Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Short Communication

Tim Joda The virtual patient in dental medicine


German O. Gallucci

Authors’ affiliations: Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, digital dental medicine, extraoral face scan,
Tim Joda, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, School intraoral scan, superimposition, virtual patient
of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern,
Switzerland
German O. Gallucci, Department of Restorative Abstract
Dentistry & BioMaterial Science, Harvard School of
Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Objectives: The aim of this Short Communication was to present a workflow for the
superimposition of intraoral scan (IOS), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and extraoral
Corresponding author: face scan (EOS) creating a 3D virtual dental patient.
Dr. Tim Joda, DMD, MSc
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics Material and Methods: As a proof-of-principle, full arch IOS, preoperative CBCT, and mimic EOS
School of Dental Medicine were taken and superimposed to a unique 3D data pool. The connecting link between the
University of Bern different files was to detect existing teeth as constant landmarks in all three data sets.
Freiburgstr. 7
3010 Bern, Switzerland Results: This novel application technique successfully demonstrated the feasibility of building a
Tel.: +41 31 632 0910 craniofacial virtual model by image fusion of IOS, CBCT, and EOS under 3D static conditions.
Fax: +41 31 632 49 31 Conclusions: The presented application is the first approach that realized the fusion of intraoral
e-mail: tim.joda@zmk.unibe.ch
and facial surfaces combined with skeletal anatomy imaging. This novel 3D superimposition
technique allowed the simulation of treatment planning, the exploration of the patients0
expectations, and the implementation as an effective communication tool. The next step will be
the development of a real-time 4D virtual patient in motion.

Digital technologies have recently received dentistry? Today, there are (still) more ques-
its way into dental medicine. Due to these tion marks than answers.
developments, clinical practices and labora- Therefore, the aim of this Short Communi-
tory techniques are shifting to virtual-based cation was to update the current status of
processes (Eaton et al. 2008; Schoenbaum knowledge as well as the technical progress
2012). Routinely diagnostic methods include in the field of 3D virtual patients science,
digital radiology and photography; treatment and presenting a workflow for the superimpo-
concepts benefit from modernized workflows sition of 3D imaging as intraoral scan (IOS),
with intraoral scanning, computer-assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT),
implant surgery, and streamlined manufac- and facial extraoral scan (EOS).
turing of dental prostheses (Patel 2010).
The fusion of these digital puzzle pieces to
Material and methods
a whole seems to be the logical continuum
of this trend: creating a 3D virtual patient.
A clinical case, requiring an implant-sup-
The entire treatment plan could be simulated
ported reconstruction for the replacement of
noninvasively, shared via network-mediated
teeth 21 and 22, was chosen to demonstrate
communication tools, and adopted to the
the stepwise procedure creating a 3D virtual
patient0 s expectation (Kau 2011; Katase et al.
patient prior to surgery:
2013). However, how far are we in virtual

Date:
Accepted 27 February 2014

To cite this article:


Joda T, Gallucci GO. The virtual patient in dental medicine.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 26, 2015, 725–726 Fig. 1. Pre- and post-extraction intraoral surface scans (IOS) as STL, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as
doi: 10.1111/clr.12379 DICOM, and stereo-photogrammetric extraoral scan (EOS) as OBJ.

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 725
Joda & Gallucci  The virtual patient

Discussion

Currently, no application system in the dental


literature is known achieving a superimposi-
tion of STL, DICOM, and OBJ files to a 3D vir-
tual patient. The presented application
technique is the first approach that realizes
the fusion of intra- and extraoral surfaces com-
Fig. 2. Pre- and post-extraction frontal as well as lateral 3D virtual patient data sets based on superimposition of
IOS + CBCT + EOS. bined with skeletal anatomy imaging. Mean-
while, it has been only reported on two files-
related fusions of either IOS + EOS (Rangel
et al. 2008; Rosati et al. 2010) or CBCT + EOS
(Naudi et al. 2013; Xin et al. 2013).
The presented 3D superimposition of IOS,
CBCT, and EOS allows outstanding advanta-
ges in future dental medicine: (1) simulation
of treatment planning and discovering
patients0 expectation; (2) facility for more
effective patient and colleague communica-
tions as well as implementation in dental
education; (3) noninvasive imaging technique
for high-precision anatomical documentation;
Fig. 3. Prosthetic-driven treatment planning based on CBCT and IOS with 3D implant software.
and (4) wide-range use in the fields of maxil-
First, full arch IOS impressions were taken remaining teeth as constant objects in all lofacial as well as plastic surgery.
(iTero Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA) three files (Fig. 2). The next step has to be the development of
and stored as STL files. The STL format Moreover, computer-assisted implant a real-time 4D virtual patient in motion.
describes triangulated surface geometries of guided-surgery in combination with 3D plan- Even though, it is still feasible to extract a
3D objects. Moreover, a CBCT was performed ning software offers an additional tool in a single frame of 3D data from a captured 4D
(i-CAT, Hatfield, PA, USA). The correspond- prosthetic-oriented digital treatment concept video sequence and export this to an OBJ file
ing data format DICOM is a standard for han- under consideration of the individual patient that could then be superimposed with CBCT
dling, storing, printing, and transmitting situation (coDiagnostiX Straumann, Basel, data. However, no commercially available
information in medicine (ISO 12052:2006). Switzerland) (Fig. 3). system is (yet) able to fuse a 4D sequence of
Finally, stereo-photogrammetric EOS comple- mimic facial movements onto DICOM, STL,
mented the series of imaging techniques and OBJ files.
Results
(3dMD, Atlanta, GA, USA). Three EOS were
captured during different smile positions as
As a proof-of-principle, this application tech-
OBJ files. OBJ is a universally accepted geome- Acknowledgements: The authors
nique successfully demonstrated the feasibility
try definition file format that represents 3D thank Dr. Oon Tian Tan and Dr. Alice
of building a craniofacial virtual reality model
color and texture information (Fig. 1). Frigerio (MEEI, Boston, MA, USA) for
by image fusion of IOS, CBCT, and EOS. The
Afterward, all media files were superim- collaboration, as well as Jesse Knowles
superimposition facilitated creating a 3D vir-
posed to a unique 3D data pool. This required (3dMD, Atlanta, GA, USA) for technical
tual patient data set under static conditions.
reproducibly detectable landmarks in every support.
Despite of these preliminary results, real-time
part of the imaging files. Here, the connect-
actions of the jaws, lips, and mimic muscles
ing link between STL, DICOM, and OBJ was
could not be captured in a 4D prototype.

References
Eaton, K.A., Reynolds, P.A., Grayden, S.K. & Wil- captured 3d photorealistic skin surface of the face Rosati, R., De Menezes, M., Rossetti, A., Sforza, C.
son, N.H. (2008) A vision of dental education in on the untextured skin image of the cbct scan. & Ferrario, V.F. (2010) Digital dental cast place-
the third millennium. British Dental Journal 205: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial ment in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction:
261–271. Surgery 42: 393–400. a technical evaluation. American Journal of
Katase, H., Kanazawa, M., Inokoshi, M. & Minaku- Patel, N. (2010) Integrating three-dimensional digi- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138:
chi, S. (2013) Face simulation system for com- tal technologies for comprehensive implant den- 84–88.
plete dentures by applying rapid prototyping. tistry. Journal of the American Dental Schoenbaum, T.R. (2012) Dentistry in the digital
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 109: 353–360. Association 141(Suppl 2): 20S–24S. age: an update. Dentistry Today 31: 108, 110,
Kau, C.H. (2011) Creation of the virtual patient for Rangel, F.A., Maal, T.J., Berge, S.J., van Vlijmen, 112–113.
the study of facial morphology. Facial Plastic Sur- O.J., Plooij, J.M., Schutyser, F. & Kuijpers-Jagt- Xin, P., Yu, H., Cheng, H., Shen, S. & Shen, S.G.
gery Clinics of North America 19: 615–622, viii. man, A.M. (2008) Integration of digital dental (2013) Image fusion in craniofacial virtual reality
Naudi, K.B., Benramadan, R., Brocklebank, L., Ju, casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. Ameri- modeling based on ct and 3dmd photogrammetry.
X., Khambay, B. & Ayoub, A. (2013) The virtual can Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 24: 1573–
human face: superimposing the simultaneously Orthopedics 134: 820–826. 1576.

726 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 26, 2015 / 725–726 © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

You might also like