Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pxvirtual 2014
Pxvirtual 2014
Authors’ affiliations: Key words: cone-beam computed tomography, digital dental medicine, extraoral face scan,
Tim Joda, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, School intraoral scan, superimposition, virtual patient
of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern,
Switzerland
German O. Gallucci, Department of Restorative Abstract
Dentistry & BioMaterial Science, Harvard School of
Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Objectives: The aim of this Short Communication was to present a workflow for the
superimposition of intraoral scan (IOS), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and extraoral
Corresponding author: face scan (EOS) creating a 3D virtual dental patient.
Dr. Tim Joda, DMD, MSc
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics Material and Methods: As a proof-of-principle, full arch IOS, preoperative CBCT, and mimic EOS
School of Dental Medicine were taken and superimposed to a unique 3D data pool. The connecting link between the
University of Bern different files was to detect existing teeth as constant landmarks in all three data sets.
Freiburgstr. 7
3010 Bern, Switzerland Results: This novel application technique successfully demonstrated the feasibility of building a
Tel.: +41 31 632 0910 craniofacial virtual model by image fusion of IOS, CBCT, and EOS under 3D static conditions.
Fax: +41 31 632 49 31 Conclusions: The presented application is the first approach that realized the fusion of intraoral
e-mail: tim.joda@zmk.unibe.ch
and facial surfaces combined with skeletal anatomy imaging. This novel 3D superimposition
technique allowed the simulation of treatment planning, the exploration of the patients0
expectations, and the implementation as an effective communication tool. The next step will be
the development of a real-time 4D virtual patient in motion.
Digital technologies have recently received dentistry? Today, there are (still) more ques-
its way into dental medicine. Due to these tion marks than answers.
developments, clinical practices and labora- Therefore, the aim of this Short Communi-
tory techniques are shifting to virtual-based cation was to update the current status of
processes (Eaton et al. 2008; Schoenbaum knowledge as well as the technical progress
2012). Routinely diagnostic methods include in the field of 3D virtual patients science,
digital radiology and photography; treatment and presenting a workflow for the superimpo-
concepts benefit from modernized workflows sition of 3D imaging as intraoral scan (IOS),
with intraoral scanning, computer-assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT),
implant surgery, and streamlined manufac- and facial extraoral scan (EOS).
turing of dental prostheses (Patel 2010).
The fusion of these digital puzzle pieces to
Material and methods
a whole seems to be the logical continuum
of this trend: creating a 3D virtual patient.
A clinical case, requiring an implant-sup-
The entire treatment plan could be simulated
ported reconstruction for the replacement of
noninvasively, shared via network-mediated
teeth 21 and 22, was chosen to demonstrate
communication tools, and adopted to the
the stepwise procedure creating a 3D virtual
patient0 s expectation (Kau 2011; Katase et al.
patient prior to surgery:
2013). However, how far are we in virtual
Date:
Accepted 27 February 2014
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 725
Joda & Gallucci The virtual patient
Discussion
References
Eaton, K.A., Reynolds, P.A., Grayden, S.K. & Wil- captured 3d photorealistic skin surface of the face Rosati, R., De Menezes, M., Rossetti, A., Sforza, C.
son, N.H. (2008) A vision of dental education in on the untextured skin image of the cbct scan. & Ferrario, V.F. (2010) Digital dental cast place-
the third millennium. British Dental Journal 205: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial ment in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction:
261–271. Surgery 42: 393–400. a technical evaluation. American Journal of
Katase, H., Kanazawa, M., Inokoshi, M. & Minaku- Patel, N. (2010) Integrating three-dimensional digi- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138:
chi, S. (2013) Face simulation system for com- tal technologies for comprehensive implant den- 84–88.
plete dentures by applying rapid prototyping. tistry. Journal of the American Dental Schoenbaum, T.R. (2012) Dentistry in the digital
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 109: 353–360. Association 141(Suppl 2): 20S–24S. age: an update. Dentistry Today 31: 108, 110,
Kau, C.H. (2011) Creation of the virtual patient for Rangel, F.A., Maal, T.J., Berge, S.J., van Vlijmen, 112–113.
the study of facial morphology. Facial Plastic Sur- O.J., Plooij, J.M., Schutyser, F. & Kuijpers-Jagt- Xin, P., Yu, H., Cheng, H., Shen, S. & Shen, S.G.
gery Clinics of North America 19: 615–622, viii. man, A.M. (2008) Integration of digital dental (2013) Image fusion in craniofacial virtual reality
Naudi, K.B., Benramadan, R., Brocklebank, L., Ju, casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. Ameri- modeling based on ct and 3dmd photogrammetry.
X., Khambay, B. & Ayoub, A. (2013) The virtual can Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 24: 1573–
human face: superimposing the simultaneously Orthopedics 134: 820–826. 1576.
726 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 26, 2015 / 725–726 © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd