Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Educational Psychology Edited
Educational Psychology Edited
Educational Psychology Edited
• to witness the diversity of growth in young people, and their joy in learning : They
could come from any ethnic background. Their first language could be English, or something else.
There are all sorts of possibilities. But whoever the particular students are, they will have potential as
human beings: talents and personal qualities—possibly not yet realized— that can contribute to
society, whether as leaders, experts, or supporters of others. A teacher's job—in fact a teacher's
privilege—is to help particular “young people” to realize their potential.
• to experience the challenge of devising and doing interesting, exciting activities for
the young : Whatever you teach, you will be able to feel the satisfaction of designing and
orchestrating complex activities that communicate new ideas and skills effectively. The challenge is
attractive to many teachers, because that is where they exercise judgment and “artistry” the most
freely and frequently. Your students will depend on your skill at planning and managing, though
sometimes without realizing how much they do so. Teachers will need you to know how to explain
ideas clearly, to present new materials in a sensible sequence and at an appropriate pace, to point out
connections between their new learning and their prior experiences. Although these skills really take a
lifetime to master, they can be practiced successfully even by beginning teachers, and they do
improve steadily with continued teaching over time. Right from the start, though, skill at design and
communication of curriculum is one of the major “perks” of the job.
The very complexity of classroom life virtually guarantees that teaching never needs to get boring.
Something new and exciting is bound to occur just when you least expect it. A student shows
an insight that you never expected to see—or fails to show one that you were sure he had. An activity
goes better than expected—or worse, or merely differently. You understand for the first time why a
particular student behaves as she does, and begin thinking of how to respond to the student's
behavior more helpfully in the future. After teaching a particular learning objective several times, you
realize that you understand it differently than the first time you taught it. And so on. The job never
stays the same; it evolves continually. As long as you keep teaching, you will have a job with
novelty.
Challenges to teaching
You may wish to make a positive difference in students' lives, but you may also have trouble
reaching individuals. A student seems not to learn much, or to be unmotivated, or unfriendly,
or whatever. And some teaching problems can be subtle: when you call attention to the
wonderful immensity of an area of knowledge, you might accidentally discourage a student
by implying that the student can never learn “enough”. The complexity of designing and
implementing instruction can sometimes seem overwhelming, instead of satisfying.
Unexpected events in your classroom can become chaos rather than an attractive novelty
Four new trends in education, at how they have changed what teachers do, and at how you
will therefore need to prepare to teach:
• increased diversity: there are more differences among students than there used to be.
Diversity has made teaching more fulfilling as a career, but also made more challenging in
certain respects.
Students learn at unique paces, show unique personalities, and learn in their own ways.
In recent decades, though, the forms and extent of diversity have increased. Now more than
ever, teachers are likely to serve students from diverse language backgrounds, to serve
more individuals with special educational needs, and to teach students either younger and
older than in the past.
This raises new challenges about planning instruction (such as how is a teacher to
find time to plan for individuals?), and philosophical questions about the very nature
of education (such as what in the curriculum is truly important to learn?).
● Lifelong learning: Another recent change has been the broadening simply of the age
range of individuals who count as “students”
a some public school divisions have moved toward including nursery or preschool
programs as a newer “grade level” preceding kindergarten. Others have expanded the
hours of kindergarten (itself considered a “new” program early in the 20th century) to
span a full-day program.
The obvious differences in maturity between preschoolers and older children lead
most teachers of the very young to use flexible, open-ended plans and teaching
strategies, and to develop more personal or family-like relationships with their young
“students” than typical with older students
The other end of the age spectrum has also expanded. Many individuals take
courses well into adulthood even if they do not attend formal university or college.
Adult education, as it is sometimes called, often takes place in workplaces, but it
often also happens in public high schools or at local community colleges or
universities.
The teachers of adult students have to adjust their instructional strategies and
relationships with students so as to challenge and respect their special strengths
and constraints as adults
The students’ maturity often means that they have had life experiences that enhance
and motivate their learning. But it may also mean that they have significant personal
responsibilities—such as parenting or a full-time job—which compete for study time,
and that make them impatient with teaching that is irrelevant to their personal goals
or needs
Teachers must ask, how they can make sure that instruction does not waste
students’ time, and how they can make it truly efficient, effective, and valuable
New trend #2: Using technology to support learning
Challenges :
Meaning : In recent years, the public and its leaders have increasingly expected teachers
and students to be accountable for their work, meaning that schools and teachers are held
responsible for implementing particular curricula and goals, and that students are held
responsible for learning particular knowledge.
Benefits :
● for teachers : The trend toward accountability has increased the legal requirements
for becoming and (sometimes) remaining certified as a teacher.
● for students : Public accountability has led to increased use of high-stakes testing,
which are tests taken by all students in a district or region that have important
consequences for students' further education. High-stakes tests may influence
grades that students receive in courses or determine whether students graduate or
continue to the next level of schooling
Challenges :
The tests are often a mixture of essay and structured-response questions (such as
multiple-choice items),
● It raise important issues about what teachers should teach, as well as how (and
whether) teachers should help students to pass the examinations.
● It also raises issues about whether high-stakes testing is fair to all students and
consistent with other ideals of public education, such as giving students the best
possible start in life instead of disqualifying them from educational opportunities.
● since the results of high-stakes tests are sometimes also used to evaluate the
performance of teachers, schools, or school districts, insuring students’ success on
them becomes an obvious concern for teachers—one that affects instructional
decisions on a daily basis.
• increased professionalism of teachers: Now more than ever, teachers are able
to assess the quality of their own work as well as that of colleagues, and to take steps to
improve it when necessary.
Teaching is a profession if its members take personal responsibility for the quality of
their work, hold each other accountable for its quality, and recognize and require
special training in order to practice it. By this definition, teaching has definitely
become more professional than in the past
- Professionalism in teaching involves personal responsibility, mutual accountability,
and the recognition of the need for special training.
- Teaching has become more professional over time, raising concerns about whether
teachers and schools meet higher standards.
- Teachers now bear increased responsibility for both student achievement and their
own continuous development.
- The rising expectations for achievement have led to more specialized requirements
for certification and licensing.
- Initiatives, such as action research, undertaken by educators themselves,
contribute to the study and improvement of teaching practices.
- Action research, while reflecting increased professionalism, also sets higher
standards for teachers in their teaching approaches.
- **Quality Improvement:** Teachers can assess and enhance the quality of their work,
contributing to overall improvement in teaching practices.
- **Accountability:** Professionalism fosters a culture of accountability, where teachers hold
themselves and colleagues accountable for the quality of education.
- **Specialized Training:** Recognition of the need for special training elevates the
standards of teaching, ensuring educators are well-prepared for the complexities of diverse
student populations and technological advancements.
- **Continuous Development:** Higher expectations for student achievement necessitate
teachers to continuously develop their skills, promoting ongoing professional growth.
- **Initiatives for Improvement:** Educators engage in initiatives like action research to
study and improve their own teaching practices, contributing to a culture of continuous
improvement.
1. **Formative Assessment:**
- **Purpose:** Provides ongoing feedback to both teachers and students during the
learning process.
- **Examples:** In-class discussions, quizzes, homework assignments, peer reviews.
- **Focus:** Improvement and adjustment of teaching and learning strategies.
2. **Summative Assessment:**
- **Purpose:** Evaluates and summarizes learning outcomes at the end of a specific
period (e.g., a unit, course, or school year).
- **Examples:** Final exams, standardized tests, end-of-term projects.
- **Focus:** Making judgments about overall achievement and assigning grades.
How educational psychology can help
The recent trends mean simply that you need to prepare for teaching differently than you
might have in the past, and perhaps differently than your own school teachers did a
generation ago. Fortunately, there are ways to do this. Many current programs in teacher
education provide a balance of experiences in tune with current and emerging needs of
teachers. They offer more time for practice teaching in schools, for example, and teacher
education instructors often make deliberate efforts to connect the concepts and ideas of
education and psychology to current best practices of education. These and other features
of contemporary teacher education will make it easier for you to become the kind of teacher
that you not only want to be, but also will need to be.
Intro ; There is a lot to learn about teaching, and much of it comes from educational
psychology. As a career, teaching has distinctive features now that it did not have a
generation ago. The new features make it more exciting in some ways, as well as more
challenging than in the past. The changes require learning teaching skills that were less
important in earlier times. But the new skills are quite learnable. Educational
psychology, and this text, will get you started at that task.
● Teachers often link the concept of learning specifically to what is taught in schools,
focusing on the official curriculum and academic achievements. In other words, when
teachers think about learning, they often prioritize academic subjects like language
and mathematics, which are part of the formal curriculum.
- This perspective may lead to a bias toward major academic subjects, potentially
overlooking the diverse learning that occurs outside the classroom’ .
● This perspective might create a narrow view of learning. By equating learning mainly
with academic achievements, teachers might unintentionally overlook or
underestimate the various ways students learn outside the formal curriculum.
Students can gain valuable knowledge and skills through experiences that are not
part of the official academic program, and this broader spectrum of learning is
important to consider.
A side effect of thinking of learning as related only to curriculum or academics is that classroom social
interactions and behaviors become issues for teachers—become things that they need to manage. As
teachers, we sometimes see incidental learning in classrooms as well, and often welcome it; but our
responsibility for curriculum goals more often focuses our efforts on what students can learn through
conscious, deliberate effort. In a classroom, unlike in many other human settings, it is always necessary to ask
whether classmates are helping or hindering individual students’ learning
Teacher’s Readiness : To begin work as a public school teacher, a person must first
engage in practice teaching for a period of time (not to mention also studying educational
psychology!)
Still another result of focusing the concept of learning on classrooms is that it raises issues
of usefulness or transfer, which is the ability to use knowledge or skill in situations beyond
the ones in which they are acquired.
A way to do it : make the skills enjoyable while they are still being learned, making learning
fun is certainly a good thing to do, but making learning useful as well as fun is even better.
Combining enjoyment and usefulness, in fact, is a “gold standard” of teaching: we generally
seek it for students, even though we may not succeed at providing it all of the time.
Psychology has to offer education many theories, concepts, and ideas from educational
psychology are consistent with the professional priorities of teachers and helpful in solving
important problems of classroom teaching
#1 Behaviorism
(learning as changes in overt behavior)
Pavlov's Experience ; In Pavlov's experiment, he observed that dogs naturally salivated when
presented with food (unconditioned stimulus) as a reflexive response (unconditioned response). He
then introduced a neutral stimulus, such as the sound of a bell, before presenting the food. After
repeatedly pairing the bell with the food, the dogs began to associate the bell with the food and
started to salivate in response to the bell alone, even without the presence of food. In this case, the
bell became a conditioned stimulus, and the salivation in response to the bell became a conditioned
response.
Teaching is usually about influencing students’ conscious words and thoughts, and not their
involuntary behaviors. But remember that schooling is not just about encouraging thinking
and talking.Teachers seek positive changes in students’ attitudes and feelings—attitudes like
a love for learning, for example, and feelings like self-confidence. It turns out that respondent
conditioning describes these kinds of changes relatively well
These changes on students’ behaviors affect their attitude about school, and therefore
also their motivation to learn;
Classical conditioning can influence students’ intrinsic motivation in directions that are
either positive or negative.
Example ; In the positive case, the child becomes more inclined to please the teacher and
to attend to what he or she has to offer; in the negative case, the opposite occurs. Since the
changes in attitude happen “inside” the child they are best thought of as one way that a child
can acquire i intrinsic motivation.
Extrinsic motivation, a tendency to direct attention and energy that originates from outside
of the child
Three key ideas about respondent conditioning
● Extinction: This term does refer to the disappearance of a link between the
conditioned stimulus and the conditioned response. It can happen withe positive and
also negative examples of classical conditioning.
Exemple ; the link between the classroom and your particular smile is no longer repeated or
associated, the child’s response gradually extinguishes, or fades until it has disappeared
entirely. In a sense the child’s initial learning is “unlearned”.
Note, though, that whether the conditioned stimulus is positive or negative, extinction
does not happen suddenly or immediately, but unfolds over time
Exemple; The child being conditioned to your smile, for example, might learn to associate
your smile not only with being present in your classroom, but also to being present in other,
similar classrooms.His conditioned smiles may be strongest where he learned them initially ,
but nonetheless visible to a significant extent in other teachers’ classrooms. To the extent
that this happens, he has generalized his learning.
Exemple : The child is smiling only in your room and not in the other rooms so,the child is
making a distinction between your room and others.
2. Operant conditioning : New behaviors because of New consequences
As with respondent conditioning, the original research about this model of learning was not done with people, but with animals.
One of the pioneers in the field was a Harvard professor named B. F. Skinner
B.F. Skinner experiment : a Harvard professor conducted research using laboratory rats to explore
the principles of this type of learning. In Skinner's experiments, rats were placed in a controlled
environment known as a "Skinner box," which contained a lever and a small tray for food. Initially, the
rats exhibited random behaviors, but by chance, some rats pressed the lever and received a small
pellet of food as a consequence.
As the rats continued to experiment with lever-pressing, they learned that this action led to the
delivery of food. Over time, the rats increased the frequency of lever-pressing, spending more time
near the lever and receiving food more frequently. Skinner termed this phenomenon "operant
conditioning," defining the food pellets as reinforcement and the lever-pressing behavior as the
operant because it influenced the rat's environment.( (because it “operated” on the rat’s
environment))
Skinner's work laid the foundation for understanding how behavior is shaped by consequences,
emphasizing the role of reinforcement in the learning process.
Exemple : If I compliment a student for a good comment during a discussion, there is more
of a chance that I will hear comments from the student more often in the future
Skinner and other behavioral psychologists experimented with using various reinforcers and
operants. They also experimented with various patterns of reinforcement (or schedules of
reinforcement), as well as with various cues or signals to the animal about when
reinforcement was available. It turned out that all of these factors—the operant, the
reinforcement, the schedule, and the cues—affected how easily and thoroughly operant
conditioning occurred. For example, reinforcement was more effective if it came immediately
after the crucial operant behavior, rather than being delayed, and reinforcements that
happened intermittently (only part of the time) caused learning to take longer, but also
caused it to last longer.
1. **Operant:**
- **Definition:** In operant conditioning, the term "operant" refers to the behavior or action
that an organism performs.
- **Example:** In Skinner's experiments with rats, the operant was the lever-pressing
behavior.
2. **Reinforcement:**
- **Definition:** Reinforcement is a consequence that follows a behavior and increases the
likelihood of that behavior recurring in the future.
- **Example:** In Skinner's experiments, the delivery of a food pellet served as a reinforcement for
the rat's lever-pressing behavior.
3. **Schedule of Reinforcement:**
- **Definition:** This refers to the pattern or frequency with which reinforcement is delivered
following a particular behavior.
- **Example:** If reinforcement is given every time the operant behavior occurs, it's a continuous
reinforcement schedule. If it's given only some of the time, it's an intermittent or partial reinforcement
schedule.
4. **Cues or Signals:**
- **Definition:** Cues or signals are environmental stimuli that indicate when a particular behavior
will be reinforced. (cues are signals that precede the behavior, indicating when reinforcement is likely)
- **Example:** In Skinner's experiments, the lever itself or a specific light might serve as a cue,
signaling to the rat that if it presses the lever, reinforcement (food) will follow.
**Differences:**
- **Operant vs. Reinforcement:** The operant is the behavior, while reinforcement is the
consequence that follows that behavior.
- **Reinforcement vs. Schedule of Reinforcement:** Reinforcement is the consequence, while
the schedule of reinforcement determines how often that consequence is delivered.
- **Reinforcement vs. Cues:** Reinforcement is the consequence that follows a behavior, whereas
cues are signals that precede the behavior, indicating when reinforcement is likely.
Operant conditioning and students’ learning: ( more likely to occur then respondent
conditioning) : These points collectively highlight the broad and pervasive role of operant
conditioning in education, its adaptability to different contexts, and the various agents
influencing the reinforcement process.
1. **Widespread Application:**
- Operant conditioning is highly prevalent in classrooms, often more so than respondent
conditioning. Given the nature of public education, teaching frequently involves linking
consequences (e.g., praise or grades) to specific student activities (e.g., reading or
completing assignments).
2. **Ubiquitous Nature:**
- Learning through operant conditioning is not limited to particular grades, subjects, or
teaching styles. It naturally occurs in a wide range of classroom settings.
Operant conditioning stimulates both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation at the same time.
it is reasonable to assume that the student felt intrinsically motivated to some partial
extent, even when reward came from outside the student as well. This was because part of
what reinforced their behavior was the behavior itself—whether it was making faces, running
a mile, or contributing to a discussion. At the same time, though, note that each student
probably was also extrinsically motivated, meaning that another part of the reinforcement
came from consequences or experiences not inherently part of the activity or behavior itself.
Example ;let's say a student enjoys doing something for its own sake, like making funny
faces or participating in a discussion. That's intrinsic motivation—it comes from within and
is tied to the activity itself. However, if the student also gets a reward or recognition from
outside, like praise or a good grade, that's extrinsic motivation. So, the student is
motivated by both the fun of the activity (intrinsic) and the external reward or
consequence (extrinsic) at the same time. It's like enjoying the activity itself and getting a
bonus reward, making the overall experience motivating on multiple levels.
Note : The extrinsic part of the reinforcement may sometimes be more easily observed or
noticed than the intrinsic part, which by definition may sometimes only be experienced
within the individual and not also displayed outwardly
The potential misconception that operant conditioning is merely a form of external manipulation or
bribery. It asserts that while external reinforcements can influence behavior, they don't necessarily
eliminate or replace the internal motivations that individuals have for engaging in certain activities.
(The idea here is that some people might think operant conditioning is just about manipulating or bribing someone to do
something. However, this statement clarifies that while external rewards can impact behavior, they don't take away or replace
the internal reasons why a person might want to do something. So, it's not just about external control; internal motivations still
play a role in why people choose to engage in certain activities.)
● Operant conditioning is not just about controlling people from the outside; it
acknowledges that people still have their own reasons inside for doing things
3. Comparing operant conditioning and respondent
conditioning:
- Schedules of Reinforcement:
- In operant conditioning, it refers to the pattern of pairing reinforcement with the
operant behavior.
- In respondent conditioning, it pertains to the pattern of pairing a conditioned
stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus.
- Partial or intermittent schedules in teaching may prolong learning but also extend the time for
extinction.(The use of intermittent schedules contrasts with continuous reinforcement, where every
occurrence of the desired behavior is reinforced. While intermittent schedules may take longer for the
individual to learn the behavior initially, they often result in more resistant and enduring behaviors. In
teaching or behavior modification, this means that intermittent reinforcement can lead to behaviors
persisting even when reinforcement is not consistently provided)
- Cues:
- In operant conditioning, a cue is a stimulus signaling that performing a behavior
may lead to reinforcement.
- It allows learning when it is acceptable to perform a voluntary action (operant),
similar to discrimination learning in respondent conditioning.
Jean Piaget's Cognitive Theory: (Learning involves the interplay of assimilation and accommodation.)
● Assimilation is interpreting new information in terms of pre-existing concepts. (what
is being transferred to a new setting is not simply a behavior (Skinner's “operant” in
operant conditioning), but a mental representation for an object or experience.)
● Accommodation is the modification of pre-existing concepts based on new
information.
● Together, these processes create cognitive equilibrium—balance between prior
knowledge and openness to new information.
- **Educational Implications:**
- Piaget's ideas are valuable for understanding students' readiness to learn.
Learning According to Piaget: Assimilation + Accommodation → Equilibrium → Schemata
2.Social Constructivism: assisted performance
- **Behaviorist Perspective:**
- Two major theories within behaviorism: respondent conditioning and operant conditioning.
- Respondent conditioning involves neutral associations gaining the power to elicit
significant responses.
- Operant conditioning focuses on how consequences and cues influence the frequency of
behaviors.
- Teachers evaluate learned behaviors as either desirable or unwanted.
- **Constructivist Perspective:**
- Describes how individuals actively engage with experiences to construct knowledge.
- Psychological constructivism emphasizes individual responses—assimilation and
accommodation.
- Social constructivism highlights the role of more expert individuals in creating
opportunities for learners to construct new knowledge.
- **Chapter Summary:**
- Learning has varied meanings, but for teachers, it's connected to curriculum, teaching,
and practical considerations.
- Both behaviorist and constructivist perspectives offer valuable insights for educators.
- Behaviorism focuses on learned behaviors, while constructivism emphasizes active
engagement and knowledge construction.
- Teachers play a pivotal role in creating learning opportunities and supporting
metacognition.