Final Demonstration Evaluation Form

Name: _________________________________________________________
Date of Observation: __________________

Rating Scale:
5 – Performance of this item is exceptionally done.
4 – Performance of this item is very satisfactory done.
3 - Performance of this item is satisfactorily done due to some omissions.
2 - Performance of this item is unsatisfactory due to serious errors and misconceptions.
1 - Performance of this item is poorly done and most of the time not observed at all.
Transmutable Table:
RATING ADJECTIVAL RATING RANGE

5 Outstanding 4.5 – 5.0

4 Very Satisfactory 3.5 – 4.49

3 Satisfactory 2.5 – 3.49

2 Unsatisfactory 1.5 – 2.49

1 Poor 1.0 – 1.49

ITEMS TO RATE 5 4 3 2 1
I. LESSON PLAN (20%)
A. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms
B. Learning Objectives are aligned with the DepEd Curriculum Guide (i.e.
MELCS)
C. Learning objectives are aligned with the Grade Level Expectations
D. There was congruence between the objective and subject matter,
materials used, teaching procedure, evaluation and assignment
E. Lesson plan manifests differentiated activities for learners
Total
II. TEACHING METHODS (20%)
A. Instructional methods/strategies support varied learning styles and
diverse cultural perspectives
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her methods to the
students’ capabilities
C. Uses scaffolding and purposeful transitions
D. Uses feedback that is specific, immediate, appropriate, and meaningful.
E. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching
F. Integrate 21st Century Skills (critical thinking, self-direction,
collaborating and interpersonal leadership, effective communication,
flexibility and adaptability, curiosity and imagination, news literacy,
infusion of literacy and numeracy)
Total
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT (20%)
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance/Assignment Homework
2. Practice exercise/Group Work
3. Students’ attention in class
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom
Total
 IV. INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS (20%)
A. IMs were easily utilized of the teacher during his/her teaching
B. IMs and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
C. IM utilizes the optimal ICT and extends student involvement
D. IMs are culturally responsive to the learners
E. IMs are developmentally appropriate to the learner's grade level
F. IMs are based on the needs, interests, experiences, and readiness of
learners
Total
V. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (10%)
A. The teacher spoke clearly with a well-modulated voice
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teacher’s
skillful questioning.
D. She observed correct pronunciation
E. The board work/IM of the teacher was free from errors in grammar and
spelling
F. The teacher practices good art of questioning to facilitate the class.
Total
VI. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY (10%)
A. The teacher demonstrates mastery of subject knowledge, major
concepts, and skills
B. The teacher is net and well-groomed
C. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend to distract the
students’ attention.
D. The teachers’ personality commands respect and attention.
Total
COMMENTS:

FINAL RATING:

I II III IV V VI Total Adjectival Rating

(Score) (Score) (Score) (Score) (Score) (Score) Score

__________________________________ ______________________________
Name and Signature of the Demo-Teacher Name and Signature of the Observer