The document outlines the rules for a debate competition between academic sections taking place on January 20th, 2024. It states that each team will have two members to speak for and against the motion. Speeches will be 2 minutes each, and other sections can ask counter questions or present rebuttals. Scores will be based on the cumulative performance of the team members in their speeches and answers. Audience members from each section can also ask rebuttal questions. Rebuttal questions should be close-ended and highlight a flaw in the opposing team's argument, using examples. The topic for debate is also provided.
The document outlines the rules for a debate competition between academic sections taking place on January 20th, 2024. It states that each team will have two members to speak for and against the motion. Speeches will be 2 minutes each, and other sections can ask counter questions or present rebuttals. Scores will be based on the cumulative performance of the team members in their speeches and answers. Audience members from each section can also ask rebuttal questions. Rebuttal questions should be close-ended and highlight a flaw in the opposing team's argument, using examples. The topic for debate is also provided.
The document outlines the rules for a debate competition between academic sections taking place on January 20th, 2024. It states that each team will have two members to speak for and against the motion. Speeches will be 2 minutes each, and other sections can ask counter questions or present rebuttals. Scores will be based on the cumulative performance of the team members in their speeches and answers. Audience members from each section can also ask rebuttal questions. Rebuttal questions should be close-ended and highlight a flaw in the opposing team's argument, using examples. The topic for debate is also provided.
• There will be 2 members from each team, one speaking for the motion and the other speaking against the motion
• Duration of speech: For: 2 mins, Against: 2 mins
• Other section teams will counter question or present rebuttals to the speaking team. A separate rebuttal time would be given post the speech of each team • Cumulative scores of both the team members will be considered based on how well they present their ideas and answer the rebuttals • We also have audience rebuttal points so bring along friends from your section to question other sections. • Please see next page for detailed rebuttal rules REBUTTAL RULES
• Rebuttal questions should not be open-ended.
• Rebuttals need to be close ended and should highlight a flaw in the other team’s argument Eg: Topic: “Censorship of media is necessary” Rebuttals like “Don’t you think censorship will restrict our freedom of speech?” Open ended and will fetch no or minimal points Speaking team argument: “Less censorship of media means a healthier democracy” Valid Rebuttal: “Acc. To Freedom of Press Index, Norway is ranked 1. However, they only have 2 main news outlets and a healthy democracy should allow presence of more privately held news networks. Thus, how is your argument that less censorship leads to healthier democracy valid? “ References: https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/rebuttal-examples https://helpfulprofessor.com/rebuttal-examples/ Topic: “Can Exes be friends” Topic is open to interpretation. Feel free to explore in any direction.