Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Okuyama 2006, Preparation of Functional Nanostructured Particles by Spray Drying
Okuyama 2006, Preparation of Functional Nanostructured Particles by Spray Drying
Review paper
Abstract—When particle dimensions are reduced to the order of several nanometers, their physical
and chemical properties deviate significantly from the bulk properties of such materials. Because
of this, there is abundant potential for their use in future technologies including electronic and
optoelectronic, mechanical, chemical, cosmetic, medical, drug, and food technologies. However,
due to their extremely small sizes, the particles suffer from many problems related to their surface and
thermal stability, shape preservation, handling, assembly in devices, etc. It is therefore an important
challenge to solve these problems by developing slightly larger particles (e.g. on the submicrometer
scale) in which the properties generated by the nanoscale material are preserved. One approach to
this is to trap nanoparticles in a micrometer-sized inert matrix. This approach allows the nanoscale
properties to be retained, since nanoparticles are separated from each other in the inert matrix. The
inert matrix also serves as a coating medium that inhibits any chemical changes to the surface of the
nanoparticles. Their larger size allows easy handling or assembly in devices. A promising method for
designing and fabricating these composite structures is a spray method, in which spherical particles
can be produced. In this paper, we review the nanostructural processing (synthesis) of submicrometer-
sized particles by a spray method, which provides a restricted reaction environment (such as pores or
cages) in the matrix for their synthesis and handling. The characterization and potential applications
of these composites are also discussed.
NOMENCLATURE
A constant (—)
d geometrical diameter (μm)
Greek
α constant (—)
ρ specific gravity of the particles (g/cm3 )
1. INTRODUCTION
from nanoparticles (i.e. a bottom-up approach). This approach permits the preser-
vation of nanoscale properties, but with particles on a micrometer scale. This is im-
portant since micrometer-sized particles are easier to handle than nanometer-sized
particles. During the process, the spray temperature is usually not very high and the
residence time of the droplet/particles is very short, so that, after spraying, the inher-
ent properties of the nanoparticles do not change appreciably. For example, when
using water as the dispersing medium, an operating temperature of around 150 ◦ C
is sufficient to completely dry droplets within a few seconds. In addition, although
the air temperature for drying can be relatively high, the actual temperature of the
evaporating droplets is significantly lower, due to cooling, as the result of the latent
heat of vaporization. During spraying, the evaporated moisture forms a skin around
the droplets, which absorbs most of the heat. Generally, the mean temperature of
the droplet is 15–20 ◦ C below the temperature of the surrounding environment [6].
590 K. Okuyama et al.
Thus, spray drying is also advantageous for the production of micrometer-sized low-
melting-point materials such as lipids, which are important for producing particles
used in drug delivery.
Porous materials are of scientific and technological interest because of their poten-
tial applications in separation processes, catalysts, chromatography, controlled drug
release, low dielectric constant fillers, pigments, microelectronics, electro-optics
and other emerging technologies in addition to nanotechnologies [7 –10]. A va-
riety of macroporous ceramics, metals, semiconductors and polymers with well-
defined pore sizes in the submicrometer range have been successfully synthesized
using self-assembled templates of a colloid as well as self-assembled templates of
an emulsion [11, 12]. The above methods for preparing ordered porous materials
have, thus far, resulted in irregular shapes and/or thin-film shapes. However, for
practical applications, ordered porous materials must be in the shape of a usable ob-
ject. It would be desirable, for example, to produce ordered porous materials with a
spherical form [13].
Figure 2. Schematic of a powder particle prepared by spray drying MCM-X. The particle has two
scales of pore size. Small pores (nanometer order) are developed in MCM-X particles and larger pores
(on the order of hundreds of nanometers) are found between the MCM-X particles.
Figure 3. Agglomerate silica particles produced by spray drying nanometer-sized silica colloids of
various sizes: (a) 4–6, (b) 20–30, (c) 40–60 and (d) 70–100 nm. (Reprinted with permission from
Ref. [20], © 2001 Kluwer.)
Table 1.
Effect of precursor concentration on the volume mean particle diameter
Figure 4. Schematic of a process for producing silica particles containing ordered pores prepared
by spray drying a mixture of silica and PSL colloids. At the lower part of the reactor (low-
temperature region) only solvent evaporation takes place, resulting in agglomerates composed of silica
and PSL nanoparticles. In the upper part of the reactor (high-temperature zone) PSL nanoparticles
decompose, resulting in silica particles containing pores. This figure is published in color on
http://www.ingenta.com
Figure 5. SEM images of the morphology of silica powders obtained using 79-nm PSL latex and
4- to 6-nm silica particles. (a) Enlarged view of the surface of a single particle and (b) SEM image
of a collection of particles. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [21], © 2001 American Chemical
Society.)
Figure 6. Arrangement of a laser particle counter coupled with a pulse height analyzer for determining
the light scattering of porous particles. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [29], © 2002 Elsevier.)
The effective dielectric constant of particles can be calculated from light scattering data by fitting the
measured data with the scattering equation based on Mie theory.
microscopy (TEM) images of the particles [29]. The response voltage decreases
with increasing porosity. From the calculation it is found that, for a sample prepared
using 6-nm silica nanoparticles, the effective refractive index is located between
1.147 and 1.194 [29].
Figure 7. Dependence of response voltage on the porosity of particles. The morphologies of the mea-
sured particles are also shown as SEM images (top) and TEM images (bottom). (Reprinted with per-
mission from Ref. [29], © 2002 Elsevier.) This figure is published in color on http://www.ingenta.com
between the inorganic species occur that eventually solidify the particle and freeze
the mesostructure. Removal of the organic solvent produces mesopore particles
possessing the order introduced by the amphiphile. The mesostructural order can
be controlled by virtue of the choice of amphiphile, solution composition or use of
additives [24, 33].
The process is initiated with a homogeneous solution of soluble silica and
a surfactant prepared in an ethanol/water solvent where the initial surfactant
concentration is much lower than the critical micelle concentration (CMC). When
the drying process occurs in the reactor, alcohol dries more readily than water which
increases the relative surfactant, water and silica concentrations. The concentration
of surfactant then reaches the CMC, micelles are formed and the successive co-
assembly of silica-surfactant micellar species into a liquid-crystalline nanophase is
induced. Lu et al. found that the resulting particles are in generally solid, with
highly ordered hexagonal, cubic or vesicular nanostructures [32].
This method allows the design of porous silica with various pore structures.
For example, using different surfactants: CTAB (CH3 (CH2 )15 N+ (CH3 )3Br− ), a
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 597
Figure 8. Representative TEM micrographs of mesostructured silica particles. (a) Faceted, calcined
particles with a hexagonal mesophase (d100 = 32.5 nm). (b) Calcined particles showing cubic
mesostructure. (c) Calcined particles showing a vesicular mesophase (d100 = 92). (d) Uncalcined
silica particles showing the ‘growth’ of ordered vesicular domains from the liquid–vapor interface.
The particle interior has a disordered, worm-like mesostructure. (Reprinted with permission from
Ref. [32], © 1999 Macmillan.)
non-ionic surfactant [Brij-56 or CH3 (CH2 )15 (OCH2 CH2 )10 OH; Brij-58 or
CH3 (CH2 )15 (OCH2 CH2 )20 OH] or triblock copolymers [Pluronic-P123, i.e.
(EO)20 (PO)70 (EO)20 ] with an acidic silica sol, Lu et al. were able to produce a
wide variety of pore structures. CTAB produced particles with a highly ordered
hexagonal mesophase over the concentration range of 0.06–0.16 M (Fig. 8a and 8c).
The use of a non-ionic surfactant, e.g. Brij-56 or Brij-58, results mainly in vesic-
ular mesostructures, with a minor presence of cubic and hexagonal mesostructures
(Fig. 8b and 8d). At a higher drying temperature, during which the outer silica shell
solidifies before droplet shrinkage is complete, uniform dimpling of the silica shell
results in order to preserve the solidified shell surface area (Fig. 8c).
598 K. Okuyama et al.
Theoretically, if the drying of a sprayed droplet is sufficiently slow and the solute
within the droplet has adequate time to redistribute by diffusion throughout the
evaporating droplet, relatively dense dried particles are produced. By contrast,
if the drying of the droplet is short and the solute in the droplet does not have
sufficient time to diffuse from the surface to the center of the droplet, it accumulates
near the drying front of the droplet. The surfactant concentration is distributed
radially and the surfactant CMC is first exceeded near the droplet surface, which
might then cause the formation of a shell-like micelle layer inside the solidified
silica shell layer. This is due to the tendency of the surfactant to attract silica.
After the formation of the micelle layer, continuation of the drying process results
in the formation of a second silica layer inside the micelle layer. This process is
illustrated in Fig. 9. At the end of the process, alternating silica and micelle layers
are found. This means that, after the removal of the organic material by post-firing
(calcination), the shell surface is uniformly dimpled.
Based on small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and N2 absorption methods, it has
been observed that the d-spacing and pore size increases with increasing surfactant
volume/molecular mass (CTAB < Brij-56 < P123).
Figure 9. Illustration of the formation of porous silica containing uniform dimpling of the shell
surfaces when Pe 1. (a) Initial droplet in the liquid phase. A shell-like micelle layer inside the
solidified silica shell layer (b). The formation of a second silica layer inside the micelle layer (c) and
the formation of a second micelle layer (d). At the end of the process, alternate silica and micelle
layers are found.
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 599
also protect the active entities from destructive action by enzymes and the low pH
environment of the stomach [45].
Encapsulation of specific agents for subsequent controlled release is a very
attractive potential application of these particles. The functionality of the particles in
this case is provided by virtue of the engineered transport properties of the particles
and by way of the method of encapsulation or containment. For example, CeCl3
can be encapsulated within a porous silica shell by the EISA method. After removal
of the surfactant, the CeO2 /CeCl3 core is surrounded by a mesoporous silica layer
through which Ce3+ can be released to provide corrosion inhibition [46].
Mesoporous oxide particles are exciling candidates for heterogeneous catalysts
due to the precise control of pore size, and very high pore volume and surface area.
The impregnation of hexachloroplatinic acid followed by reduction in the presence
of water vapor leads to the formation of platinum nanowire within the pores of
hexagonally ordered mesoporous silica [46].
The pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) was introduced in 1956 to deliver
a conventional formulation of a micronized suspension [47]. Unfortunately, it
is inefficient, with most formulations, depositing no more that 10–15% of the
dose in the lungs, with the majority of the dose being deposited in the oro-
pharynx [48]. Due to a high input energy, disruption in the crystal lattice can
cause physical and chemical instability. Disorder regions in the resulting product
are thermodynamically unstable.
Traditional approaches to formulations for pMDIs have involved formulating
micronized particles with densities in the range of 1.0–1.5 g/cm3 [49]. However,
micronization usually results in a broad particle size distribution, with little control
over other particle attributes such as density and surface energy [50].
Figure 10. Spray-drying method for producing micrometer-sized particles comprised of nanoparticles
for drug delivery. This figure is published in color on http://www.ingenta.com
longer residence time in the lungs [53]. Once deposited, nanoparticles often remain
in the fluid lining of the lung until dissolution (if they are soluble). In addition,
cellular uptake studies have demonstrated that certain cells such as cancer cells
and epithelial cells are able to take up nanoparticles [54]. In vivo studies have
reported an accumulation of nanoparticles at tumor sites [55]. Such properties make
nanoparticles a very attractive delivery vehicle for the treatment of lung cancer.
If nanoparticles can be delivered to the lungs, their unique properties of avoiding
mucociliary clearance and delivering drugs directly to the target tissue or target cells
might be utilized in the therapeutic treatment of lung-specific diseases, including
lung cancer.
However, a serious current problem in the utilization of nanoparticles for drug
release that makes their use severely limited is their low inertia. The mass median
aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of nanoparticles is not suitable for purposes of
inhalation [56] and they are predominantly exhaled from the lung after inspira-
tion [57]. The size of many nanoparticles places them in a transitional region,
where neither diffusion nor sedimentation or impaction are effective deposition
mechanisms [58]. Consequently, it would be expected that a large fraction of an
inhaled dose would be exhaled and only a small particle fraction of the particles
would be deposited in the lung. In addition, their small size leads to the formation
of aggregates, making their physical handling in liquid and dry powder form difficult
— a common practical problem that must be overcome before nanoparticles can be
used for oral drug delivery [59]. Because of these limitations, nanoparticles are not
presently being exploited commercially or clinically as vehicles for drug delivery in
the lung [53].
Maximum deposition of a drug in the tracheo-bronchial and deep alveoli regions
for normal inhalation rates can be achieved when powder particles several microm-
eters in diameter with a narrow size distribution are used [56]. In respiratory drug
602 K. Okuyama et al.
delivery, size influences drug deposition patterns and particles of 1–5 μm are re-
quired for deep lung penetration. Therefore, a current challenge is to integrate the
transportation properties of micrometer-sized particles with the attractive properties
of nanoparticles for drug delivery. Towards this objective, Finlay et al. [58] inves-
tigated the feasibility of developing carrier particles to deliver nanoparticles to the
lung by incorporating nanoparticles into microparticle carriers. This approach is
illustrated in Fig. 10. The MMAD of such carriers can be adjusted to give sufficient
lung deposition in the desired upper or lower part of the lung (either the bronchial
region or the alveolar region). After deposition in the lung, the carrier matrix dis-
solves, releasing the nanoparticles. Finlay et al. used gelatin (242 ± 14 nm) and
poly(butylcyanoacrylate) (nano)particles (173 ± 63 nm) with lactose as the matrix.
The size of the powder was determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (2.5–
2.6 μm), with the MMAD being around 3 μm.
Figure 11. SEM images of (a) a typical hollow sphere LPP obtained by spray drying a solution of
polystyrene nanoparticles (170 nm) and (b) magnified view of the particle surface in (a). (Reprinted
with permission from Ref. [53], © 2002 National Academy of Science USA.)
Figure 12. Variation in the mass mean aerodynamic diameter (!) and geometrical diameter (F)
of DPPC–DMPE–lactose. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53], © 2002 National Academy of
Science USA.)
Figure 12 shows the variation in mass mean diameter and geometrical diameter of
spray-dried DPPC–DMPE–lactose. Compressed air at variable pressure (1–5 bar)
ran a rotary atomizer located above the dryer with a drying air flow rate of 98 kg/h;
the inlet temperature was fixed at 110 ◦ C, the outlet temperature was 46 ◦ C, and the
feed rate of the solution was 70 ml/min.
The Peclet number also controls the formation of large hollow porous nanoparti-
cles (LPNPs). Pe 1 yields relatively dense dried particles. However, if Pe 1,
nanoparticles are trapped at the free surface of the droplet in an energy well result-
ing from the large air–water surface energy, which is greater than the difference be-
tween the particle–air and particle–water surface energies. As the droplet evaporates
and particles accumulate on the free surface, capillary forces draw nanoparticles to-
gether and ultimately van der Waals forces [65] lock them in place. At the end of
the process, the evaporating front becomes a shell with a crust rich in nanoparticles,
604 K. Okuyama et al.
enclosing the remaining solution. As the solution escapes by evaporation from the
shell, the nanoparticles remaining in the drop are pushed onto the inner surface of
the shell.
D = 2At α , (2)
where D is the particle diameter (nm), A = 2.6 ± 0.3 nm day−α , α = 0.33 ± 0.03
and t is the time in days [72]. The visible luminescence of ZnO is also dependent
on particle size. Spanhel and Anderson [71] observed that the luminescence peak at
about 500 nm for fresh colloid shifted to 560 nm after 5 days of aging. The shift in
the luminescence peak results from an increase in the energy band gap opening due
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 605
to the change in crystalline size, which can be roughly predicted using the Brush
equation [73].
It has been proposed that the visible luminescence is caused by the disintegration
of excitons and an electron then jumps to a state located near the center of the
gap [74]. The increase in band gap on particle size reduction shifts the position
of the luminescence spectra to shorter wavelengths. If the time evolution of the
luminescence spectra of a ZnO colloid prepared by Spanhel and Anderson’s method
is observed, it can be seen that the fresh colloid emits a nearly blue color, which then
changes to green and finally reaches a yellow–green color. This definitive change
is very interesting. When the size of particles in a ZnO colloid could be stopped
at various aging times, ZnO particles that produce a variety of colors ranging from
nearly blue to nearly yellow could be produced.
For preparing ZnO composites that emit stable colors, ZnO nanoparticles in a
fresh ZnO colloid prepared by the Spanhel and Anderson method [71] were trapped
in a matrix made of silica nanoparticles [75]. Initially, the ZnO colloid and silica
colloid were mixed and then quickly spray dried. Depending on the aging time of
the colloid, the color of the powder can be varied. Figure 13 shows the effect of
aging time on the luminescence spectra of ZnO composite [75]. For comparison,
the inset in Fig. 13 shows the evolution of the luminescence spectra of a ZnO colloid
prepared by the Spanhel and Anderson method; from fresh colloid to colloid aged
for 1 week. The luminescence peak located around 500 nm for the fresh colloid
shifted to around 560 nm after 1 week of aging. The present method, therefore, is a
simple one for producing ZnO nanoparticles that emit a specified color.
Figure 13. (a) Dependence of PL spectra for samples prepared at SiO2 concentrations of (A) 4 and
(B) 0.4 mol/l, using a 254-nm Xe laser source measured after aging for various times: as prepared,
aged more than 10 days and aged more than 30 days. The inset shows the PL spectra of the ZnO
colloid (0.1 M); solid line: fresh colloid and dashed line: colloid aged for 1 week. (Reprinted with
permission from Ref. [75], © 2001 American Institute of Physics.)
606 K. Okuyama et al.
Figure 14. Luminescence emission of ZnO/SiO2 particle composites prepared using (a) a ZnO colloid
aged for 0 h without the addition of TEOS, (b) a ZnO colloid aged for 0 h (100 ml) with the addition
of 1 g of TEOS, (c) a ZnO colloid aged for 12 h (100 ml) with the addition of 1 g of TEOS and (d) a
ZnO colloid aged for 1 week (100 ml) with the addition of 1 g of TEOS. (Reprinted with permission
from Ref. [76], © 2004 Elsevier.)
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 607
6. CONCLUSION
using the spray-drying method. These could be in the form of large porous particles
that microencapsulate nanoparticles.
Acknowledgements
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Fellowships for
M. A. and F. I. are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the Grant-
in-Aids from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
through the JSPS (K. O. and I. W. L.), and by the NEDO’s Nanotechnology Particle
Project based on a fund provided by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,
Japan.
REFERENCES
1. K. Masters, Spray Drying Handbook. Wiley, New York (1991).
2. M. Fareed, A new approach to modeling of single droplet drying, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 2985–2993
(2003).
3. K. Okuyama and I. W. Lenggoro, Preparation of nanoparticles via spray route, Chem. Eng. Sci.
58, 537–547 (2003).
4. W. N. Wang, I. W. Lenggoro and K. Okuyama, Dispersion and aggregation of nanoparticle
derived from colloidal droplets under low-pressure conditions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 288,
423–431 (2005).
5. P. Luo and T. G. Nieh, Synthesis of ultrafine hydroxyapatite particles by a spray dry method,
Mater. Sci. Eng. C 3, 75–78 (1995).
6. J. Broadhead, S. K. Edmond Rouan and C. T. Rhodes, The deposition of spray-dried beta-
galactosidase from dry powder inhaler devices, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 18, 1169–1206 (1992).
7. M. E. Davis, Ordered porous materials for emerging applications, Nature 417, 813–821 (2002).
8. F. Schüth and W. Schmidt, Microporous and mesoporous materials, Adv. Mater. 14, 629–638
(2002).
9. O. D. Velev and A. M. Lenhoff, Colloidal crystals as templates for porous materials, Curr. Opin.
Colloid Interface Sci. 5, 56–63 (2000).
10. A. Stein, Sphere templating methods for periodic porous solids, Microporous Mesoporous Mat.
44-45, 227–239 (2001).
11. O. D. Velev, T. A. Jede, R. F. Lobo and A. M. Lenhoff, Porous silica via colloidal crystallization,
Nature 389, 447–448 (1997).
12. A. Imhof and D. J. Pine, Ordered macroporous materials by emulsion templating, Nature 389,
948–951 (1997).
13. J. Kim, O. Wilhelm and S. E. Pratsinis, Packaging of sol-gel-made porous nanostructured titania
particles by spray drying, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 2802–2808 (2001).
14. B. T. Holland, L. Abrams and A. Stein, Dual templating of macroporous silicates with zeolitic
microporous frameworks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 4308–4309 (1999).
15. K. H. Rhodes, S. A. Davis, F. Caruso, B. Zhang and S. Mann, Hierarchical assembly of zeolite
nanoparticles into ordered macroporous monoliths using core–shell building blocks, Chem.
Mater. 12, 2832–2834 (2000).
16. M. Antonietti, B. Berton, C. Göltner and H.-P. Hentze, Synthesis of mesoporous silica with
large pores and bimodal pore size distribution by templating of polymer lattices, Adv. Mater. 10,
154–159 (1998).
17. J. S. Yin and Z. L. Wang, Plasmon energy shift in mesoporous and double length-scale ordered
nanoporous silica, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2629–2631 (1999).
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 609
18. A. Lind, F. C. Hohenesche, J.-H. Smått, M. Lindén and K. K Unger, Spherical silica agglom-
erates possessing hierarchical porosity prepared by spray drying of MCM-41 and MCM-48
nanospheres, Microporous Mesoporous Mat. 66, 219–227 (2003).
19. F. Iskandar, I. W. Lenggoro, T.-O. Kim, N. Nakao, M. Shimada and K. Okuyama, Fabrication and
characterization of SiO2 particles generated by spray methods for standards aerosol, J. Chem.
Eng. Jpn. 34, 1285–1292 (2001).
20. F. Iskandar, I. W. Lenggoro, B. Xia and K. Okuyama, Functional nanostructured silica powders
derived from colloidal suspensions by sol spraying, J. Nanoparticle Res. 3, 263–270 (2001).
21. F. Iskandar, Mikrajuddin and K. Okuyama, In situ production of spherical silica particles
containing self-organized mesopores, Nano Lett. 1, 231–234 (2001); see also: Highlights of
the recent literature, materials science: spraying nanoporous silica, Science 292, 1611 (2001).
22. F. Iskandar, Mikrajuddin and K. Okuyama, Controllability of pore size and porosity of self-
organized porous silica particles, Nano Lett. 2, 389–392 (2002).
23. F. Iskandar, Mikrajuddin and K. Okuyama, Ordered nanoporous particles, in: Encyclopedia of
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, H. S. Nalwa (Ed.), Vol. 8, pp. 259–270. American Scientific
Publishers, CA (2004).
24. G. V. R. Rao, G. P. Lòpez, J. Bravo, H. N. Pham, A. K. Datye, H. Xu and T. L. Ward,
Monodisperse mesoporous silica microspheres formed by evaporation-induced self assembly
of surfactant templates in aerosols, Adv. Mater. 14, 1301–1304 (2002).
25. T. Buranda, G. M. Jones, J. P. Nolan, J. Keij, G. P. Lopez and L. A. Sklar, Ligand receptor
dynamics at streptavidin-coated particle surfaces: a flow cytometric and spectrofluorimetric
study, J. Phys. Chem. B. 103, 3399–3410 (1999).
26. C. Kresge, M. Leonowichz, W. Roth, C. Vartuli and J. Beck, Ordered mesoporous molecular
sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism, Nature 359, 710–712 (1992).
27. L. Gradoń, S. Janeczko, M. Abdullah, F. Iskandar and K. Okuyama, Self-organization kinetics
of mesoporous nanostructured particles, AIChE J. 50, 2583–2593 (2004).
28. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. Wiley,
New York (1983).
29. H. Chang and K. Okuyama, Optical properties of dense and porous spheroids consisting of
primary silica nanoparticles, J. Aerosol Sci. 33, 1701–1720 (2002).
30. F. Iskandar, H. Chang, and K. Okuyama, Preparation of microencapsulated powders by an
aerosol spray method and their optical properties. Advanced Powder Technol. 14, 349–367
(2003).
31. J. Heyder and J. Gebhard, Optimization of response functions of light scattering instruments for
size evaluation of aerosol particles, Appl. Opt. 18, 705–711 (1979).
32. Y. Lu, H. Fan, A. Stump, T. L. Ward, T. Rieker and C. J. Brinker, Aerosol-assisted self-assembly
of mesostructured spherical nanoparticles, Nature 398, 223–226 (1999).
33. M. T. Bore, S. B. Rathod, T. L. Ward and A. K. Datye, Hexagonal mesostructure in powders
produced by evaporation-induced self-assembly of aerosols from aqueous tetraethoxysilane
solutions, Langmuir 19, 256–264 (2003).
34. P. York, Supercritical fluids ease drug delivery, Manufact. Chem. 71, 26–29 (2000).
35. R. F. Ziolo, E. P. Giannelis, B. A. Weinstein, M. P. O’Horo, B. N. Ganguly, V. Mehrotra,
M. W. Russell and D. R. Huffman, Matrix-mediated synthesis of nanocrystalline γ -Fe2 O3 : a
new optically transparent magnetic material, Science 257, 219–223 (1992).
36. P. Tartaj, M. de Puerto Morales, S. V. Verdaguer, T. G. Carrenõ and C. J. Serna, The preparation
of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine, J. Phys. D 36, R1820-R197 (2003).
37. E. Bourgeat-Lami and J. J. Lang, Encapsulation of inorganic particles by dispersion polymeriza-
tion in polar media: 1. silica nanoparticles encapsulated by polystyrene, J. Colloid Interface Sci.
197, 293–308 (1998).
38. M. N. A. Hawlader, M. S. Uddin and M. M. Khin, Microencapsulated PCM thermal-energy
storage system, Appl. Energy 74, 195–202 (2003).
610 K. Okuyama et al.
39. P. Deasy, Microencapsulation and related drug process, Drugs Pharmac. Sci. 20, 1–361 (1984).
40. A. Millqvist-Fureby, M. Malmsten and B. Bergenståhl, An aqueous polymer two-phase system
as carrier in the spray-drying of biological, J. Colloid Inteface Sci. 225, 54–61 (2000).
41. F. Pavanetto, I. Genta, P. Giunchedi and B. Conti, Evaluation of spray-drying as a method for
polylactide and polylactide-co-glycolyde microsphere preparation, J. Microencapsul. 10, 487–
497 (1993).
42. D. Kobayashi, S. Tsubuku, H. Yamanaka, M. Asano, M. Miyajima and M. Yoshida, In vivo
characteristics of injectable poly(DL-lactic acid) microspheres for long-acting drug delivery,
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 24, 819–825 (1998).
43. P. Giunchedi, H. O. Alpar and U. Conte, PDLLA microspheres containing steroids: spray-
drying, o/w and w/o/w emulsifications as preparation methods, J. Microencapsul. 15, 185–195
(1998).
44. C. Thomasin, G. Corradin, Y. Men, H. P. Merkle and B. Gender, Tetanus toxoid and synthetic
malaria antigen containing poly(lactide)/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres: importance of
polymer degradation and antigen release for immune response. J. Control. Release 41, 131–145
(1996).
45. Ch. B. Felder, N. Vorlaender, B. Gander, H. P. Mekle and H. U. Bertschinger, Microencapsulated
enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and detached fimbriae for peroral vaccination of pigs, Vaccine
19, 706–715 (2001).
46. T. Ward, A. Datye, G. Lòpez, J. Brinker and F. van Swoll, Nanostructural Engineering of
Complex Functional Particles. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA (2003).
47. Y. Kawashima, T. Serigano, T. Hino, H. Yamamoto and H. Takeuchi, A new powder design
method to improve inhalation efficiency of pranlukast hydrate dry powder aerosols by surface
modification with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate nanospheres, Pharmacol. Res. 15,
1748–1752 (1998).
48. R. Melchar, M. F. Biddischombe, V. H. F. Mak, M. D. Short and S. G. Spiro, Lung deposition
patterns of directly labelled salbutamol in normal subjects and in patients with reversible airflow
obstruction, Thorax 48, 506–511 (1993).
49. S. P. Newman, K. P. Steed, G. Hooper, J. I. Jones and F. C. Upchurch, Improved targeting of
beclomethasone diproprionate (250 g metered dose inhaler) to the lungs of asthmatics with the
Spacehaler™ , Respir. Med. 93, 424–431 (1999).
50. P. H. Hirst, G. R. Pitcairn, J. G. Weers, T. E. Tarara, A. R. Clark, L. A. Dellamary, G. Hall,
J. Shorr and S. P. Newman, In vivo lung deposition of hollow porous particles from a pressurized
metered dose inhaler, Pharmacol. Res. 19, 258–264 (2002).
51. A. L. Adjei and P. K. Gupta, Inhalation Delivery of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins. Marcel
Dekker, New York (1997).
52. L. Gradoń, T. Sosnowski, K. Okuyama, and F. Iskandar, Interaction of nanostructured particles
with the lung surfactant, in: Nanostructured Materials and Their Applications, W. W. Szyman-
ski, P. E. Wanger, M. Itoh and T. Ohachi (Eds), pp. 145–156. Facultas, Vienna (2004).
53. N. Tsapis, B. Bennett, B. Jackson, D. A. Weitz and D. A. Edwards, Trojan particles. Low porous
carriers of nanoparticles for drug delivery, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12001–12005 (2002).
54. R. Ghirardelli, F. Bonasoro, C. Porta and D. Cremaschi, Identification of particular epithelial
areas and cells that transport polypeptide-coated nanoparticles in the nasal respiratory mucosa
of the rabbit, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1416, 39–47 (1999).
55. I. Brigger, C. Dumernet and P. Convreur, Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis, Adv.
Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, 631–651 (2002).
56. W. H. Finlay, The Mechanics of Inhalated Pharmaceutical Aerosol: An Introduction, Academic
Press, New York (2001).
57. J. Heyder, J. Gebhard, G. Rudolf, C. Schiller and W. Stahlhofen, Deposition of particles in the
human respiratory tract in the size range 0.005–15 μm, J. Aerosol Sci. 17, 811–825 (1986).
Preparation of functional nanoparticles 611
58. J. O.-H. Sham, Y. Zhang, W. H. Finlay, W. H. Roa and R. Löberberg, Formulation and
characterization of spray-dried powders containing nanoparticles for aerosol delivery to the lung,
Int. J. Pharm. 269, 457–467 (2004).
59. M. Kabbaj, N. C. Phillips, Anticancer activity of mycobacterial DNA: effect of formulation as
chitosan nanoparticles, J. Drug. Targeting 9, 317–328 (2001).
60. D. A. Edwards, J. Haness, G. Caponetti, J. Hrkach, A. BenJebria, M.L. Eskew, J. Mintzes,
D. Deaver, N. Lotan and R. Langer, Large porous particles for pulmonary drug delivery, Science
276, 1868–1871 (1997).
61. D. L. French, D. A. Edwards and R. W. Niven, The influence of formulation on emission,
deaggregation and deposition of dry powders for inhalation, J. Aerosol Sci. 27, 769–783 (1996).
62. T. R. Sosnowski, L. Gradoń, F. Iskandar and K. Okuyama, Interaction of deposited aerosol
particles with the alveolar liquid layer, in: Optimization of Aerosol Drug Delivery, L. Gradoń
and J. Marijnissen (Eds), pp. 205–216. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003).
63. R. Vanbever, A. BenJebria, J. Mitzes, R. Langer and D. A. Edwards, Sustained release of insulin
from insoluble inhaled particles, Drug Dev. Res. 48, 178–185 (1999).
64. I. Gonda, Physico-chemical principles in aerosol delivery, in: Topics in Pharmaceutical
Sciences, D. J. A. Crommelin and K. K. Midha (Eds), pp. 95–115. Medpharm Scientific, Stuttgart
(1991).
65. O. D. Velev, K. Furusawa and K. Nagayama, Assembly of latex particles by using emulsion
droplets as templates: 1. Microstructured hollow spheres, Langmuir 12, 2374–2384 (1996).
66. H. N. Pham, A. Viergutz, R. J. Gormley and A. K. Datye, Improving the attrition resistance of
slurry phase heterogeneous catalysts, Powder Technol. 110, 196–203 (2000).
67. H. E. Bergna, Attrition resistant porous particles produced by spray drying, in: Proc. 196th Natl.
Mtg. of ACS. ACS, Washington, DC (1989), Ch. 7.
68. R. H. Müller and J. S. Lucks, Arzneistofftrager aus festen Lipidteilchen (Feste Lipidnanospharen
(SLN)), Eur. Patent EP 0 605 497 B1 (1996).
69. C. Schwarz, W. Mehnert, J. S. Lucks and R. H. Müller, Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for
controlled drug delivery: I. Production, characterization and sterilization, J. Control. Release 30,
83–96 (1994).
70. C. Freitas and R. H. Müller, Spray-drying of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNTM), Eur. J. Pharm.
Biopharm. 46, 145–151 (1998).
71. L. Spanhel and M. A. Anderson, Semiconductor clusters in the sol-gel process: quantized
aggregation, gelation and crystal growth in concentrated ZnO colloids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113,
2826–2833 (1991).
72. S. Monticone, R. Tufeu and A. V. Kanaev, Complex nature of the UV and visible fluorescence
of Colloidal ZnO nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. B. 102, 2854–2862 (1998).
73. L. Brus, Electronic wave-functions in semiconductor clusters — experiment and theory, J. Phys.
Chem. 90, 2555–2560 (1986).
74. M. Abdullah, T. Morimoto and K. Okuyama, Generating blue and red luminescence from
ZnO/polyethylene glycol nanocomposites prepared by in-situ method, Adv. Funct. Mater. 13,
800–804 (2003).
75. Mikrajuddin, F. Iskandar, F. G. Shi and K. Okuyama. Stable photoluminescence of zinc oxide
quantum dots in silica nanoparticles matrix prepared by the combined sol-gel and spray drying
method. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 6431–6434 (2001).
76. M. Abdullah, S. Shibamoto and K. Okuyama, Synthesis of ZnO/SiO2 nanocomposite emitting
specified luminescence color. Opt. Mater. 26, 95–100 (2004).
77. A. Ulman, Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers, Chem. Rev. 96, 1533–1554
(1996).