Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0023643813002843 Main
1 s2.0 S0023643813002843 Main
1 s2.0 S0023643813002843 Main
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Quality attributes of soft wheat products are affected by physicochemical characteristics and rheological
Received 2 May 2013 properties of wheat flour. Whole-wheat flour has a significant impact on baking qualities (stack height,
Received in revised form stack weight, specific volume, and breaking strength) of whole-wheat saltine crackers due to its high
26 July 2013
water absorption capacity. SRC profiles, alveograph and rheometer parameters were determined to
Accepted 30 July 2013
observe the effect of whole-wheat flour on whole-wheat cracker flour blends. NMR technique was uti-
lized to demonstrate the water migration and competition in whole-wheat dough components. Results
Keywords:
of SRC testing revealed that the water absorption of whole-wheat flour blends increased with the
Rheological properties
Whole-wheat saltine cracker
addition level of whole-wheat flour. The rheological properties (G0 , G00 , P, L, W values) were influenced
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) significantly by the presence of whole-wheat flour. Results of NMR indicated that water migrated from
Water migration gluten network into arabinoxylans matrix in whole-wheat dough system, resulting in inferior saltine
Solvent retention capacity (SRC) cracker-baking qualities of whole-wheat flour, i.e., small breaking strength, stack height and specific
volume. The stack height, specific volume, and breaking strength of end products showed significant
correlations with the arabinoxylans, dough extensibility, and gluten index of whole-wheat flour.
Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0023-6438/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.07.022
44 J. Li et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 55 (2014) 43e50
bran particles can physically disrupt the gluten matrix, leading to Table 2
premature bubble rupture (Li et al., 2012). Flour analysis.
NMR technique which is a useful tool to detect the macro-water Amount of Moisture Protein Ash Wet gluten Gluten Starch
distribution and migration among high-moisture samples non- SWWW (g/100 g) (g/100 g)b (g/100 g)b (g/100 g)b index damage
invasively (Stapley, Hyde, Gladden, & Fryer, 1997) was successfully (g/100 g)a (g/100 g)b
applied to examine the water migration between macromolecules 0 13.2 8.43 0.442 24.5 60.9 3.1
(arabinoxylans and gluten network) in whole-wheat bread dough 25 12.5 8.92 0.734 24.4 44.1 3.1
50 11.7 9.35 1.015 28.6 26.2 3.4
system (Li et al., 2012). Thus, the objectives of this study were: 1) to
75 11.0 9.92 1.241 26.0 8.4 3.4
investigate the effect of whole-wheat flour on the rheological 100 10.3 9.77 1.522 22.2 6.6 3.4
properties of whole-wheat saltine cracker flour blends using the a
Abbreviations as in Table 1.
rheometer, alveograph, and SRC testing; 2) to verify the mechanism b
14 g/100 g mb.
of the impact of whole-wheat flour on the quality attributes of
whole-wheat saltine cracker using the NMR technique; and 3) to
blends were determined according to the AACC International
establish the relationship between the rheological properties of
Approved Methods and results are shown in Table 2.
whole-wheat flour blends and end-product quality parameters.
2.3.1. Formula
2.1. Materials
In the sponge, ingredients included flour (65 g/100 g), sour-
dough starter (4 g/100 g), instant dry yeast (0.3 g/100 g), yeast foods
Soft white whole-wheat flour (SWWW; UltragrainÒ) was kindly
(0.03 g/100 g), and water (27 g/100 g, 29 g/100 g, 30 g/100 g, 32 g/
provided by ConAgra Flour Mills, Inc. (Omaha, NE, USA). Soft red
100 g, and 34 g/100 g water was added into five whole-wheat flour
winter flour (SRW; Golden Shield, enriched and unbleached) and
blends, respectively). The sourdough starter was initially supplied
hard red winter flour (HRW; Harvest King winter wheat, enriched
by the Oregon State University and was fed every day using old
and unbleached) were obtained from General Mills, Inc. (Minne-
starter (50 g), HRW flour (100 g), and distilled water (50 g). The
apolis, MN, USA). Baking soda (ARM & HAMMER Div. of Church &
starter ingredients were mixed (Hobart A-200 mixer) at 1st speed
Dwigh, Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA), yeast food (ADM Arkady Inc.,
for 5 min until well blended, and the starter dough was placed in a
Olathe, KS, USA), salt (Morton Salt, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Crisco
container with a lid until it tripled in volume at room temperature.
vegetable shortening (trans-fat free) (J.M. Smucker Company, Orr-
The dough ingredients included flour (35 g/100 g), shortening
ville, OH, USA) and instant dry yeast (Lesaffre Yeast Corporation,
(14 g/100 g), salt (0.8 g/100 g), water (1 g/100 g), and baking soda
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) were purchased from a local super-
(determined by the total titratable acidity of the sponge). All in-
market (Portland, Oregon, USA). The chemical reagents (ACS grade)
gredients were scaled on the basis of 500-g flour weight. Instant
used for conducting SRC tests were purchased from Nurnberg Sci-
dry yeast, yeast foods, and salt were weighed and dispersed sepa-
entific Company (Portland, OR, USA).
rately in the amount of water required in the formula before use.
2.2. Whole-wheat saltine cracker flour blends preparation and
2.3.2. Baking soda dosage determination
analysis
The total titratable acidity (TTA) test was considered as an
indication of the fermentation process. To determine the baking
Whole-wheat saltine cracker flour samples were composited
soda dosage in the cracker dough formula and to control the final
from the blends of SWWW, SRW, and HRW flour (Table 1). HRW
product pH (in the range of 7e8), the TTA of cracker sponge was
flour is suitable for making crackers (Slade et al., 1994) and meets
determined after 18-h sponge fermentation. TTA was prepared by
the requirement of relatively high gluten strength for high-quality
mixing 15 g sponge with 100 mL deionized water and stirred for
cracker flour (Kweon, Slade, & Levine, 2011b). From our preliminary
30 s at 2nd speed using the Hamilton Beach commercial blender
trials (data not shown), the optimum addition range of HRW flour
(model 908 Clamshell, Procter-Silex, Inc., USA) until the sponge
was 10e20 g/100 g which was determined by the breaking strength
sample was completely dispersed. Then, the sponge slurry was
of end products (if HRW was 20 g/100 g, the end-product texture
transferred into a 250 mL beaker with a stir bar inside and placed
became harder and less crispy), so 15 g/100 g of HRW flour was
onto a magnetic stirrer (model PC-520, Coring Laboratory Stirrer,
added consistently in each group, except for the 100 g/100 g
USA). 0.1 M/L NaOH solution was used to titrate (Brinkmann Dis-
SWWW group. The addition levels of SWWW flour in flour blends
pensette, Germany) the sponge slurry until a final pH value of 6.6.
were 0 g/100 g (control flour blend), 25 g/100 g, 50 g/100 g, 75 g/
The volume of NaOH solution used for titration was referred as the
100 g and 100 g/100 g, respectively.
TTA value (Sutherland, 1989). The relationship between TTA and
Protein (AACCI 46-30.01), moisture (AACCI 44-15.02), ash
baking soda dosage is shown in Table 3.
(AACCI 08-01.01), starch damage (AACCI 76-33.01), wet gluten and
gluten index (AACCI 38-12.02) of five different whole-wheat flour
Table 3
Total tritable acidity (TTA) of sponge and baking soda
Table 1
dosage in whole-wheat cracker dough.
Flour blend composition of whole-wheat saltine crackers.
TTA (mL) Baking soda (g)
Amount of Sponge (65 g/100 g) Dough (35 g/100 g)
per 500 g flour
SWWW (g/100 g)a
SWWW SRW HRW SWWW SRW
7e8 3.0
0 50 15 35 9e11 4.0
25 25 25 15 35 12e13 5.0
50 50 15 35 14e16 6.0
75 50 15 25 10 17e18 7.0
100 65 35 18e19 7.5
a
20e21 8.0
SWWW: soft white whole-wheat; SRW: soft red winter; HRW: hard red winter.
J. Li et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 55 (2014) 43e50 45
Table 4
End-product quality evaluation.a
Amount of SWWW Stack weightc,d (g) Stack heightd (mm) Specific volume (mL/g) Breaking strength (g) Moisture (g/100 g) pH
(g/100 g)b
0 27.2 0.2a 34.8 0.4a 1.27 0.06a 1236.3 70.1a 3.1 7.7
25 27.0 0.2a 32.7 0.3b 1.25 0.02a 1052.7 82.6b 3.1 7.6
50 26.5 0.3b 29.8 0.4c 1.14 0.04b 829.8 25.6c 3.9 7.1
75 25.1 0.3c 28.9 0.3c 1.02 0.03c 732.0 23.0c 3.7 7.4
100 24.9 0.4d 26.8 0.6d 1.00 0.02c 700.6 16.6c 3.6 7.3
a
Data were the mean value S.D. Values in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (P < 0.05). Standard deviation was at least three
replicate experiments.
b
Abbreviations as in Table 1.
c
Dry basis.
d
Stack of 7 crackers.
AX are a highly water-absorbing component, which exert a negative a better predictor of overall performance of cracker flour than the
effect on the quality of crackers, especially on the volume of crackers LA-SRC value alone (Kweon et al., 2011b). The SRC values and GPI of
(Kweon, Slade, & Levine, 2011a). The high water-absorbing com- cracker flours are shown in Fig. 2. The SRC values of control flour
ponents restrained the hydration of the gluten proteins from blend (0 g/100 g SWWW) which was a blend of 85 g/100 g SRW and
forming the proper network needed for gas retention. The cracker 15 g/100 g HRW were: W-SRC ¼ 55.3 g/100 g, LA-SRC ¼ 95.5 g/
dough was too tight to allow for puffing during baking, resulting in 100 g, SC-SRC ¼ 72.3 g/100 g, and Suc-SRC ¼ 104.1 g/100 g. Typical
reduction of the stack height and specific volume of end products standard SRC values for soft wheat sponge-and-dough cracker (e.g.,
(Carey et al., 2002). The generation of discontinuous protein film saltine crackers) flour were reported as: W-SRC 57 g/100 g, LA-
decreased the breaking strength and reduced the bubbling of the SRC 100 g/100 g, SC-SRC 72 g/100 g, and Suc-SRC 96 g/100 g
whole-wheat crackers during baking. Thus, the development of the (Kweon et al., 2011b). The four SRC values of the control flour blend
gluten network during dough machining was a decisive factor to the were similar to the typical standard except for the slight differences
superior baking quality of whole-wheat flour blends. As expected, in LA-SRC and Suc-SRC, which may be due to the addition of 15 g/
the color of the end products gradually became browner and darker 100 g HRW flour. If there was more HRW, the LA-SRC would be
with the increased ratio of whole-wheat flour (Fig. 1). greater, probably over 100 g/100 g. The reduction in LA-SRC
compared to the target range was probably due to the SRW, but
3.2. Effect of whole-wheat flour on SRC profiles of whole-wheat the increase in Suc-SRC was probably due to the HRW. The SRC
flour blends values and GPI (0.54) of the control flour blend suggested that it
Fig. 2. Effects of soft white whole-wheat (SWWW) flour on the solvent retention
capacity (SRC) values of whole-wheat flour blends. SRC: solvent retention capacity; W-
Fig. 1. The color values (L, a* and b*) of the crackers made from five different addition SRC: water SRC; LA-SRC: lactic acid SRC; SC-SRC: sodium carbonate SRC; Suc-SRC:
levels of soft white whole-wheat (SWWW) flours. L: lightness; a*: redness-greenness; sucrose SRC; GPI (Gluten Performance Index) ¼ Lactic Acid SRC/(Sodium
b*: blueness-yellowness. Carbonate þ Sucrose) SRC.
J. Li et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 55 (2014) 43e50 47
affecting the cracker quality (Kweon et al., 2011a). In the frequency G0 (which was correlated with the protein content) did not result
sweep test, the G0 (storage modulus) of whole-wheat dough in strong elasticity of dough and full formation of gluten network,
reduced with the addition level of SWWW flour, which indicated which may be caused by the high water absorption of wheat bran in
that the elasticity of whole-wheat cracker dough was restrained. whole-wheat dough system. Thus, the preferable baking quality of
The high water absorbent-capacity of wheat bran competes for whole-wheat products cannot be demonstrated by the high-level
water with the gluten network and starch granule in whole-wheat G0 -value.
dough system, which inhibited sufficient water absorption and The rheological properties of flours have been reported to
formation of gluten network (Rosell et al., 2010). The AX is the main depend on starch granular structure, amylose to amylopectin ratio,
component of wheat bran, and it shows the ability of sequestrating and the presence of phosphate esters (Singh & Singh, 2001). The
water and restricting the formation of gluten network in whole- presence of large starch granules in wheat flour is likely responsible
wheat bread dough (Li et al., 2012). However, the G0 -value for high G0 and G00 values (Kaur, Singh, & Sodhi, 2002). However, the
increased again as the SWWW flour content exceeded 50 g/100 g; starch content and its granular size were diluted and sheared by the
the flour blend with 75 g/100 g SWWW had the highest G0 (Fig. 4a), increased level of wheat bran in whole-wheat flour (Li et al., 2012).
which may be related to the highest protein content of this blend Therefore, the result of G00 of cracker dough reduced with the
(Table 2). This result indicated that the G0 was more affected by the increasing SWWW flour content (Fig. 4b) may be caused by the
protein content of flour blend than by the shearing action of wheat smaller granular size and shape of the native starches in the system.
bran in the frequency sweep test. G0 represents the dynamic elas- In addition, the reduced G00 -value of whole-wheat dough indicated
ticity and G00 represents the dynamic viscous property. As shown in that the G00 was less to do with the flour protein content and more
Fig. 4, the G0 values were larger than the G00 values, indicating that to do with the bran content in the frequency sweep test. High G00 -
the dough was more elastic than viscous. However, the high-level value may be beneficial to the quality of whole-wheat products.
Fig. 4. Effects of soft white whole-wheat (SWWW) flour on the rheological properties
(a. G0 : storage modulus; b. G00 : loss modulus) in the frequency sweep test of whole-
wheat cracker dough blended with (-) 0 g/100 g SWWW flour (SWWW); (C) 25 g/ Fig. 5. T2 relaxation time distribution of whole-wheat cracker flour blends with five
100 g SWWW; (:) 50 g/100 g SWWW; (;) 75 g/100 g SWWW; (A) 100 g/100 g different levels of soft white whole-wheat (SWWW) flour: d Control: 0 g/100 g; :
SWWW. 25 g/100 g; : 50 g/100 g; : 75 g/100 g; : 100 g/100 g.
J. Li et al. / LWT - Food Science and Technology 55 (2014) 43e50 49
Levine, H., & Slade, L. (2004). Influence of hydrocolloids in low-moisture foods-a Rosell, C. M., Santos, E., & Collar, C. (2010). Physical characterization of fiber-
food polymer science approach. In P. A. Williams, & G. O. Phillips (Eds.), Gums enriched bread doughs by dual mixing and temperature constraint using the
and stabilizers for the food industry (pp. 425e436). United Kingdom, Cambridge: MixolabÒ. European Food Research and Technology, 231, 535e544.
Royal Society of Chemistry. Serpil, O., Kevser, K., Bengihan, T., & Hamit, K. (2008). Predicting the cookie quality of
Li, J., Kang, J., Wang, L., Li, Z., Wang, R., Chen, Z. X., et al. (2012). Effect of water flours by using MixolabÒ. European Food Research and Technology, 227, 1549e1554.
migration between arabinoxylans and gluten on baking quality of whole wheat Singh, J., & Singh, N. (2001). Studies on the morphological, thermal and rheo-
bread detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Journal of Agriculture and logical properties of starch from some Indian potato cultivars. Food Chemistry,
Food Chemistry, 60, 6507e6514. 75, 67e77.
Lu, Z., & Seetharaman, K. (2013). 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and dif- Slade, L., Levine, H., Craig, S., & Arciszewski, H. (1994). Reducing checking in crackers
ferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies of water mobility in dough systems with pentosanase. United States Patent, No 5,362,502.
containing barley flour. Cereal Chemistry, 60, 120e126. Sliwinski, E. L., Kolster, P., & van Vliet, T. (2004). On the relationship between large-
Moore, T., & Strouts, B. (2008). Basic cracker technologyⅠ: ingredients and formu- deformation properties of wheat flour dough and baking quality. Journal of
lation. American Institute of Baking, 4, 1e9. Cereal Science, 39, 231e245.
Mulla, M. Z., Bharadwaj, V. R., Annapure, U. S., & Singhal, R. S. (2010). Effect of Stapley, A. G. F., Hyde, T. M., Gladden, L. F., & Fryer, P. J. (1997). NMR imaging of the
damaged starch on acrylamide formation in whole wheat flour based Indian wheat grain cooking process. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,
traditional staples, chapattis and pooris. Food Chemistry, 120, 805e809. 32, 355e375.
Pizzinatto, A., & Hoseney, R. C. (1980). A laboratory method for saltine crackers. Sutherland, R. (1989). Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) and total titratable acidity
Cereal Chemistry, 57, 249e252. tests. American Institute of Baking, 5, 1e6.
Preston, K. R., Kilborn, R. H., & Dexter, J. E. (1987). Effects of starch damage and Tester, R. F. (1997). Properties of damaged starch granules: composition and
water absorption on the alveograph properties of Canadian hard red spring swelling properties of maize, rice, pea and potato starch fractions in water at
wheats. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, 20, 75e80. various temperatures. Food Hydrocolloids, 11, 293e301.