Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3 - Process Costing
Chapter 3 - Process Costing
In manufacturing process costing setting, each unit is assumed to receive the same
amount of direct materials cost, direct manufacturing labor costs, and indirect
manufacturing costs. Units are computed by dividing total costs by the number of
units.
The principal difference between process costing and job costing is the extent of
averaging used to compute unit costs of products or services. In job-costing
system, individual jobs use different quantities of production resources. Thus, it
would be incorrect to cost each job at the same average production cost.
In contrast, when identical or similar units of products or services are mass
produced, and not processed as individual jobs, process costing averages
production costs over all units produced.
The difference between job order and process costing system is, thus, the
extent of the averaging used to compute unit cost. In job order costing
each job differs in terms of material used, labor incurred, and
manufacturing overhead. Hence, it is impossible to assign the same cost
for different jobs. On the contrary, identical units produced in mass took
1
equal amount of direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing
overhead. Thus, the unit cost can be found by dividing total cost by the
number of units produced.
2
costing system fit among others to, paint manufacturers, oil refineries, sugar
refineries, and salt producers.
o In process costing system, manufacturing costs, direct material, direct labor, and
manufacturing overhead costs are accumulated in the same way as job order
costing system. However, the costs are accumulated by department over some
period of time than by individual jobs.
o The time period over which the cost is to be accumulated depends on the
information needs of the company. It can be a week, two weeks, but no longer
than a month most often. Cost accumulation is much simpler for a process costing
system than for a job order cost system.
Case 1: Process costing with zero beginning and zero ending work in
process inventory that is all units are started and fully completed by the
end of the accounting period.
Solution:
Direct Material costs per unit (32,000/400) Br. 80
Conversion costs per unit (24000/400) 60
Assembly Department costs per unit 140
Case 2: Process Costing with zero beginning but some ending work in
process inventory
3
Data for the Assembly Department for February 2021
Physical Units for February 2021
Work in Process, beginning inventory (February 1) 0 units
Started during February 400 units
Completed and transferred out during February 175 units
Work in Process, ending inventory (February 28) 225 units
Total Costs for February 2021
Direct materials costs added during February Br.32,000
Conversion costs added during February 18,600
Total Assembly Department costs added during February 50,600
In addition, the Assembly Department estimates that the partially assembled units are on
averages 60% complete as to conversion costs.
How should the co. calculate the cost of fully assembled units in February 2021 and
the cost of partially assembled units still in process at the end of February 2021?
Steps:
Summarize the flow of physical units of output.
Compute output in terms of equivalent units.
Compute equivalent unit costs.
Summarize total costs to account for.
Assign total costs to unit’s completed and to units in
ending work in process.
Equivalent Units: A key Concept
Material, labor and overhead costs are incurred at different rates in production
process. Direct material usually placed in production at one or more discreet
points in the process. In contrast, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, called
conversion costs, and usually are incurred continuously throughout the process.
When an accounting period ends, the partially completed goods that remain in
process generally are at different stages of completion with respect to material and
conversion activity.
Example: Suppose there are 1000 physical units in process at the end of an accounting
period. Each of the physical units is 75% complete with respect to conversion. How much
conversion activity has been applied to these partially completed units?
Conversion activity occurs uniformly throughout the production process. Therefore, the
amount of conversion activity required to do 75% of the conversion on 1000 units is
equivalent to the amount of the conversion on 750 units. The number is computed as
follows:
1000 partially completed physical units in process * 75% complete with respect to
Conversion = 750
The term equivalent units is used in process costing to refer to the amount of
manufacturing activity that has been applied to a batch of physical units. The 1000
physical units in process represent 750 equivalent units of conversion activity.
The term equivalent unit is also used to measure the amount of direct materials
represented by the partially completed goods. Since direct materials are incorporated at
4
the beginning of the production process, the 1000 physical units represent 1000
equivalent units of direct material (1000 physical units * 100% complete with respect to
direct materials).
Journal Entries
Work in Process- Assembly 32,000
Account Payable Control 32,000
(To record direct materials purchased and used in production)
Work in Process- Assembly 18,600
5
Various accounts 18,600
(To record Assembly department conversion costs)
Work in Process- Testing 24,500
Work in Process- Assembly 24,500
(To record cost of goods completed and transferred from Assembly to
Testing Department)
Case 3: Process costing with some beginning and some ending work in
process inventory.
Data for the Assembly Department for March 2021
Physical Units for March 2021
Work in Process, beginning inventory (March 1) 225 units
Direct Materials (100% complete)
Conversion costs (60% complete)
Started during March 275 units
Completed and transferred out during March 400 units
Work in Process, ending inventory (March 31) 100 units
Direct Materials (100% complete)
Conversion costs (50% complete)
Total Costs for March 2021
Work in process, beginning inventory
Direct materials (225 equivalent units * Br. 80/unit) Br. 18,000
Conversion costs (135 equivalent units * Br.60/unit) 8,100 Br. 26,100
Direct materials costs added during March 19,800
Conversion costs added during March 16,380
Total costs to account for Br.62, 280
6
100*100%; 100*50% 100 50
Accounted for 500
Work done in current period 500 450
Journal Entries
Work in Process- Assembly 19,800
Account Payable Control 19,800
(To record direct materials purchased and used in production)
Work in Process- Assembly 16,380
Various accounts 16,380
(To record Assembly department conversion costs)
Work in Process- Testing 52,000
Work in Process- Assembly 52,000
(To record cost of goods completed and transferred from Assembly to
Testing Department)
7
A distinct feature of the FIFO process-costing method is that work done
on beginning inventory before the current period is kept separate from
work done in the current period.
Costs incurred in the current period and units produced in the current
period are used to calculate costs per equivalent unit of work done in the
current period.
In contrast equivalent unit and cost per equivalent unit calculations in the
weighted average method merge the units and costs in beginning inventory
with units and costs of work done in the current period.
8
Total costs of units completed & transferred 52,480
Work in process, ending (100 units)
Direct Materials 7,200 100*72
Conversion costs 2,600 50*52
Total work in process, ending 9,800
Total costs accounted for Br. 62,280