RUBRICS (MATH 10 - Q1)

Performance Task 2: (Illustrates quadratic equation)

Materials: Pencil, Bond Paper, Ruler, Color

Procedure:

1. Create four to eight window comic strip.

2. The comic strip must contain conversation that allows you to explain the difference of
quadratic equation from other equations.
3. You can use your favorite comic/cartoon character as the lead character of the comic strip,
or you can use your own identity in the storyline.

Rubric

CRITERIA 10 9 8 below

The comic strip The comic strip shows The comic strip shows
Creativity shows many creative many creative clear elements.
elements. elements.

The story line The story line discusses The story line discusses
Accuracy discusses clear difference of quadratic difference of quadratic
difference of equation. equation.
quadratic equation.

The submitted PT is The submitted PT is The submitted PT is not

Neatness very neat. neat. neat.

The PT was The PT was submitted The PT was submitted 2

Punctuality submitted on time. 6 weeks after the due weeks after due.
date.

Source: https://www.numerade.com/ask/question/pahelp-po-dito-g9-po-baka-nmn-po-
mathematics-9-quarter-1-performance-task-1-melc-1-illustrates-quadratic-materials-equation-
pencil-bond-paper-ruler-color-procedure-create-four-to-eight-windo-16385/
 CONSOLIDATED (MALE)

Criteria Delagua Dimpas Estrad Gayon Mamada Onofre Ramos Roena Saiman Uyan
a

Creativty

Accuracy

Neatnes

Punctuality

Total

CONSOLIDATED (FEMALE)

Criteria Aguilar Basog Calagba Hitutua Mansad Matut Pawin Rongalo Sanico Sudaria
s e

Creativty

Accuracy

Neatnes

Punctuality

Total
 RUBRICS (MATH 10 - Q1)

Performance Task 1: (Solve quadratic equation by factoring)

Materials: Copy of the material, Scissor, Paste/Glue, Coupon bond
Procedure:
1. Create a puzzle like the given below. Write a quadratic expression and its factor on
each puzzle.
2. Be creative and put some color on each puzzle piece. You can be creative in making
the shape of each puzzle.
3. Make four puzzle pieces.

Rubrics

Neat: 10

Creativity: 10

Total: 20
 CONSOLIDATED (FEMALE)

Criteria Aguilar Basog Calagba Hitutua Mansad Matut Pawin Rongalo Sanico Sudaria
s e

Creativty

Neatness

Total

CONSOLIDATED (FEMALE)

Criteria Aguilar Basog Calagba Hitutua Mansad Matut Pawin Rongalo Sanico Sudaria
s e

Creativty

Neatness

Total
Performance Task 3: (Represents a quadratic function using: (a) table of values; (b) graph;
and (c) equation)

Rubrics:
Clarity: 4
Neatness: 3
Creativity: 3
Total: 10
 CONSOLIDATED (FEMALE)

Criteria Aguilar Basog Calagba Hitutua Mansad Matut Pawin Rongalo Sanico Sudaria
s e

Clarity

Neatness

Creativity

Total

CONSOLIDATED (FEMALE)

Criteria Aguilar Basog Calagba Hitutua Mansad Matut Pawin Rongalo Sanico Sudaria
s e

Clarity

Neatness

Creativity

Total
Performance Task 4:
Individual Task

The students will do an individual task using the quadratic inequalities, showing,
creativeness of their work and the mathematical reasoning. Their output will be graded as to how
they present their task. The rubrics of the of this task will be provided below.

Rubric for the Performance Task

CRITERIA Outstanding Satisfactory Developing Beginning Rating

4 3 2 1 50%

The computations The The The

Accuracy are accurate. A computations are computations are computations
wise use of accurate. Use of erroneous and are erroneous
quadratic key quadratic show some use and do not
inequalities is inequalities is of key quadratic show some 15%
evident. evident. inequalities. use of
quadratic
inequalities.
The model is well The model is firm The model is less The model is
Stability fixed and in place. and stationary. firm and show not firm and
slight movement has the 15%
tendency to
collapse
The design is The design is The design The design
Creativity comprehensive and presentable and makes use of the does not use
displays the makes use of the algebraic algebraic 10%
aesthetic aspects of concepts of representations representation
the mathematical algebraic but not and not
concepts learned. representations. presentable. presentable.
The explanation is The explanation The explanation The
clear, exhaustive or is clear and is explanation is
thorough, and coherent. It understandable incomplete
Mathematical
coherent. It covers the but not logical. It and
Reasoning includes interesting important presents only inconsistent 10%
facts and concepts. It uses some evidences with little
principles. It uses effective of mathematical evidence of
complex and mathematical reasoning. mathematical
refined reasoning. reasoning.
mathematical
reasoning.
 Overall Rating 50%

Sources: Department of Education at action@deped.gov.ph. Department of Education-Instructional

Materials Council Secretariat (DepEd-IMCS), First Edition 2015.

Source D.O. #73, s. 2012

https://dokumen.tips_grade-10-math-module-1st-quarter.pdf

INDIVIDUAL TASK (SCORES)

NAMES (MALE) ACCURACY STABILITY CREATIVITY MATHEMATICAL OVERALL

REASONING RATING

1. DELAGUA,
CHARLES 12 10 6 7 35
DAVEN B.

2. DIMPAS,
JOHN
VINCENT 13 11 6 10 40
JULZ S.

3. ESTRADA, 10 11 7 7 35
DAN MARK
P.

4. GAYON, 11 10 7 6 34
JOHN
LORENCE C.

5. MAMADA, 9 9 6 6 30
THEODORE
MATTHEW
P.

6. ONOFRE, 10 9 5 6 30
YASIN P.

7. RAMOS, 11 9 6 8 34
DONNIE P.
JR.
8. ROENA, 9 9 5 7 30
RODEL JOHN
F.

9. SAIMAN, 0 0 0 0 0
MAICO S.

10. UYAN, SAAD 9 8 6 7 30

C.

NAMES ACCURACY STABILITY CREATIVITY MATHEMATICAL OVERALL

(FEMALE) REASONING RATING

11. AGUILAR, 11 10 7 7 35
JAZLYN F.

12. BASOG, 5 4 3 3 15
JANILYN B.

13. CALAGBAS, 10 9 5 6 30
JOSSELL

14. HITUTUA, 9 9 7 5 30
APRIL JOY
T.

15. MANSAD, 11 9 4 6 30
SHANIN D.

16. MATUTE, 13 12 7 8 40
ELLAINE
JASMINE

17. PAWIN, 10 10 5 5 30
PRINCESS L.

18. RONGALO, 9 10 5 6 30
RHEA JANE

19. SANICO, 9 8 7 6 30
MIKA JANE
D.
20. SUDARIA, 11 8 5 6 30
GIANA B.
Performance Task 5:
Individual Task

The students will do an individual task using the quadratic functions by explaining, showing,
creativeness of their work and the mathematical reasoning. Their output will be graded as to how
they present their task. The rubrics of the of this task will be provided below.

Rubric for the Performance Task

Outstanding Satisfactory Developing Beginning

CRITERIA Rating
4 3 2 1
The computations The The The
are accurate and computations are computations are computations
show a wise use of accurate and erroneous and are erroneous
Accuracy
quadratic show the use of show some use and do not 3
functions. quadratic of quadratic show some
functions. functions. use of
quadratic
functions.
The model is well The model is firm The model is less The model is
Stability fixed and in place. and stationary. firm and show not firm and
slight movement. has the 2
tendency to
collapse
The design is The design is The design The design
comprehensive and presentable and makes use of the does not use
displays the makes use of the algebraic algebraic 2
Creativity
aesthetic aspects of concepts of representations representation
the mathematical algebraic but not and not
concepts learned. representations. presentable. presentable.
The explanation is The explanation The explanation The
clear, exhaustive or is clear and is explanation is
thorough, and coherent. It understandable incomplete
Mathematical
coherent. It covers the but not logical. It and 3
Reasoning includes interesting important presents only inconsistent
facts and concepts. It uses some evidences with little
principles. It uses effective of mathematical evidence of
complex and mathematical reasoning. mathematical
refined reasoning. reasoning.
mathematical
reasoning.

Overall Rating 10%

Sources: Department of Education at action@deped.gov.ph. Department of Education-Instructional
Materials Council Secretariat (DepEd-IMCS), First Edition 2015.

Source D.O. #73, s. 2012

https://dokumen.tips_grade-10-math-module-1st-quarter.pdf

INDIVIDUAL TASK (SCORES)

NAMES (MALE) ACCURACY STABILITY CREATIVITY MATHEMATICAL OVERALL

REASONING RATING

21. DELAGUA,
CHARLES 3 2 2 2 9
DAVEN B.

22. DIMPAS,
JOHN
VINCENT 3 2 1 3 9
JULZ S.

23. ESTRADA, 2 2 1 2 7
DAN MARK
P.

24. GAYON, 3 2 1 1 7
JOHN
LORENCE C.

25. MAMADA, 3 1 1 2 7
THEODORE
MATTHEW
P.

26. ONOFRE, 3 1 2 1 7
YASIN P.

27. RAMOS, 2 2 1 2 7
DONNIE P.
JR.
28. ROENA, 2 2 1 2 7
RODEL JOHN
F.

29. SAIMAN, 2 2 2 1 7
MAICO S.

30. UYAN, SAAD 2 2 2 2 8

C.

NAMES ACCURACY STABILITY CREATIVITY MATHEMATICAL OVERALL

(FEMALE) REASONING RATING

31. AGUILAR, 3 2 1 2 8
JAZLYN F.

32. BASOG, 0 0 0 0 0
JANILYN B.

33. CALAGBAS, 2 2 2 2 8
JOSSELL

34. HITUTUA, 2 2 2 1 7
APRIL JOY
T.

35. MANSAD, 2 3 1 2 8
SHANIN D.

36. MATUTE, 3 2 2 2 9
ELLAINE
JASMINE

37. PAWIN, 2 2 1 2 7
PRINCESS L.

38. RONGALO, 3 1 2 1 7
RHEA JANE

39. SANICO, 2 2 1 1 6
MIKA JANE
D.
40. SUDARIA, 2 1 1 2 6
GIANA B.