Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 1, 5:2:24
Lecture 1, 5:2:24
1
Stress, Health and sustainable working life
If you create a healthy work environment it will create benefits on the individual level and the
individual worker, lower rate of burnouts and physical complaints. That would also benefit the
organization, where people work: It will always benefit the organization, less people quit so the
turnover ratio decreases, they show better performance levels, higher productivity levels. This also
translates to society benefits: national health costs will be reduced, less health costs for the
organization. It also translates to national health.
Sustainable work life: leaders lead well, good work life balance, having time to recovery from work,
good organization at policies, good job design.
2
We can frame our course organization we look at this model.
Demographic changes
- dual-career-families: it wasn’t that common 30 years back, we have to adjust cause
maybe people have careers in different places and they have families.
- aging work force: different priorities in life, different skills and needs when it comes
to work.
- Shortages in specific sectors: construction, healthcare, teaching, ICT. W need to
think how to make them work in the future.
Automation/AI
- Decrease of simple jobs: many jobs with simple and repetitive tasks. Some jobs will
disappear and some other will increase, new skills will need to be implemented.
3
- Increase in jobs that require social & cognitive skills, lifelong learning. Some jobs
and tasks will disappear, and increase in other jobs with innovative skills.
We have big change going on in working life, many jobs will disappear, so we will really need to
rethink our society structure and to insure that everybody has an income. We are already on the
move from work society to scientific society of meaning: we are already thinking differently about
work than the previous generations. There are different aspiration, less work, more choice. There
are radical changes coming out.
There are different ways to think about HR Management. There are different practicies that
companies may apply. They have developed different practices: they effect people well-being and
performances, they are always linked. The most common sight it’s a win-win situation and a
mutual gain perspective, one increases the other. If you have put HRM practicies in place this will
effect the well being and at the same time the performance. If you make people happy, they’re
more willing to engage into work, and being productive and make effort.
Well-being
HRM practices +
This second model below comes from a more labor process theory, from the sociology perspective.
Work and management are in a constant struggle. HRM practicies effect the well-being but this
could also lead to a lower performance. Well-being could also decrease performance: they become
lazy, the management will always try to reduce costs, improve the profitability and production
4
while trying to reduce labor costs, increase profits: this will be at the expenses of the employees
There’s an exploitation idea behind.
Well-being
HRM practices -
There are conflicting outcomes into these studies: it’s not easy to show the actual results of HRM
polices and how to measure them.
66% of the models showed support for mutual gains perspectives: if you have HRM
practicies in places, the benefits people between people’s well-being and this will also
effects productivity.
5 studies (out of 46) showed some evidence for conflicting outcomes: when the company
will introduce beneficial HRM practicies for well-being there will be some reductions in
performance outcome.
22% showed no relationships or fragmented relationships.
Important limitations
- Small number of studies
- Single source data
- Cross-sectional
- Individual OR unit performance
Well-being
HRM practices +
Stress research evolves from more physiological aspects. For a long time also animals gave insights
on the stress research. Starting from the first ones: stress modify biological systems in some ways.
We try to maintain the stable internal environment of body.
Stress results from disturbance of homeostasis (i.e., body’s attempt to maintain stable
internal environment);
to psychological perspectives...
- Role and importance of cognition in experiencing stress
6
Stress is …(very important model this one)
an interaction of...
- features of the environment or events (=stressors)
outside the person
- an individual’s response (psychological, physiological, and
behavioral) to environmental demands, threats, and
challenges (=strain)
Here we can see the process: primary appraisal is when you enter in a
potential stressful situation, you notice what is happening in your
environment and you make sense either if it’s positive, or irrelevant or
dangerous. Once it’s dangerous, it’s seen as a stressor, but then comes
the secondary appraisal, so the ability to deal with the situation: do I
have enough resources to deal with the stress? If I do, I don’t perceive
the situation as stressful. It depends if it’s exceeding my resources.
Temporary, intermittent or chronic (so it comes back). Stress can be an be very temporary
and fleeting. It may also be a coming back situation, since there are different type of
stressors: chronic etc.
Type of stressors
7
- Challenge stressors: they’re both stressful at the moment and energizing at the same time.
Deadline and workload, both stressful and it engages people, they are eager to overcome
the challenges, opportunity for growth and development.
- Hindrance: those stresses are always bad and negativity. They hinder the person from
achieving a goal. For example, a continuous interruption at work, a colleague always with
questions, or working without equipment, role conflicts when you’re not sure about your
role and responsibilities. It places you in a difficult positions.
24% thinks that it’s been taken very seriously and well-cared of. If we sum some of the
percentages, 29% of the people thinks that it’s not very well handled.
Does your work affect your health? Red: Yes, mainly negatively; Blue: No;
Green: Yes, mainly positively.
9
The risk that people have of dying of cardiovascular death because of stress at work. If there are
blue levels of strains the stress is lower,
but it increases when with a high level
of cardiovascular diseases there’s a
high level of job strain. Pretty similar
with the job demand, even if the
higher level seems to be the one in the
middle, while on the third is the
opposite: so, having autonomy and
control at work is seen as a buffer of
people health when you have high
levels of control at work than you have the best level of cardio vascularity.
Looking at the effort reward imbalance, you have to invest a lot of effort while getting little in
return is also increasing the chances to cardiovascular death.
Stress doesn’t only effects workers themselves, but also the future generation: female workers that
have stress at work associates with the child diseases, such as metabolic diseases,
psychopathology and cardiovascular problem of the child. Prenatal stress concerns both the
mother and the infant.
- preterm birth
- metabolic disease
- cardiovascular disease
- psychopathology
Maternal stress relates to problems in infant, potentially crossing over to the next generations.
1. Physical health
2. Emotional well being
3. Work related
Work related outcomes also are really relevant for companies and
organizations: people who are stressed will suffer from a loss of
work motivation; they will show a lower level of work engagement.
In addition, they are most likely to absent or call in sick. It’s also a
burden for the society, but I’s hard to estimate those costs.
Direct
- Medical (hospital admissions, physician fees,
medication)
- Non-medical (insurance, litigation, travel costs, ...)
Indirect
- Productivity loss (sickness absence, turnover,
presenteeism, ...)
Intangible: really hard to measure.
- Pain, suffering, loss of quality of life (willingness to
pay?)
11
Low psychological demand but high control: the ones that may feel a little bit bored, not
challenged enough.
Then we add a new element that was added to the theory: the social support mechanism, a third
dimension. It’s the amount of support one can take from colleagues.
Here in this model support is added, while the formula for stress remains the same.
Variation of this traditional model: Job demand resources model (Demerouti et al)
Exams: specific situation and then the view of a specific theory. For example, the graph about job
control cardiovascular and discuss the graph of the stress = demands x control or the other one.
Check o’net.
Conclusion
13