cash across the two economies. Coakley, Flood, Fuertes, & Taylor (2005) stated that comparing

the prices of similar or identical goods from the basket in the two countries is an easy way to

determine whether PPP differences exist.

Hence, following the model determination of Oladipupo and Onotaniyohuwo (2011) with slight

change, the numerical connection between trade rates and equilibrium of instalments is indicated

as:

BOP = f (GDP, EXR, INFL, INTR, INFR, CPI, MS) …………………………… (1)

Where;

BOP = Balance of payments


GDP = Gross Domestic Product

EXR = Exchange Rates

INFL = Inflation Rates,

INTR = Interest Rates

INFR = Infrastructure

MS = Money Supply

CPI = Consumer Price Index

Specifying equation (1) in econometric form we have:

RBOP = β0 + β1GDPt + β2EXRt + β3INFLt + β4INTRt + β5INFRt + β6CPIt + β7MSt + t

Where;

t = Denotes the white noise error term

β0 = Is a constant parameter, while

β1, β2, β3, β4, β5, β6, β7 = Are the parameter of coefficients.

They are the slope of the graph that measures the change in the BOP as a result of a unit change

in Gross Domestic Product, Exchange Rates, Inflation Rates, Interest Rates, Infrastructure,

Money Supply, Capital Price Index.

3.2 Model Specification


This exploration model is determined from the assessment of the above hypothetical and

exact setting. The review utilized the Customary Least Square (OLS) and Johansen co-joining

assessment strategies to test for the short and long runs impacts individually. Factors

incorporates: Capital streams, Total national output (Gross domestic product), Exchange Adjusts,

Trade Rates, Expansion Rates, Loan costs, Foundation, Work Economic situations, Equilibrium

of instalments and Oil Income. The model figured out portrays Genuine Gross domestic product

as the reliant variable while Swapping scale (EXR), are proxied as free factors. The outcomes

show that oil income and equilibrium of instalment apply adverse consequences while swapping

scale unpredictability contributes decidedly to Gross domestic product over the long haul.

3.3 A prior Expectation

The Apriori expectations of the explanatory variables are as expressed as: β1, β2, β3, β4,

β5, β6, β7  ; that is gross domestic product, exchange rates, inflation rates, interest rates,

infrastructure, money supply, and capital price index are expected to have a positive impact on

Nigeria’s balance of payment.

3.4 Measurement of variable

The estimation of monetary factors includes evaluating and surveying these factors to

give significant bits of knowledge into the financial circumstances and elements of a country.

The estimation strategies shift contingent upon the particular variable, yet by and large include

the utilization of measurable and financial pointers.


VARIABLES MEASUREMENT

Balance of Payments The BoP is measured through various

components, including the current account

(exports and imports of goods and services),

capital account (financial investments), and

financial account (assets and liabilities).

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GDP is typically measured using three

approaches – the production approach,

income approach, and expenditure approach.

Exchange Rates Exchange rates are measured as the relative

value of one currency compared to another.

Inflation Rates Inflation rates are measured as the percentage

change in the general price level of goods and

services over a specific period.

Interest Rates Interest rates are measured as the cost of

borrowing or the return on investment.

Infrastructure Infrastructure quality is assessed based on

criteria such as transportation efficiency,

communication networks, and energy

availability.

Money Supply Money supply is typically categorized into


different levels (M0, M1, M2, M3) based on

the degree of liquidity. Central banks and

financial institutions monitor and report on

these measures to understand the money

circulating in the economy.

Consumer Price Index (CPI) CPI is calculated by comparing the current

cost of the basket of goods to a reference base

year. It is expressed as an index number, and

changes in the index reflect inflation or

deflation in consumer prices.

3.5 Estimation Techniques

In pursuit of my second objective, I aim to unravel the trend of exchange rates and

balance of payments in Nigeria. With the use of descriptive statistics, I intend to craft a visual

narrative using graphs that will not merely illustrate but breathe life into the evolving trends

within this economic realm. As for the second prong of my investigation, I will wield the

advanced weaponry of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) analysis, navigating the intricate

pathways of economic data to reveal the hidden patterns and unveil the secrets that lie beneath

the surface. This approach promises not just analysis but a revelation, as I embark on a journey

to decode the nuanced dynamics that shape the economic landscape of Nigeria.

3.6 Sources of Data


The research data employed in analysing the impacts of exchange rate on balance of payment

positions in Nigeria were secondary data, such as Balance of payments, Gross Domestic

Product, Exchange Rates, Inflation Rates, Infrastructure, Money Supply, Consumer Price

Index.

Balance of payments data is gotten from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Gross

Domestic Product data is sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin.

Exchange Rates data is derived from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Inflation

Rates data is also sorted from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Infrastructure data

is sourced from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Money Supply data is gotten

from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. Consumer Price Index data is sourced from

the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin.

You might also like