INTERNAL USE

Date April 2020

5-MINUTES SALES TALK
Product Marketing Department, Komatsu CIS LLC No. 5M-2020-002

Komatsu PC1250SP-8 vs Volvo EC950EL Comparison

Komatsu PC1250SP-8 Volvo EC950EL

Summary:
Komatsu PC1250SP-8 has follow advantages compare with Volvo EC950
1) Bigger engine horsepower +12%;
2) Bigger bucket and productivity +12%;
3) Bigger bucket digging force +18%;
4) Better working range (longer arm +15%, boom +7%)
5) Bigger machine population in Russia

1) Spec comparison table

Komatsu Volvo Komatsu
Items
PC1250SP-8 EC950EL advantages
Operation weight, ton 110,7 90
Komatsu
Engine model Volvo D16E
SAA6D170E-5
Engine Engine horsepower Net, kW 502 446 +12%
Displacement, L 23,15 16,1
Emission level Tier3 Tier3
Bucket, m3 6,7 6* +12%
Arm, m 3,4 2,95 +15%
Working
Boom, m 7,8 7,25 +7%
equipment
Bucket digging force, kN 502 424 +18%
Arm digging force, kN 395 408
Undercarriage Shoes, mm 700 650
*6m3 bucket is installed by Ferronordic distributor (not from Volvo factory). Volvo allows maximum 5,6m3 bucket for EC950
(according to brochure).

2) Number of imported machines to Russia (Period Jan2017-Dec2019)

Komatsu PC1250SP-8: 149 units vs. Volvo EC950EL: 13 units (11 times difference!)
 INTERNAL USE

Date April 2020

5-MINUTES SALES TALK
Product Marketing Department, Komatsu CIS LLC No. 5M-2020-002

Komatsu PC1250SP-8 vs Volvo EC950EL Comparison

3) Productivity estimation comparison
.
Estimated productivity of PC1250SP-8 is 12% higher than Volvo EC950EL

Basic information
1 Material type Sandstone
2 Bank density t/m3 2,7
3 Loose factor - 1,74
4 Loosed material density 1,55
Equipment
Komatsu Volvo
1 Excavator -
PC1250SP-8 EC950EL
2 Bucket capacity m3 6,7 6
3 Dump truck - 55t class
4 Body volume m3 34,2
5 Payload kg 55000
Calculation conditions
1 Loading angle deg. 90
2 Machine efficiency - 0,75
3 Bucket fill factor - 0,95
4 HE cycle time* sec 21 20,5
5 HE cycle time (1st bucket) sec 6
Calculation result
1 Passes 5 6
2 DT loading time sec 90 108,5
3 Loaded material voulme m3 31,83 34,2
4 Loaded DT quantity per hour 30 25
5 Hourly productivity m3/h 954,9 855
* HE productivity was estimated under same conditions. HE Cycle time were +12%
actually measured on customer’s jobsite in Kuzbass.

4) Safety

No handrails around left side of

excavator. Only catwalk.
Handrails & catwalk are provide
safe access to cabin and
periodical maintenance
 INTERNAL USE

Date April 2020

5-MINUTES SALES TALK
Product Marketing Department, Komatsu CIS LLC No. 5M-2020-002

Komatsu PC1250SP-8 vs Volvo EC950EL Comparison

5) Working range
Due to PC1250SP-8 has longer arm
and boom, so Komatsu has better
working range for more efficient
digging and loading operation not
only for 55t dump trucks, but also
90t and 130t class dump trucks
(compare with Volvo EC950).

Komatsu
Komatsu Volvo
Working range parameters advantage
PC1250SP-8 EC950EL
s
Maximum digging height, mm 13 000 12 410 +5%
Maximum dumping height, mm 8 450 8 090 +4%
Maximum digging radius, mm 14 070 12 270 +13%
Maximum digging radius at ground level, mm 13 670 11 950 +13%
Maximum digging depth, mm 7 900 7 120 +10%

CONTACT INFORMATION:
Oleg Repin
Product Marketing Department
Komatsu CIS, LCC.
Tel.:+7(495)982-3959 ext. 1516
E-mail: Repin@global.komatsu