Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPP INFO For 5CzBN
SUPP INFO For 5CzBN
Information
Supporting Information
Table of Contents
1 GENERAL METHODS................................................................................................................ 2
11 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 40
S1
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
1 General Methods
Unless otherwise noted, all commercially available compounds were used as received without further
purification. Tetrahydrofuran was distilled from sodium/benzophenone. All reactions were carried out under
an atmosphere of dry nitrogen using oven-dried glassware unless otherwise stated.
NMR spectra were recorded on a VARIAN Mercury plus 300 (300.8 MHz), VARIAN Mercury plus
400 (399.95 MHz) and BRUKER Avance III HD (400.13 MHz) using the solvent peaks as internal reference
for the chemicals shifts δ of the reported 1H and 13
C nuclei (CDCl3: δ(1H) = 7.26 , δ(13C) = 77.16 ;
DMSO-d6: δ(1H) = 2.50 , δ(13C) = 39.52 ; acetone-d6: δ(1H) = 2.05 , δ(13C) = 29.84 and DCM-d2:
δ( H) = 5.32 , δ( C) = 53.84 ). Chemical shifts of
1 13 1 19
F nuclei were externally referenced to trifluoroacetic
acid. Multiplicities of signals are reported as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), quint (quintet),
sept (septet), m (multiplet) and combinations of these multiplicities. Coupling constants J are reported in Hz,
rounded on half of whole numbers. All coupling constants J reported refer to JHH couplings, if not stated
13
otherwise. Spectra of C nuclei were recorded 1H-decoupled. The applied solvents are specified in the
descriptions of the corresponding experiments.
ESI-MS spectra were recorded on a BRUKER DALTONICS Esquire 3000 Plus ESI-Ion Trap mass
spectrometer or BRUKER DALTONICS Impact II ESI-TOF mass spectrometer with a mass accuracy of 5 ppm.
Ionization modes are specified in the descriptions of the corresponding experiments.
All reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography using MERCK silica gel plates 60 F254
(aluminium sheets, 200 µm layer thickness) or MACHERY NAGEL Alugram® Xtra SIL G/UV254 (aluminium
sheets, 200 µm layer thickness). Spots were visualized utilizing UV light and/or appropriate staining solutions
of vanillin, ninhydrin, permanganate or molybdophosphoric acid. Flash chromatography was performed on a
BIOTAGE® Isolera One using 10 g or 50 g Biotage® SNAP cartridge KP-Sil columns filled with MACHEREY
NAGEL silica gel 60 (size 40−63 µm).
GC-FID spectra were recorded on a THERMO SCIENTIFIC Trace 1310 gas chromatograph equipped
with a THERMO SCIENTIFIC TG-5MS column (5% diphenyl- and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane, 0.25 mm ID,
0.25 µm film thickness, length 30 m) using hydrogen as carrier gas and nitrogen as make-up gas.
Irradiation was performed with twelve OSRAM Oslon SSL royal blue (455 nm) LEDs attached to an
aluminium heat sink. The LEDs were operated at approx. 700 mA per LED.
Cyclic voltammetry measurements were done with a METROHM Autolab PGSTAT302N,
respectively an EMSTAT3 Standard PalmSens ES316X965 equipped with a glassy carbon electrode as
S2
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
working electrode and platinum wire as counter electrode. Silver wire was used as pseudo reference
electrode and 0.1 M solution of tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate was applied as supporting electrolyte.
Scan rate was set to 100 mV/s. Solutions were degassed with argon prior to measurements and experiments
were performed under an protective atmosphere of argon. Ferrocene was used as an internal reference
(Fc/Fc+) to determine the reduction and oxidation potentials. The applied solvents are specified in the
descriptions of the corresponding experiments.
Absorption spectra were obtained on a JASCO V-650 UV/Vis spectrophotometer and on a Shimadzu
UV-1280 UV/Vis spectrometer. All spectra were recorded in MeCN (5 µ M) in a 1 cm quartz cuvette.
The zero-zero vibrational state excitation energy E0,0 was estimated by the corresponding energy of
the wavelength at which emission and absorption overlap. This wavelength was determined setting the
intensity of emission λmax to the absorbance at excitation wavelength (400 nm, for 4MeOCzIPN 450 nm).
Excited state oxidation and reduction potentials were calculated by the following approximating formulas:
E1/2(PC*/PC●−) = E1/2(PC/PC●−) + E0,0 and E1/2(PC●+/PC*) = E1/2(PC●+/PC) − E0,0.
Names and Nomenclature. BN: benzonitrile (A4); ClIPN: 5-chloro isophthalonitrile (A1Cl); Cz: carbazole
(D3); DPA: diphenylamine (D2); 2FBN: 3,5-difluoro benzonitrile = meta,meta´-difluoro benzonitrile (A3);
FIPN: 5-fluoro isophthalonitrile (A1F); IPN: isophthalonitrile (A2); MeOCz: 3,6-dimethoxy-9H-carbazole
(D1); Mes-Acr-Me+: 9-Mesityl-10-methylacridinium; PDI: perylene bisimide; Rh-6-G: rhodamine-6G.
S3
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
A) In a flame dried Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar 1.25 equiv (per halogen of the
benzene carbonitrile) carbazole or 3,6-dimethoxy-9H-carbazole were dissolved in dry THF (0.05 M,
relating to 1.0 equiv of the corresponding benzonitrile) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. Then,
1.88 equiv (per halogen of the benzene carbonitrile) NaH (60% in mineral oil) were added and the
suspension was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Finally, 1.00 equiv of the corresponding
benzene carbonitrile was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h.
The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of water. After removal of THF, the residue was
dissolved in DCM and washed with water. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography on silica gel.
B) In a flame dried Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar 1.25 equiv (per halogen of the
benzene carbonitrile) diphenylamine were dissolved in dry THF (0.05 M, relating to 1.0 equiv of the
corresponding benzonitrile) under an atmosphere of argon. Then, 1.88 equiv (per halogen of the
benzene carbonitrile) NaH (60% in oil) were added and the suspension was stirred at 50 °C for
30 minutes. Finally, 1.00 equiv of the corresponding benzene carbonitrile was added and the
resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by
the addition of water. After removal of THF, the residue was dissolved in DCM and washed with
water. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel.
S4
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
a
The corresponding signals of this doublet are found at 153.7 and 151.1, hence the signal (151.8) of the carbon para to
the fluorine substituted carbon is positioned in between.
S5
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
S6
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
MeO OMe
13
C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 155.6, 155.1, 154.4,
N
145.1, 144.5, 135.6, 135.3, 133.6, 132.5, 125.7, 125.3,
124.6, 115.7, 115.0, 114.5, 113.6, 112.0, 110.8, 110.5,
MeO OMe
110.1, 104.1, 103.5, 102.8, 56.1, 55.9, 55.8. HR MS (ESI+,
C64H48N6O8
1029.12 g/mol MeCN): m/z = 1051.3436 [M+Na]+, calc. 1051.3426.
S7
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
1 4CzIPN 80%b
2 3DPAFIPN 16%
3 5CzBN 37%
4 3DPA2FBN 20%
5 3CzClIPN 77%b
6 3DPAClIPN 12%
7 4MeOCzIPN 3%
8 5MeOCzBN 1%
9 Mes-4MeOAcr-2MeOPh+ 73%b
a
yield determined by GC-FID analyses using mesitylene as internal standard. b isolated yield.
S8
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
1 Mes-Acr-Me+ 16 h 87%
2 3CzClIPN 16 h 89%
a
yield determined by GC-FID analyses with mesitylene as internal standard.
1-Bromo-4-methoxybenzene (5)
S9
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
2 3DPAFIPN 1h 64%
3 5CzBN 1h 69%
4 3DPA2FBN 2h 77%
5 3CzClIPN 3h 0%
7 4MeOCzIPN 5h 0%
8 5MeOCzBN 5h 0%
9 [Ir(ppy)2(dtbpy)](PF6) 1h 56%
10 Eosin Y -c 0%
a
conversion and yield of 7 determined by GC-FID analyses with mesitylene as internal standard. b isolated yield after 18 h of
irradiation. c after 24 h only traces of acetophenone 7 could be detected.
2,3-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)butane-2,3-diol (8)
S10
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
extracted with DCM (3×). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4 and filtered. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel
(hexanes/ethyl acetate; 3-20% ethyl acetate) to afford the final pinacol-type product 8 as a colorless solid.
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.18 – 7.10 (m, 4H), 6.82 – 6.79 (m, 4H), 3.84 – 3.81 (m, 6H), 2.50 (s, 1H),
2.23 (s, 1H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 3H).
S11
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPA2FBN
1 mol %
3 equiv DIPEA
8h 21% │ 60%
A 3 equiv HCO2H
c(PC) = 2 mM
MeCN Σ 81%
c = 0.2 M
fac-Ir(ppy)3
1 mol %
3 equiv DIPEA
8h 22% │ 59%
A 3 equiv HCO2H
c(PC) = 2 mM Σ 81%
MeCN
c = 0.2 M
3DPA2FBN
1 mol %
3 equiv DIPEA
12 h 23% │ 63%
Adiluted 3 equiv HCO2H
c(PC) = 0.4 mM
MeCN Σ 86%
c = 0.04 M
fac-Ir(ppy)3
1 mol %
3 equiv DIPEA
8h 26% │ 64%
Adiluted 3 equiv HCO2H
c(PC) = 0.4 mM Σ 90%
MeCN
c = 0.04 M
20% │ 58%
8h
3DPA2FBN Σ 78%
3 equiv DIPEA
2 mol %
Adiluted/2×cat 3 equiv HCO2H 12 h
c(PC) = 0.8 mM
MeCN
c = 0.04 M 23% │ 64%
Σ 87%
23% │ 65%
6h
3DPA2FBN Σ 88%
3 equiv DIPEA
2 mol %
A2×cat 3 equiv HCO2H 8h
c(PC) = 4 mM
MeCN
c = 0.2 M 24% │ 67%
Σ 91%
Rh-6G
2.2 equiv DIPEA 0% │ 0%
B DMSO 24 h
10 mol %
degassed Σ 0%
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
1 mol %,
1.4 equiv DIPEA
12 h 8% │ 34%
C DMSO
pyrene Σ 42%
degassed
5 mol %
a
yield determined by GC-FID analyses with mesitylene as internal standard.
S12
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S1: Reaction progress for different conditions of aryl sulfonate detriflation (see table) displayed in a kinetic diagram. Given
concentrations refer to the corresponding concentration of the photocatalyst in the reaction mixture. Yields are determined by GC-
FID with mesitylene as internal standard.
Method A:
In an oven dried Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar 1 mol % (0.0025 mmol) photocatalyst (PC)6
and 69.1 mg 2-naphthol trifluoromethanesulfonate (9) (0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were dissolved in 1.25 mL
MeCN (c(PC) = 2.0 mM) or in 6.0 ml MeCN (c(PC) = 0.4 mM). Then, 96.9 mg diisopropylethylamine
(0.75 mmol, 3.0 equiv) and 34.5 mg formic acid (0.75 mmol, 3.0 equiv) were added and the solution was
irradiated with blue light (455 nm) for 8 h to 16 h (as indicated). Mesitylene was added as internal standard
and yields were determined by GC-FID analyses.
Method B:7
An oven dried Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with 10 mol % rhodamine 6G
and 27.6 mg 2-naphthol trifluoromethanesulfonate (9) (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv). The Schlenk tube was
evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen (3×). Then, 1 mL dry DMSO and 28.4 mg diisopropylethylamine
(0.22 mmol, 2.2 equiv) were added under nitrogen. The solution was degassed by freeze-pump-thaw cycles
(3×) and irradiated with blue light (455 nm) for 24 h. Mesitylene was added as internal standard and yields
were determined by GC-FID analyses.
S13
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Method C:8
In an oven dried Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar 1 mol % Ru(bpy)3Cl2, 5 mol % pyrene and
55.2 mg 2-naphthol trifluoromethanesulfonate (9) (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were dissolved in 1 mL DMSO
under nitrogen. 36.2 mg diisopropylethylamine (0.28 mmol, 1.4 equiv) were added. The solution was
degassed by freeze-pump-thaw cycles (3×) and irradiated with blue light (455 nm) for 12 h. Mesitylene was
added as internal standard and yields were determined by GC-FID analyses.
S14
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S2: Cyclic voltammogram of 3,6-dimethoxy-carbazole D1 in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
Figure S3: Cyclic voltammogram of diphenylamine D2 in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S15
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S4: Cyclic voltammogram of carbazole D3 in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S16
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Table S1: All potentials in Volts vs. SCE. Measurements were performed in MeCN using ferrocene as internal standard unless
otherwise noted (Fc+/Fc → SCE: +0.380 V9). a For method of determination: see ‘General Methods’ section (p. S2) for more details.
b
Measurement in no-degassed MeCN as polar solvent provides the lifetime kp‒1 of the prompt part of the photoluminescence only;
kd‒1 [µs] of the delayed photoluminescence was not determined. c CV measurement performed in DCM to enhance solubility. d CV
measurement performed in MeCN/DCM 5:1 v/v to enhance solubility. e Not determined due to weak emission intensity.
Abbreviations
Donors:
Cz (carbazole, D3), DPA (diphenylamine, D2), MeOCz (3,6-dimethoxy-9H-carbazole, D1)
Given numbers refer to the actual quantity of the respective donor in the molecule.
Acceptors:
BN (benzonitrile, A4), ClIPN (5-chloro isophthalonitrile, A1Cl), 2FBN (3,5-difluoro benzonitrile = meta,meta´-
difluoro benzonitrile, A3), FIPN (5-fluoro isophthalonitrile, A1F), IPN (isophthalonitrile, A2)
A1Cl A1F A2 A3 A4
R R R CN CN
NC CN NC CN NC CN R R R R
R R R R R R F F R R
Cl F R R R
S17
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
N
NC CN
N N
C56H32N6
788.91 g/mol
5,00E+02
4,00E+02
3,00E+02
Current/µA
2,00E+02
1,00E+02
0,00E+00
-2,000 -1,500 -1,000 -0,500 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000
-1,00E+02
Potential/V
Figure S5: Cyclic voltammogram of 4CzIPN in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S18
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S6: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 4CzIPN in MeCN (5 µM).
S19
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
N
NC CN
N N
F
C44H30FN5
647.76 g/mol
Figure S8: Cyclic voltammogram of 3DPAFIPN in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S20
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S9: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 3DPAFIPN in MeCN (5 µM).
S21
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3,50E+02
3,00E+02
2,50E+02
2,00E+02
Current/µA
1,50E+02
1,00E+02
5,00E+01
0,00E+00
-2,000 -1,500 -1,000 -0,500 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000
-5,00E+01
Potential/V
Figure S11: Cyclic voltammogram of 5CzBN in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S22
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S12: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 5CzBN in MeCN (5 µM).
S23
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S14: Cyclic voltammogram of 3DPA2FBN in DCM and ferrocene as internal standard.
S24
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S15: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in MeCN (5 µM).
S25
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
5,00E+02
4,00E+02
3,00E+02
Current/µA
2,00E+02
1,00E+02
0,00E+00
-1,800 -1,300 -0,800 -0,300 0,200 0,700 1,200 1,700 2,200
-1,00E+02
Potential/V
Figure S17: Cyclic voltammogram of 3CzClIPN in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S26
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S18: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 3CzClIPN in MeCN (5 µM).
S27
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S20: Cyclic voltammogram of 3DPAClIPN in MeCN and ferrocene as internal standard.
S28
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S21: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 3DPAClIPN in MeCN (5 µM).
S29
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S23: Cyclic voltammogram of 4MeOCzIPN in MeCN/DCM 5:1 v/v and ferrocene as internal standard.
S30
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S24: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 4MeOCzIPN in MeCN (5 µM).
S31
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S25: Cyclic voltammogram of 5MeOCzBN in DCM and ferrocene as internal standard.
S32
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S26: UV/Vis absorption and emission spectrum of 5MeOCzBN in MeCN (5 µM).
S33
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
S34
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S29: 19F NMR spectrum of 3DPAFIPN in CDCl3, 8.0 mg 3DPAFIPN (0.01 mmol), 11 mg p-fluoro toluene (0.1 mmol) as
internal standard, integral of standard set to 10.00, integral of F in 3DPAFIPN = 1.01 = 1 F.
1 13
H and C NMR spectra (shown below, pages S36 and S37) resemble those reported by Zhang and co-
workers. Note the 259.5 Hz 1JC,F coupling at 152.4 (153.7/151.1) ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum
10
[M+Na]+
[M+NH4]+
[M+K]+
[M+H]+
Figure S30: Overview HR MS (ESI+, MeCN) spectrum of 3DPAFIPN ([M+Na]+, calc.: 670.2378) up to m/z 885.
Please note that only traces of a putative structure 4DPAIPN ([M+Na]+, calc. 819.3207)10 may have been formed.b
b +
Reported and calculated mass data for a putative compound 4DPAIPN in ref. 10 (“m/z calcd. for C56H40N6Na
+
([M + Na] ) 817.3212, found: 817.3147.“) differ from the correct value and may stem from typos as
819.3212 refers to the uncharged [M+Na] m/z value: 819.3212).
S35
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+NH4]+ [M+K]+
Figure S31: Detailed HR MS (ESI+, MeCN, m/z 640 to 690) spectrum of 3DPAFIPN , m/z = 648.2558 [M+H]+, calc. 648.2558;
665.2826 [M+NH4]+, calc. 655.2823; 670.2378 [M+Na]+, calc. 670.2377;
686.2111 [M+K]+, calc. 686.2117.
10.2 19F NMR, 13C NMR Spectra Details and HR MS Spectra of 3DPA2FBN (D2-A3)
Figure S33: Zoomed overview 13C NMR spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in CDCl3 (157 -109 ppm).
S36
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
Figure S34: Zoomed detailed of 13C NMR spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in CDCl3 showing JCF couplings (157-152 ppm).
Figure S35: Zoomed detail of 13C NMR spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in CDCl3 showing JCF couplings (136-134 ppm).
Figure S36: Zoomed detail of 13C NMR spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in CDCl3 showing JCF couplings (131-123 ppm).
Figure S37: Zoomed detail of 13C NMR spectrum of 3DPA2FBN in CDCl3 showing JCF couplings (115-108 ppm).
S37
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+K]+
Figure S38: Overview HR MS (ESI+, MeCN) spectrum of 3DPA2FBN ([M+Na]+, calc.: 663.2331) up to m/z 970.
[M+Na]+
[2M+Na]+
Figure S39: Overview HR MS (ESI+, MeCN + Na formiate) spectrum of 3DPA2FBN ([M+Na]+, calc.: 663.2331) up to m/z 1350
[M+H]+
Figure S40: Overview HR MS (ESI+, MeCN + HCOOH) spectrum of 3DPA2FBN ([M+H]+, calc.: 641.2511) up to m/z 1425.
S38
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
[M+Na]+
[M+H]+
[M+K]+
Figure S41: Detailed HR MS (ESI+, MeCN, m/z 640 to 685) spectrum of 3DPA2FBN , m/z = 641.2519 [M+H]+, calc. 641.2511;
663.2329 [M+Na]+, calc. 663.2331; 679.2081 [M+K]+, calc. 679.2070.
S39
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
11 References
1) Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw,
J. E.; Goldberg, K. I., Organometallics, 2010, 29, 2176-2179.
2) Joshi-Pangu, A.; Lévesque, F.; Roth, H. G.; Oliver, S. F.; Campeau, L. -C.; Nicewicz, D. A.; DiRocco, D.
A., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 7244-7249.
3) Ohkubo, K.; Mizushima, K.; Iwata, R.; Fukuzumi, S. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 715-722.
4) Nguyen, J. D.; Matsuura, B. S.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1218-1221.
5) Nakajima, M.; Fava, E.; Loescher, S.; Jiang, Z.; Rueping, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8828-8832.
6) For the experiment with 2 mol % catalyst 0.005 mmol photocatalyst were dissolved in 1.25 ml MeCN.
7) Shaikh, R. S.; Düsel, S. J. S.; König, B. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8410-8414.
8) Ghosh, I.; Shaikh, R. S.; König, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8544-8549.
9) Pavlishchuk, V. V.; Addison, A. W. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 298, 97-102.
10) Luo, J.; Zhang, J., ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 873-877.
S40
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPAFIPN D2-A1F
S41
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPAFIPN D2-A1F
S42
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPAFIPN D2-A1F
S43
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
5CzBN D3-A4
S44
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
5CzBN D3-A4
S45
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPA2FBN D2-A3
S46
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPA2FBN D2-A3
S47
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3DPA2FBN D2-A3
S48
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3CzClIPN D3-A1Cl
S49
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
3CzClIPN D3-A1Cl
S50
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
N
NC CN
N N
Cl
3DPAClIPN D2-A1Cl
S51
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
N
NC CN
N N
Cl
3DPAClIPN D2-A1Cl
S52
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
4MeOCzIPN D1-A2
S53
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
4MeOCzIPN D1-A2
S54
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
5MeOCzBN D1-A4
S55
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
5MeOCzBN D1-A4
S56
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
O
O
O
O
N O
S57
Zeitler et al. Supp. Information
1
Fulmer, G. R.; Miller, A. J. M.; Sherden, N. H.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Nudelman, A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Bercaw, J. E.; Goldberg, K. I., Organometallics, 2010, 29, 2176-2179.
2
Joshi-Pangu, A.; Lévesque, F.; Roth, H. G.; Oliver, S. F.; Campeau, L. -C.; Nicewicz, D. A.; DiRocco, D. A., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 7244-7249.
3
Ohkubo, K.; Mizushima, K.; Iwata, R.; Fukuzumi, S. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 715-722.
4
Nguyen, J. D.; Matsuura, B. S.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1218-1221.
5
Nakajima, M.; Fava, E.; Loescher, S.; Jiang, Z.; Rueping, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8828-8832.
6
For the experiment with 2 mol % catalyst 0.005 mmol photocatalyst were dissolved in 1.25 ml MeCN.
7
Shaikh, R. S.; Düsel, S. J. S.; König, B. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8410-8414.
8
Ghosh, I.; Shaikh, R. S.; König, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8544-8549.
9
Pavlishchuk, V. V.; Addison, A. W. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 298, 97-102.
10
Luo, J.; Zhang, J., ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 873-877.
S58