Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beka Syedan
Beka Syedan
Beka Syedan
COURT CASE
3. The Petitioners of instant Writ Petition have their claim on the basis of
Award 1985 from Petitioner No. 01 to 08 whereas rest of the Petitioners have their
case on the basis of Review orders. Most of the Petitioner were minor at the time of
Award, hence are not entitled for rehabilitation benefits. The Petitioner No. 01 namely
Azhar Hussain Shah even after the issuance of offer letter has not handed over
possession of the BUP, consequently allotment letter was not issued. It is also to
mention that Petitioner No. 16 is daughter of Petitioner No.01 who cannot be qualified
for allotment of plot due to definition of family unit and she was under age at the time
of Award. The contention of the CDA is that the cases of the Petitioner of the instant
Writ Petition cannot be decided without recording of evidence because the claims are
based on BUP, the status of BUP is legal or illegal, the Petitioners are hit by definition
of family unit, the Petitioners were minor at the time of Award or otherwise etc.
4. The case was fixed for hearing for 08-05-2023 wherein the Honourable
High Court has expressed displeasure as to why the orders of this Court not
implemented which were issued from time to time. Vide para-07 of the Court order the
Honourable Court passed the following order:-