Reviewer Tour Policy

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

TOURISM PLATFORMS ADAPTANCY PLATFORM

A platform is a common theme shared by Acknowledges that mass tourism has


each batch of studies on tourism. negative impacts but these can be
minimized or avoided with “alternative
A platform is very similar to the concept
tourism” (Jafari 1999), which refers to low-
of paradigm (perspective or set of ideas),
volume low impact form of tourism-
which is a way of looking at the nature of
antithesis of mass tourism.
something, identifying the issues which are
most important to consider, and thinking of KNOWLEDGE-BASED PLATFORM
ways to solve those issues.
Views tourism from holistic perspective;
THE FIRST FOUR PLATFORMS not just from the impacts and forms but
ENUMERATED COME FROM JAFARI in terms of the underlying structures and
(1999), WHILE THE LAST ONE IS CITED functions. This platform supports a critical
FROM TODES (2011) analysis of tourism and is not inclined to
labeling certain forms of tourism.
1. Advocacy platform
SOCIAL JUSTICE PLATFORM
2. Cautionary platform
Embraces “participatory process
3. Adaptancy platform
involving open dialogue; inclusivity,
4. Knowledge-based platform resource distribution, equity, equality,
pro-poor planning; gender sensitivity;
5. Social justice platform responsiveness to diversity”
ADVOCACY PLATFORM TOURISM DEVELOPMENT THEORIES
Tourism is a “clean industry” because it ADVOCACY PLATFORM
does not produce smoke that pollutes the
environment. Laissez Faire Theory

Tourism also revitalizes cultural traditions Laissez Faire (French for “leave it be”)
theory assumes that an industry, such as
The world is able to maintain peace tourism, will function best when it is left
through mutual understanding that is solely to market forces. This is also known
created by tourism. as liberal economic theory.
The end result of this advocacy is mass Modernization Theory
tourism. Theories that are related to this
platform are modernization theory and as applied to tourism assumes that tourism
trickle-down theory. contributes to the economic progress
and transformation of “traditional”
CAUTIONARY PLATFORM societies in modern ones. Tourism
Views tourism as a bad thing and improves the standard of living of the
decries the negative effects of mass residents through transfer of technology,
tourism that the advocacy platform has improvement of t knowledge and skills, and
engendered. Critics of mass tourism view the adoption of “Western culture”.
tourism as creating dependency and Trickle–Down Theory
leakages the sap the wealth of the
country.
Related to modernization theory is the has underdeveloped supply and demand,
trickle-down theory. This theory assumes or where visitation rates are so small as to
that any form of economic growth will not perceive any impact from it.
lead to the improvement of the living
AD-HOC PLANNING
conditions of all. Everyone benefits from
tourism growth from the hotel manager to is planning only as the need arises, such
the cigarette vendor. as planning in preparation for a town fiesta
or when an important visitor is coming.
Neoliberal Theory
Ad-hoc planning is related to issue-based
Neoliberal theory of development posits that
planning, which is planning driven by
the economy functions best when there
issues that emerge from time to time and
is minimal government intervention.
the search for solutions to those issues
Unlike laissez faire where there is virtually
no control from government, neoliberalism INTEGRATED TOURISM PLANNING
accepts the idea of government regulation
but rejects government competing with the is when tourism is developed and
private sector by being a business operator planned as an integrated system within
itself. itself and as part of an overall tourism plan
and total development patterns in an area.
CAUTIONARY THEORIES
An example of integrated planning is
Dependency Theory provided in the National Tourism
Development Plan (NTDP).
states that tourism can actually worsen
the plight of “Third World” countries BOOSTERIST APPROACH
because the “First World” countries
exploit and siphon off the resources of Boosterism sees tourism as a positive
the latter. Tourism is seen as creating force for economic growth. Its primary
dependencies by the “periphery” goal is to maximize tourism revenues
(developing nations) on the “core” through mass tourism.
(developed countries). The main strategies are to expand tourism
Irridex Model physical capacity and conduct heavy
international promotion campaigns.
Doxey’s Irritation Index model (Irridex
model) is a theory about the social (Product-led or market-led, State-led,
impacts of tourism. It states that industry-led or shared enterprise between
resident’s attitudes toward tourism will public and private sector.)
deteriorate over the destination life cycle PRODUCT-LED DEVELOPMENT
as the negative consequences of tourism
intensify. “Build it and they will come”. Product-led
approach suggests that the key to
APPROACHES TO TOURISM PLANNING successful tourism program is to provide
AND DEVELOPMENT infrastructure, facilities, and amenities to
NO PLANNING tourists.

Many destinations start out with no SPATIAL PLANNING APPROACH


tourism planning at all. Planning may not is a type of product-led tourism
be seen as necessary when the place planning, but on the wider scale. It is
focused on “destination layout and 2. Devolved planning approach is where
design” and breaks down tourism into local government units assume control
spatial units such as gateways (main of tourism planning and development
access point, such as an airport), for their respective jurisdictions.
communities, access, routes, attraction
MIDDLE PATH APPROACH (BHUTAN
complexes
MODEL)
Gunn and Var (2002, in Chaisawat n.d.)
The opposite of boosterism is low
identifies three spatial units in tourism.
volume, high-yield tourism, which
1. Site scale refers to planning at the level Scheyvens (2007) called the “middle path
of individual tourism property like hotel, approach” of Bhutan where strict controls
resort, or restaurant. are imposed on the types and volume of
2. Destination scale is the planning of tourism to maximize revenue but minimize
tourism in a community and its the adverse effects of tourism religion,
surrounding areas. culture, and environment.
3. Regional scale is planning at the level of
ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACH
province, region, or country.
Environmental approach works best when
DEMAND-LED APPROACH
the place being considered for tourism
“Know the customer and satisfy them”. development is endowed with natural
attractions of outstanding beauty; remote;
Demand-led approach is akin to Kotler’s
beyond the reach of commercial electric and
marketing orientation. Demand-led
water services; or protected by laws, such
approach is important for two reasons.
as protected areas and ancestral domains
 First is we need to design the tourism of indigenous people.
product around the market, and Carrying Capacity is one of the most
 Second, demand projections serve as important concepts in environmental
the basis for expansion of the physical planning. Carrying capacity is defined as
capacity of the destination. “the minimum number people that may
BUREAUCRATIC/GOVERNMENT-LED visit a tourist destination at the same
APPROACH time, without causing destruction of the
physical, economic, socio-cultural
Bureaucratic approach puts the environment, and an unacceptable
Government at the center of planning decrease in the quality of visitors
and development. It is the primary and satisfaction”
multi-tasking actor. Government may use
various types of instruments to promote Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) is
tourism- advocacy, money, action, and another useful concept in tourism planning.
laws. The LAC approach attempts to delimit the
conditions that are deemed ideal for an
TWO TYPES OF BUREAUCRATIC area and sets up management strategies to
APPROACHES achieve the conditions.
1. Central planning approach is where ECOTOURISM APPROACH
the national-level agencies carry out all
functions related to tourism planning It is defined by the DOT (2002) as “a form
and development. of sustainable tourism within a natural
and cultural heritage area where The fair trade movement is “a response to
community participation, protection and the failure of conventional trade to
management of natural resources, culture deliver sustainable livelihoods and
and indigenous knowledge and practices, development opportunities to people in
environmental education and ethics, as well the poorest countries of the world”
as economic benefits are fostered and
Fair trade is a trading partnership, based
pursued for the enrichment of host
on dialogue, transparency and
communities and satisfaction of visitors.
respect,that seeks greater equity in
SOCIAL APPROACH international trade.
Social approaches to tourism planning SUSTAINABLE TOURISM APPROACH
emphasize the role of stakeholders in the
Tourism should be developed without
tourism planning process. It is concerned
damaging natural or cultural resources
with directing the benefit and control of
so that those will come after us may also
resources toward the community and other
have the opportunity to enjoy them.
vulnerable groups.
Sustainable tourism development is
PARTICIPATORY/STAKEHOLDER
supported by the triple bottom line of
APPROACH
environmental conservation, social
puts people at the center of the planning justice, and economic viability.
process. It is an approach in which each
We can also call it Equity, Environment,
relevant stakeholder has a say in the
Economy. It is a form of tourism that
deliberation and decision-making process.
respects local culture, protects nature, and
COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM advocates social responsibility and fair
commerce.
is “tourism that is owned and/or
managed by communities and intended
to deliver wider community benefit”
(Armstrong 2012). The core idea of CBT is
allowing a community to have control over a
tourism enterprise.
Community-based tourism is an example of
transactive planning approach, which is
“based on social learning theory and
transactive (interpersonal) interaction.
PRO-POOR APPROACH
Pro-poor tourism (PPT) is defined as
“tourism that generates net benefits for
the poor” (Ashley, Roe, & Goodwin 2001).
In this approach, “the needs of the poor are
prioritized over externally-oriented growth
imperatives”
FAIR TRADE TOURISM

You might also like