Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conference Procedings On Dolomite
Conference Procedings On Dolomite
15 – 16 November 2018
NN Mankayi
• CGS is a government institution, one of the SOE’s – the CGS’s Engineering &
Geohazards main concern is safety & sustainable use of the land with a
primary objective to limit the effects of GEOHAZARDS on infrastructure.
• According to this Act & in the context of disaster management and reduction,
CGS is required to “Advise local, provincial and national authorities in respect of geology and
geohazards that may affect infrastructure development through the production of geoscientific
and geological information.”
2
ROLE OF CGS IN DOLOMITE RELATED ISSUES
Act as an advisory body on geo-
hazards, i.e. public, NHBRC,
Municipalities & government
departments.
Collaborative Projects:
Mainly for government departments
3
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE NDP
Constitution of South Africa • Vision Statement – National Development Plan (NDP) 2030:
(Act 108 of 1996) “We, the people of South Africa, have journeyed far since the long
lines of our first democratic election on 27 April 1994, when we
elected a government for us all. Now in 2030 we live in a country
which we have remade”. Have we or are we on track???
4
TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ON DOLOMITIC
LAND
#Subsection 2 of Section 27 of the
Municipal Systems Act (32 of 2000).
#required to provide core principles,
mechanisms & processes that are
Requires that municipalities must identify
necessary to ensure safe development, binding requirements in terms of the
i.e. including development on dolomitic land. legislation for integrated planning &
development, i.e. should be both political
CGS is expected to advise on matters related & technical.
Geohazards.
Therefore, a commitment to fully implement the core-principles & requirements as set out in the SANS
1936/ NHBRC 2015 Manual across spheres of government is critical, including at municipal level.
5
DOLOMITE AND FORMATION OF SINKHOLES
2018/11/22 6
APPROXIMATE OCCURRENCE OF DOLOMITE IN SOUTH
AFRICA
#Dolomite Outcrop
#Covers 5 out of 9
Provinces
#Approx. 5 % of
Northern Cape’s area
coverage
Affected Districts
• John Taolo
Gaetsewe (JTG)
D.M
• ZF Mgcawu D.M
• Frances Baard D.M
7
EFFECTS AND IMPLICATIONS
Housing Transport routes
Threats to:
10
CORE-PRINCIPLES & REQUIREMENTS
(SANS 1936 & NHBRC 2015 MANUAL)
– Section 4.3.6 of SANS 1936-1:2012 state that, “The local authorities in whose jurisdiction
the developments fall shall establish, implement and maintain a Dolomite Risk
Management Strategy (DRMS) in accordance with the principles and requirements of SANS
1936-4 to mitigate the risks associated with developments on such land.”
– Section 4.1.4 (SANS 1936-2:2012) state that, “An application for land use rights, made to
any relevant authority, shall include a sufficient level of information to provide confidence
in the presented determinations(s).”
11
DOLOMITE RISK ASSESSMENT AND INHERENT HAZARD
CLASSIFICATION
• Gravity survey: • Percussion drilling:
– Overview of the subsurface materials. – Identification & description of subsurface
– Areas of gravity low or low density profile.
materials, e.g. deep bedrock. – Delineation of broader subsurface material
– Areas of gravity high or high density horizons.
materials, e.g. shallow bedrock. – Identification of subsurface cavities &
– Assist in location of drilling positions. groundwater levels, if any.
12
DOLOMITE AREA DESIGNATION AND SITE ZONATION
CASE STUDY 1
Zone l, IHC 4(3)//1/4: Medium inherent susceptibility with <20 m of blanketing layer and characterised by small cavities.
Zone ll, IHC 6/7(3)//1/6 : Medium to high inherent susceptibility with variable blanketing layer and characterised by large cavities.
Zone lll, IHC 4/6//1/7: Medium to high inherent susceptibility with >20 m of blanketing layer and characterised by large cavities.
13
DOLOMITE AREA DESIGNATION AND SITE ZONATION
CASE STUDY 2
14
DOLOMITE AREA DESIGNATION AND SITE ZONATION
CASE STUDY 3
Zone A, Inherent Hazard Class: 3/4 (1) // 3(1) , D3 dolomite area designation.
Full title residential development (RN2-3) on stands of 300 m2 or greater is recommended or 10 – 25 dwelling houses per
hectare and a population if ≤ 60 people per hectare is recommended.
Any form of commercial, retail and/or light industrial development is permissible (C1 to C10) as in SANS 1936-1(2012) Table
1 with appropriate stringent precautionary measures.
15
CRITICAL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES
IN TERMS OF SANS 1936-3
There is always a risk in dolomitic areas, but the risk can be managed through
implementation of appropriate precautionary measures, as set out in SANS
1936-Part 3 and site specific Dolomite Risk Management Plans (DRMP’s).
16
DEVELOPMENT & DRMS BY DEVELOPERS
PHASE 1 – Research:
Critical: All developers on dolomite Hazard identification, risk
must establish, implement & analysis & evaluation.
maintain a DRMS in accordance with (Physical & Anthropogenic
factors)
the principles of SANS 1936-4.
17
CONCLUSION
18
Thank You
“DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT AS A FIRST STEP IN PLANNING AN EFFECTIVE DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES”
By A.S. POTGIETER