Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 81

CSWIP 3.

0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T12

1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 6-7mm.
b 11-12mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject

3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 6-7mm.
b 7.5-8.5mm.
c 9-10mm.
d 12-13mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 10-11mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 4.5-5.5mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 10-15 accumulative total.


b 20-30mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 1-9mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 4 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm depth.
b 0.1-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 3-4mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 50-70mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 With reference to cluster porosity, which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the square area and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?

a 10-14mm2.
b 20-60mm2.
c None observed.
d 61-87mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 28-35mm total length.


b 22-27mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 14-17mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-12mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T13

1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 10-11mm.
b 7-8mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 12-13mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 6-7mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 11-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 4.5-5.5mm.
b 6.5-7.5mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9.5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 10-15 accumulative total.


b 20-30mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 1-9mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm depth.
b 0-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 3-4mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the total accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 55-100mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 With reference to porosity, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the largest pore and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?

a 2-2.5mm diameter.
b 0.5mm diameter.
c None observed.
d 1-1.5mm diameter.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 28-35mm total length.


b 22-27mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 10-15mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length
c None observed.
d 1-5mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T15

1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 6-7mm.
b 10-11mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 6-7mm.
c 1-2mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 9.5-10mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 10-11.5mm.
d 12-12.5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 4-5mm.
b 6-7mm.
c 2-3mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 10-15mm accumulative total.


b 20-30mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 1-9mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 4 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?

a 0.5-1mm depth.
b 0-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 2-3mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the total accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 65-135mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 With reference to porosity, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the largest pore and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?

a 2-2.5mm diameter.
b 0.5mm diameter.
c None observed.
d 1-1.5mm diameter.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 28-35mm total length.


b 22-27mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?

a 10-15mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-5mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 1

Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.

Weld Face

1 Maximum excess weld metal height (The highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a Equal to or less than 0mm.


b 1-4mm.
c 5-6mm.
d 7-8mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a None observed.
b 50-70mm.
c 10-30mm.
d 80-110mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 50-65mm.
b 22-35mm.
c None observed.
d 8-18mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a Smooth intermittent.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the weld and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a The area is between 10-15mm2.


b The area is between 100-150mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 16-70mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2-3mm transverse crack.


b 15mm longitudinal crack.
c None observed.
d 9-14mm longitudinal crack.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 70-90mm accumulative total.


b 30-60mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 Sharp indications of mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop


marks): Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root

10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 35-40mm total length.


b 20-25mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 28-35mm total length.


b 1-10mm total length.
c None observed.
d 15-23mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment to the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 31-39mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length.
c None observed.
d 40-60mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 15-30mm total length.


b 5-8mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 10-17mm total length.


b 1-4mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-8mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

17 With reference to mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material
(excluding hard stamping): Which of the answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 2 items observed.
b 1 item observed.
c None observed.
d 3 or more items observed.
e Accept.
f Reject.

18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject
your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a The area is between 10-15mm2.


b The area is between 18-40mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 45-90mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

19 With reference to burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers
best matches your assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 With reference to angular distortion: Which of the following answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels? (measure from the weld centreline to the plate edge)

a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face

Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification

WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date

M
e
a
A B
s
u
r
e

f
r

A4-6
o
m

t
h
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Visual Plate Report
Weld Root

Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e

f
r
o
m

A4-7
h
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

o
n
l
y

Note: Excess weld metal = Toe blend = Weld width=

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 2

Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.

Weld Face

1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a Equal to or less than 0mm.


b 1-4mm.
c 5-6mm.
d 7-8mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a None observed.
b 45-80mm.
c 1-40mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 60-70mm.
b 15-24mm.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 60mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a The area is between 10-15mm2.


b The area is greater than 100mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 70-90mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2-3mm transverse crack.


b 15mm longitudinal crack.
c None observed.
d 9-14mm longitudinal crack.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 35-45mm accumulative total.


b 15-25mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer best
matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root

10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 1.5-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c 0-1mm.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 4-5mm.
b 2-3mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 35-40mm total length.


b 15-25mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 28-35mm total length.


b 1-10mm total length.
c None observed.
d 13-20mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.

a 31-39mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length.
c None observed.
d 40-60mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 15-30mm total length.


b 5-8mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 10-17mm total length.


b 1-4mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-8mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative total
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 3 or more items observed.


b 1 item observed.
c None observed.
d 2 items observed.
e Accept.
f Reject.

18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a The area is between 1-5mm2.


b The area is between 25-45mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 10-15mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels? (Measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge.)

a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face

Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification

WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date

M
e
a
s A B
u
r
e

f
r
o

A4-13
m

t
h
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Visual Plate Report
Weld Root

Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e

f
r
o
m

t
h

A4-14
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

o
n
l
y

Note: Excess weld metal = Toe blend = Weld width=

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 3

Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.

Weld Face

1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a Equal to or less than 0mm.


b 1-4mm.
c 5-6mm.
d 7-8mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a None observed.
b 45-65mm.
c 1-30mm.
d 75-100mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 60-70mm.
b 24-39mm.
c None observed.
d 5-23mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 50mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-15 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a The area is between 15-25mm2.


b The area is greater than 100mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 70-90mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2-3mm transverse crack.


b 15mm longitudinal crack.
c None observed.
d 9-14mm longitudinal crack.
e Accept.
f Reject.

7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 70-90mm accumulative total.


b 30-60mm accumulative total.
c None observed.
d 91-100mm accumulative total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.

9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer best
matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a More than 2 areas.


b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 2 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-16 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root

10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2-3mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 0-1mm.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 2-3mm.
b 1-1.5mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 40-55mm total length.


b 25-35mm total length.
c None observed.
d 1-10mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 30-45mm total length.


b 1-15mm total length.
c None observed.
d 16-29mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.

a 31-39mm total length.


b 18-22mm total length.
c None observed.
d 40-60mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-17 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 40-60mm total length.


b 5-8mm total length.
c None observed.
d 2-4mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 10-17mm total length.


b 1-4mm total length.
c None observed.
d 5-8mm total length.
e Accept.
f Reject.

17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative total
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 2 items observed.
b 1 item observed.
c None observed.
d 3 or more items observed.
e Accept.
f Reject.

18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?

a The area is between 2-3mm2.


b The area is between 10-20mm2.
c None observed.
d The area is between 4-8mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.

19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?

a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-18 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 Pore dimensions: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?

a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.

WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-19 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face

Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification

WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date

M
e
a
s A B
u
r
e

f
r
o

A4-20
m

t
h
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Visual Plate Report
Weld Root

Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e

f
r
o
m

t
h

A4-21
i
s

d
a
t
u
m

o
n
l
y

Note: Excess weld metal = Toe blend = Weld width=

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner

WELD INSPECTION 3.0 Answer grid EXAM DATE: EXAMINATION NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERSION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(training) CANDIDATE NAME:

I agree with the terms and Tick Date of Birth


conditions of this examination Box D D M M Y Y
PLATE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_
CANDIDATE SIGNATURE: O O O O O O O O O O
A B C D E F _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
YOUR SIGNATURE MUST BE _
O O O O O O O O O O
1 O O O O O O O O O O
FULLY CONTAINED IN THE BOX _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
2 O O O O O O O O O O
3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7

14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner

WELD INSPECTION 3.0 Answer grid EXAM DATE: EXAMINATION NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERSION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(training) CANDIDATE NAME:

I agree with the terms and Tick Date of Birth


conditions of this examination Box D D M M Y Y
PLATE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_
CANDIDATE SIGNATURE: O O O O O O O O O O
A B C D E F _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
YOUR SIGNATURE MUST BE _
O O O O O O O O O O
1 O O O O O O O O O O
FULLY CONTAINED IN THE BOX _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
2 O O O O O O O O O O
3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7

14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner

WELD INSPECTION 3.0 Answer grid EXAM DATE: EXAMINATION NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERSION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(training) CANDIDATE NAME:

I agree with the terms and Tick Date of Birth


conditions of this examination Box D D M M Y Y
PLATE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_
CANDIDATE SIGNATURE: O O O O O O O O O O
A B C D E F _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
YOUR SIGNATURE MUST BE _
O O O O O O O O O O
1 O O O O O O O O O O
FULLY CONTAINED IN THE BOX _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
2 O O O O O O O O O O
3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7

14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner

WELD INSPECTION 3.0 Answer grid EXAM DATE: EXAMINATION NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERSION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(training) CANDIDATE NAME:

I agree with the terms and Tick Date of Birth


conditions of this examination Box D D M M Y Y
PLATE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_
CANDIDATE SIGNATURE: O O O O O O O O O O
A B C D E F _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
YOUR SIGNATURE MUST BE _
O O O O O O O O O O
1 O O O O O O O O O O
FULLY CONTAINED IN THE BOX _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
2 O O O O O O O O O O
3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7

14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner

WELD INSPECTION 3.0 Answer grid EXAM DATE: EXAMINATION NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VERSION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(training) CANDIDATE NAME:

I agree with the terms and Tick Date of Birth


conditions of this examination Box D D M M Y Y
PLATE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_
CANDIDATE SIGNATURE: O O O O O O O O O O
A B C D E F _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
YOUR SIGNATURE MUST BE _
O O O O O O O O O O
1 O O O O O O O O O O
FULLY CONTAINED IN THE BOX _
_
O O O O O O O O O O
2 O O O O O O O O O O
3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7

14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Introduction


Level 1
WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Rev 3 October 2014 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
WIS1-40215

Course Objectives Course Objectives

 To identify various weld imperfections (defects).  To carry out inspection of parent materials and
 To understand the relevant welding technology consumables.
related to visual inspection.  To carry out visual inspection of welds, report
 To understand the need for documentation in on them and assess their compliance with
welding. specified acceptance criteria.
 To be aware of codes and standards related to  To pass the CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector
inspection requirements. qualification.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welcome Health and Safety

Getting the most out of the course Evacuation in the event of fire
 Leave by the nearest exit.
Please  Do not stop to pick up your possessions.
 Switch off mobile phones.  Go directly to the fire assembly point.
 Do not smoke in the building.
 Ask questions.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


The Course The Course

The Visual Welding Inspector course provides an The main objective of the course is to prepare
introduction to practical inspection practices and for the CSWIP Visual Welding Inspection
procedures. examination.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

CSWIP Certificate Scheme CSWIP Certificate Scheme

Certificate Scheme for Personnel The reference document


for the CSWIP scheme is:

Document No.
CSWIP-WI-6-92
(12th Edition May 2012).

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

CSWIP Certificate Scheme CSWIP Certificate Scheme

Document No. CSWIP-WI-6-92  Level 1: 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector.


 Provides terms of reference for the three
levels of Inspector grade.  Level 2: 3.1 Welding Inspector.
 Provides guidance on the knowledge required
for each level of Inspector grade.  Level 3: 3.2 Senior Welding Inspector.
 Sets out the examination format and provides
guidance on questions.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


CSWIP 3.0 Examination Requirements The CSWIP 3.0 Examination

1. Two passport size photographs, with your


name and signature on reverse side.
2. Eye test certificate, the certificate must
show near vision and colour tests.
3. Completed examination form, you can Practical Examination Only
print from the website www.twi.co.uk

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

The CSWIP 3.0 Examination The CSWIP 3.0 Examination

Practical part A1 Practical plate examination


Inspection of a plate butt weld to a code provided  There will be twenty multi choice questions, ie
by the Test Centre. identify the defect, size etc and also an accept
or reject to the acceptance criteria.
 In addition, a plan will be required detailing
where the defects are, their type and size.

1 Hour
30 Minutes

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

The CSWIP 3.0 Examination Notification of Examination Results

Practical fillet weld examination


 There will be fourteen multi choice questions,
the maximum and minimum weld leg lengths 70%
and throat thicknesses, identify other defects,
Pass mark
their size etc and accept or reject in
accordance with the acceptance criteria.

For every section to be


awarded the certificate
2 copies of certificates and an identity card sent
to delegates’ sponsor.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Certification Scheme for
Personnel

Recognised Worldwide

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


TWI Visual Welding Inspection TWI Visual
CSWIP 3.0 Welding Inspection
Visual Welding Inspector

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Terminology: Types of joints and welds
Level 1
WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


WIS1-40215

Terminology Terminology

A joint A weld
A configuration of members. A union between materials caused by heat, and
or pressure.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Types of Joint Butt Joints

T Edge Cruciform Square edged


Closed Open

Single sided butt


V Bevel

Double sided butt


V Bevel
Butt Lap Corner

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Types of Joint Types of Joint
Single V and Single U Single Bevel and Single J
Included angle Included angle Angle of bevel Angle of bevel
Angle Angle
of bevel of bevel

Land Root
(optional) radius

Root Root face Root face


radius
Root face Root face Root gap Root gap
Root gap Root gap Land

Single V butt Single U butt Single bevel butt Single J butt

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Types of Weld Types of Weld

Two commonly used welds types Fillet weld Edge weld Compound weld

Butt weld

Fillet weld
Butt weld Plug weld Spot weld

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Weld Toes

The toes of the weld can be defined as the


junction of the weld face and the base metal.

Can be a serious stress raiser.


Terminology: Features of the weld

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Weld Toes Excess Weld Metal

Weld metal lying


A B outside the plane
joining the toes.

BS499 -1

Also known as weld


reinforcement,
overfill, crown.

C D

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Toe Blend Toe Blend


a Stress Concentration Stress Reduced

80° 6mm 20° 3mm

Excessive height = acute angle Excess height = lower angle


Acute angle = stress concentration Lower angle = reduced stress concentration
Excessive height + acute angle = Poor toe blend Excess height + lower angle = Good toe blend

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Importance of Toe Blend Features of the Weld

The higher the toe blend angle the greater the Weld zone
concentration of stress.
Weld face

Excess weld metal height of 3mm max will give Weld


metal Fusion
a toe blend angle of 20°-30° approximately. boundary/line
Heat
Affected
Zone
(HAZ)

Root

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Terminology
Plate Butt Weld Features
Features of the Weld
Parent metal Toe Weld face Features of a Fillet weld on plate
Toe

Toe
Parent
metal
Face

Weld
Weld
Root HAZ Root HAZ

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Fillet Welds

Fillet welds
 Cheapest form of arc welded joint.
 Used extensively in many types of structure.
 The external shape and size can be measured.
Terminology: Types of weld  The internal quality is dependant on joint fit-up
and the use of a qualified WPS.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Fillet Weld Dimensions


Fillet Weld Profiles
Leg Length

Mitre fillet The leg length of a fillet weld is the distance from
the root to the toe of the fillet weld.
Also called the fusion face.

Concave fillet
Vertical leg length

Convex fillet

Horizontal leg length

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Fillet Weld Dimensions Fillet Weld Dimensions
Throat Thickness Throat Thickness
The throat thickness of a fillet weld is the The throat thickness can be expressed in
perpendicular distance from the root to the face terms of either:
centre of the fillet weld.  Design throat thickness.
 Actual throat thickness.

Throat thickness

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Throat Thickness Throat Thickness


Convex Fillet Weld Concave Fillet Weld

Actual throat Actual throat Design throat =


Actual throat

Design throat Design throat

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Throat and Leg Terminology


The Ratio Types of Weld
Based on the right
angled triangle
Leg length
LL TT a = Horizontal leg length.
6
b b = Vertical leg length.
1.414 1

1 0.707
?
6 x 0.707 = 4.242 or 4.2mm a

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Terminology Terminology
Types of Weld Types of Weld
Butt welds Partial Penetration Butt welds
t2 t2
t2
t1 t1
t1

t2 t1
t1
t’2
t’1
t1 – Design throat t2 – Actual throat t1 t’1= Design throat thickness
thickness thickness t 2 t’2= Actual throat thickness
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Inspector Duties

Any questions?

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


TWI Visual Welding Inspection CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspection

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspection Inspection Equipment


Level 1
WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


WIS1-40215

Why Measure? Inspection Considerations

The purposes  When to carry out inspections?


of measuring  How to carry out inspections?
 What equipment will be required?
Demonstration Welding process
 What is the quality of welding required?
of conformance control
to specified  How to interpret the code or standard
requirements requirements?

 Welding current  Shielding gas flow rate


arc voltage preheat/inter-pass
travel speed temperature, humidity

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Three Monitoring Stages Inspection Equipment

1. Before welding.  Steel rule.  Contour gauge.


 Flexible tape measure.  Torch or other light
2. During welding.  Bevel angle gauge. source.
 Root gap gauge.  Mirror.
3. After welding.  Misalignment gauge.  Magnifying glass - 5x
 Fillet gauge. magnification.
 Height/depth gauge.  Paint stick/marking
crayon.
 Voltmeter.
 Pea shooter type flow
 Ammeter. meter.
 Temp indicating  Stop watch.
crayons/pyrometer.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Inspection Equipment Multi Purpose Inspection Gauge

Inspection of welds
using the Cambridge
multi purpose welding
gauge.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Temperature Indicating Crayons Digital Thermometers

Temperature sensitive  Are temperature-sensitive


materials resistors whose resistance
varies inversely with
 Crayons, paints and temperature.
pills.  Used when high sensitivity
 Cheap and convenient, is required.
easy to use.  Gives the actual
temperature.
Doesn’t measure the  Need calibration.
actual temperature!

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Contactless Temperature
Inspection Equipment
Measurement
 IR radiation and optical
pyrometer.
 Measure the radiant
energy emitted by the
hot body.
Any questions?
 Contactless method,
can be used for remote
measurements.
 Very complex.
 For measuring high
temperatures.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


CSWIP 3.0 Welding Inspection

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Welding Imperfections and


Level 1 Materials Inspection

WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


WIS1-40215

Features to Consider Features to Consider

Butt welds - Size Butt welds - Profile

x
Weld cap width
Excess weld
metal height

Root bead width


Root penetration x x
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Features to Consider Features to Consider

Butt welds - Toe blend Butt welds - Weld width

x
x x
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Welding Defects Welding Defects

Incomplete root penetration a. Excessively thick


root face.

Causes
b. Too small a root
 Too small a root gap.
gap.
 Arc too long.
 Wrong polarity. c. Misplaced welds.
 Electrode too large for joint
preparation. d. Lack of cross
 Incorrect electrode angle. penetration.
 Too fast a speed of travel for
current.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Incomplete root fusion Root concavity

Causes
 Too small a root gap. Causes
 Arc too long.  Root gap too large.
 Wrong polarity.  Excessive grinding.
 Excessive back purge TIG.
 Electrode too large for joint
preparation.
 Incorrect electrode angle.
 Too fast a speed of travel for
current.
 Linear misalignment.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Excess root penetration Root undercut

Causes Causes
 Excessive amperage  Root gap too large.
during welding of root.  Excessive current/arc
 Excessive root gap. energy.
 Insufficient root face.  Small or no root face.
 Poor fit up.
 Excessive root grinding.
 Improper welding
technique.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Welding Defects Welding Defects

Cap undercut

Overlap

Causes
 Excessive welding current.
 Welding speed too high. Excess weld metal
 Incorrect electrode angle.
 Excessive weave.
 Electrode too large.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Lack of fusion Incompletely filled groove


and lack of side wall fusion

Causes
 Contaminated weld
preparation.
 Amperage too low.
 Amperage too high
(welder increases
speed of travel). Causes
 Dip transfer MIG/MAG.  Insufficient weld metal deposited.
 Improper welding technique.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Inter run Incompletely Filled Groove/ Incompletely filled groove


Lack on inter-run fusion

Causes
 Insufficient weld
metal deposited.
 Improper welding
technique.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Welding Defects Welding Defects

Gas pores/porosity Gas pores/porosity

Causes
 Excessive moisture in
flux or preparation.
 Contaminated preparation.
 Low welding current.
 Arc length too long.
 Damaged electrode flux.
 Loss of gas shield.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Inclusions - Slag Inclusions - Slag

Causes Causes
 Insufficient cleaning  Insufficient cleaning
between passes. between passes.
 Contaminated weld preparation.  Contaminated weld
 Welding over irregular profile. preparation.
 Incorrect welding speed.  Welding over irregular profile.
 Arc length too long.  Incorrect welding speed.
 Arc length too long.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Inclusions - Tungsten Burn through

Causes
 Excessive amperage
Causes
during welding of
 Contamination of weld Caused by tungsten
root.
touching weld metal or parent metal during
 Excessive root grinding.
welding using the TIG welding process.
 Improper welding technique.
 Excessive current.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Welding Defects Welding Defects

Spatter Arc strikes


Causes
 Electrode straying onto
parent metal.
Causes  Electrode holder with
 Excessive arc energy/ poor insulation.
current.  Poor contact of earth
 Excessive arc length. clamp.
 Damp electrodes.  Striking outside the
 Arc blow. joint preparation.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects


Linear
Mechanical damage Excess weld metal height
Lowest plate to highest point
Chisel
Chisel
Chisel Marks
Marks
Marks Pitting Corrosion Grinding Marks

3mm

Excess penetration
Lowest plate to highest point
Linear misalignment measured in mm.
Angular

3mm

Angular misalignment measured in mm.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Defects Welding Defects

Non-alignment of two abutting edges

50mm

3mm

Angular distortion.
Measure the distance to the edge of the plate (50mm).
Use a straight edge (rule) to find the amount of distortion then
2mm measure the space (3mm).
This reported as Angular distortion 3mm in 50mm.
Also known as: Hi low, mismatch or misalignment.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Welding Imperfections and
Materials Inspection

Any questions?

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


TWI Welding Inspection

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Introduction to Welding Processes


Level 1
WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


WIS1-40215

Welding Processes Factors for Fusion Welding

Fusion welding Welding with pressure  A high intensity heat source.


 Protection from the atmosphere.
Resistance Solid state  Protection from surface contaminants.
welding welding
 Adequate properties – physical, metallurgical
and mechanical.
Arc Oxy fuel Electroslag Thermit Power
welding welding welding welding beam
welding

MMA TIG MIG/MAG/ SAW PAW


FCAW EBW LBW

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Heat Source Atmosphere

 Local application of heat in order for fusion to Protection from oxygen and nitrogen
occur.
 ARC – a low voltage high energy spark across Fluxes - MMA/SAW.
an air gap. Gases - TIG, MIG/MAG, FCAW.
 Typical temperature range for steels Vacuum - Lasers, electron beam.
approximately 1400-1500°C.
 Average temperature in the arc approximately
6000°C.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Contamination Properties

Mechanical cleaning The completed weld must have adequate


 eg MMA, TIG, MIG, MAG properties
 Material selection.
 Consumable selection and control.
Chemical cleaning  Control of heat input.
 eg TIG, MIG, MAG  Add alloying elements.
 Heat treatments.

Fluxes/slag
 eg SAW, MMA,FCAW

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Four Factors Welding Variables

All welding processes must comply with these 1. Amperage


four factors in order to produce an acceptable  Flow of electrical current through a conductor.
weld.  Measured in Amperes (I).
 Controls burn off rate and depth of penetration.
 Electrical pressure required to cause current to flow
through a circuit.

2. Voltage
 Volt (E) is the unit of electrical pressure.
 Controls weld pool fluidity.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Variables Constant Current Characteristic

3. Polarity Drooping characteristic


 Determines heat distribution at the arc.
 Direct current (DC), can be either DC+ or DC-.
 Alternating current (AC). OCV
Operating Work Point
 Current flow alternates between the positive
Volts

and negative poles.


 The rate of weld progression. Increase arc
gap
20
4. Travel speed
Decrease
 Affects heat input and affects metallurgical and arc gap
mechanical properties.

120 Amps

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Constant Current Characteristic Summary

Flat characteristic Constant current Constant voltage


(drooping) characteristic (flat) characteristic
OCV

20
MMA MIG/MAG
Volts

TIG FCAW

SAW > 1000 AMPS ELECTROSLAG

SAW < 1000 AMPS


200 Amps

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Welding Inspection Manual Metal Arc (MMA) Welding

Manual Metal Arc Welding


(MMA) Consumable electrode
Evolved gas shield Flux covering

Shielded Metal Arc Welding Weld Metal Core Wire

Slag Arc
(SMAW) Weld Pool
Parent metal

MMA – Principle of operation

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Manual Metal Arc (MMA) Welding MMA

Power source.
Power control
Transformer/
Advantages: Disadvantages:
panel
Rectifier

Electrode oven  Field or shop use.  High skill factor.


Heated quiver
 Range of  Slag inclusions.
consumables.  Low operating factor.
Electrodes  All positional.  High level of fume.
Inverter power
Power return
source  Very portable.  Hydrogen control.
cable
Electrode
 Simple equipment.
holder
Safety visor
(with dark lens) Power cable

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


MMA Defects Welding Process

Typical defects Main features


1. Slag inclusions.  Shielding provided by decomposition of flux
2. Arc strikes. covering.
3. Porosity.  Electrode consumable.
4. Undercut.
 Manual process.
5. Shape defects (overlap, excessive root
penetration, etc). Welder controls
 Arc length.
Most welding defects in MMA are caused by a lack of  Angle of electrode.
welder skill (not an easily controlled process), the  Speed of travel.
incorrect settings of the equipment or the incorrect
use and treatment of electrodes.  Amperage settings.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

WELDING PROCESS MIG/MAG Welding Process

Metal Inert Gas (MIG)-


Metal Active Gas (MAG) External wire
feed unit Transformer/
Rectifier

Internal wire

Gas Metal Arc Welding


feed system

(GMAW) Power control


panel
Power cable
and hose
assembly

15kg wire spool


Liner for wire
Power return
cable Welding gun
assembly

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

MIG/MAG Torch Assembly MIG/MAG Wire Drive System


Torch body
Internal wire drive system Plain top roller
On/Off switch
Torch head assembly
(less nozzle)
Hose
port

Nozzles or Spot welding


shrouds spacer

Contact tips Half grooved Wire guide


Gas diffuser bottom roller

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


MAG/GMAW MIG/MAG - Principle of Operation

MIG-Metal Inert Gas 100% Argon

Aluminium,
copper,
9% nickels

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

MIG/MAG - Principle of Operation MIG/MAG Principle of Operation

MAG - Metal Active Gas 100% CO2 Effect of shielding gas on weld bead shape

80% Argon + 20% CO2

Carbon steels,
low alloy steels
De oxidisers: Silicon,
100% CO2 80% ARGON/20% CO2
manganese and
aluminium Wire formulation EN 439:M21

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

MIG/MAG Variables MIG/MAG Metal Transfer

Three process variables MIG/MAG (GMAW) Transfer Modes


1. Wire stick out/extension.
Pulse Transfer
2. Arc voltage.
Volts

3. Wire feed speed.


Cold Metal Dip Transfer
Transfer
(CMT)
Surface Tension Transfer
(STT)
<20V
Dip Transfer
<200 A Amps

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


MIG/MAG Synergic Systems MIG/MAG Synergic Systems

Example: Synergic pulsed MIG/MAG welding


A form of pulsed welding using electronic control
logic to determine the value of the pulse
parameters and pulse frequency, according to the
selected value of wire feed speed.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

MIG/MAG Pulsed Transfer Pulsed Transfer

Peak current - Spray Transfer

AMPS: 107–220
Amps
VOLTS: 22.8
WFS: 3.3m/min
Wire dia: 1.2mm

Background current - Dip Transfer

Time

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

MIG/MAG Pulsed Transfer MIG/MAG Digital systems

Peak Current =
Spray Transfer
Amps

Background Current =
Dip Transfer

Time

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


MIG/MAG MIG/MAG Flux Cored Arc Welding

Advantages: Disadvantages:
 Lower skill required.  Lack of sidewall FCAW
fusion. methods
 Easily automated.
 All positional dip and  Range of
 Thick/thin materials. consumables.
 Continuous  Loss of gas
electrode. shield/site.
With gas shielding Without gas With metal
 Complex equipment. - gas shielded shielding – self powder - Metal
 High ozone levels. shielded core

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Gas Shielded – Principle of Operation Shielded - Principle of Operation

Gas nozzle Gas nozzle

Consumable flux/metal cored Consumable flux-cored wire


wire electrode electrode

Gas shield Contact Tube Evolved Gas shield Contact Tube

Weld Pool Arc Weld Metal Arc

Slag Slag Weld Pool

Parent Metal Weld Metal Parent Metal

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Advantages/Disadvantages Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG)


Advantages: Disadvantages:
 Field or shop use.  High skill factor. Gas Tungsten Arc Welding
 High productivity.  Slag inclusions. (GTAW)
 All positional.  Cored wire is
 Slag supports and expensive.
shapes the weld  High level of fume
bead.  (self shielded).
 No need for shielding  Limited to steels and
gas. nickel alloys.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


TIG - Principle of Operation TIG Torch

Tungsten
Gas nozzle housing Tungsten
electrodes

Non-consumable tungsten
Fitted ceramic
electrode Ceramic
shielding cup
shield cup
Gas shield

Arc
Filler Rod
Weld Pool Gas lens
On/Off switch
Weld Metal
Parent Metal Split collet

Gas diffuser

Torch body
Spare ceramic
shielding cup

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Manual TIG Automatic TIG

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Advantage and Disadvantages

Advantages: Disadvantages:
 High quality.  Very high skill factor.
 Good control.  Range of
 All positional. consumable.
 Lowest H2 arc  Loss of gas Submerged Arc Welding
process. shield/site.
 No slag.  Complex equipment.
 High ozone levels.
 Low output.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


SAW SAW Fluxes

Fused
Contact tube Baked at high temperature, glossy, hard and
Flux recovery
black in colour, cannot add ferro-manganese,
Consumable
Weld Pool non moisture absorbent and tends to be of the
electrode Flux Feed
acidic type.
Weld Metal Arc Parent Metal

Slag Agglomerated
Baked at a lower temperature, dull, irregularly
shaped, friable, (easily crushed) can easily add
alloying elements, moisture absorbent and tend
to be of the basic type.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

SAW Fluxes SAW Fluxes

Fused SAW flux Agglomerated SAW Flux

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

SAW Fluxes Introduction to Welding Processes

Fluxes for SAW may be classified as

Type of Flux Improving quality


Acid
general purpose
Any questions?
Fused
Neutral

Semi-basic
Basic

High basic
Maximum toughness Agglomerated

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspection

CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspection Material Inspection


Level 1
WIS1

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


WIS1-40215

Material Inspection Pipe Inspection

All materials arriving on site should be Condition


inspected for: (Corrosion, damage, wall thickness ovality, laminations and seam)

 Size/dimensions.
 Condition.
 Type/specification.
Welded seam
 In addition other elements may need to be
considered depending on the materials form or
shape.
Specification

Other checks may need to be made such as:


Distortion tolerance, number of pipes and storage*.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Plate Inspection Rolling Imperfections

Condition
(Corrosion, mechanical damage, laps, bands and laminations)
Direction of rolling

Specification Laps*

Lamination Segregation
Other checks may need to be made such as:
Distortion tolerance, number of plates and storage.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Material Imperfections Lapping
Mechanical damage Lap

Lamination

Segregation line
Laminations are caused in the parent plate by the steel
making process, originating from ingot casting defects.
Segregation bands occur in the centre of the plate and
are low melting point impurities such as sulphur and
phosphorous.
Laps are caused during rolling when overlapping metal
does not fuse to the base material.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Lapping Lapping

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Lamination Lamination

Plate lamination

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


Material Inspection

Any questions?

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015


TWI Mission

MISSION RESOURCES SUPPORT DELIVERY


To provide our Members
with authoritative and
impartial expert advice,
INTRODUCTION TO TWI knowhow and safety
assurance through
engineering, materials
and joining technologies

EXPERTISE PRODUCTS ACCESS KNOWLEDGE

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Profile Serving multiple industrial sectors


Construction Aerospace Energy and Electronics, Oil, Gas and Equipment,
 Five UK technology and and Environment Photonics Chemical Consumables
Engineering Automotive and Medical and Materials
centres.
 14 international training
centres.
 £75m of R&D in materials
joining, structural integrity
and NDT.
 700 Industrial Members
in 4500 locations
worldwide.
 Over 800 staff.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Products and Services Benefits of Industrial Membership

Faster
Technical development
helpdesk times
RandD,
consultancy Avoidance
Failure and Enhanced of costly
investigation manufacturing safety remedial
support action

Welding, Training and


inspection Increased Reduced
and testing
Certification
manufacturing Value- environmental
efficiency Added impact

Software Information
packages and services
development Cross-
Competent sectoral
Workforce technology
transfer
Technology Technical
Online transfer / and
technical supply chain commercial
knowledge support reduction of
risk

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

1
Industrial Membership

As an Industrial Member of TWI, you will be entitled to


expert technical support with a response guaranteed within You will be allocated a pre-paid consultancy budget and
one working day. Through our “who knows?” service, you receive a 10% discount on TWI training courses. You will
will be able to find the relevant expert with exactly the also be able to draw on TWI’s authority and impartiality if
knowledge you need. you require an expert witness in arbitration.

Your company will be able to commission TWI to undertake On top of this you will be given access to expert technical
substantial confidential research and consultancy projects knowledge, comprising the Weldasearch alert service from
on your company’s behalf – TWI conducts 800 such projects our welding and joining information database, technical
for its member companies each year. You will also benefit literature reviews, a technical journal archive and 200
from access to the outcomes of TWI’s core research best practice guides.
programme, a series of research endeavours with an annual
budget in excess of £3 million.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Professional or Associate Membership Professional or Associate Membership

Membership of The Welding Institute  Associate Membership is open for everyone who
has an active interest in welding and materials
Aspirations towards rewarding careers in the joining. Associate Membership provides a
welding and joining industry: springboard to those in the engineering
 Membership of The Welding Institute as either a community, particularly those in joining and
Professional Member or an Associate provides a welding engineering, who aspire to professional
clear demonstration of your commitment to excellence
by affiliating yourself with the leading international
membership and Engineering Council
membership body for welding and joining personnel. registration.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Professional or Associate Membership Weldasearch

Professional Membership in addition gives you industrial Weldasearch - The Materials Joining Database
recognition by your peers and most importantly, personal
and professional prestige. Whether you want a practical article on how to apply a
welding process, or detailed information on research into
Recognition throughout your career takes a number of the background of a particular subject, you'll find the
distinct steps. Each of these steps marks a demonstration answer in Weldasearch. Produced by TWI Information
of competence. Whether you are an Associate, Technician, Services, Weldasearch is a database of short abstracts of
Member or Fellow - these are rungs on the professional over 200,000 articles on welding, joining and allied
ladder to acceptance of ability. They also constitute the technologies (sample abstracts).
route to professional registration with the UK body of
chartered institutions - the Engineering Council. –
Use of Weldasearch is free for TWI Industrial Members,
WJS Members and TWI Professional Members.
See more at:
http://www.theweldinginstitute.com/membership

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

2
Weldasearch Weldasearch

Comprehensive coverage Keep up to date


 Covering metals, plastics and ceramics, Weldasearch aims to be a
comprehensive record of appropriate world-wide literature
published since 1968.  You can use Weldasearch to set up monthly
 Source material includes journals, conference proceedings, books, alerts on subjects of interest to you (a free
patents, standards and theses. List of core journals abstracted by service for TWI Industrial Members, WJS
Weldasearch.
 Welding, brazing and soldering, microjoining, diffusion bonding,
Members and TWI Professional Members).
thermal cutting, surfacing and hardfacing, thermal spraying.  Recent abstracts of articles particularly
 Aerospace, automotive, electronics, shipbuilding and power relevant to several major industry
generation industries; fabrication of bridges, pipelines, offshore
structures and pressure vessels, process plant. sectors, which were added to the
 Robotics, automation, repair and maintenance, inspection, quality Weldasearch database at the last monthly
control, non-destructive testing, fatigue and fracture, corrosion, upload, are available as PDF files to download.
metallurgy and materials science, health and safety.

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

Weldaseach

For more information

Please contact Weldasearch Services, TWI,


Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21
6AL, UK
Phone: +44 (0)1223 899000
Fax: +44 (0)1223 892588
E-mail: weldasearch@twi-global.com

Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015

You might also like