Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxmann's Company Law Chapter 2
Taxmann's Company Law Chapter 2
Taxmann's Company Law Chapter 2
CHAPTER
ADMINISTRATION D
2 COMPANY LA)
21
22
OVERVIEW OFADMINISTRATION OF COMPANYLA"
With te establishment of the NCIT nd NCLAT the Company Law Board u
the: Companies Act, 1956-stand dissolved.
povsions relating to the investioation: of acompany's accounts, freezingO
assets, class action suits, NCLT.
winding up of companies are governed by the
The Tribunal (NCLT) is not bound by the strict iudicial rules of evidenc and
Proceeure. It can decide cases by folowing principles of natural iustice. NCLAI
Cr Appellate Tribunal" is an authority provided for dealing with appeals aris1ing
out of the decisions of the Tribçnal. Any party dissatisfied by any order of the
Iribunal mày bring an appeal to contest that decision. The Appellate. Tribunal
reyiews the decisions of the Tribunal and has power to set aside, nodify or
confirnm it.
The decisions of Appellate Tribunal can further be challenged in the Supreme
Court.
Difference between National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and Nationai
Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)
1. The NCLT has primary jurisdiction whereas NCLAT has appellate, juris
TAXMANNO diction.
2. NCLAT is a higher quasi-judicial body than NCLT.
3. Evidence and witnesses are generally presented before NLT for taking
the decisions and NCLAT generally reviews decisionsof NCLT andchecks
it on apoint of law or fact.
4. Fact finding and evidence collection isprimarily atask of Tribunal whereas
the Appellate-Tribunal decide cases based on already collected evidence
and witnesses.
Judicial Member
Ajudicial member shall be person, who -
(a) is or has been a judge of a Hligh Court; or
(b) is or has been a istrict Judge for at least five years; or
ajudicial office
( ilds for at least ten years as anadvocate ofa court or held
or as member of a tribunal.
Technical Member
A technical member shall be a person who -
Law
(a) has for at least fifteen years been amember of the Indian Corporate Joint
Service or indian Legal Service out of which at least three years as
Secretary or above; or
fifteen
(b) is or-has been in practice as a.chartered accountant for at least
years; or
(c) is or has been in practice as a cost accountant for at least fifteen years;
or
--fd) is-or has been in practice as a company secretary for at least fifteen years;
Or
Aperson who has not completed fifty years of age shall not be eligible for
appoint1nent as Member. The Member may retain his lien with his parent cadre
for
or Ministry or Department, as the case may be, while holding office as such
a period not exceeding one year.
(2) The Tribunal may, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the parties
orders'thereon ás it thinks fit.
to any proceeding before it, pass such
(3) "The Tribunal shall have power to review its awn orders.
may prefer
(4) Any person aggrieved by an order or decision of the Tribunal
an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(5) The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall not be bound by the proce
dure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, but shall be guided
by the principles of natural justice. Subject to the other provisions of this
Act and of any rules made by the Central Government, the Tribunal and
TAXMANN®
the Appeilate Tribunal shall have power to regulate their own procedure.
(6) The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shal! have the same powers as
are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while
trying a suit in respect of the folowing matters:
(a) surnmoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and
examining him on oath;
(b) requiring the discovery, and production of documents;
(c) receiving evidence on affidavits;
(d) subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1372, requi
sitioning any public record or document or copy of such record or
document from any office;
(e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
) reviewing its decisions;
(g).dismissing arepresentation for default or deciding it ex parte.
(7) Any order nade by the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal may be en
forced by that Tribunal in the same manner as if it were a decree made
by a court in asuit pending therein.
(8) All proceedings before the Tribunal or the Appellate
Tribunal shall be
deemed to be judicial proceedings within the Indian Penal
Code.
26
OVERVIEW OF ADMINISTRATION OF COMPANY LAW
Special Court constitüted for the area in which the offence has been
committed or where there are more Special Courts than one for
such area, by such one of them as may be specified in this behalr
by the Government;
(b) Where a perSon accused of or suspected of the commission of an
offence under this Act is forwarded to a Magistrate under sub-sec
tion (2) or sub-section (2A) of section 167 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), such Magistrate may authorise the
detention of such person in such custody as he thinks fit for a
period notexceeding fifteen days in the whole where such Magistrate
is a Judicial Magistrate and seven days in the whole where such
Magistrate is an Executive Magistrate:
Provided that in ca_es which are triable by th» Special Courtwhere
such Magistrate considers
() when such person is forwarded to him as aforsaid; or
(i) upon or at any time before the expiry of the period of deten
tion authorised by him,
that the detention of such person is unnecessary, he shall or
oNNVWXV.I. der such personto be forwarded to the Special Court having
jurisdiction;
(c) Fhe SpeciaiCoutrt may exercise, in relation to the person forwarded
to it under clause (b), the same power which a Magistrate having
jurisdiction to try a case may exercise under section 167 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in relation to an accused person
in such case who has been forwarded to him under that section;
() A Special Court may, upon perusal of police report of the facts
constituting an offence under this Act or upon complaint made
by an officer of the Central Government or a State Government
authorised in his behalf, take cognizance of that offence without|
the accused being committed to it for rial.
(2) When trying an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an
offence other than an offence under this Act with which the accused may,
under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, be charged at the same trial.
(3) Nothing containedin this section shall be deemed to affect the special
powers of the,High Court regarding bail under section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1'973, and the High Court mày exercise such powrs
including the power under clause (b)of sub-section (1) of thàt section as
if the reference to "Magistrate", in that section inciuded also a reference
to a Special Court constituted under section 36.
OVERVIEW OF ADMINISTRATION OF COMPANY LAW 29
under section
(4) In respect of persons accused of an offence punishable
19 or section 24 or section 27A or for offences involving commercial
quantity the references in sub-section (2) of section 167 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 thereof to"ninety days", where they occur. shall
be construed as reference to "one hundred and eighty days":
within the
Provided that, if it is not possible to complete the investigationmay
Court extend
said period of one hundred and eighty days, the Special
the said period up to one year on
the report of the Public Prosecutor
reasons for
indicating theprogress of the investigation and the specific
said period of one hundred and
the detention of the accused beyond the
eighty days.
the Code of Criminal Procedure,
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained inthis Act with imprisonment for a
1973, the offences punishable under
summariy.
term of not more than three years may be tried