Mock 3

Good work done by you however improvement scope is always there. Below are some
comments.

I think you have used chat gpt or something similar for answers..like we discussed dont
rely on tah...use summary poinst ...

You need to check if HAVE YOU COVERED THE TECHNICAL POINTS FOR EACH
QUESTION (if not, which ones did you miss and think why did you miss those points.

1-Here comments should be related to influence, pressure, hierarchy, unsafe behaviour,

MD not challenging unsafe behaviour etc. Other general comments are not relevant to
the question.

Valid points here are presence of a hierarchy, presence of interaction, some having more
influence over others, some having less influence, worker having full freedom how to
behave, unsafe behaviour increasing, misuse of extinguisher, supervisor laughing and
joking, senior person under pressure to join unsafe group, pressure to listen to group,
MD not challenging unsafe behaviour, etc.

2a- Here only positive ARRAGENMENTS are needed. For example, escorting evacuees is
a good arrangement. Points should be only related to FIRE aspects. All points should be
GIVEN IN SCENARIO

Valid points here include fire call points work, notices posted, assembly point is given,
people are escorted, supervisor takes up fire marshal role, people aware of emergency
arrangement, written procedure present etc.

2b- Points should be only related to FIRE aspects with negative polarity. Points like doing
it only for insurance requirement also is valid. All points should be GIVEN IN SCENARIO.
You should not assume and write points.

Valid point are no fire RA, improper procedure, no drills and testing, lack of awareness,
lack of training, no fire marshal training, overall risk deemed as low, MD not taking
salesperson concerns seriously, etc

2c- Specific points were told in the class on this topic. It includes legal requirement,
avoiding panic, familiarizing with escape routes, assembly points, find weakness in
procedures, as per HSMS requirement, alarm sound familiarity, for practise purpose, etc.

3a- Only REPORTING related points are needed and that too INTERNAL REPORTING
only. Valid points are they did not report, they violated law, they lied and covered up, did
not record the accident, they violated the law, wrist breaking was a reportable injury and
still did not report etc.

3b- Specific points were told in the class on this topic. This was about EXTERNAL
REPORTING (means company reporting to enforcement agency and not about internal
reporting). Thus, points would include using specified template (like RIDDOR), sending
the report within a specified time (like 24hrs in some countries), having a competent
employee fill up the forms correctly, reporting to relevant labour inspectorate, with a
minimum info in first report, with more detail info in later reports.

4- Legal reasons should focus on what consequences will occur if the showroom does
not follow the law such as negative publicity orders, labour officer visits, avoid fines,
avoiding penalties, avoiding court public action, avoid reputational damage,
compensation pay-outs, to avoid punitive damages, legal claims, visit from enforcement,
visit from labour inspectors etc.

5- Question is only asking about INJURED APPRENTICE violation and not of other
workers hence all points should focus on his violation. Same clauses of ILO can be
violated multiple times in different occasions. Many points are there like playing with
extinguisher, over speeding, ignoring warning sign, not reported incident, agreed to lie
about how it happened, not taking care of own safety, not taking of others safety,
breaking his wrist by not listening to procedures etc. Do not write WORKER RIGHTS
(right to training, right to consultation etc are rights and not RESPONSIBILITIES)

6- This was about preventing this particular accident that just happened. Finding root
causes, being proactive etc are valid points. Legal aspects, insurance aspects not valid for
NM investigation they will be valid only for actual accident investigation. Repeating
similar points like ‘avoid reoccurrence’ will not give you enough marks.

Valid point are to identify root causes, immediate causes, could have identified trends,
could have identified unsafe acts and behaviour, avoid potential consequences, identify
potential consequences, identify lack of IITS etc. Remember the grammar here matters as
it should be based on preventing THIS ACCIDENT that just happened and not to prevent
future accidents.

7- If you do the color-coding technique more negative points can be extracted from
scenario. Remember, for culture questions always take it as if its type-1 based on
scenario only question. Also, if 20 mark means write at least 25+ points.

Valid points here include bonus based culture instead of safety focus, poor mgmt.
commitment, lack of visible leadership and presence, pressure to fit in, excess ambitious
target, poor supervision, poor communication, not recorded accidents in book, no fire
marshal training, management ignoring worker shortcuts, fear of fitting in, rushing job
culture, NM not reported, NM not investigated, poor legal compliance, poor emergency
procedures, no action on concerns, no accident investigation, Insafe behaviour of
apprentice etc.
8- R&R should focus on delegation, awareness of roles, training received, supervision
given or received, internal communication etc.

Valid point are MD not overseeing his role, delegation was done, not all worker know
their roels, nobody recorded NM and accident, not all worker competent, lack of training,
no fire marshal role training, not all know how to raise concern and escalate to more
senior, not all have clearly defined R&R, lack of supervision, not all know limit of their
authority, apprentice did not report incident to someone more senior, no body took
action after NM, nobody spoke or reported NM etc.

Green ticks mean it is a mark-worthy point and if no tick means not a mark-worthy point.
Overall improve on the area of weakness and find out how to avoid similar mistakes in
future. Work hard and you will be able to clear.