Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T05 2022 11 30 Online Talk Directors Duties
T05 2022 11 30 Online Talk Directors Duties
ASEAN-China
Desk
10
Separate Legal Personality
The shares only give their holders for the time being
some typical rights, normally those to:
● Dividends;
● Voting in shareholdersʼ meetings;
● Surpluses to liquidation; and
● Corporate information during AGMs.
18
A Directorʼs Fundamental Duties
The Facts:
● RW Millers was the subject of a takeover between Ampol Petroleum
Ltd and Howard Smith Ltd. The Ampol faction, together with
Bulkships, owned approximately 55 percent of the issued share
capital of RW Millers.
● The directors of RW Millers preferred Howard Smith Ltd as they had
created better takeover terms, including future employment for the
current directors.
● The directors of RW Millers then issued 10 million of new shares in
favour of Howard Smith Ltd claiming that the dominant purpose of
the issuance was to raise capital to finance the purchase of two
tankers. The effect of the issuance was that the Ampol factionʼs
shares were diluted from 55 percent to 36.6 percent.
Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 821 (cont.)
30
General Duty in Winding-Up / Insolvency
Duty to cooperate with the liquidator
● Failure to cooperate with the liquidator may result in
criminal sanctions, such as imprisonment and fines.
● Directors are also obligated to hand over, or to cause to be
handed over, all books, property, and records over to the
liquidator.
● The liquidator also has the power to apply for the public or
private examination of directors in court. This is often
sought where there is suspected wrongdoing on part of the
director or there has been a lack of cooperation. A director
can then be ordered to attend court in order to be
cross-examined and questioned by the liquidator.
General Duty in Winding-Up / Insolvency (cont.)
…
● (3) Any transfer or assignment by a company of all its property to
the trustees for the benefit of all its creditors shall be void.
What amounts to fraudulent trading? (cont.)
Tetuan Sulaiman & Taye v Wong Poh Kun & Anor [2020] 10
CLJ 121:
● Two directors of Bistari Land Sdn Bhd were sued in
their personal capacity for fraudulent trading.
● Bistari Land was sued by Tetuan Sulaiman & Taye and
the Malaysian Government (different suits) for debts
owed.
● Both Tetuan Sulaiman and the Malaysian Government
filed to wind-up Bistari Land
What amounts to fraudulent trading? (cont.)
Tetuan Sulaiman & Taye v Wong Poh Kun & Anor [2020] 10 CLJ 121:
The court held that the directors of Bistari Land were personally
liable for fraudulent trading:
● Bistari Land received three tranches of payment clearly enabling
them to pay Tetuan Sulaiman and the Malaysian Government.
● The payments were dissipated into the directorʼs personal
account.
● Bistari Land paid all other creditors except Tetuan Sulaiman and
the Malaysian Government.
● The directors of Bistari Land intentionally allowed Bistari Land to
be wound-up.
● The court ordered the directors to make payment to the
liquidator.
Fiduciary duties on other
company executives
by Joseph Khor
38
CEOs, CFOs, COOs etc.
YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/mahwengkwai
Twitter: www.twitter.com/mahwengkwai
Instagram: www.instagram.com/mahwengkwai
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/company/mahwengkwai
Facebook: www.facebook.com/mahwengkwai
Complimentary Consultation
Notice: This presentation does not constitute legal advice and its contents should not
be relied upon as such. The facts and circumstances of each and every case will differ
and therefore will require specific legal advice. Feel free to contact us for
complimentary legal consultation.
Complimentary Consultation