Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crystallization of Isotactic Polypropylene in The Presence of A B-Nucleating Agent Based On A Trisamide of Trimesic Acid
Crystallization of Isotactic Polypropylene in The Presence of A B-Nucleating Agent Based On A Trisamide of Trimesic Acid
Crystallization of Isotactic Polypropylene in The Presence of A B-Nucleating Agent Based On A Trisamide of Trimesic Acid
ABSTRACT: Tris-2,3-dimethyl-hexylamide of trimesic constant cooling rate or under isothermal condition have a
acid (TATA) is an new type of b-nucleating agent for iso- single peak in spite of the formation of two polymorphic
tactic polypropylene (iPP). The crystallization, melting modifications. The crystallization isotherms cannot be
characteristics, and the supermolecular structure of iPP linearized according to the Avrami equation because of
nucleated with TATA were studied on the samples crystal- simultaneous crystallization of the a-and b-forms, having
lized under nonisothermal and isothermal conditions. The different nucleation and growth rate. It was also found
b-nucleating ability of TATA was rather high even at low that the b-content increased with increasing conversion
concentration. It was established that TATA possessed during isothermal crystallization because of the higher
dual nucleating ability generating samples with mixed growth rate of the b-phase. The b-phase formed in the
(a and b) polymorphic compositions. The b-content presence of TATA consist of lamellar crystallites. In the
showed an maximum value at low concentrations (10–100 early stage of the crystallization, hedritic structure is
ppm) of TATA. The b-content decreased with increasing formed. V C 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 121:
agents.27 Distinct structural variations allow to About 36.5 g (0,284 mol) 2,3-dimethyl-cyclohexyla-
design nucleators and clarifiers with various proper- mine, 2.8 g (0,066 mol) lithium chloride, 35.5 g (0.344
ties. They may be extraordinary efficient at low mol) triethyl-amine, and 130 mL NMP were placed in
concentrations (few hundred ppm and even less). a 500-mL three-necked flask. About 26.6 g (0.086 mol)
Developed for the common a-form of iPP, the first 1,3,5-benzene-tricarboxylic acid trichloride dissolved
trisamide clarifier was commercially introduced by in 50 mL NMP were added to this clear yellow solu-
Ciba. in 2006 [c.f. WO 04/072168]. It was recognized, tion at 5 C over a period of 1 h. After stirring for 2 h at
however, that members of aromatic trisamides fam- 75–80 C, the reaction mixture was chilled and poured
ily may work as b-NA for iPP [c.f. WO 03/102069]. under stirring into 600-mL ice water. The precipitate
The effects of various b-NA-s on the melting and was filtered off, then washed with 200 mL water and
crystallization behavior of iPP were previously com- 400-mL hot methanol, and eventually dried in a vac-
pared and already published elsewhere.10 uum oven at 80 C. About 33 g of 1,3,5-benzene-tricar-
Our preliminary results included first findings boxylic acid tris(2,3-dimethyl-cyclohexylamide) was
with one experimental trisamide from Ciba (desig- finally obtained (71% yield) as faintly yellowish pow-
nated as CG-220), which has been studied more in der with a melting point >300 C. Elemental analysis:
detail and is now reported herein. Further aim of Calculated values for C33H51N3O3: C 73.70%; H 9.56%;
this work is to introduce the methodology of quali- N 7.81%; experimentally determined values: C 73.33%;
fying a b-NA, because lot of contradictory works is H 9.51%; N 7.87%. TATA is thermally stable com-
presented in the literature in this field. The major pound, and its intensive thermal degradation in inert
problem is that several authors do not take into atmosphere occurs above 400 C (Fig. 1). The nucleat-
account the unique melting behavior of beta ing agent crystallizes in needle form (Fig. 2).
nucleated iPP,1,28 and the results obtained in those
works do not represent the polymorphic composi-
tion of the samples reliably.29–32 Moreover, it was Methods
also highlighted in this work that b- and a-iPP crys- IPP samples with TATA content of 10, 50, 100, 300,
tallize simultaneously during isothermal crystalliza- 500, and 1000 ppm were prepared in a Brabender
tion study, and therefore the Avrami evaluation of
crystallization isotherms recorded by DSC is funda-
mentally flawed, because the crystallization process
of the two modifications is impossible to separate.
Despite that several paper is dealing with the kinetic
evaluation of b-nucleated iPP according to Avrami
method.23,33 The competitive growth of the two
phase can only be studied by Wide angle X-ray scat-
tering (WAXS) technique presented by Chen et al.34
Figure 3 Effect of the concentration of TATA on the melting (a) and crystallization (b) curves of the nucleated samples.
Cooling and heating rate Vc ¼ Vh ¼ 10 C min1, TR ¼ TR* ¼ 100 C).
where the bc is the b-content, Xb and Xa are the corresponds to DHa [see Fig. 3(a)]. To take into
degree of crystallinity of the a- and b-form, respec- the account the degree of overlapping of the a- and
tively, and DH0a and DH0b are the enthalpy of fusion b-melting peaks, Li and Cheung29 proposed an
of the completely crystallized a- and b-forms, while empirical equation with a correction factor (Cf).
DHa and DHb the enthalpy of the fusion of the Unfortunately, they evaluated the melting curves of
a- and b-forms in the samples with mixed polymor- the b-nucleated samples cooled to 50 C when conclud-
phic composition. DHa and DHb can be determined ing of their equation. Consequently, the disturbing
from the area under a- and b-melting peaks. Unfortu- effect of the ba-recrystallization was not eliminated.
nately, the literature values for the enthalpy of fusion Therefore, the reliability of the proposed equation
of a- and b-iPP are rather contradictory1,40 and seems to be questionable, although this method was
strongly depend on the method of their determina- already applied in several woks. We separate the melt-
tion. There are three pairs of enthalpy values deter- ing peaks by the method of the vertical line38 using
mined by similar method.1 These are the following the following equilibrium enthalpy values of fusion:
for the a- and b-form: 170.0 and 168.5 J/g,41 221 and DH0a ¼ 148 J/g43 and DH0b ¼ 113 J/g.44
192 J/g,42 and 148 and 113 J/g,43,44 respectively. In The nucleating efficiency of the additives can be
spite of the notable difference in numerical values of characterized by their influence on the peak tempe-
the enthalpy of fusion determined by different meth- rature of the crystallization curves (Tcp) registered at
ods, the bc differs only slightly applying the above a constant cooling rate during nonisothermal crystalli-
values in Eq. (2), because the determining factor is zation. It is worth of mentioning that Lotz and
the quotient q ¼ DH0a /DH0b and not the absolute colleagues46 proposed an efficiency scale, which is
value of the enthalpy according to the Eq. (2): based on the comparison of the peak temperature of
the crystallization of non-nucleated (Tc1), nucleated
q
bc ¼ (3) (TcNA), and self-seeded (Tc2) samples according to
q þ DH
DHb
a
the Eq. (4):
The Eq. (3) is obtained after introducing q in Eq. (2). TcNA Tc1
NE ¼ 100% (4)
In most of cases, the a- and b-melting peaks are Tc2
overlapped, and thus they should be separated. The
simplest approximation of the partition is the draw- where TcNA, Tc1, and Tc2 are the peak temperatures
ing a vertical line through the maxima between the of the nucleated non-nucleated and self-seeded
two endothermic peaks.45 The low temperature part samples, respectively. Unfortunately, this equation
of area gives DHb and the high temperature area cannot be adopted for b-iPP, because the b-nucleated
Figure 10 Melting curves of isothermally crystallized Figure 11 Melting curves of isothermally crystallized
sample containing 100 ppm of TATA. sample containing 50 ppm of TATA.
reliable because of the disturbing effect of the alpha as a function of Tc for the samples with different
to beta recrystallization. Therefore, the literature TATA concentrations is shown in Figure 12. In the
data obtained in this way should be treated with temperature range 110–135 C, the samples are rich
criticisms. in b-modification. The highest bc (about 80%) can
The crystallization curves of b-nucleated samples be achieved at lower crystallization temperatures
show only single peaks [Fig. 3(b)] in spite of the (Tc ¼ 110–125 C) with 10–100 ppm TATA concentra-
formation of two different polymorphs existing as tion. Above Tc ¼ 135 C, the b-phase forms only in
individual, separate phases. In accordance with the
nucleating ability of TATA, the temperature range
and peak temperature of the crystallization (Tcp) are
shifted toward higher temperatures with increasing
concentration of the nucleating agent. The dependence
of the peak temperature (Tcp) and the enthalpy (DHc)
of crystallization on the concentration of the TATA are
displayed in Figure 8. The increasing of DHc with
increasing concentration of TATA could be explained
with increasing a-content having higher enthalpy of
fusion. Moreover, the crystallinity becomes larger
because of elevating the crystallization temperature
with increasing the TATA concentration.
Isothermal crystallization
The isothermal crystallization of the b-nucleated
samples with different TATA concentration was per-
formed in the temperature range Tc ¼ 110–145 C.
Melting curves of samples heated from Tc without Figure 12 Dependence of the b-content on the temperature
recooling are shown in Figures 9–11. The b-content of the isothermal crystallization and concentration of TATA.
Figure 17 Formation a b-hexagonite (in the center) during isothermal crystallization of sample containing 10 ppm TATA
(Tc ¼ 135 C, tc ¼ 22, 30, 45, and 50 min). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com.]
crystallize slowly. Therefore, the crystallization iso- a- and b-forms with different nucleation and growth
therms are rather flat, and it is difficult to mark out rate occurs simultaneously. This scenario results in
the base line. Isotherms, suitable for the quantitative very complicated overall process. One can only spec-
evaluation, are available only in a narrow tempera- ulate how the overall rate of the crystallization and
ture range (Tc ¼ 125–130 C). The crystallization the polymorphic composition depend on the crystal-
isotherms registered in this temperature range were lization time or conversion under isothermal condi-
evaluated by the Avrami equation: tion. In the presence of b-NA with dual nucleating
ability, it is most probable that the nucleation of the
a- and b-phase is athermal (i.e., the number of the
n
x ¼ 1 ekt or lnð lnð1 xÞÞ ¼ n ln t þ ln K (5)
nuclei of both phases are constant during the crystal-
where K is the rate constant of the crystallization, n lization). In this case, the polymorphic composition
is the Avrami’s exponent, and x is the relative pro- is determined by the relative growth rate of the
portion of crystallized material. However, the crys- polymorphs and the relative number of the athermal
tallization isotherms of the samples nucleated with a- and b-nuclei. It is known that the growth rate of
TATA could not be linearized by the Avrami equa- the b-phase is higher than that of the a-phase in the
tion (Fig. 14). It is clearly visible in Figure 14 that temperature range T ¼ 100–140 C,1,40 and the ratio
Avrami plots have no linear section in the whole of the growth rate is temperature dependent. Conse-
crystallization range. A linear line was fitted to quently, the b-content assumed to be increased with
Avrami plots in the conversion range of 1.15–91%. increasing crystallization time or conversion. The ex-
We have to remark here that the correct estimation perimental results corroborate the above assumption.
of the initial time (t0) of crystallization is essential. If The alteration of bc of the samples as a function of
the line is fitted to a small section of the Avrami the conversion during the isothermal crystallization
plots, the fitting might be good, but the results is demonstrated in Figure 15. The samples were crys-
obtained will not be reliable. Avrami plots presented tallized isothermally at 130 C for different times and
in Figure 14 indicate unambiguously that the n than heated from Tc. bc was determined on the basis
depends on time due to the crystallization of the of the melting curve as described earlier [see eqs. (2)
Figure 19 Arrangement of the b-lamellae in the sample nucleated with 100 ppm TATA and crystallized at Tc ¼ 130 C
for 30 min.
spiral dislocations, which are responsible for lamel- 4. Shi, G. Y.; Zhang, X. D.; Qiu, Z. X. Makromol Chem 1992, 193,
lar branching.1,51,52 583.
5. Varga, J.; Mudra, I.; Ehrenstein, G. W. J Appl Polym Sci 1999,
74, 2357.
CONCLUSIONS 6. Ikeda, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Killough, L. Novel beta-nucleator for
polypropylene; Polypropylene ’96. World Congress, Zürich,
TATA is an active b-NA. In its presence, samples Switzerland, 1996.
with mixed polymorphic compositions form, which 7. Marco, C.; Gomez, M. A.; Ellis, G.; Arribas, J. M. J Appl
indicates that TATA possesses dual nucleating abil- Polym Sci 2002, 86, 531.
ity. The b-content has maximum value at low con- 8. Kotek, J.; Raab, M.; Baldrian, J.; Grellmann, W. J Appl Polym
Sci 2002, 85, 1174.
centration (10–100 ppm) of TATA. During isother-
9. Cermak, R.; Obadal, M.; Ponizil, P.; Polaskova, M.; Stoklasa,
mal crystallization, the highest b-content (about K.; Lengalova, A. Eur Polym J 2005, 41, 1838.
80%) can be achieved at lower crystallization tem- 10. Menyhárd, A.; Varga, J.; Molnár, G. J Therm Anal Calorim
peratures (Tc ¼ 110–125 C) at 10–100 ppm TATA 2006, 83, 625.
concentrations. The crystallization curves registered 11. Varga, J. Menyhárd, A. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 2422.
12. Behrendt, N.; Mohmeyer, N.; Hillenbrand, J.; Klaiber, M.;
at constant cooling rate or under isothermal condi-
Zhang, X. Q.; Sessler, G. M.; Schmidt, H. W.; Altstadt, V.
tion have a single peak in spite of the formation of J Appl Polym Sci 2006, 99, 650.
two polymorphic modifications. The crystallization 13. Dong, M.; Guo, Z.; Yu, J.; Su, Z. J Polym Sci B 2008, 46, 1725.
isotherms cannot be linearized according to the 14. Mathieu, C.; Thierry, A.; Wittmann, J. C.; Lotz, B. J Polym Sci
Avrami equation because of the simultaneous crys- Part B: Polym Phys 2002, 40, 2504.
15. Mohmeyer, N.; Schmidt, H. W.; Kristiansen, P. M.; Altstadt, V.
tallization of the a-and b-forms, having different
Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5760.
nucleation and growth rates. It was also found that 16. Lu, Q.; Dou, Q. e-Polymers 2008, 076.
the b-content increased with increasing conversion 17. Lu, Q. L.; Dou, Q. J Macromol Sci Part B: Phys 2008, 47, 463.
during isothermal crystallization because of the 18. Dou, Q. J Appl Polym Sci 2009, 111, 1738.
higher growth rate of the b-phase. The b-phase 19. Dou, Q.; Lu, Q. L. J Vinyl Addit Technol 2008, 14, 136.
20. Dou, Q.; Lu, Q. L.; Li, H. D. J Macromol Sci Part B: Phys 2008,
formed in the presence of TATA consists of lamellar
47, 900.
crystallites. In the early stage of the crystallization, a 21. Dou, Q.; Lu, Q. Polym Adv Technol 2008, 19, 1522.
hedritic structure is formed. 22. Xiong, F.; Guan, R.; Xiao, Z. X.; Xiang, B. L.; and Lu, D. P.
Polym Plast Technol Eng 2007, 46, 97.
References 23. Xiao, W.; Wu, P.; Feng, J. J Appl Polym Sci 2008, 108, 3370.
24. Xiao, W. C.; Wu, P. Y.; Feng, J. C.; Ya, R. Y. J Appl Polym Sci
1. Varga, J. J Macromol Sci Phys 2002, B41, 1121. 2009, 111, 1076.
2. Lotz, B.; Wittmann, J. C.; Lovinger, A. J Polym 1996, 37, 4979. 25. Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, Z.; Chen, C.; Mai, K. Polymer
3. Leugering, H. J. J Macromol Chem 1967, 109, 204. 2008, 49, 5137.
26. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Tao, Y.; Mai, K. Eur Polym J 2008, 44, 3754. 40. Varga, J. In Crystallization, Melting and Supermolecular
27. Blomenhofer, M.; Ganzleben, S.; Hanft, D.; Schmidt, H.-W.; Structure of Isotactic Polypropylene; Karger-Kocsis, J., Ed.;
Kristiansen, M.; Smith, P.; Stoll, K.; Mader, D.; Hoffmann, K. Chapman & Hall: Netherlands, 1995; p 56.
Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3688. 41. Li, J. X.; Cheung, W. L.; Jia, D. M. Polymer 1999, 40, 1219.
28. Varga, J. J Therm Anal 1986, 31, 165. 42. Shi, G. Y.; Huang, B.; Zhang, J. Y. Makromol Chem Rapid
29. Li, J.; Cheung, W. J Therm Anal Calorim 2000, 61, 757. Commun 1984, 5, 573.
30. Liu, M. X.; Guo, B. C.; Du, M. L.; Chen, F.; Jia, D. M. Polymer 43. Monasse, B.; Haudin, J. M. Colloid Polym Sci 1985, 263, 822.
2009, 50, 3022. 44. Varga, J; Garzó, G. Acta Chim Hungar 1991, 128, 303.
31. Tang, X. G.; Yang, W.; Bao, R. Y.; Shan, G. F.; Xie, B. H.; Yang, 45. Li, J. X.; Cheung, W. L. J Mater Process Technol 1997, 63, 472.
M. B.; Hou, M. Polymer 2009, 50, 4122. 46. Fillon, B.; Lotz, B.; Thierry, A.; Wittmann, J. C. J Polym Sci
32. Kang, J.; Chen, J. Y.; Cao, Y.; Li, H. L. Polymer 2010, 51, 249. Part B: Polym Phys 1993, 31, 1395.
33. Zhao, S.; Cai, Z.; Xin, Z. Polymer 2008, 49, 2745. 47. Varga, J.; Schulek-Tóth, F.; Ille, A. Colloid Polym Sci 1991,
34. Chen, Y. H.; Mao, Y. M.; Li, Z. M.; Hsiao, B. S. Macromole- 269, 655.
cules 2010, 43, 6760. 48. Samuels, R. J. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 1975, 13, 1417.
35. Varga, J. J Therm Anal 1989, 35, 1891. 49. Petraccone, V.; Derosa, C.; Guerra, G.; Tuzi, A. Makromol
36. Karger-Kocsis, J.; Shang, P. P. J Therm Anal 1998, 51, 237. Chem Rapid Commun 1984, 5, 631.
37. Olley, R. H.; Bassett, D. C. Polymer 1982, 23, 1707. 50. Derosa, C.; Guerra, G.; Napolitano, R.; Petraccone, V.; Pirozzi,
38. Turner Jones, A.; Aizlewood, J. M.; Beckett, D. R. Macromol B. Eur Polym J 1984, 20, 937.
Chem 1964, 75, 134. 51. Varga, J.; Ehrenstein, G. W. Colloid Polym Sci 1997, 275, 511.
39. Shangguan, Y. G.; Song, Y. H.; Peng, M.; Li, B. P.; Zheng, Q. 52. Trifonova-Van Haeringen, D.; Varga, J.; Ehrenstein, G. W.;
Eur Polym J 2005, 41, 1766. Vancso, G. J. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2000, 38, 672.