Gravitational Teleportation

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Gravitational Holographic Teleportation

Fran de Aquino

To cite this version:


Fran de Aquino. Gravitational Holographic Teleportation. 2013. �hal-01077618�

HAL Id: hal-01077618


https://hal.science/hal-01077618
Preprint submitted on 26 Oct 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est


archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés.
Gravitational Holographic Teleportation
Fran De Aquino
Copyright © 2013 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved.

A process of teleportation is here studied. It involves holography and reduction of the gravitational mass of the
bodies to be transported. We show that if a holographic three-dimensional image of a body is created and sent to
another site and the gravitational mass of the body is reduced to a specific range, then the body will disappear and
posteriorly will reappear exactly where its holographic three-dimensional image was sent.

Key words: Modified theories of gravity, Experimental studies of gravity, Holography.


PACS: 04.50.Kd, 04.80.-y, 42.40.-i.
.
1. Introduction

During long time evidences have been particle and Δp is the variation in the
shown that spacetime is holographic. A particle’s kinetic momentum; c is the speed
holographic principle has been conjectured of light.
to apply not just to black holes, but to any This equation shows that only for
spacetime [1, 2, 3, 4]. Covariant holographic Δp = 0 the gravitational mass is equal to the
entropy bounds generalize to other inertial mass.
spacetimes [5, 6]. Fully holographic theories In general, the momentum variation
have now been demonstrated, in which a Δp is expressed by Δp = FΔt where F is
system of quantum fields and dynamical the applied force during a time interval Δt .
gravity in N dimensions is dual to a system Note that there is no restriction concerning
of quantum fields in N − 1 classical the nature of the force F , i.e., it can be
dimensions [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. mechanical, electromagnetic, etc.
Recently, scientists from University of Equation (1) tells us that the
Arizona led by Nasser Peyghambarian have gravitational mass can be negative. This fact
invented a system that creates holographic, is highly relevant because shows that the
three-dimensional images that may be well-known action integral for a free-
viewed at another site [12]. Peyghambarian b
says the machine could potentially transport particle: S = −m c∫ ds , m > 0 , must be
a
a person's image over vast distances. generalized for the following form (where
Here, we show that if a holographic m g can be positive or negative):
three-dimensional image of a body is created
(2 )
b
and sent to another site and the gravitational S = − m g c ∫ ds
a
mass of the body is reduced to a specific
or
range, then the body will disappear and
(3)
t2
posteriorly will reappear exactly where its S = − ∫ m g c 2 1 − V 2 c 2 dt
t1
holographic three-dimensional image was
where the Lagrange's function is
sent.
L = −m g c 2 1 − V 2 c 2 . (4)
2. Theory t2
The integral S = ∫t m g c 2 1 − V 2 c 2 dt ,
1

From the quantization of gravity it preceded by the plus sign, cannot have a
follows that the gravitational mass mg and minimum. Thus, the integrand of Eq.(3) must
the inertial mass mi are correlated by means be always positive. Therefore, if m g > 0 ,
of the following factor [13]: then necessarily t > 0 ; if m g < 0 , then
mg ⎧⎪ ⎡ ⎤⎫
2
⎛ Δ ⎞ ⎪ t < 0 . The possibility of t < 0 is based on
χ= = ⎨1 − 2⎢ 1 + ⎜⎜
p
⎟⎟ − 1⎥⎬ (1)
mi 0 ⎪ ⎢ ⎝ i0 ⎠
m c ⎥ the well-known equation t = ± t0 1−V 2 c2
⎩ ⎣ ⎦⎪⎭
of Einstein's Theory.
where mi 0 is the rest inertial mass of the
2
Thus if the gravitational mass of a mg χ mi 0
particle is positive, then t is also positive Mg = = = χM i (8)
1−V 2 c2 1−V 2 c2
and, therefore, given by t = +t0 1−V 2 c2 .
It is known that the uncertainty
This leads to the well-known relativistic principle can also be written as a function of
prediction that the particle goes to the future, ΔE (uncertainty in the energy) and Δt
if V → c . However, if the gravitational mass (uncertainty in the time), i.e.,
of the particle is negative, then t is negative ΔE.Δt ≥ h (9)
and given by t = − t0 1 −V 2 c2 . In this case, This expression shows that a variation of
the prediction is that the particle goes to the energy ΔE , during a time interval Δt , can
past, if V → c . Consequently, m g < 0 is the only be detected if Δt ≥ h ΔE . Consequently,
necessary condition for the particle to go to a variation of energy ΔE , during a time
the past. interval Δt < h ΔE , cannot be
The Lorentz's transforms follow the experimentally detected. This is a limitation
same rule for m g > 0 and m g < 0 , i.e., the imposed by Nature and not by our
equipments.
sign before 1 − V 2 c 2 will be (+ ) when Thus, a quantum of energy
m g > 0 and (− ) if m g < 0 . ΔE = hf that varies during a time interval
The momentum, as we know, is the Δt = 1 f = λ c < h ΔE (wave period) cannot
r r
vector p = ∂L ∂V .Thus, from Eq.(4) we obtain be experimentally detected. This is an
r imaginary photon or a “virtual” photon.
r mgV r
p = = M gV (5) Now, consider a particle with energy
± 1−V 2 c2 2
M g c . The DeBroglie’s gravitational and
The (+ ) sign in the equation above will be inertial wavelengths are respectively
used when m g > 0 and the (− ) sign if λ g = h M g c and λi = h M i c . In Quantum
m g < 0 . Consequently, we can express the Mechanics, particles of matter and quanta of
r radiation are described by means of wave
momentum p in the following form
r packet (DeBroglie’s waves) with average
r mgV r wavelength λi . Therefore, we can say that
p = = M gV (6)
1−V 2 c2 during a time interval Δt = λi c , a quantum
whence we get a new relativistic expression of energy ΔE = Mgc2 varies. According to the
for the gravitational mass, i.e.,
uncertainty principle, the particle will be
mg
Mg = (7 ) detected if Δt ≥ h ΔE , i.e., if λi c ≥ h M g c 2
1−V 2 c2 or λi ≥ λ g 2π . This condition is usually
Note that m g is not the gravitational mass at
satisfied when M g = M i . In this case,
rest, which is obtained making Δp = 0 in Eq.
λ g = λi and obviously, λi > λi 2π .
(1), i.e., m g 0 = mi 0 . In this case, the equation
However, when M g decreases λ g increases
above reduces to the well-known Einstein’s
equation: and λ g 2π can become bigger than λi ,
mi0 making the particle non-detectable or
Mi =
1−V 2 c2 imaginary.
Since the condition to make the
Substitution of Eq. (1) into Eq. (7) leads particle imaginary is
to the following equation λg
λi <

and
3
λg h h λ formation, where atoms with strong mutual
= = = i affinity combine to form molecules. It is the
2π M g c χM i c 2πχ
case, for example of the water molecules, in
Then we get which two Hydrogen atoms join an Oxygen
1 atom. It is the so-called Chemical Affinity.
χ<= 0.159
2π The degree of Mutual Affinity, A , in
However, χ can be positive or negative the case of imaginary particles , respectively
( χ < +0.159 or χ > −0.159 ). This means described by the wave functions Ψ1 and
that when Ψ2 , might be correlated to Ψ12 and Ψ22 . Only
a simple algebraic form fills the requirements
− 0.159 < χ < +0.159 (10) of interchange of the indices, the product
Ψ12 .Ψ 22 = Ψ 22 .Ψ12 =
the particle becomes imaginary. = A1, 2 = A 2 ,1 = A (12 )
Consequently, it leaves our Real Universe,
i.e., it performs a transition to the Imaginary In the above expression, A is due to the
Universe, which contains our Real Universe. product Ψ12 .Ψ22 will be always positive.
The terms real and imaginary are borrowed
from mathematics (real and imaginary From equations (11) and (12) we get
numbers). A = Ψ12 .Ψ22 = k 2 ρ1g (imaginary) ρ 2 g (imaginary =
All these conclusions were originally m1g (imaginary) m2 g (imaginary)
deduced in a previous article [13]. = k2 (13)
V1 V2
Quantum Mechanics tells us that if an
experiment involves a large number of Since imaginary gravitational masses
identical particles, all described by the same are equivalent to real gravitational masses
wave function Ψ , real density of mass ρ then the equations of the Real Gravitational
Interaction are also applied to the Imaginary
of these particles in x, y, z, t is proportional
Gravitational Interaction. However, due to
to the corresponding value Ψ 2 ( Ψ 2 is imaginary gravitational mass, m g (imaginary ) , to
known as density of probability. If Ψ is
be an imaginary quantity, it is necessary to
imaginary then Ψ 2 = ΨΨ* . Thus,
ρ ∝ Ψ = Ψ.Ψ ). Similarly, in the case of
2 * put m g ( imaginary ) into the mentioned equations

imaginary particles, the density of imaginary in order to homogenize them, because as we


gravitational mass, ρ g ( imaginary ) , in x, y, z, know, the module of an imaginary number is
always real and positive.
will be expressed by ρg(imaginary) ∝ Ψ2 = Ψ Ψ* . Thus, based on gravity theory, we can
Since Ψ 2 is always real and positive and write the equation of the imaginary
gravitational field in nonrelativistic
ρ g (imaginary ) = m g ( imaginary ) V is an imaginary Mechanics.
quantity then, in order to transform the ΔΦ = 4π G ρ g ( imaginary ) (14 )
proportionality above into an equation, we
It is similar to the equation of the real
can write
gravitational field, with the difference that
Ψ 2 = k ρ g (imaginary ) (11) now instead of the density of real
Since the modulus of an imaginary number is gravitational mass we have the density of
always real and positive; k is a imaginary gravitational mass. Then, we can
proportionality constant (real and positive) to write the general solution of Eq. (14), in the
be determined. following form:
The Mutual Affinity is a dimensionless ρ g (imaginary dV
quantity with which we are familiarized and Φ = −G ∫ (15)
r2
of which we have perfect understanding as to
This equation expresses, with nonrelativistic
its meaning. It is revealed in the molecular
approximation, the potential of the imaginary
4
gravitational field of any distribution of range − 0.159mi 0 < m g < +0.159mi 0 . When
imaginary gravitational mass. this occur the gravitational masses becomes
Particularly, for the potential of the imaginaries and the bodies perform transitions
field of only one particle with imaginary to the Imaginary Universe (leaving the Real
gravitational mass m g ( imaginary ) , we get: Universe) (See Eq. (10)). However, the physical
phenomenon that caused the reduction of the
G m g ( imaginary
Φ =−
)
(16 ) gravitational masses of the bodies stays at the
Real Universe. Consequently, the bodies return
r
Then the force produced by this field upon immediately to the Real Universe for the same
another particle with imaginary gravitational positions they were before the transition to the
Imaginary Universe. This is due to the
mass m ′g ( imaginary ) is
Imaginary Gravitational Interaction between the
r r ∂Φ imaginary gravitational masses of the bodies and
Fg (imaginary) = − Fg′(imaginary) = − m′g (imaginary = the imaginary gravitational masses of the forms
∂r
mg (imaginary m′g (imaginary shaped by the bodies in the imaginary
= −G (17) spacetime 1 before the transition to the Imaginary
r2 Universe. These imaginary forms initially
By comparing equations (17) and (13) we shaped by the bodies are preserved in the
obtain imaginary spacetime by quantum coherence
r r effects [14, 15, 16, 17].
F12 = − F21 = − G A 12 22
VV
(18 ) Since spacetime is holographic then an
k r
In the vectorial form the above equation is imaginary form shaped in imaginary spacetime
by the holographic three-dimensional image of a
written as follows
r r body has much more similarity with the body
F12 = − F21 = − GA 12 22 μˆ
VV
(19 ) than the imaginary form shaped in the imaginary
k r spacetime by the real body.
Versor μ̂ has the direction of the line Mutual affinity is directly related to
connecting the mass centers (imaginary similarity. This means that the degree of
masses) of both particles and oriented from 1 mutual affinity, A , between the imaginary
to 2. bodies (which were sent to the Imaginary
In general, we may distinguish and Universe) and the imaginary forms shaped by
quantify two types of mutual affinity: their holographic images is far greater than
positive and negative. The occurrence of the the degree of mutual affinity between the
first type is synonym of attraction, (as in the imaginary bodies and the imaginary forms
case of the atoms in the water molecule) shaped in the imaginary spacetime by the real
while the aversion is synonym of repulsion. bodies before the transition to the Imaginary
r Universe. Thus, according to Eq. (19), the
In fact, Eq. (19) shows that the forces F12 and
r bodies are strongly attracted to the
F21 are attractive, if A is positive holographic three-dimensional image placed
(expressing positive mutual affinity between in the far site. Consequently, the bodies do
the two imaginary particles), and repulsive if not return for the positions they were before
A is negative (expressing negative mutual the transition, they reappear as real bodies
affinity between the two imaginary exactly where their holographic three-
particles). dimensional images were sent. Thus, is
Now, after this theoretical background, carried out the teleportation of the bodies to
we can explain the Gravitational the far site. Since the process combines
Holographic Teleportation. holography and gravitation, we have called
Initially, is created a holographic this process of Gravitational Holographic
three-dimensional image of the bodies and Teleportation.
sent to another site. The technology for this
is already known [12]. Next, the 1
The real spacetime is contained in the imaginary
gravitational masses of the bodies are spacetime. Such as the set of real numbers is
reduced to a contained in the set of imaginary numbers.
5

References
[1] G. ’t Hooft (1993) Dimensional Reduction in Quantum
Gravity, arXiv: gr-qc/9310026.

[2] Susskind, L. (1995) J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377.

[3] G.’t Hooft (2000) The Holographic Principle,


arXiv: hep-th/0003004.

[4] Bigatti, D., and Susskind, L. (2000) TASI lectures on the


Holographic Principle. arXiv: hep-th/0002044.

[5] Bousso, R. (2002) Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 825.

[6] Padmanabhan, T. (2007) arXiv: 0706.1654 [gr-qc].

[7] Maldacena, J.M., (1998) Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231


[(1999) Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113]

[8] Witten, E., (1998) Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505.

[9] Aharony, O. et al., (2000) Phys. Rept. 323, 183.

[10] Alishahiha, M. Et al., (2005) JHEP 0506, 028.

[11] Horowitz G. T. and Polchinski, J., (2006) arXiv :gr-


qc/0602037.

[12] Peyghambarian, N. et al., (4 November 2010) Nature,


468, 1-128, p. 80.

[13] De Aquino, F. (2010) Mathematical Foundations of


the Relativistic Theory of Quantum Gravity, Pacific
Journal of Science and Technology, 11 (1), pp. 173-232.

[14] Preparata, G. (1995) QED Coherence in matter


(Singapore: World Scientific)

[15] Arani R, Bono I, Del Giudice E, Preparata G (1995)


Int. J. Mod. Phys. B9 1813–1841.

[16] Del Giudice E, Preparata G and Vitiello G (1988)


Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1085–1088.

[17] Del Giudice E and Vitiello G (2006) Phys. Rev. A,74,


022105

You might also like