Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

50th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE

50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

EFFECT OF SEEPAGE CUT OFF BELOW EARTHEN DAM UNDER RAPID DRAWDOWN

S. Tung 1, G. N. Bhandari 2, S. P. Mukherjee 3

ABSTRACT

A dam is constructed across a river, as a barrier, to accumulate water in the reservoir to use it for various
purposes like irrigation, navigation etc. Seepage through and below an earthen dam plays an important
role in determining the stability of dam. The rapid drawdown condition creates a critical limit State which
occurs when the water level drops rapidly adjacent along upstream slope relative to the time required for
water pressures to dissipate along it. Stability analysis during rapid drawdown is an important
consideration in the design of embankment dams. During rapid drawdown, stability of embankment is
reduced as the pore water pressures within embankment remain high. Seepage cutoff below an earthen
dam is necessary for reducing seepage flow and thereby increasing its stability. The current study was
carried out using FLAC 2D and SEEP/W software’s to evaluate the factor of safety with the help of the
strength reduction method in case of rapid drawdown. The analysis has been done for an embankment
dam with base width of 17m and side slope 2(H):1(V) made of homogeneous soil. For numerical
modeling the different sheet pile locations adopted for seepage analysis are B/8, 2B/8 and 3B/8 (B=Base
Width of Dam) distances away from the downstream end in different drawdown ratio. Variations of sheet
pile length for the numerical analysis are 5m, 10m and 15m. Pore pressure variation, Flownet, Phreatic
surface and fluid flow vector have been obtained for the numerical models by FLAC 2D software. Based
on the numerical results an attempt has been made to gain an insight into the effect of seepage cut off
(sheet pile) on those parameters. It has been observed, that during rapid drawdown, there is a tendency of
failure of slope. The factor of safety has been found to increase when sheet pile is considered to be placed
below a dam than the same when no sheet pile was considered below the dam because of increase of
length of flow path. Increase of length of sheet pile the factor of safety has increased for a fixed location
of sheet pile with respect to base width of a dam. It has been found to this study that drawdown ratio has
great influence on factor of safety. It has been observed that, factor of safety decreases when drawdown
ratio increases. As Sheet pile length increases seepage path increases, which reduce the exit gradient. It is
observed that for a fixed length of sheet pile exit gradient increases when sheet pile position is shifted
away from downstream end.

1
Tung _Smita, Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,
smita1989smita@gmail.com
2
Bhandari _Gupinath, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,
gnbhandari@hotmail.com
3
Mukherjee_Sibapriya, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,
sibapriya.mukherjee@gmail.com
Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

It has been noticed that Pore pressure value within the dam is more if sheet pile is shifted towards the
upstream end. It has been observed that when sheet pile length increases flow vector reduces indicating
quantity of fluid flow is less. Due to this fact the path traced by the percolating water i.e. creep length
increases and thereby hydraulic gradient is reduced. It also has been observed that the negative signs are
due to the fact that fluid flows in the downward direction along the length of sheet pile. At the position of
sheet pile there is an abrupt jump of fluid flow vector.

Keywords: Earthen dam, Sheet pile, Rapid drawdown, Flownet, Factor of safety, Pore pressure, FLAC
2D, SEEP/W, Fluid flow vector.
50th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE
50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

EFFECT OF SEEPAGE CUT OFF BELOW EARTHEN DAM UNDER RAPID DRAWDOWN

S. Tung, Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,


smita1989smita@gmail.com
G. N. Bhandari, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,
gnbhandari@hotmail.com
S. P. Mukherjee, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-32,
sibapriya.mukherjee@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: The rapid drawdown condition creates a critical limit State which occurs when the water level drops
rapidly adjacent along upstream slope relative to the time required for water pressures to dissipate along it. Stability
analysis during rapid drawdown is an important consideration in the design of embankment dams. During rapid
drawdown, stability of embankment is reduced as the pore water pressures within embankment remain high.
Seepage cutoff below an earthen dam is necessary for reducing seepage flow and thereby increasing its stability.
The current study was carried out using FLAC 2D and SEEP/W software’s to evaluate the factor of safety with the
help of the strength reduction method in case of rapid drawdown. The analysis has been done for an embankment
dam with base width of 17m and side slope 2(H):1(V) made of homogeneous soil in different drawdown ratio. For
numerical modeling the different sheet pile locations adopted for seepage analysis are B/8, 2B/8 and 3B/8 distances
away from the downstream end. Variations of sheet pile length for the numerical analysis are 5m, 10m and 15m.
Pore pressure variation, Flownet, Phreatic surface and fluid flow vector have been obtained for the numerical
models by FLAC 2D software. Based on the numerical results an attempt has been made to gain an insight into the
effect of seepage cut off (sheet pile) on those parameters. It has been observed, that during rapid drawdown, there is
a tendency of failure of slope. Increase of length of sheet pile the factor of safety has increased for a fixed location
of sheet pile with respect to base width of a dam.

INTRODUCTION vital, as due to rapid drawdown in low


Stability analysis during rapid drawdown is an permeability soils, pore pressure induced may
important consideration in earthen dam. Seepage cause slope failure as well as piping failure. Rapid
through and below earth dam plays an important draw-down consists of a relatively high water table
role in determining the stability of dam. The basis which has remained against an earth levee for a
for rational seepage analysis was developed about period of time such that pseudo steady-state
one hundred and fifty years ago by Darcy (1856), conditions are created in the levee. In such
whose experiments led to the conclusion (Darcy’s scenarios, the pore-water pressures present in the
law) that determines velocity with which water Embankment dam during drawdown do not have
flows under a hydraulic gradient through porous enough time to dissipate. In that situation
medium. Seepage analysis is necessary for heightened pore-water pressures on the up-stream
obtaining the quantity of seepage losses and the side of an embankment can trigger either deep or
distribution of pore water pressure in the medium shallow failures.
through which seepage occurs. During the low The foundation below the dam is affected by the
tides, as the water levels fall from their initial differential head formed between upstream and
position, the condition is termed as ‘Drawdown’ – downstream. The seeping flow generates erosive
a state in which the rate of receding water level and forces which tend to pull soil particles with the
the permeability of the associated earthen dam is flow. The seepage may lead to occurrence of
Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

piping phenomenon which results in collapse of the stability of slopes, dam and earth dikes. . Huang et
dam. To prevent such hazards it is necessary to al (2009) investigated the influence of transient
lengthen the seepage path. One of the methods of seepage on stability of dam considering water level
such lengthening is to introduce sheet piles as draws down rapidly. It was evaluated using finite
cutoff below the dam. The partial differential element method that lowest factor of safety
equation which governs the seepage through a induced on the upstream side of dam immediately
heterogeneous, anisotropic, saturated unsaturated after drawdown and the factor of safety of
soil can be derived based on the principle of upstream slope increases rapidly with time. David
conservation of mass for a representative volume et al (2010) investigated the effect of water
under consideration. During a transient process if dynamics on earth dam based in transient
the total stresses remain constant, the differential simulation seepage condition using two-
equation governing three dimensional transient dimensional numerical model based on Richards’
case through a porous medium when the equation for water flow in porous medium.
controlling parameters change with respect to has Freduland (2011) analyzed the effects of the pore
been can be written as, water pressures and the stability of the earth dam
under rapid drawdown condition focusing on the
డ డ డ changing of pore-water pressures in the levee in an
൫݇௫ ങ೓ ൯ + డ௬ ቀ݇௫ ങ೓ ቁ + డ௭ ൫݇௫ ങ೓ ൯ = ݉ఊ ങ೓ (1)
డ௫ ങೣ ങ೤ ങ೥ ങ೟ uncoupled fashion. It was found that in an earth
where h = total available head under which dam the impact of rapid draw-down can vary
unsteady seepage occurs; x, y= two mutually significantly based on the hydraulic conductivity of
perpendicular directions i.e. horizontal and vertical the individual layers. Hansen et al (2012)
direction respectively; kx, ky= permeability in investigated that factor of safety tends to drop
below unity under the seepage face primarily
horizontal and vertical directions respectively;
because of the strength of the exit gradient near the
݉ఊ =storage co-efficient. toe of the structure and secondarily because of the
Bishop (1955) has done the analysis for slope overflow velocity. Rakhshandehroo et al (2013)
stability by method of slices. Bishop’s method can analyzed transient pore water pressure fluctuations
be used for total stress as well as effective stress of Doroodzan dam using 3-D finite element model.
analysis. Wenjun Dong and Schwanz (2005) It was found that Phreatic line at the upstream face
presented the results of Finite Element Soil-Pile- of the dam closely followed the reservoir level
Interaction for analysis of floodwall in soft clay. rapid drawdown, whereas at the interior sections of
By using appropriate soil parameters, interaction the dam phreatic line did not drop as fast.
effects were modeled in the finite element model. On the basis of the outcome of these studies the
Xu et al (2005) investigated experimentally factor present investigation has been done to carry out
of safety against stability in soft ground in Huai-He stability and seepage analysis of an earth dam
rivers levee. It was found that mechanism of under rapid drawdown condition with and without
instability during sudden drawdown of floodwater, sheet pile. This has been done to examine the
preceded with a local failure of slope instability in influence of length and position of sheet pile cut-
embankment slope, whose slip surface passes off on exit gradient, overall factor of safety, pore
through the toe of slope. Rapid rise of water also pressure within the dam, in rapid drawdown
cause wetting of unsaturated region in the structure condition.
result in slope failures. The key problem lies in
determination of the position of phreatic surface in MODEL FOR STUDY
transient simulations, when water table level The model dam studied is presented with its
dramatically changes during extreme floods (Chen, dimension and the relevant soil parameters are also
Zhang, 2006). Schmertmann (2006) observed that indicated in Figure. 1.
permeability and shear strength of each soil varies
with the degree of saturation. Thus saturated and
nearly saturated conditions may cause reduction of
550th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE
50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

a triangular mesh was considered within the


domain (as shown in Figure 2). The elliptic
equations were used for modeling flows through
porous media.
Table 1 Details of sheet pile
Area of cross 0.03 m2
section per meter
Moment of 0.00225 m4
Inertia per meter
Esteel 2E+11 N/m2

Bulk modulus (K)) and shear modulus (G) ( were


used in FLAC-2D 2D as stiffness parameters. Drained
bulk and shear modulus for the various soil layers
were calculated using the following relationships:
Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the dam with details Bulk modulus K is given by,
‫ܧ‬′
K = 3 (1െ2υ′ ) (2)
TWO DIMENSIONAL NUMERICAL
ANALYSES Shear modulus G is given by,
‫ܧ‬′
Two-dimensional
dimensional numerical analyses were carried G = 2 (1+2υ′ ) (3)
out with the help of FLAC-2D.2D. In the 2D model where, υ′ = Poisson ratio under effective stress
of the earthen dam, the beam element was used conditions; E′ = Modulus of elasticity of the soil
for sheet pile. The appropriate properties of under effective stress conditions. The interface
structural elements (e.g. axial stiffness and properties include normal stiffness (K ( n), shear
flexural rigidity) were considered for beam stiffness (Ks) and shear strength parameters of the
elements. Interface elements were created interface. The interface stiffness was calculated as
between the soil and sheet pile elements and a follows:
strength reduction factor depending on roughness (‫ܭ‬+
4‫ܩ‬
)
3
of interaction was applied for interface. The Kn , Ks = 10. Max [ ] (4)
∆ ܼ min
interfaces were considered on both sides of the where, Kn = Normal stiffness
iffness of the interface;
sheet pile. The standard fixed boundary Ks = Shear stiffness of the interface and
conditions were used in the numerical
numer model, i.e. ∆ Z min= Minimum width of the neighboring zone.
fixed in horizontal direction on the vertical Table 2 Properties of interface elements
boundaries and fixed in both x and y directions Normal and 2.019E+8 Mpa
along the bottom of the model. Mohr-Coulomb
Mohr Shear stiffness
model was used to model the foundation and Adhesion 13.0 kN/m2
embankment soils
Table 1 and Table 2 present the details of
o sheet pile
Friction 3.3°
and properties of interface element used in FLAC
2D. According to guidelines
uidelines set out by USACE
(1989), FLAC-2D2D was used to model earthen dam
geometry without sheet pile and with sheet pile. PARAMETRIC STUDIES
The models are presented in Figure 3 and Figure 4, Table 3 shows the different studies under different
respectively. The flow net is also drawn by solving hydraulic head conditions and with different sheet
the Laplace equation using SEEP/W . In such case,
Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

pile locations. In the table, B is the width of the show the flow net diagram, pore pressure variation
base of the dam. contour and phreatic surface and fluid flow vector
with and without sheet pile as obtained from
FLAC 2D. Similarly, Figure 9 show stability
analysis of embankment using sheet pile for
drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for drawdown ratio
(L/H)= 1 as obtained from SEEP/W.

Fig. 2 Numerical modeling of earthen dam without


sheet pile in FLAC 2D

Table 3 Different cases for parametric study


Sheet pile Sheet pile position
Sl. No. length (m) from downstream
end
1 - -
2 5 B/8 Fig. 3 Earth Earthen dam flow net with sheet pile of
3 10 B/8 length 15m at B/8 distance from downstream end for
4 15 B/8 drawdown rate= 0.66 m /hour and L/H= 0 (obtained
5 20 B/8 from SEEP/W )
6 5 2B/8
7 10 2B/8
8 15 2B/8
9 20 2B/8
10 5 3B/8
11 10 3B/8
12 15 3B/8
13 20 3B/8
Note: B= width of the base of the dam

RESULTS
The seepage analysis in the present study has been
carried out considering different cases; such as
sheet pile length, sheet pile position and upstream
draw down, using the SEEP/W and various
parametric studies of the earthen dam with or
without sheet pile using FLAC 2D. Figure 3,
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the flow net diagram Fig. 4 Earthen dam flow net with sheet pile of
obtained from SEEP/W with sheet pile, for length 15m at B/8 distance from downstream end
drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for drawdown ratio for drawdown rate= 0.66 m /hour and L/H= 0.3
(L/H)= 0, 0.3, 0.85 respectively. Figure 6,7 and 8 (obtained from SEEP/W )
50th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE
50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

Fig. 7 Pore pressure variation of earthen dam


without sheet pile
Fig. 5 Earthen dam flow net with sheet pile of
length 15m at B/8 distance from downstream end
for drawdown rate= 0.85 m/hour and L/H= 0
(obtained from SEEP/W)

Fig. 8 Pore pressure variation of earthen dam with


sheet pile

Fig. 6 Earth Earthen dam flow net with sheet pile


of length 15m at B/8 distance from downstream
end for drawdown rate= 0.66 m /hour and L/H= 0
(obtained from FLAC)

Fig. 9 Stability of earthen dam using 15m long


Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

sheet pile at B/8 position from drawdown end at Factor of safety


drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for drawdown ratio Overall factor of safety of the dam has been
(L/H)= 1 (obtained from SEEP/W) obtained from FLAC 2D and SEEP/W. Factor of
safety of the dam has been obtained by numerical
analysis. The FLAC Shear strength method
DISCUSSION determines a factor of safety based on a defined
Based on the numerical results presented above an maximum unbalanced force for a failure surface
attempt has been made to gain an insight into the utilizing the stress/strain characteristics for the soil.
effect of seepage cut off (sheet pile) on exit (Reference: Itasca 2005). The factor of safety takes
gradient, factor of safety against piping and pore into account both piping and overall stability of the
pressure developed within the body of the dam. dam. In Figure 11 overall factor of safety has been
plotted against different sheet pile positions for
Effect of sheet pile length and location on exit different sheet pile lengths. It is observed from the
gradient figure that for a fixed length of sheet pile overall
An attempt has been made to observe the effect of factor of safety remains almost constant when
location and length of sheet pile, used, as seepage sheet pile position moves away from downstream
cutoff on exit gradient. For this purpose a plot of end. For a particular position of sheet pile, when
exit gradient vs. sheet pile length has been length of the sheet pile increases, overall factor of
performed for different sheet pile position safety increases with sheet pile length.
indicated in Figure 10. It is observed from Figure
10 that for any fixed position of sheet pile, exit
gradient reduces with sheet pile length for any
particular position of sheet pile in drawdown
condition , when drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour and
drawdown ratio (L/H)= 1. As Sheet pile length
increases seepage path increases, which reduce the
exit gradient. It is observed that for a fixed length
of sheet pile exit gradient increases when sheet pile
position is shifted away from downstream end.

Fig. 11 Factor of safety vs. different sheet pile


positions for different sheet pile length at B/8
position from drawdown end at drawdown rate
0.66 m/hour for drawdown ratio (L/H)= 1

Effect of Drawdown in Factor of Safety for fixed


sheet pile position

An attempt has been made to observe the effect of


drawdown on factor of safety using cutoff
Fig. 10 Exit gradient vs. sheet pile length for presented in figure 12. Figure 12 represents factor
different sheet pile positions of safety in steady state condition and drawdown
condition of drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour and
drawdown ratio (L/H) = 1 for earthen dam in B/8
50th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE
50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

position from downstream end using of sheet pile It destabilizing effect than the increased frictional
is attributed to the fact that that in rapid drawdown strength and the factor of safety decreases
condition when water level changes factor of safety drastically.
drastically changes due to variation of pore water .
pressure.

Fig. 13 Factor of safety vs. different sheet pile


positions for 5m length sheet pile from drawdown
Fig. 12 comparison of Factor of safety vs. different end at drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for different
sheet pile position from drawdown end at drawdown ratio
drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for drawdown ratio
(L/H) = 1 and steady state condition Effect of Drawdown ratio on Factor of Safety
for fixed sheet pile position

Effect of Drawdown ratio on Factor of Safety An attempt has been made to observe the effect of
for fixed sheet pile length drawdown ratio on earthen dam in fixed sheet pile
position for variation of sheet pile length. Figure
An attempt has been made to observe the effect of 14 represents that effect of drawdown ratio on
drawdown ratio on earthen dam in different sheet factor of safety of earthen dam for fixed sheet pile
pile position for fixed sheet pile length of 5m. position with variation of sheet pile length. It
Figure 13 represents that effect of drawdown ratio observe form figure 14 that when sheet pile length
on factor of safety of earthen dam for fixed sheet increases factor of safety drastically increases. It
pile length with variation of sheet pile position. It also observed from the figure that when drawdown
observe form figure 13 that when sheet pile ratio increases factor of safety decreases. When
position moves away from downstream end factor drawdown ratio varies in between 0.4 to 0.85 factor
of safety drastically decreases. It also observed of safety abruptly decreased.
from the figure that when drawdown ratio
increases factor of safety decreases. When
drawdown ratio varies in between 0.4 to 0.85 factor
of safety abruptly decrease. This is attributed to the
fact that for fixed sheet pile length and different
position of sheet pile from downstream end for
lower drawdown ratio (L/H < 0.8), the increased
weight of the slope has a proportionately greater
Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

Fluid flow vector

Fluid flow vector is defined as discharge per unit


area i.e. in the unit of velocity. Figure 16 and
presents the graph of fluid flow vectors at a depth
of 2m below the base of the dam for different
positions of a typical 3B/8 from downstream end
and for different sheet pile length respectively. It is
observed from Figure 16 that maximum flow
vector occurs at sheet pile position. For each case
the flow vector is increased at the sheet pile
position indicating vertical flow along sheet pile.
Fig. 13 Factor of safety vs. different sheet pile Irrespective of length and position, negative flow
length for B/8 position from drawdown end at vector occurs at the upstream side of sheet pile.
drawdown rate 0.66 m/hour for different The negative signs are due to the fact that fluid
drawdown ratio flows in the downward direction along the length
of sheet pile. At the position of sheet pile there is
Effect of sheet pile on pore pressure variation an abrupt jump of fluid flow vector. At the
Figure 15 shows the pore pressure against sheet upstream side of sheet pile, fluid flow vector
pile position for fixed length of sheet in draw down decreases along the length and at the downstream
condition. At the point where sheet pile exists there side of sheet pile it increases with length. It is
is abrupt decrease of pore water pressure. observed that for the same position of sheet pile in
Thereafter it suddenly increases sharply. The case of different sheet pile length fluid flow vector
abrupt change is sharp for sheet pile position at is maximum for 5 meter length than those for 10m,
3B/8 position from downstream end. The change 15m, 20m length. As sheet pile length increases
gradually reduces for position of sheet pile at 2B/8 flow vector reduces indicating quantity of fluid
and B/8 from downstream end. Thus the effect of flow is less when sheet pile length is more. Due to
cutoff by sheet pile is therefore reduced as the this fact the path traced by the percolating water
sheet pile from downstream. It is thus observed i.e. creep length increases and thereby hydraulic
that Pore pressure value is more if sheet pile is gradient is reduced.
shifted towards the upstream end. When sheet pile
position is shifted from downstream towards
upstream Pore pressure value is increased beyond
the sheet pile position.

Fig. 16 fluid flow vector for different length sheet


Fig. 15 Pore pressure variation for 5m length sheet pile at 3B/8 positions from downstream end in
pile for different sheet pile positions in drawdown drawdown condition (at drawdown rate=0.66
condition (at drawdown rate=0.66 m/hour) m/hour and drawdown rate = 1)
50th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE
50th
IGC
17th – 19th DECEMBER 2015, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Venue: College of Engineering (Estd. 1854), Pune, India

2. CHEN Q., ZHANG L.M., (2006) Three-


CONCLUSIONS dimensional analysis of water infiltration into
the Gouhou rockfill dam using satu-rated-
The following conclusions may be drawn from the
unsaturated seepage theory. Can. Geotech. J.,
present study,
1. Exit gradient reduces with sheet pile length for 43, 449––461.
any particular position of sheet pile when sheet pile 3. Darcy, H., (1856) : Les Fountains Publiques
position is shifted in rapid drawdown. de la Ville de Dijon [The public Fountains on
2. For a fixed length of sheet pile exit gradient the city of Dijon] Dalmont, Paris
increases when sheet pile position is shifted away
4. David zumr and Milena císlerová (2010) soil
from downstream end in rapid drawdown.
moisture dynamics in levees during flood
3. Sheet pile length increases the seepage path,
events – Variably saturated approach , J.
reducing the exit gradient and hence reduces the
Hydrol. Hydromech., 58,
chance of piping failure also in rapid drawdown.
5. Fredlund , Lu and Feng (2011) “Combined
4. For a fixed length of sheet pile factor of safety
against piping decreases when sheet pile position is Seepage and Slope Stability Analysis of
shifted away from downstream end. Rapid Drawdown Scenarios for Levee
5. During drawdown, factor of safety drastically Design” Geo-Frontiers, ASCE 2011
decreases when drawdown ratio increases. 6. Hansen David and Roshanfekr Ali(2012),
6. Pore pressure value within the dam is more if ‘Assessment of Potential for Seepage-
sheet pile is shifted towards the upstream end. Induced Unraveling Failure of Flow-Through
7. Flow vector reduces with increase of sheet pile Rockfill Dams’, Int. J. Geomech. 12 pp.560-
length. 573.
7. Huang and Jia (2009): “Strength reduction
NOTATION FEM in stability analysis of soil slopes
The followings symbols are used in this paper: subjected to transient unsaturated seepage’’
B = Base width of earth dam
Computer and Geotechnics, Vol. 36, 1-2,
C = Cohesion of soil
E = Modulus of Elasticity pp.93-101.
E′ = Stiffness of Soil 8. Lee and Benson (2000) :“A Study of long
Φ = Angle of internal friction term performance of seepage barrier’’,
G = Shear Modulus Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.
K = Bulk Modulus 9. Rakhshandehroo and pourtouiserkani (2013)
Kn = Normal stiffness of the interface
IJST, Transactions of Civil Engineering,
Ks = Shear stiffness of the interface
υ′ = Poisson ratio “predicting doroodzan dam hydraulic
η = Porosity behavior during rapid drawdown” Vol. 37,
∆ Z min = Minimum width of the neighboring No. C2, pp 301-310.
zone 10. Schmertmann j.h., (2006) Estimating slope
stability re-duction due to rain infiltration
REFERENCES moulding. Journal of Geo-technical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132, 9,
1. Bishop, A. W., (1955): “The use of the slip 1219––1228.
circle in the stability analysis of slopes”, 11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-ED
Geotechnique V, No. 1, pp. 7-17. Washington, DC 20314-1000 Manual
No.1110-2-2502 29 September 1989
Smita Tung & G.N Bhandari & S.P Mukherjee

Engineering and Design RETAINING AND


FLOOD WALLS.
12. Wenjun Dong(2005)-“Finite Element Soil-
Pile-Interaction Analysis of Floodwall in Soft
Clay”, Ph.D., P.E., M. ASCE and Neil T.
Schwanz, P.E., MVD Geotechnical Regional
Technical Specialist
13. Xu G. M., L. Zhang and Liu S. S. (2005)
,‘Preliminary Study of Instability Behavior of
Levee on Soft Ground during Sudden
Drawdown’ , Slopes and Retaining
Structures Under Seismic and Static
Conditions.

You might also like