Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aatcc TM100
Aatcc TM100
174 AATCC TM100-2019 AATCC Manual of International Test Methods and Procedures/2021
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
tion as test sample but containing no anti- 10. Calculation not been established. Until a precision
bacterial finish will be required if calcu- statement is generated for this test
lating percent reduction using formula 10.1 Report bacterial counts as the method, caution should be used when
outlined in 10.2. number of bacteria per sample (swatches testing materials with this method. In
8.1.3 Viability Controls. Viability con- in jar) not as the number of bacteria per most cases the use of standard statistical
trol fabric is required and should be mL of neutralizing solution. Report “0” techniques in making any comparisons of
known to demonstrate > 1 log bacterial counts at 100 dilution as “less than 100.” test results for either within-laboratory or
growth as defined in 10.4. 10.2 Calculate percent reduction of between-laboratory averages have been
8.1.4 Test specimens should not be bacteria by the specimen treatments using found to be generally accepted.
sterilized prior to testing. If sterilization Eq. 1.
is performed, method and reason for ster- 100(B – A)/B = R (Eq. 1) 13. Notes and References
ilization must be noted on the test report.
13.1 Publication available from U.S. De-
where: partment of Health and Human Services,
9. Procedure R = % reduction CDC/ NIH-HHS Publication No. (CDC) 84-
A = the number of bacteria recovered 8395; web site: www.hhs.gov.
9.1 Size of inoculum per sample. Ap- from the inoculated treated test 13.2 ATCC is the American Type Culture
ply 1.0 ± 0.1 mL of test inoculum (7.1.1) specimen swatches in the jar in- Collection (USA), P.O. Box 1549, Manassas
so that recovery from (1) viability control cubated over the 24-h contact pe- VA 20108; tel: +1.703.365.2700; fax: +1.703.
fabric swatches or (2) test fabric swatches riod 365.2701; web site: www.atcc.org. CIP is the
at “0” contact time (plated as soon as pos- B = the number of bacteria recovered Pasteur Institute Collection (France), DSM is
sible after inoculation) will show counts from the inoculated untreated test
the German Collection of Microorganisms
of 1-3 × 105 organisms. and Cell Cultures (Germany), NBRC is the
specimen swatches in the jar in- NITE Biological Resource Center (Japan),
9.1.1 As soon as possible after inocula- cubated over the 24-h contact pe-
tion (“0” contact time), add 100 ± 1 mL NRRL is the Northern Regional Research Lab
riod. (USA), NCIMB is the National Collection of
of neutralizing solution to each of the jars Industrial Bacteria (UK), and CUG is the Cul-
containing the inoculated untreated con- 10.3 If an untreated control is not avail- ture Collection University of Göteborg (Swe-
trol swatches, the inoculated test able, use Eq. 2. den). Equivalent bacteria strains obtained
swatches and the viability control fabric from agencies of the World Federation of Cul-
swatches. 100(C – A)/C = R (Eq. 2) ture Collection (WFCC) may be used by
9.1.2 The neutralizing solution should where: agreement between the interested parties. The
include ingredients to neutralize the spe- strains used in the test shall be documented
C = the number of bacteria recovered with their supply source.
cific antibacterial fabric treatment and to from the inoculated, test speci-
take care of any pH requirements of the 13.3 Consistent and accurate testing re-
men swatches in the jar immedi- quires maintenance of a pure, uncontaminated,
fabrics (from finishes, antibacterial ately after inoculation (at “0” nonmutant test culture. Avoid contamination
agents, etc.). The neutralizing solution contact time) by use of good sterile technique in plating and
employed should be reported. transferring. Avoid mutation by strict adher-
9.1.3 Shake the jars vigorously for one 10.4 For a valid test there should be: ence to monthly stock transfers. Check culture
minute. Make serial dilutions with sterile (1) “0” colonies of test organism recov- purity by making streak plates periodically
distilled water and plate (in duplicate) on ered from the uninoculated test specimen and observing for single species-characteristic
nutrient agar. Dilutions of 100, 101, 102 swatches and (2) a significant (≥ 1 log) type of colonies.
are usually suitable. increase in the numbers of bacteria recov- 13.4 A suitable viability control fabric
9.1.4 Incubation over contact periods. known to demonstrate > 1 log growth under
ered from the inoculated viability control the standard conditions in this method has
Incubate additional jars containing inocu- specimen swatches incubated for the been identified and can be purchased through
lated viability control swatches and jars specified contact time over the numbers the International Antimicrobial Council
containing inoculated test swatches at 37 of bacteria recovered from the inoculated (www.amcouncil.org).
± 2°C (99 ± 3°F) for 24 h. Similar jars viability specimen swatches at “0” con-
may be incubated over other periods tact time (immediately after inoculation). 14. History
(e.g., 1 or 6 h) to provide information
about the bactericidal activity of the treat- 14.1 Last revised 2019 to remove several
11. Report issues that led to confusion among users. Am-
ment over such periods.
9.1.5 Sampling of viability control and 11.1 Report percent reduction of bacte- biguity was reduced by defining the parame-
ters for use of untreated viability controls,
test swatches. After incubation, add 100 ria by the specimen treatment against concentration of nutrient in inoculum me-
± 1 mL of neutralizing solution to jars each test organism. Report should include dium, inoculum preparation, fabric swatch
containing viability control swatches and the calculation method used. preparation, sample sterilization, and final test
to jars containing test swatches. Shake 11.2 The criterion for passing the test report contents.
the jars vigorously for 1 minute. Make must be determined by the interested par- 14.2 Revised 2012. Editorially revised
serial dilutions and plate (in duplicate) on ties. 2010, 2009. Reaffirmed 2008. Editorially re-
nutrient agar. Dilutions of 100, 101, 102 11.3 All variables and materials used in vised and reaffirmed 2004. Revised 1999. Re-
are usually suitable for treated test fab- the test including sample size, steriliza- affirmed 1998. Revised 1993. Reaffirmed
rics. Dilutions of 103 or 104 may be re- 1989. Revised (with title change) 1988. Edito-
tion and method, media used, neutralizer rially revised and reaffirmed 1986. Editorially
quired for viability control and untreated used, and the dilution medium used. revised 1985. Revised 1981. Reaffirmed 1977.
control swatches depending on the incu- Editorially revised 1974, 1971, 1969. Revised
bation period. 12. Precision and Bias 1965.
9.1.6 Incubate all plates for 24-48 h at 14.3 Developed in 1961 by AATCC Com-
37 ± 2°C (99 ± 3°F). 12.1 Precision for this test method has mittee RA31.
AATCC Manual of International Test Methods and Procedures/2021 AATCC TM100-2019 175
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists