EXAMINING THE STUDENT'S ROLE: A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION INTO

THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

AND PERFORMANCE

SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

OF THE ACADEMIC REQUIRMENTS IN
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

Researcher

Johnlloyd De Manuel

April 2024

1
 Abstract

This research project aims to explore the historical background, current

state of knowledge, practical applications, future trends, and

controversies surrounding the research topic. It aims to address the

specific research problem in the larger context of the field, identify gaps

in existing literature, explore different theoretical frameworks, discuss

potential methodologies, and consider practical applications.

The research methodology should provide a concise overview of the

general context, a clear research question or objective, and a detailed

description of the chosen research methodology. It should also discuss

potential limitations and challenges associated with the chosen

methodology, evaluating the reliability and validity of the findings.

Justification for selecting a particular research methodology over

alternative methods can enhance credibility and showcase one's

rationale behind choosing an approach that best suits their objectives

and available resources.

The findings of the study have provided valuable insights into the topic

and have potential implications for various stakeholders. Based on these

findings, recommendations for future research can be made, such as

exploring the impact of different variables on the research problem or

conducting a comparative analysis with other similar studies. Overall,

2
this research contributes to the existing body of knowledge and opens

avenues for further investigation in this field.

3
 Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various industries, including

finance and healthcare, by enabling better decision-making through data

analysis and rethinking information integration. It includes machine

learning and narrow AI, which can surpass human learning and

reasoning abilities. However, some remain skeptical due to the

subjective nature of human experience. Understanding students'

interactions with AI-generated content is crucial for educators and

institutions to design adaptable teaching strategies and curriculums.

Addressing biases and ensuring inclusivity in AI algorithms and datasets

can lead to more effective educational practices. By studying student

interactions with AI, educators can gain insights into the benefits and

challenges of integrating AI technology into the classroom, inform

decisions about the appropriate use of AI tools, and guide educators in

providing necessary support. Understanding student perspectives can

also contribute to ongoing discussions about ethical considerations

surrounding AI in education, fostering a more inclusive and equitable

learning environment.

Statement of the Problem

Ensuring inclusivity in AI algorithms and datasets may lead to biased

outcomes, as it can be difficult to accurately represent the diverse

perspectives and experiences of all students in a standardized manner.

4
Standardized AI algorithms and datasets may inadvertently perpetuate

biases and inequalities in the education system. Without accurately

representing the diverse perspectives and experiences of all students, AI

tools may inadvertently discriminate against certain student populations

or reinforce existing biases. This raises ethical concerns and hampers

the goal of creating an inclusive and equitable learning environment.

Therefore, finding ways to ensure inclusivity in AI algorithms and

datasets is crucial to addressing this problem and fostering fair

educational opportunities for all students.

Purpose of the Study

To investigate the research problem of ensuring inclusivity in AI

algorithms and datasets, the study aims to explore ways to address

biases and inequalities in the education system. By accurately

representing diverse perspectives and experiences, the study seeks to

create an inclusive and equitable learning environment that provides fair

educational opportunities for all students. Additionally, the study intends

to identify ethical concerns related to AI tools in education and develop

strategies to mitigate discrimination and reinforce inclusivity.

Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the impact of these strategies

on student outcomes.

Significance of the Study

5
The significance of this study lies in its potential to address biases and

inequalities in the education system by utilizing diverse datasets and

perspectives. By creating an inclusive and equitable learning

environment, this study aims to provide fair educational opportunities for

all students. Additionally, it seeks to identify ethical concerns related to

AI tools in education and develop strategies to mitigate discrimination

and ensure inclusivity. Lastly, the study aims to evaluate the impact of

these strategies on student outcomes, further emphasizing their

significance in promoting a more equitable education system.

Theory or Theoretical Perspective

The theoretical perspective in this study is focused on addressing

inequalities in the education system and promoting a more equitable

learning environment. It aims to achieve this by utilizing diverse datasets

and perspectives, as well as identifying ethical concerns related to AI

tools in education. The study also includes the development of strategies

to mitigate discrimination and ensure inclusivity. The impact of these

strategies on student outcomes will be evaluated, highlighting their

significance in promoting a fair education system for all students. The

theoretical perspective in this study recognizes that inequalities in the

education system can have long-lasting effects on individuals and

society as a whole. By addressing these inequalities, the study seeks to

6
create a more level playing field where every student has equal

opportunities to succeed. Through the analysis of diverse datasets and

perspectives, the study aims to uncover hidden biases and systemic

barriers that may perpetuate inequity. Additionally, it acknowledges the

importance of considering ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI

tools in education, ensuring that these technologies are used

responsibly and do not further marginalize students. By developing

strategies to mitigate discrimination and promote inclusivity, the study

aims to foster a safe and supportive learning environment for all

students, regardless of their background or circumstances. Ultimately,

the evaluation of these strategies and their impact on student outcomes

will provide valuable insights into creating a fair and equitable education

system that benefits everyone. Some may argue that the ethical

concerns surrounding AI tools in education are outweighed by the

potential benefits they offer in terms of personalized learning and

improved academic outcomes for students.

Research Method

To investigate the problem of discrimination and promote inclusivity in

education, a study will be conducted. The study aims to create a safe

and supportive learning environment for all students, irrespective of their

background or circumstances. The strategies implemented will be

evaluated to understand their impact on student outcomes, which will aid

7
in developing a fair and equitable education system that benefits

everyone. The research method employed will involve analyzing the

ethical concerns surrounding AI tools in education in relation to the

potential benefits they offer, such as personalized learning and improved

academic outcomes for students. One counterargument to the input

could be that implementing AI tools in education may actually create an

unfair and inequitable system, as it may disproportionately benefit

students who have access to these tools and resources while leaving

behind those who do not.

Definition of Key Terms

1. Exploring the concept of a fair and equitable education system: The

article could delve into what it means to have a truly fair and equitable

education system, discussing key factors such as equal access to

resources, personalized learning opportunities, and improved academic

outcomes for all students.

2. Analyzing ethical concerns surrounding AI tools in education: The

writer can provide an in-depth examination of the potential ethical issues

that arise with the use of AI tools in education. This may include topics

such as data privacy, algorithmic biases, and the potential for

depersonalization of student-teacher interactions.

8
3. Investigating the benefits of AI tools in education: The article can

explore various advantages offered by AI tools in education, like

personalized learning experiences tailored to individual needs, enhanced

student engagement through interactive platforms, or improved

academic performance due to adaptive assessment techniques.

4. Examining potential disparities created by implementing AI tools: The

writer can discuss how implementing AI tools might create an unfair

educational landscape where students with access to these resources

receive better opportunities compared to those who don't. This section

could highlight the importance of ensuring equal distribution and

accessibility when integrating technology into classrooms.

5. Understanding counterarguments against using AI tools in education:

Besides addressing concerns about inequity, exploring other

counterarguments against using AI in education will add depth to the

topic. It may involve discussing perspectives such as skepticism around

replacing human teachers or fears regarding overreliance on technology

hindering essential skill development among students.

Delimitations

The study could focus on specific concerns and arguments against using

AI tools in education rather than a comprehensive analysis of all possible

counterarguments. Additionally, the study may only consider

9
perspectives from educators, policymakers, and relevant stakeholders in

the field of education. One counterargument against using AI in

education is that it may lead to a decrease in human interaction and

personalized instruction, which are important for students' social and

emotional development.

1. What specific concerns do educators, policymakers, and relevant

stakeholders have about the use of AI tools in education?

2. How does the use of AI in education impact human interaction and

personalized instruction?

3. What are the effects of decreased human interaction and personalized

instruction on students' social and emotional development?

4. Are there any potential solutions or strategies to mitigate the negative

effects of AI on essential skill development among students?

5. How do students perceive the use of AI tools in their learning

experiences, and what are their opinions on its impact on their skill

development?

Limitations of the Study

10
The limitations of this study include a narrow focus on specific concerns

and arguments against using AI tools in education, rather than a

comprehensive analysis of all possible counterarguments. Additionally,

the study only considers perspectives from educators, policymakers, and

relevant stakeholders in the field of education, potentially excluding

valuable insights from other individuals or groups. Another limitation is

that the study may not address the potential benefits of AI in education

or explore alternative solutions to address concerns about decreased

human interaction and personalized instruction.

Summary

One concern about using AI tools in education is that they may not take

into account the unique needs and preferences of individual students.

Critics argue that these tools may provide a one-size-fits-all approach to

education, which can hinder personalized instruction and limit student

engagement. Another argument against using AI in education is the

potential for decreased human interaction. Some educators argue that

face-to-face interaction between teachers and students is crucial for

building rapport, fostering critical thinking skills, and promoting social-

emotional development. Additionally, policymakers and stakeholders in

11
the field of education have expressed concerns about the ethical

implications of using AI tools, such as data privacy and security issues.

References

12