Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture10 PV System and Farm Design
Lecture10 PV System and Farm Design
Lecture10 PV System and Farm Design
M. A. Alam
alam@purdue.edu
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN USA
1
Outline
1) Configurations of PV systems
2) Principles of fixed tilt farm design
3) Calculation of yearly energy yield
4) Conclusions
Fabrication,
Device physics, Reliability, LCOE
Manufacturing
Collection of Panel
Module Rooftop
independent
p-n junction solar cell PV
2-level PV Cell Solar farm
nm nm-𝜇m cm-m km
Inverter Distribution
Cells, modules, panel panel
CC
Charge Battery/ AC
controller storage source/
grid
Hybrid:
Multiple sources
Both AC/DC loads
1) Configurations of PV systems
2) Principles of fixed tilt farm design
3) Calculation of yearly energy yield
4) Conclusions
1450
𝐼0 (W/m2 )
1400
1350
1300
400
300 Extra-
(kW-hr/m2 )
terrestrial
200
Monthly
100 Monthly GHI
0
J FMAMJ J ASOND
13
How to tilt a solar module (i.e.
determine 𝛽)
𝐼𝑏
𝜃𝑧
𝛽 𝛼
North
𝛼(𝑑) = 90 − 𝐿 ± 𝛿(𝑑)
South
𝛿
𝜃𝑧 𝜃𝑧 (𝑑) = 𝐿 ∓ 𝛿(𝑑)
𝛼 𝜃𝑧,𝑤 = 𝐿 + 23.45
𝜃𝑧,𝑠 = 𝐿 − 23.45
𝜃𝑧,𝑤 = 𝐿 + 23.45
𝛽
𝜃𝑧,𝑠 = 𝐿 − 23.45
16
Example: How to tilt a module
19
Standalone yield: Direct light
𝐼𝑇 = 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑟 + 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 + 𝐼𝑎𝑙𝑏
𝐼𝑏
𝜃𝑧
𝛽 𝛼
𝐼𝑑 𝐼𝑑
𝛽 𝛽
𝐼𝑑 𝜋 𝐼𝑑 1 + cos 𝛽
𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 = න sin 𝜃 𝑑𝜃 =
2 𝛽 2
ℎ + 𝑠 – (0 + 𝑠 2 + ℎ2 + 2𝑠ℎ cos 𝛽)
𝑉𝐹 =
2ℎ
1
𝑉𝐹 = 1 + 𝑟 − 1 + 𝑟 2 + 2𝑟 cos 𝛽 → (1 − cos 𝛽)/2
2
M. A. Alam, PV Lecture Notes 22
Stand-alone module: Energy yield
𝐼𝑏
𝜃𝑧
𝛽 𝛼
𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑟 = 𝐼𝑏 cos(𝜃𝑧 − 𝛽)
𝐼𝑑 1 + cos 𝛽
𝐼𝑇 = 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑟 + 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 + 𝐼𝑎𝑙𝑏 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 =
2
ℎ 𝜃𝑍𝑤
ℎ𝑦
𝛽 ℎ𝑥
𝑟𝑠
𝑝
𝐼𝑏
𝜃𝑧
𝛽 𝛼
𝑝
M. A. Alam, PV Lecture Notes 30
Farm yield: diffused energy collection
𝐼𝑇 = 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑟 + 𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 + 𝐼𝑎𝑙𝑏
𝐼𝑑
𝐼𝑑
𝛼+𝛽
𝛽 𝛼
𝑝 𝐼𝑑 𝜋 𝑝 𝐼𝑑 1 + cos(𝛼 + 𝛽 )
𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓 (𝜉) = × න sin 𝜃 𝑑𝜃 = ×
ℎ 2 𝛽+𝛼(𝜉) ℎ 2
1) Configurations of PV systems
2) Principles of fixed tilt farm design
3) Calculation of yearly energy yield
4) Conclusions
80
60 W
40
20
0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
4
3
2 period
(m)
1 Row spacing
0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
5
4
SBR
3
2
1
0
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
Yearly Yield (kW-hr/m2 )
Latitude (deg.)
• 𝑅𝐴 = 0.2
• 1-2 % gain in YY
• 1-2o increase in optimum tilt angle
• < 1% reduction in LCOE*
Longitude
60
0
-60
-120
-180
(a)(i)
Improvement, %
1 2
(c) (d) 40 GvBF vs. mono
ℎ 0
160
𝑟 Latitude 40 N
2
(a)(ii) (e) (f) 140
0.5
area
𝑟 = 0.5ℎ 120
Daily Energy/farm
0.4
0.3 𝑟=0
W
(kW-hr/m )
2
100 Monofacial
0.2
(10% soiling loss)
0.1 80
0 1 2 3 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65
p/h Annual mean-clearness index
(b) (g) (h)
M. A. Alam, PV Lecture Notes
39
Land-cost inclusive optimization
(a) = 0 (b) = 15 (c) = 100
40
M. A. Alam, PV Lecture Notes
Conclusions
PV design must be understood in a system context.
Given the weather information, it is relatively easy to
calculate the energy yield for stand-alone modules as
well as solar farms.
The increasing cost of land and wide-spread PV
deployment are encouraging the PV industry to
explore novel technologies (e.g. bifacial PV) and farm
topologies (e.g. floating solar).
An end-to-end cost-benefit analysis is essential to
create a farm thatM.is ideally suited to a location.
A. Alam, PV Lecture Notes
41
Self-study Quiz