Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EBook Clinical Anesthesia Fundamentals Ebook Without Multimedia First Edition Ebook PDF PDF Docx Kindle Full Chapter
EBook Clinical Anesthesia Fundamentals Ebook Without Multimedia First Edition Ebook PDF PDF Docx Kindle Full Chapter
All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic
copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from
the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materi-
als appearing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government
employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please contact
Wolters Kluwer Health at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, via
email at permissions@lww.com, or via our website at lww.com (products and services).
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed in China
This work is provided “as is,” and the publisher disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied,
including any warranties as to accuracy, comprehensiveness, or currency of the content of this work.
This work is no substitute for individual patient assessment based upon healthcare professionals’
examination of each patient and consideration of, among other things, age, weight, gender, current or
prior medical conditions, medication history, laboratory data and other factors unique to the patient.
The publisher does not provide medical advice or guidance and this work is merely a reference tool.
Healthcare professionals, and not the publisher, are solely responsible for the use of this work including
all medical judgments and for any resulting diagnosis and treatments.
Given continuous, rapid advances in medical science and health information, independent professional
verification of medical diagnoses, indications, appropriate pharmaceutical selections and dosages, and
treatment options should be made and healthcare professionals should consult a variety of sources.
When prescribing medication, healthcare professionals are advised to consult the product information
sheet (the manufacturer’s package insert) accompanying each drug to verify, among other things, con-
ditions of use, warnings and side effects and identify any changes in dosage schedule or contradictions,
particularly if the medication to be administered is new, infrequently used or has a narrow therapeutic
range. To the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, no responsibility is assumed by the
publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property, as a matter of products liability, negli-
gence law or otherwise, or from any reference to or use by any person of this work.
LWW.com
ix
xv
Paul G. Barash, MD
Bruce F. Cullen, MD
Robert K. Stoelting, MD
Michael K. Cahalan, MD
M. Christine Stock, MD
Rafael Ortega, MD
Sam R. Sharar, MD
I
1. History and Future 3
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rafael Ortega and Christopher J. Hansen
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sam R. Sharar and Peter von Homeyer
Pa t B: Pharmacology
r
7. Principles of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 119
. . . . . . . . .
hanesh K. Gupta and homas K. Henthorn
D
T
8. Inhalational Anesthetic Agents 137
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ramesh Ramaiah and Sanjay M. Bhananker
Pa t C: echnology
r
T
14. The Anesthesia Workstation 255
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Naveen Nathan and om C. Krejcie
T
15. Standard Anesthesia Monitoring Techniques and Instruments 277
. . . . .
Ryan J. Fink and Jonathan B. Mark
xvii
III
C
16. Preoperative Evaluation and Management 297
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Natalie F. Holt
. . . . . . . . .
Gerardo Rodriguez
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shamsuddin Akhtar
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark C. Norris and Roya Saffary
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mary E. Warner
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wendy K. Bernstein and Kyle E. Johnson
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ashley N. Agerson and Honorio . Benzon
T
38. Nonoperating Room Anesthesia and Special Procedures 721
. . . . . . . . .
Karen J. Souter and suta Nishio
I
39. Postoperative Recovery 733
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roger S. Mecca
. . .
James E. Szalados
. . . . . . . . .
Amy E. Vinson and Robert S. Holzman
Section V: Appendices
I
A. Formulas 825
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Atlas of Electrocardiography 829
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gina C. Badescu, Benjamin M. Sherman, James R. Zaidan, and Paul G. Barash
I Introduction
Most medical textbooks begin by discussing the history of the subject. Why?
Succinctly stated, we only learn from the past. Although modern anesthesiol-
ogy is practiced in today’s future-driven environment, there is much to learn
by analyzing the historical evolution of the specialty.
The field of anesthesiology is at a turning point that will define the future
course of the profession. Today, anesthesiologists face new challenges, from
expanding their roles in perioperative medicine and critical care to confronting
professional competition and health care reform.
Understanding how and why anesthetics came into use, how they have
evolved, and how the profession has grown is essential for a true understand-
ing of the specialty and anticipating new forays into the future.
anesthetics for surgical pain and severed nerves for relief of neuralgia. Chi-
nese physicians have used acupuncture and various herbal substances to ease
surgical pain for centuries. In 1804, Seishu Hanaoka (1760–1835), a surgeon
from Japan, induced general anesthesia with a herbal combination contain-
ing anticholinergic alkaloids capable of inducing unconsciousness. Hanaoka
developed an enteral formulation called Tsusensan. His patients would ingest
?
this concoction before Hanaoka would begin the surgical procedure (1).
Did
You Know II. Inhaled Anesthetics
By 1800, Sir Humphry A. Nitrous Oxide
Davy was aware Joseph Priestley (1733–1804), an English chemist and clergyman known for
that nitrous oxide his isolation of oxygen in its gaseous form, was also the first to isolate nitrous
had analgesic oxide. Although he did not report on nitrous oxide’s possible medical applica-
properties and that tions, it was his discovery and isolation of this and various other gases that
it had potential to be would allow for modern methods of inhaled anesthesia. Sir Humphry Davy
used during surgical (1778–1829) described nitrous oxide’s effect on breathing and the central ner-
procedures. However, vous system. In 1800, he stated, “As nitrous oxide in its extensive operation
it was Horace Wells appears capable of destroying physical pain, it may probably be used with
who, 45 years later,
advantage during surgical operations in which no great effusion of blood takes
first attempted to use
place.” Despite his insight, Davy did not employ nitrous oxide as an anes-
nitrous oxide as a
general anesthetic. thetic, and his lasting legacy to history was coining of the phrase “laughing
gas,” which describes nitrous oxide’s ability to trigger uncontrollable laughter.
Horace Wells (1815–1848) was the first individual to attempt a public
demonstration of general anesthesia using nitrous oxide. Wells, a well-known
dentist from Hartford, Connecticut, had used nitrous oxide for dental extrac-
tions. In 1845, he attempted to publicly perform the painless extraction of a
tooth using nitrous oxide. However, possibly due to inadequate administra-
tion time, the patient was not fully insensible to pain and was said to have
moved and groaned. Because of this, Wells was discredited and became deeply
disappointed at his failed demonstration. Wells spent the better part of his
remaining life in self-experimentation and unsuccessfully pursuing recognition
for the discovery of inhaled anesthesia (2).
B. Diethyl Ether
? Did
You Know
Although the origin of diethyl ether’s discovery is debated, it may first have
been synthesized by eighth-century Arabian philosopher Jabir ibn Hayyan or
13th-century European alchemist Raymundus Lully.
By the 16th century, Paracelsus and others were preparing this compound
Physicians and and noting its effects on consciousness. Paracelsus documented that diethyl
chemists were familiar ether could produce drowsiness in chickens, causing them to become unre-
with the compound, sponsive and then wake up without any adverse effects. In the 17th and 18th
diethyl ether, for centuries, ether was sold as a pain reliever, and numerous famous scientists
centuries before it of the time examined its properties. Because of its effects on consciousness,
was used as a general
it also became a popular recreational drug in Britain and Ireland as well as
anesthetic.
in America, where festive group events with ether were called “ether frolics.”
Although many were aware of the effects of inhaled ether, it was a physician
from Georgia who first administered ether with the deliberate purpose of pro-
ducing surgical anesthesia. Crawford Williamson Long (1815–1878) admin-
istered ether as a surgical anesthetic on March 30, 1842, to James M. Venable
for the removal of a neck tumor. However, his results were not published until
1849, three years after William T. G. Morton’s famous public demonstration.
This was not from a lack of insight, but rather a lack of desire for recognition.
When he finally did publish his experiments with ether, he stated he did so at
the bequest of his friends who felt he would be remiss not to state his involve-
ment in the history of inhalation anesthesia.
On October 16, 1846, William T. G. Morton induced general anesthe-
sia with ether, which allowed surgeon John Collins Warren (1778–1856) to
remove a vascular tumor from Edward Gilbert Abbott (Fig. 1-1). The anes-
thetic was delivered through an inhaler consisting of a glass bulb containing
an ether-soaked sponge and a spout at the other end through which the patient
could breathe. The glass bulb was open to room air, allowing the patient to
breathe in fresh air that mixed with the ether inside the bulb before passing
through the spout and into the patient’s lungs. The event occurred in a surgi-
cal amphitheater at the Massachusetts General Hospital, known today as the
Ether Dome. News of the demonstration spread quickly, and, within a matter
of months, the possibility of painless surgery was known around the world.
Figure 1-2 he sculpture atop the ther Monument in the Public Garden in Boston
T
E
symbolizing the relief of human suffering.
Medical and Surgical Journal (the predecessor to the New England Journal
of Medicine), was widely distributed (4). The news reached Horace Wells,
who contended that he had discovered inhaled anesthetics through his use of
nitrous oxide. It was these assertions that would lead to what is now called the
“ether controversy.” The debate was made worse by what was most likely an
attempt for monetary reward, with Morton’s subsequent denial of Jackson’s
share in the discovery, leading to all three being pitted against one another (5).
The controversy would destroy both the reputations and lives of those
involved, and to this day it lives on through various monuments throughout
New England and other areas of the nation avowing credit to those depicted.
It should be noted that, although not usually cited as being involved in the
ether controversy, Crawford Long did publish his accounts of his use of ether.
As such, there are various monuments asserting his place in the history of
anesthesia (Fig. 1-2).
D. Spread of Ether
After Morton’s famous demonstration, Henry Jacob Bigelow and his father
Jacob Bigelow wrote letters to English physicians Francis Boott and Robert
Liston, respectively. Boott, a general practitioner, and Liston, a surgeon, con-
V deo 1-2 ducted Europe’s first successful administration of surgical anesthesia with
i
Open Drop Ether ether in December 1846, leading to Liston’s famous words, “Well gentlemen,
this Yankee Dodge sure beats mesmerism hollow.” News traveled fast, and use
of ether anesthesia swiftly found its way throughout the European continent.
E. Chloroform
Although chloroform had been discovered nearly two decades earlier, it was
not used as a surgical anesthetic until a year after Morton’s demonstration in
1847. James Young Simpson, a Scottish obstetrician, had learned of ether’s
effects after Liston’s successful operation and had employed it with some
of his patients. Although it did relieve some of the suffering associated with
childbirth, Simpson was not satisfied and began to search for a better solu-
tion. Through the advice of a chemist, he became aware of chloroform and its
anesthetizing effects. On November 4, 1847, he and two friends imbibed the
contents of a bottle containing chloroform. Needless to say, they were satisfied
by their self-experimentation and Simpson began using chloroform to relieve
the pain of childbirth.
F. Critics of Anesthesia
?
The anesthetic use of chloroform and ether was not without its skeptics, and
arguments against its use were made on moral, religious, and physiologic
grounds. However, unlike ether, in Europe, chloroform use was more eas- Did
ily legitimized through the scientific logic of John Snow, who proclaimed its You Know
safety over ether and would eventually administer it to Queen Victoria during The scientific study of
the birth of Prince Leopold. Perhaps because of the widespread use of chlo- surgical anesthesia
roform and the effect a monarch can have on its citizens, the use and study prospered in 19th
of surgical anesthesia prospered in 19th-century Europe, while in the United
-
century Europe,
States it remained comparatively stagnant. while in the United
States it remained
G. The Birth of Modern Surgical Anesthesia comparatively stagnant
London physician John Snow, best known for his epidemiologic work on chol- for decades.
era and the introduction of hygienic medicine, could also be called the first
true anesthetist. As was his manner, he delved deeply into the study and under-
standing of volatile anesthetics. Unlike Morton, Wells, and Jackson, Snow was
not worried about his role and potential legacy in medicine, but rather with
the safe and proper administration of anesthesia. His calm and attentive atti-
tude in the operating theater and focus on the patient’s well-being, rather than
his self-pride, is a model to be emulated.
?
Perhaps Snow’s intense study of the mechanism of action and possible side
effects of inhaled anesthetics inspired the quest for an ideal inhalation anes-
thetic. Throughout the 20th century, various drugs such as ethyl chloride,
Did
ethylene, and cyclopropane were used for surgical anesthesia. But these were
You Know
eventually abandoned due to a variety of drawbacks such as their pungent Inhaled anesthetics
nature, weak potency, and flammability. The discovery that fluorination such as cyclopropane
contributed to making anesthetics more stable, less toxic, and less combus- and ether were
tible led to the introduction of halothane in the 1950s. The 1960s and 1970s abandoned among
would bring about various fluorinated anesthetics such as methoxyflurane other reasons due to
and enflurane. These were eventually discontinued due to untoward side their high flammability.
effects. Although initially more difficult to synthesize and purify, isoflurane,
an isomer of enflurane, had fewer side effects than previous agents. It has
been used since the late 1970s and is still a popular inhalation anesthetic
today. There were no further advances in inhaled anesthetics until the intro-
duction of desflurane in 1992 and sevoflurane in 1994. Both of these agents,
along with isoflurane and nitrous oxide, are the most widely used inhaled
agents used today.
?
Phenobarbital was the first drug to be used as an intravenous induction agent.
This barbiturate, synthesized in 1903 by Emil Fischer and Joseph von Mering,
Did caused prolonged periods of unconsciousness followed by slow emergence and
You Know as such was not an ideal anesthetic. However, its success in producing anes-
The barbiturates thesia and the promotion and study of intravenous anesthetics by men such
were the first drugs as John Lundy opened new possibilities in anesthesia. In 1934, Ralph Waters
to be administered (1883–1979) from the University of Wisconsin and John Lundy (1894–1973)
intravenously as from the Mayo Clinic administered thiopental (a potent barbiturate) as a
induction agents. successful intravenous induction anesthetic agent. Lundy emphasized the
approach, referred to as “balanced anesthesia,” that consisted of a combina-
tion of several anesthetic agents and strategies to produce unconsciousness,
neuromuscular block, and analgesia. Through use of this approach, Lundy
allowed for a safer and more complete administration of anesthesia. Thio-
pental’s popularity led to the introduction of several other types of intrave-
nous hypnotics including ketamine (1962), etomidate (1964), and propofol
(1977). Since that time, other intravenous agents such as benzodiazepines and
new opioids have been added to the specialty’s armamentarium and further
research continues.
B. Regional Anesthesia
Cocaine, originally described by Carl Koller in 1884 as a local anesthetic,
became a mainstay for regional anesthesia through the early 1900s. During
this time period, various nerve and plexus blocks were described, as was the
technique of spinal anesthesia, all using cocaine as a local anesthetic. How-
ever, early cases of regional anesthesia were not without incident. Adverse
effects, including postdural puncture headache, vomiting, and cocaine’s addic-
tive quality, necessitated the development of local anesthetics such as procaine
in 1905 and lidocaine in 1943, which were much safer.
Throughout the 1940s, advances continued in the field of regional anesthe-
sia with the advent of continuous spinal anesthesia by William T. Lemmon in
1940 and Edward Tuohy’s eponymous needle in 1944. Tuohy’s modification
of the spinal needle allowed a catheter to pass into the epidural space and
administer doses of local anesthetics. From that point to the present, subarach-
noid and epidural administration methods of local anesthetics and opioids are
commonly employed for analgesia during labor and delivery as well as for
managing postoperative pain. Innovations such as ultrasound imaging and
nerve stimulators are now used to facilitate locating and identifying nerves,
thus improving the quality of the block.
References
1. Ortega RA, Mai C. History of anesthesia. In: Vacanti CA, Sikka PK, Urman RD, et al.,
eds. Essential Clinical Anesthesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:1–6.
2. Haridas RP. Horace Wells’ demonstration of nitrous oxide in Boston. Anesthesiology.
2013;119(5):1014–1022.
3. Zeitlin GL. Charles Thomas Jackson, “The Head Behind the Hands.” Applying science to
implement discovery in early nineteenth century America. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(3):
687–688.
4. Bigelow HJ. Insensibility during surgical operations produced by inhalation. Boston Med
Surg J. 1846;16:309–317.
5. Ortega RA, Lewis KP, Hansen CJ. Other monuments to inhalation anesthesia. Anesthe-
siology. 2008;109(4):578–587.
Questions
1. The first successful public demonstration of 4. The term balanced anesthesia was introduced
the use of ether anesthesia during a surgical to refer to:
procedure is generally credited to whom? A. A combination of anesthetic agents to
A. Joseph Priestley produce unconsciousness, neuromuscu-
B. William Morton lar block, and analgesia
C. Charles Jackson B. The combined use of spinal anesthesia
D. Henry Bigelow and sedation
C. General anesthesia with a barbiturate
2. Advantages of fluorinating anesthetic agents
and morphine
include all of the following EXCEPT:
D. Total intravenous anesthesia
A. Greater potency
B. Greater stability 5. The correct historical order of introduction
C. Greater toxicity of the following local anesthetics is:
D. Less combustibility A. Lidocaine, procaine, bupivacaine
B. Procaine, cocaine, lidocaine
3. Which of the following neuromuscular block-
C. Cocaine, procaine, lidocaine
ing agents (NMBA) was first used in clinical
D. Cocaine, bupivacaine, procaine
practice?
A. Vecuronium
B. Succinylcholine
C. Pancuronium
D. Curare
II Foundations of
Anesthesia
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.