Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Previewpdf
Previewpdf
For many student teachers the classroom is a strange and potentially uncontrollable environment. The transition from being a
pupil to being a teacher is abrupt and can be traumatic. This book shows how the period of classroom observation, which for
most students precedes teaching practice, plays an important part in this transition process.
In A Guide to Classroom Observation, Rob Walker and Clem Adelman explain what is involved in being a good observer.
They answer such practical questions as how should an observer react to a class, where should he sit, what should he wear,
how far should he allow himself to participate in the lesson. They go on to demonstrate that observation can be a positive
activity, incorporating analysis of teacher gesture, voice and movement, and pupil reaction together with study of the effects of
the physical arrangements of the classroom and school on the school population.
A Guide to Classroom Observation considers the different methods of recording classroom activity—tape, videotape, slides
—and the ways in which useful information can be derived from such recordings. The authors then go on to show how the
teacher’s observations can be used to modify his own teaching strategies. By enabling the student observer to understand in a
systematic fashion the complex events of the classroom, Rob Walker and Clem Adelman have provided an invaluable
teaching tool for the student and the practising teacher.
Rob Walker is Professor of Education at Deakin University, Victoria; Clem Adelman is Professor of Education at the
University of Reading.
A GUIDE TO CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
Rob Walker
Clem Adelman
Photographs by Janine Wiedel
Routledge
First published 1975 by Methuen & Co Ltd
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
“To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.”
© 1975 Rob Walker and Clem Adelman
Acknowledgements vi
Index 151
Acknowledgements
Our thanks:
To the teachers who participated in our study groups at the Centre for Science Education 1971–2 and 1972–3. Because of
them the ideas in this book emerged in the way they did.
To Jim Binham, Colin Muge, Ann Hall, Martin Phillipson, Neville Jones, Berris Bowen, Lezli Weintrobe and Miriam
Smith-Philipson for allowing us to observe and record in their classes and to use extracts and photographs in this book. To
Tony Malpas for first suggesting we write the book.
To Ann Fiander for the quotation from her dissertation.
To Cyril Daltry and Margaret Brown for the quotations from mathematics students.
To Harold Silver, whose imagination and commitment to teacher education made it possible. Few researchers can have had
the opportunities to realize their ideas in the way we did.
To Chelsea College, the SSRC, the Central Research Fund of the University of London and the Ford Foundation for their
financial support at various times since 1968.
To Basil Bernstein.
To John Elliott and Barry MacDonald.
To George Gross
To Alan and Diana Fone.
To Pat Clipsham, electric typist.
To Liz, Lynne, Ben and Tomsk.
The authors and publishers would also like to thank the following for permission to reproduce material from the
publications cited:
The Daily Express for the cartoon by Giles; the Daily Telegraph for the quotation from their issue of 13 December 1973;
the Guardian for the cartoon by Horner; Hutchinson & Co Ltd for M.L.J.Abercrombie, Anatomy of Judgement; John Wiley
and Sons Ltd for Willard Waller, The Sociology of Teaching; Penguin Books Ltd for Douglas Barnes, James Britton, and
Harold Rosen, Language, the Learner and the School; Random House for Immanuel Wallerstein and Paul Starr, The
University Crisis Reader, Vol. I, and Jules Henry, Culture Against Man; Simon and Schuster Inc and Deborah Rogers Ltd for
Sylvia Ashton-Warner, Teacher (© 1963, Sylvia Ashton-Warner); the Editor of Visual Education and the author for Robert
Jardine, ‘An exploration in the use of videotape recording in teacher—pupil relationships’ (The National Council for Audio-
visual Aids in Education). Cyrilly Abels for permission to reprint part of The Totalitarian Classroom: A Learning Game, ©
1969 Michael Rossman.
The Observation Handbook: a guide for students on first teaching
practice.
Observation soon reveals the classroom as a complex social system (Daily Express 18 January 1973.)
chaos…
how well-behaved the children were.
(the fact that) although they could do the working the children weren’t sure what fractions and decimals were.
how many children were really lost.
(the fact that) children couldn’t visualize areas, sizes of.
the range of intelligence.
the frustration and lack of idealism among teachers.
the girls (being)…much keener workers.
(the fact that) there were forty-three in my class and the backward ones were…
how the slow children appreciated what you did for them.
(the fact that) the masters had a friendly atmosphere in their classes, but when I took over…
(the fact that) every lesson seemed to be a lesson in English.
(the fact that) the children were disciplined but they weren’t understanding.
(the fact that) the children went out to measure the football field—even so they could still talk of ‘square acres’.
the range of intelligence—how do you cope?
how helpful they were (the children) to me, a student teacher.
the complications of giving out pencils and equipment.
the use by infants of Cuisenaire (rods).
children’s capacity to help themselves.
(the fact that) these juniors liked having someone there all the time (staff shortage).
(the fact that) the (girls’) school was keen on trying new experiments, but it was bluff.
how the children forgot from week to week.
(the fact that) in my school they seemed to have no real difficulty at all.
(the fact that) though children couldn’t do written work they were devastatingly keen observers, e.g. details in acting,
miming.
(the fact that) the children weren’t keen to progress in arithmetic.
(this thought) think at level of slower children!
how the teachers’ personalities were reflected in the way they gave their lessons.
the surprising advance juniors make in one year.
the misery of a secondary modern school in the Midlands with an immigrant population. The children couldn’t understand
the teachers’ speech.
the variations in children’s capacity.
(this thought) there was an unstreamed school, one boy ESN but parents refused to allow him to go to a special school: he
needed a lot of time.
the complicated patterns of streaming.
the marking and position lists…
Going on teaching practice—observation
Most initial courses for teachers adopt a plan for easing students into teaching by allowing them to observe experienced
teachers at work. Colleges vary considerably in the way they organize and prepare for this period of initial observation. Some
primary courses direct observation to particular aspects of child development by extensive lecture and seminar sessions, and
then control observation periods, gradually building up from half-day sessions to longer periods. In other colleges students
may find themselves in a school for periods of several weeks armed only with an initial reading list and a satisfactory X-ray
certificate.
The schools, too, vary in the way they receive students. Students may arrive fresh from the college expecting to spend
several days ‘observing’, only to be told, ‘I’m afraid we’re very short-staffed this week. Would you mind sitting in with 2B
this lesson? They’ve got the work to do, so you shouldn’t have any problems.’ The students who survives 2B is likely to
graduate rapidly to 4H, and may feel at the end of a week that this baptism of fire has taught him far more than he would have
learnt sitting meekly at the sidelines watching a master teacher at work.
If observation is taken to mean simply sitting and watching, the observational period is usually one of unease, a transitional
state between being student and being teacher. Few students seem to know quite what to look for, or how to learn from the
experience; they often become bored. Teachers can feel anxious having someone watching them teach and are happy to move
the student into a more active phase. In classes where the teacher is more informal the transition is easier and smoother and
the observational role presents fewer problems.
In what follows we have tried to set out an approach to observation which takes into account the variations and
discontinuities that exist between courses, between schools and between classrooms. In what we propose we hope that the
primary and secondary school student teachers, however prepared, and whatever the nature of the school setting they enter,
will be able to find something helpful and useful.
Originally we wrote these observation notes as a guide to teaching practice for students. What we found from trying the
notes out in a number of colleges and university departments was that there was just as much need for the guide among
college tutors and supervising teachers in schools as there was among students themselves. This book is aimed at both student
teachers and at those responsible for their supervision; for while their problems are different their concerns are very similar.
What we hope most of all is that these books will provide a means by which students and supervisors can communicate with
each other. The basis of their relationship, which is the collision of theory and experience, is critical for education and
underlies all we have written.
Bibliography
AMIDON.E.A. and HUNTER, ELIZABETH(1966) Improving leaching. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
ASHTON-WARNER, SYLVIA(1966) Teacher. Penguin.
BIDDLE, B.J. and ADAMS, R.S. (1970) The Realities of the Classroom. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
BOYER, E.G. and SIMON, ANITA (1967, 1970) Mirrors for Behaviour, 14 vols. Research for Better Schools Incorporated, Philadelphia.
BROWN, R. and BELLUGI, U. (1964) ‘Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax’. Harvard Educational Review, 34.
FIANDER, ANN (1973) ‘What does education achieve: a case study of a teacher and six pupils’. GCSE dissertation, Chelsea College.
FLANDERS, N.A. (1971) Studying Teaching Behaviour. Wiley.
FRAKE, C. (1969) ‘The ethnographic study of cognitive systems’ and ‘Notes on queries in ethnography’, both in S.A.Taylor (ed.),
Cognitive Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
HANNAM, SMYTH and STEPHENSON(1971) Young Teachers and Reluctant Learners. Penguin.
HOLLAND, R. (1970) ‘George Kelly: constructive innocent and reluctant existentialist’, in D.Bannister (editor), Perspectives in Personal
Construct Theory. Academic Press.
KELLY, G. An introduction (1968) to his ideas and their operationalization is in D.Bannister and J.M.M.Mair. The Evaluation of Personal
Constructs. Academic Press.
KIRK, S. and Hopkin, N. (ed.) (1972) CATS Manual. Centre for Advanced Television Studies, 15 Prince of Wales Crescent, London NW1.
KOUNIN.J.S. (1970) Discipline and Group Management in Classrooms. Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
Man: a course of study (1970) Evaluation strategies. Education Development Center. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
MEDLEY, D.M. and MITZEL, H.E. (1963) ‘Measuring classroom behaviour by systematic observation’, in N.L.Gage Handbook of
Research on Teaching, first edition, Rand McNally.
RESEARCH COMMITTEE OF THE INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF EDUCATION (1967) …And Softly Teach . Achievements in
Teaching No. 3. University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
SPINDLER, G. (ed.) (1910) Being an Anthropologist: fieldwork in eleven cultures. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
WITHALL, J. (1956) ‘An objective measurement of a teacher’s classroom interactions’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47,
pp. 203–12.