Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HIST 313 Essay1. Middleton
HIST 313 Essay1. Middleton
Perspectives
The historical works of Juvaini and Rashid al-Din provide valuable information on
various aspects of the Mongol Empire, focusing on the reigns of Genghis Khan and that of
his government respectively. While Juvaini reported on the Mongol army and the virtues of
Genghis Khan, Rashid al-Din focused on administrative policies and anecdotes that
highlighted Ogedei Qa'an's character. This comparative analysis will explore how the two
authors express and emphasize distinct themes in their texts, demonstrating the military might
of the Mongols and the guiding principles of their empire. Although Juvaini and Rashid al-
Din sources contribute to our understanding of the Mongol Empire, they differ in emphasis,
with Juvaini emphasizing military power and virtues of Genghis Khan, while Rashid al-Din
provides an overview of the administrative mechanisms and style that governed the then
empire. Specifically, this essay will shed light on Ogedei Qa'an's policies and character as
well as any differences in perspective. The variations derived from the author's perspective
and the context in which he wrote, will provide a nuanced view of the Mongol Empire.
Juvaini, in “Genghis Khan: History of the World Conqueror”, painted a vivid picture
of the Mongol army and military structure, emphasizing its unprecedented power and
effectiveness. The author describes the Mongols as ferocious on the battlefield, comparing
them to “trained wild animals. Juvaini portrays Genghis Khan as a bold and strategic leader
who united disparate tribes into a formidable force capable of conquering vast territories.
History highlights the military prowess of the Mongols in war and peace. Through Genghis
Khan, the empire was feared because of its capability. They were able to fight successfully
and defeat their enemies. Basically, Juvaini's portrayal of Ögedei emphasizes his martial
prowess and strategic genius. He described the Mongol army as "trained wild beasts" under
Ögedei's command, emphasizing their ferocity and effectiveness in combat. Juvaini also
mentions Ögedei's decisive and ruthless personality, as evidenced by his reaction to the Oirat
rebellion. This harsh treatment recalls the Mongols' formidable reputation and the
In contrast, Rashid al-Din, in his work on the Mongolian government, shifted the
Ogedei Qa'an's reign, illustrating his generosity, tax reform, and justice. The passages
describe examples of Ogedei Qa'an dealing with social and economic issues, depicting a ruler
concerned with the welfare of his subjects. This perspective gives the reader insight into the
administrative climate that sustained the Mongol Empire. Specifically, Ogedei Qa'an is
depicted as someone who had a heart for the people. He tried as much as possible to ensure
that the welfare of the people is prioritized. His leadership style appears to be people-
centered. Essentially, Rashid al-Din presents an image of a fair ruler, emphasizing Ögedei's
traits as a righteous and intelligent man. He recounts tales that highlight Ögedei's
magnanimity, such the one about the wrestler who captured a wolf and the father with 10
daughters. These tales demonstrate Ögedei's care for his subjects' welfare and his readiness to
act kindly and compassionately. Rashid al-Din also underlined Ögedei's reforms and
dedication to maintaining justice, as well as his determination to creating a reasonable and
Juvaini and Rashid al-Din both contributed significantly to how readers see Mongol
leaders. They painted vivid pictures of the leaders although they might have been biased in
some instances. Juvaini emphasizes Genghis Khan's virtues, describing his generosity,
benevolence, and strategic sense. In contrast, Rashid al-Din's passages highlight Ogedei
Qa'an's multifaceted personality, displaying moments of generosity, severity, and anger. These
characteristics were intended to humanize the Mongol leaders and provide insight into their
leadership style. Therefore, the readers can get a sense of reality in the story as opposed to the
feeling of fantasy as seen in legends. Readers can picture Mongol leaders as ordinary humans
with weaknesses and strengths. The divergent viewpoints present in Juvaini and Rashid al-
Din's differing interpretations of Ogedei Qa'an might be attributed to their varied goals and
the Mongols' extreme military might and atrocities. His image serves as a cautionary tale
about the risks of defying the Mongols and their brutality. Rashid al-Din, on the other hand,
wrote as a Mongol with the intention of promoting and legitimizing the dynasty. He
highlighted Ögedei's virtues, such his altruism and dedication to justice, in order to present
Conclusion
Mongol Empire, with Juvaini emphasizing military strength and virtue, while Rashid al-Din
examines political, administrative policies and characteristics of Mongol leaders. The striking
differences reflect different aspects of the Mongol Empire, presenting a comprehensive view
of its military power and guiding principles. Although both acknowledged Ögedei's power,
different priorities and perspectives shaped their stories, Juvaini reminds readers of the
formidable military might of the Mongols and the consequences of challenging their
authority, while Rashid al-Din seeks to legitimize and glorify the dynasty by demonstrating
his skill and abilities, Ögedei management and commitment to justice.Together, these primary
Though the lenses of these two writers, readers are able to take a step back into history and
References