Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Use of Ict by The Teachers
The Use of Ict by The Teachers
Farwa Sajid
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN
2018
THE USE OF ICT BY THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN
UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR AT B.S LEVEL
By
Farwa Sajid
Department of Education
University of Haripur
Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
2018
CERTIFICATION
Certified that the contents and form of thesis entitled “THE USE OF ICT BY THE
LEVEL” submitted by Farwa Sajid have been found satisfactory for the requirement
----------------------------
Mam Haleema Bano
----------------------------
External Examiner
----------------------------
Date: -------------------- Chairman
Department of Education
University of Haripur
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION
I, Farwa Sajid D/O Mohammad Sajid Roll No. 6150 Registration No.14F-UH-
142, a student of B.S (Hons) at University of Haripur, do hereby solemnly declare that
the thesis entitled, “Use of ICT by teachers and students in University of Haripur at
B.S level” submitted by me in partial fulfillment of B.S degree in Education, is my
original work and has not been submitted or published earlier or shall not, in future be
submitted by me for obtaining any degree from this or any other university or
institution.
______________________
Farwa Sajid
Dated:_________________
FORWARDING SHEET
The thesis titled, “The use of ICT by the teachers and students at University of
Haripur”, submitted by Ms. Farwa Sajid, Roll No 6150 in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of B.S in Education, has been completed under my
guidance and supervision.
_______________________
Haleema Bano
Supervisor
Dated: ____________________
APPROVAL SHEET
Title of thesis: The use of ICT by the teachers and students in University of Haripur
at B.S level
_____________________________
Supervisor
___________________________________
External Examiner
___________________________________
Member
_________________________________
Chairman,
Department of Education
University of Haripur
Dated: _______________________
DEDICATION
I dedicated this piece of research
To the Holy
My
i
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 SUMMARY 38
5.2 FINDINGS 38
5.3 CONCLUSION 43
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS 44
REFERENCES 45
APPENDIX 50
ii
LIST OF TABLES
S.No. Title Page No
1. Table No 1 25
2. Table No 2 26
3. Table No 3 26
4. Table No 4 27
5. Table No 5 28
6. Table No 6 28
7. Table No 7 29
8. Table No 8 30
9. Table No 9 30
10. Table No 10 31
11. Table No 11 31
12. Table No 12 32
13. Table No 13 33
14. Table No 14 33
15. Table No 15 34
16. Table No 16 34
17. Table No 17 35
18. Table No 18 36
19. Table No 19 36
20. Table No 20 37
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
blessed me with an opportunity to make this humble contribution. All praises, respect
and Darood-o-Salam are due to the Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Sallalla-ho-
Alay-i-Wasallam), whose pious teachings and practices have led me to carry out this
and immense help, throughout the completion of this work, at the same time to the
whole faculty education department for guidance and facilitation .I would like to
believing in me and for her continuous thought provoking feedback in whole research
M.Phil. (Scholar) in Education department who did whatever was possible in order to
get this work completed. Last but not least, I would like to thank all people who have
Farwa Sajid
iv
ABSTRACT
The current research study focused upon the use of ICT by the teachers and students
in university of Haripur at BS level. The research design applied was survey that was
conducted by questionnaire to the male and female students at University level. The
objective of the study was to find out about the use of different forms of ICT by the
teachers and students of University of Haripur. The sample was drawn on random
bases; included were both male and female students at University of Haripur who
could easily be accessed. Thus the total sample comprised of 50 male and 50 female
students. The tool was validated via expert opinions by the supervisor and other
teachers from department. This was analyzed afterwards using statistical tools of
percentage and chi-square within the respondents. After analysis, the most of the male
teachers use ICT tools for learning process as compared to female teachers and
students also recorded that teachers use ICT tools i.e. Laptop, multimedia for learning.
It is recommended that the administration of the University of Haripur may ensure
equal excess of male and female students to all ICT resources and provision of ICT
lab in every department may help and prove the use of ICT by female students at the
University of Haripur
v
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
establishments all through the world. ICT in Pakistan is at its underlying stage
however ideally moving right way however the tranquility of advance is moderate.
accessible; and • General instructive programming over network, national and global
commonplace entities in all aspects of life. Across the past twenty years the use of
ICT has fundamentally changed the practices and procedures of nearly all forms of
activity and quality education has traditionally been associated with strong teachers
having high degrees of personal contact with learners. The use of ICT in education
lends itself to more student-centered learning settings. But with the world moving
rapidly into digital media and information, the role of ICT in education is becoming
more and more important and this importance will continue to grow and develop in
Higher education systems have grown exponentially in the last five decades to
meet the demands of quality education for all. This aspect has further gained
Technology (ICT). Demand for skilled and competent labor is ever increasing in the
1
education for all has emerged as determining factor of economic growth and
development. In order to increase the access to higher education and improving its
reach to the remotest parts of the country contribution of open and distance learning
and that too at affordable cost. The last two decades have witnessed the inclusion of
developments in ICTs in higher education systems around the world. Even then the
programs is daunting. The focus of this paper is to examine the role of Information
century.
speculations of discovering that hold the best influence today are those in light of
constructivist standards (Duffy and Cunningham, 1996). These standards place that
social associations are believed to assume a basic part in the procedures of learning
constructivist learning through their arrangement and support for asset based,
2
understudy focused settings and by empowering figuring out how to be identified with
setting and to rehearse (Berge, 1998; Barron, 1998). As said already, any utilization of
ICT in learning settings can act to help different parts of information development and
as an ever increasing number of understudies utilize ICTs in their learning forms, the
The present current more youthful age is now and then alluded to as Age X
since they feel "X-ed." out of customary openings. This age of the twenty-first
century ought to end up referred to, in any case, as Age E since they are turning into
the most entrepreneurial age since the Mechanical Insurgency. Upwards of 5.6 million
Americans more youthful than age 34 are currently attempting to begin their own
particular organizations today. 33% of new business people are more youthful than
age 30, in excess of 60 percent of 18-to 29-year-olds say they need to possess their
own particular organizations, and about 80 percent of would-be business people in the
Unified States are between the ages of 18 and 34! (Ernst and Youthful, 2000)
With those dangerous numbers have come comparative increments in the field
educational module and projects committed to enterprise and new pursuit creation has
been astounding. The quantity of schools and colleges that offer courses identified
with business has developed from a modest bunch in the 1970s to 1,600 of every 2003
(Katz, 2003).
Contemporary ICTs can give solid help to every one of these prerequisites and
there are currently numerous remarkable cases of world class settings for competency
and execution based educational program that make sound utilization of the
affordances of these innovations (e.g. Oliver, 2000). For a long time, educators
3
wishing to embrace such educational program have been constrained by their assets
and apparatuses yet with the expansion and far reaching accessibility of contemporary
ICTs, numerous confinements and obstructions of the past have been expelled. Also,
numerous parts of the way we live. If one somehow happened to look at such fields as
engineering, the effect of ICT over the previous a few decades has been gigantic. The
way these fields work today is limitlessly not quite the same as the ways they worked
previously. Yet, when one takes a gander at training, there appears to have been an
uncanny absence of impact and far less change than different fields have encountered.
Various individuals have endeavored to investigate this absence of action and impact
There have been various variables hindering the discount take-up of ICT in
instruction over all parts. These have included such factors as an absence of
subsidizing to help the buy of the innovation, an absence of preparing among built up
ICT as showing apparatuses (Starr, 2001). In any case, as of late, factors have risen
which have fortified and urged moves to embrace ICTs into classrooms and learning
regarding program conveyance, the open doors for adaptable conveyance gave by
4
ICTs (e.g. Oliver and Short, 1996); the limit of innovation to offer help for altered
instructive projects to address the issues of individual students (e.g. Kennedy and
McNaught, 1997); and the developing utilization of the Web and WWW as
instruments for data access and correspondence (e.g. Oliver and Towers, 2000)
As we move into the 21st century, these variables and numerous others are
applying solid powers as a powerful influence for the selection of ICTs in instruction
and contemporary patterns propose we will soon observe substantial scale changes in
the way training is arranged and conveyed as a result of the openings and affordances
of ICT. This paper looks to investigate the probable changes we will find in
the paper will investigate the effect both present and rising data and correspondence
advancements will probably have in coming a very long time on what is found out,
when and where learning will happen and how the learning will happen..
The current research study explores the use of ICT in terms of its usage for
effective learning at higher educational level. It leads to the finding the use of ICT by
i. To find out about the use of different forms of ICT by the teachers of
ii. To find out about use of different forms of ICT by the students of University
5
1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
perceptions and practices, compare their perceptions and practices with recent ICT
forms and to improve their teaching methods by using ICT. It is also helpful for the
students how to use ICT effectively for various purposes in their study. It is also
ICT tools.
This study was delimited to the University of Haripur due to limited time and
resources.
6
Chapter 2
ICTs stand for information and communication technologies and are defined,
for the purposes of this primer, as a “diverse set of technological tools and resources
Different technologies are typically used in combination rather than as the sole
delivery Mechanism. For instance, the Kothmale Community Radio Internet uses both
radio broadcasts and computer and Internet technologies to facilitate the sharing of
The Open University of the United Kingdom (UKOU), established in 1969 as the first
educational institution in the world wholly dedicated to open and distance learning,
recent years, online programming. Similarly, the Indira Gandhi National Open
University in India combines the use of print, recorded audio and video, broadcast
has changed our way of life, impacting many areas of knowledge. In education, ICT
has proven to be a great support to both teachers and students. It's called information
storage and processing, reporting, recording and presenting information in the form of
7
voice, images and data contained in nature acoustic signals, optical or
2012). Since the emergence of the new technologies and especially the Internet, have
not stopped generating opportunities, projects, platforms and initiatives that have to
do with learning. Schools and institutes possibly were the first to develop many
extent by the rise and fast improvement in overall data and PC interchanges
was welcomed is currently winding down away. We are currently seeing not just the
undeniable degree programs on the web and online colleges (Phoenix, 2006; Cardean,
and building are not as far reaching as courses in different trains in advanced
education. The explanations behind this are, science and building instruction has,
portion of the uncommon needs of undergrad science and building training have not
Peterson, 2002) are remarkably hard to give online as a result of the conventional
8
want for the immediate task of instruments. Correspondingly, course materials that
themes that require just content based discourse (Bourne, 2005). For online science
hypothesis, people have a few channels by which information is conveyed. On the off
chance that data is introduced by means of at least two of these channels, there will be
enhancing learning (Ellis, 2004). Additionally bolster for the potential advantages of
investigated learning styles and distinguished four particular ways to deal with taking
in: the sensor, the analyzer, the practitioner, and the maker. A mixed media approach
exhibits the possibility to deliver these diverse ways to deal with learning, as was
training educational module originates from the manners by which ICTs are
graduates can show proper levels of data proficiency, "the ability to distinguish and
issue and afterward to recognize, find and assess important data keeping in mind the
end goal to draw in with it or to tackle an issue emerging from it" (McCausland,
Wache and Berk, 1999, p.2). The drive to advance such improvements originates from
general moves among organizations to guarantee their graduates show not just
9
abilities and learning in their subject spaces yet in addition general properties and
capacity to reason formally, to take care of issues, to impart successfully, to have the
to be directly related to learning content that we had laid out. These technologies
should help comply with the competences previously designed. Moreover, technology
has meant the opportunity to generate many learning spaces which are not always
many activities can be resolved, in part, looking for tutorials in the networks. But
clearly that while it is easy to learn to use platforms or an application which is more
complicated to learn to make them serve as an educational tool, and this is where one
The technology does not involve an adaptation of the above tools, but also as a
paradigm shift of learning. In this sense, there is no university in the world that does
not already have the digital platform or campus to develop part of their learning
activities or even most of these. Moreover, the approach of e-learning has been
changing up do proposal from learning really motivators and even thrilling (Bach &
Fores, 2007). But just as initially the virtual university campuses were one of the
centers of learning, at present the network is itself already a great tool to learn and get
paradigm of spaces where one can learn. In fact, it would be a mistake at this moment
10
stop to consider the networks as one of the important learning spaces. There are
authors who choose to directly affirm that is needed connected to learn (Jubany, 2012)
The field of higher education has been affected by ICTs, which have
undoubtedly affected teaching, learning and research .ICTs have the potential to
accelerate, enrich, and deepen skills, to motivate and engage students, to help relate
ICTs are able to provide strong support for all these requirements and there are now
many outstanding examples of world class settings for competency and performance-
based curricula that make sound use of the affordances of these technologies (Oliver,
2000).
The use of ICT will not only enhance learning environments but also prepare
next generation for future lives and careers .Changed pool of teachers will changed
responsibilities and skill sets for future teaching involving high levels of ICT and the
need for more facilitative than didactic teaching roles (Littlejohn et al., 2002).
Students using ICTs for learning purposes become immersed in the process of
learning and as more and more students use computers as information sources and
cognitive tools, the influence of the technology on supporting how students learn will
continue to increase.
The field of education has been affected by ICTs, which have undoubtedly
affected teaching, learning, and research (Yusuf, 2005). A great deal of research has
proven the benefits to the quality of education (Al-Ansari, 2006). ICTs have the
potential to innovate, accelerate, enrich, and deepen skills, to motivate and engage
11
students, to help relate school experience to work practices, create economic viability
for tomorrow's workers, as well as strengthening teaching and helping schools change
(Davis and Tearle, 1999; Lemke and Coughlin, 1998; cited by Yusuf, 2005)
learner motivation and engagement, by facilitating the acquisition of basic skills, and
by enhancing teacher training. ICTs are also transformational tools which, when used
especially computers and Internet technologies, enable new ways of teaching and
learning rather than simply allow teachers and students to do what they have done
before in a better way. ICT has an impact not only on what students should learn, but
it also plays a major role on how the students should learn. Along with a shift of
delivery has now shifted from “teacher centered” forms of delivery to “student-
centered” forms of delivery. ICT provides motivation to Learn. ICTs such as videos,
television and multimedia computer software that combine text, sound, and colorful
moving images can be used to provide challenging and authentic content that will
comic skits, and other performance conventions to compel the students to listen and
become more involved in the lessons being delivered. Some of the parents of the
respondents opined that their children were feeling more motivated than before in
such type of teaching in the classroom rather than the stereotype 45 minutes’ lecture.
They were of the view that this type of learning process is much more effective than
the monotonous monologue classroom situation where the teacher just lectures from a
12
ICT presents an entirely new learning environment for students, thus requiring
a different skill set to be successful. Critical thinking, research, and evaluation skills
variety of sources to sort through (New Media Consortium, 2007). ICT is changing
powerful tool for offering educational opportunities. It is difficult and maybe even
impossible to imagine future learning environments that are not supported, in one way
thus fostering the authenticity of learning environments. ICT may also make complex
learning environments. Thus, ICT may function as a facilitator of active learning and
higher-order thinking (Alexander, 1999; Jonassen, 1999). The use of ICT may foster
commonplace entities in all aspects of life. Across the past twenty years the use of
ICT has fundamentally changed the practices and procedures of nearly all forms of
activity and quality education has traditionally been associated with strong teachers
having high degrees of personal contact with learners. The use of ICT in education
lends itself to more student-centered learning settings. But with the world moving
rapidly into digital media and information, the role of ICT in education is becoming
13
more and more important and this importance will continue to grow and develop in
the 21st century. Higher education systems have grown exponentially in the last five
decades to meet the demands of quality education for all. This aspect has further
Technology (ICT). Demand for skilled and competent labour is ever increasing in the
education for all has emerged as determining factor of economic growth and
development. In order to increase the access to higher education and improving its
reach to the remotest parts of the country contribution of open and distance learning
and that too at affordable cost. The last two decades have witnessed the inclusion of
developments in ICTs in higher education systems around the world. Even then the
programs is daunting. The focus of this paper is to examine the role of Information
century.
the way we live, and in addition the requests of the general public. Perceiving the
effect of new advancements on the work environment and regular daily existence, the
and classroom offices, keeping in mind the end goal to limit the instructing and
learning innovation hole amongst today and what's to come. This rebuilding
14
to furnish students with information of particular branches of knowledge, to elevate
existing setting. Bauer and Kenton (2005) expressed in their examination that despite
the fact that educators were having adequate aptitudes, were imaginative and
an instructing and learning device. Reynolds, Treharne and Tripp (2003) additionally
expressed the requirement for additionally inquire about on how ICT can enhance
training.
At the point when innovation use is lined up with the instructional objective,
innovation training inside the setting of educators' work in the classroom" (Mayo,
Kajs and Tanguma, 2005, p.12). Wang, Ertmer and Newby (2004) finished up about
this theme as our future instructors accomplish high certainty levels for innovation
usage, important innovation utilize can come nearer to being the standard, as opposed
to the exemption, in our K-12 classrooms" (p. 242). Deaney, Ruthven and Hennessy
(2003) additionally thought to be three noteworthy focuses for utilizing ICT: the
requirement for more extensive abilities for viable utilization of apparatuses, the need
to center on the energy of innovation and the need to move well-known examples of
15
2.7 BENEFITS OF INTEGRATING ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
teaching, learning, and research. In addition, it increases flexibility; provide the rich
environment and motivation for teaching learning process which have a profound
impact on the process of learning by offering new possibilities for learners and
summarized as follows:
i. Increased access;
xi. Increase the capacity and cost effectiveness of education and training systems;
xii. To reach target groups with limited access to conventional education and
training;
16
xiii. To support and enhance the quality and relevance of existing educational
structures;
its infancy. The government is making hectic efforts for the promotion and
development of IT culture in the country. For the same, government is allocating huge
all public and private sector universities connected with high speed internet are the
structures especially its use for e-Learning and e Teaching at Higher Education
Similarly, Pakistan is going through good and bad experiences in adoption and
use of ICTs for educational purposes as there are several social, political, cultural,
human and technological constraints which are impeding the adoption of this
ICTs use in e-Teaching and e-Learning. Two cities of the N-W.F.P province of
Pakistan, i.e. Peshawar and Dera Ismail Khan, were selected as a sample population
for data collection due to their unique characteristics. Peshawar is a highly dense,
of public and private sector universities and degree awarding institutions besides a
17
high literacy rate. On the other hand, Dera Ismail Khan is the second oldest city with
the second largest public sector university and several private sector universities with
less population, lacking the basic technological infrastructure and facilities with
The awareness of primary school children’s is the linkage between ICT and
the way they learn within the situation of a school that has been particularly
successful in integrating ICT into the curriculum. Including teachers into the research
design has the advantage of aiding the recall of particular learning episodes which,
with children of this age, are a fertile ground for insights into the teaching and
learning dynamic
(ICT) as a central tenet of university teaching and learning, the fact remains that many
university students and faculty make only limited formal academic use of computer
changing the situation for teaching, learning and collaboration between colleagues.
Changed roles because of ICT competence raise questions about the importance of
systematic ICT features within teacher education. Many of the newly qualified
teachers wish they had more knowledge about ICT and related techniques
(Andersson, 2006).
most previous studies in the economic literature, discover the evidence for a positive
provides an interesting parallel to the existing work that does not find beneficial
effects for pupils and to the related work on firms where there is evidence that ICT
18
investment enhances firm productivity (Machin, McNally, Silva., 2007). PowerPoint
and other visual technologies have become determined in schools. Adoption of these
will only be a success if the link between the possibilities of CMC and teacher
practice becomes clearer. Language teachers seem to start using CMC, even though
no evidence was found that these teachers have a more positive degree of
to the social and vocational rationales in launching the computer literacy and
Directorate is able to look after issues related to hardware and software, maintenance
almost all staff is now using ICT to enhance and extend learning in their subject areas
unspectacular, especially within the school setting, where the influence of year group
and school attended are prominent. There was a strong sense of educational uses of
ICTs being constrained by the nature of the schools within which ‘educational’ use
was largely framed and often situated (Selwyn, Potter, Cranmer; 2008). Children
would now appear to have demands and expectations beyond the tokenistic ‘go on the
computer’ as an end in itself. Thus teachers should strive for constructing meaningful
and really useful opportunities for children to use computers and, therefore,
19
The combined impact of both teacher and school characteristics was explored
computer use. Variables at teacher and at school level are related to different types of
computer use (Tondeur, Valcke, Braak., 2008). In order to enable all pupils to realize
their potential, facilities and strategies have to be reviewed and developed to ensure
that their learning experience is appropriate. The generic capability of ICT can
enhance and enable the learning of pupils with special educational needs (SEN), but
do not purport to consider specifically the specialized technology required for certain
manifestations of special need. ICT certainly has much potential to enhance the
teaching of all four skills in language learning, and to make skills available to a wider
ICT teacher training, including a significant correlation between the views of experts
and those of teachers. A second paper delves deeper to describe and contrast the
highest and lowest-rated approaches to ICT teacher training (Davis, Preston, Sahin.,
2001). The ICT coordinators were both knowledgeable and enthusiastic about ICT use
and this placed them in a good leadership position to guide and implement ICT use in
20
In developing countries like Pakistan, Information Technology (IT) is still in
its infancy. The government is making hectic efforts for the promotion and
development of IT culture in the country. For the same, government is allocating huge
all public and private sector universities connected with high speed internet are the
structures especially its use for e-Learning and e-teaching at Higher Education
availability;
ii. Imposing technological systems from the top down without involving faculty
and students;
iii. Using inappropriate content from other regions of the world without
customizing it appropriately;
iv. Producing low quality content that has poor instructional design and is not
v. Although ICT offers a whole lot of benefits there are some risks of using ICT
vi. It may create a digital divide within class as students who are more familiar
with ICT will reap more benefits and learn faster than those who are not as
technology savvy.
vii. It may shift the attention from the primary goal of the learning process to
21
viii. It can affect the bonding process between the teacher and the student as ICT
becomes a communication tool rather than face to face conversation and thus
ix. Also since not all teachers are experts with ICT they may be lax in updating
the course content online which can slow down the learning among students.
x. The potential of plagiarism is high as student can copy information rather than
Radio and television have been used widely as educational tools since the
1920s and the 1950s, respectively. There are three general approaches to the use of
on a temporary Basis;
2.10.2 Teleconferencing:
people located at two or more different places.” There are four types of
teleconferencing based on the nature and extent of interactivity and the sophistication
of the technology
22
i. Audio conferencing;
iii. Videoconferencing;
and other resource persons remotely. In open and distance learning, teleconferencing
is a useful tool for providing direct instruction and learner support, minimizing learner
isolation.
23
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study was aimed to investigate use of ICT by the teachers and students
B.S level in University of Haripur. The nature of this study was descriptive as it tends
to find out about use of different forms of ICT by the teachers and students. The
questionnaire was used to collect data. This method is commonly used in educational
research with purpose to learn about general trends prevailing among different stake
holders of education.
3.1 POPULATION
All the students and teachers in University of Haripur at B.S level constituted
3.2 SAMPLE
The sample of the study contains 100 students i.e. randomly male and female.
after reviewing the related literature. It comprised of twenty statements about two
The researcher personally visited all the potential respondents, briefed them
about study and got the questionnaires filled by the students of University of Haripur.
Data obtained through survey was then entered into the computer excel spread
sheet. SPSS was the software used for data analysis. The opinion of teachers about
24
Chapter 4
DATA ANALYSIS
This study was aimed to investigate use of ICT by teachers and students at
University of Haripur. Data was collected from applied science and social science
departments from male and female students through a questionnaire which comprised
of twenty statements. The tool was constructed on 5 point rating scale this data was
analyzed using SPSS. The following table shows the results of this analysis
Table 1: My teachers create his /her own digital learning materials for students.
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 3 12 15 17 10
Male 26.3
% 5.3% 21.1% 29.8% 17.5%
%
N 4 7 16 10 6
Female 37.2 2.393
% 9.3% 16.3% 23.3% 14.0%
%
0.664
N 7 19 31 27 16
Total 31.0
% 7.0% 19.0% 27.0% 16.0%
%
This table shows that according to 5.3% male and 9.3% female students their
teachers never create his /her own digital learning materials for students, 21.1% male
and 16.3% female students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3%male and 37.2%
female students that their teachers often, 29.8% male and 23.3% female students that
their teachers most of the time, 17.5% male and 14.0% female students that their
always create his /her own digital learning materials for students.
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.664) is statistically
25
26
Table 2: My teacher record instructions in cell phone in audio format during
presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 13 4 15 12 13
Male
% 22.8% 7.0% 26.3% 21.1% 22.8%
N 11 2 8 15 7
Female
% 25.6% 4.7% 18.6% 34.9% 16.3%
3.200 0.525
N 24 6 23 27 20
Total
% 24.0% 6.0% 23.0% 27.0% 20.0%
Table 2 shows that according to 22.8% male students and 25.8% female
students their teacher never record instructions in cell phone in audio format during
presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites ,
7.0%male and 4.7% female students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3% male and
18.6% female students that their teachers often, 21.1% male and 34.9%female
students that their teachers most of the time, 22.8% male and 16.3%female students
that their teachers always record instructions in cell phone in audio format during
presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.525) is statistically
27
This table shows according to 15.8% male and 16.3% female students their
teachers never use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using multimedia ,
7.0%male and 20.9% female students that their teachers sometimes , 21.1% male and
14.0% female students that their teachers often , 31.6%male and 34.9%female
students that their teachers most of the time , 24.6%male and 14.0%female students
that their teachers always use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using
multimedia
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.1215) is
Table 4: My teacher use internet every day to prepare his /her lesson.
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 6 8 5 20 18
Male
% 10.5% 14.0% 8.8% 35.1% 31.6%
N 1 5 14 13 10
Female
% 2.3% 11.6% 32.6% 30.2% 23.3%
10.544 0.032
N 7 13 19 33 28
Total
% 7.0% 13.0% 19.0% 33.0% 28.0%
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 2.3%female students their
teachers never use internet every day to prepare his /her lesson,14.0%male and
11.6%female students that their teachers sometimes ,8.8%male and 32.6% female
students that their teachers often ,35.1%male and 30.2% female students that their
teachers most of the time, 31.6 %male and 23.3% female students that their teachers
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.032) is statistically
28
Table 5: My teacher post home work for students on the university website.
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 6 15 12 13 11
Male
% 10.5% 26.3% 21.1% 22.8% 19.3%
N 7 6 7 18 5
Female 6.473
% 16.3% 14.0% 16.3% 41.9% 11.6%
0.166
N 13 21 19 31 16
Total
% 13.0% 21.0% 19.0% 31.0% 16.0%
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 16.3% female students their
teachers never post home work for students on the university website, 26.3% male
and 14.0% female students that their teachers sometimes, 21.1%male and 16.3%
female students that their teachers often, 22.8 % male and 41.9% female students that
their teachers most of the time, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their
teachers always post home work for students on the university website.
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.166) is statistically
teachers never look for online professional development opportunities, 21.1% male
and 7.0% female students that their teachers sometimes, 29.8%male and 23.3 %
female students that their teachers often, 24.6 % male and 37.2 % female students that
29
their teachers most of the time, 22.8% male and 20.9% female students that their
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.062) is statistically
teachers never give me assignments which require the use of internet, 8.8% male and
4.7% female students that their teachers sometimes, 21.1 % male and 16.3% female
students that their teachers often, 36.8% male and 32.6 % female students that their
teachers most of the time, 28.1 % male and 44.2 % female students that their teachers
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.499) is statistically
30
Table 8: Teachers make use of the interactive lessons and educational games.
Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
N 6 11 9 19 12
Male 10.5 15.8
% 19.3% 33.3% 21.1%
% %
N 5 3 10 15 10
Female 11.6 23.3
% 7.0% 34.9% 23.3% 0.48
% % 3.475
2
N 11 14 19 34 22
Total 11.0 19.0
% 14.0% 34.0% 22.0%
% %
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 11.6 % female students their
teachers never use of the interactive lessons and educational games., 19.3% male and
7.0 % female students that their teachers sometimes, 15.8% male and 23.3 % female
students that their teachers often, 33.3 %male and 34.9% female students that their
teachers most of the time,21.1% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.482) is statistically
31
% %
This table shows according to 35.1%male and 37.2 % female students their
teachers never communicates online with parents, 14.0% male and 11.6% female
students that their teachers sometimes, 12.3% male and 14.0% female students that
their teachers often, 22.8% male and 27.9% female students that their teachers most of
the time, 15.8% male and 9.3% female students that their teachers always
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.871) is statistically
teachers use what’s app to provide feedback on assignments, 10.5% male and 18.6
%female students that their teachers sometimes, 19.3% male and 11.6% female
students that their teachers often, 35.1 % male and 25.6% female students that their
teachers most of the time, 15.8% male and 18.6% female students that their teachers
32
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.664) is statistically
Table 11 I record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation
and share with my classmates
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 2 9 18 20 8
Male 31.6
% 3.5% 15.8% 35.1% 14.0%
%
N 2 8 13 9 11
Female 30.2 3.622
% 4.7% 18.6% 20.9% 25.6%
% 0.460
N 4 17 31 29 19
Total 31.0
% 4.0% 17.0% 29.0% 19.0%
%
This table shows according to 3.5% male and 4.7% female students they never
record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and share with
my classmates,15.8% male and 18.6% female students that they sometimes , 31.6%
male and 30.2% female students that they often , 35.1% male and 20.9% female
students that they most of the time,14.0%male and 25.6 % female students that they
always record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.460) is statistically
Table 12 I use to share my presentation with my classmate using Social Media Sites
(what’s app, Facebook, email).
Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
Male N 0 1 7 27 22 5.082
% .0% 1.8% 12.3 47.4% 38.6%
33
%
N 2 1 4 14 22
Female
% 4.7% 2.3% 9.3% 32.6% 51.2%
N 2 2 11 41 44 0.27
Total 11.0 9
% 2.0% 2.0% 41.0% 44.0%
%
This table shows according to 0.0%male and 4.7% female students they never
use to share my presentation with my classmate using social media sites, 1.8% male
and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3% female students
that they often, 47.4 % male and 32.6% female students that most of the time ,38.6%
male and 51.2% female students that they always use to share my presentation with
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.279) is statistically
use digital learning material provided by teacher, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female
students that they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3 % female students that they often,
38,6% male and 46.5 % female students that they most of the time, 47.4 % male and
34
39.5 % female students that they always use digital learning material provided by
teacher
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.686) is statistically
sometimes use relevant video clips as a resource for learning, 12.3% male and 7.0 %
female students that they often, 42.1% male and 41.9% female students that they most
of the time, 45.6% male and 44.2 % female students that always use relevant video
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.179) is statistically
35
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they
sometimes use multimedia for giving presentations, 0.0% male and 4.7% female
students that they often, 40.4% male and 53.5 % female students that they most of the
time , 59.6% male and 37.2% female students that they always use multimedia for
giving presentations
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.034) is statistically
Table 16 I use cell phone dictionary for searching relevant meanings during lessons
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 0 1 4 20 32
Male
% .0% 1.8% 7.0% 35.1% 56.1%
N 1 1 3 17 21
Female
% 2.3% 2.3% 7.0% 39.5% 48.8%
1.743 0.783
N 1 2 7 37 53
Total
% 1.0% 2.0% 7.0% 37.0% 53.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never
use cell phone dictionary for searching relevant meanings during lessons, 1.8% male
and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes, 7.0% male and 7.0 % female students
that they often, 35.1% male and 39.5 % female students that they most of the time,
56.1% male and 48.8% female students that they always use cell phone dictionary for
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.783) is statistically
Table 17 I use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes
Gender Often Most of the time Always Chi Square p
N 2 26 29 1.171
Male
% 3.5% 45.6% 50.9%
Female N 3 22 18
36
% 7.0% 51.2% 41.9%
N 5 48 47
Total
% 5.0% 48.0% 47.0% 0.557
This table shows according to 3.5% male and 7.0% female students they often
use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes, 45.6% male
and 51.2% female students that they most of the time , 50.9% male and 41.9% female
students that they always use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning
purposes
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.557) is statistically
37
Table 18 I use laptop during lecture for the sake of enhancement of knowledge by
using different websites
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always p
r the time Square
N 0 1 1 22 33
Male
% .0% 1.8% 1.8% 38.6% 57.9%
N 1 0 2 22 18
Female 4.881
% 2.3% .0% 4.7% 51.2% 41.9%
N 1 1 3 44 51 0.300
Total
% 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 44.0% 51.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never
use laptop during lecture for the sake of enhancement of knowledge by using different
websites,1.8% male and 0.0% female that they sometimes, 1.8% male and 0.0%
female students that they often, 38.6% male and 51.2% female students that they most
of the time, 57.9% male and 41.9% female students that they always use laptop during
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.300) is statistically
Table 19 I use the internet only for the sake of learning purposes
never use the internet only for the sake of learning purposes,8.8% male and 7.0%
female students that they often, 36.8% male and 46.5% female students that they most
38
of the time, 54.4% male and 41.9% female students that they always use the internet
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.252) is statistically
N 0 1 24 32
Male
% .0% 1.8% 42.1% 56.1%
N 1 1 20 21
Female 1.720
% 2.3% 2.3% 46.5% 48.8%
0.632
N 1 2 44 53
Total
% 1.0% 2.0% 44.0% 53.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3 % female students they
never use internet daily for completing my assignments, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female
students that they often , 42.1 % male and 46.5% female students that they most of the
time , 56.1% male and 48.8% female students that they always use internet daily for
completing my assignments
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.632) is statistically
39
Chapter 5
The objective of the study was examine the difference between male and
female students of university of Haripur and their teachers in making use of ICT at
statements first ten statements were about the use of ICT by the teachers of University
of Haripur whereas the second part of the questionnaire was about use of ICT by the
randomly selected to take part in this data and data was collected by the researchers
personally visiting in the departments. The data was cross tabulated using SPSS THE
5.2 FINDINGS:
1. 5.3% male and 9.3% female students their teachers never create his /her own
digital learning materials for students, 21.1% male and 16.3% female students that
their teachers sometimes, 26.3%male and 37.2% female students that their
teachers often, 29.8% male and 23.3% female students that their teachers most of
the time, 17.5% male and 14.0% female students that their always create his /her
2. 22.8% male students and 25.8% female students their teacher never record
instructions in cell phone in audio format during presentation and upload these
recordings to a class room blog or university websites, 7.0%male and 4.7% female
students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3% male and 18.6% female students
40
that their teachers often, 21.1% male and 34.9%female students that their teachers
most of the time, 22.8% male and 16.3%female students that their teachers always
record instructions in cell phone in audio format during presentation and upload
3. 15.8% male and 16.3% female students their teachers never use topic relevant
students that their teachers sometimes , 21.1% male and 14.0% female students
that their teachers often , 31.6%male and 34.9%female students that their teachers
most of the time , 24.6%male and 14.0%female students that their teachers always
4. 10.5%male and 2.3%female students their teachers never use internet every day to
prepare his /her lesson,14.0%male and 11.6%female students that their teachers
often ,35.1%male and 30.2% female students that their teachers most of the time,
31.6 %male and 23.3% female students that their teachers always use internet
5. 10.5%male and 16.3% female students their teachers never post home work for
students on the university website, 26.3% male and 14.0% female students that
their teachers sometimes, 21.1%male and 16.3% female students that their
teachers often, 22.8 % male and 41.9% female students that their teachers most of
the time, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers always post
6. 1.8% male and 11.6% female students their teachers never look for online
that their teachers sometimes, 29.8%male and 23.3 % female students that their
41
teachers often, 24.6 % male and 37.2 % female students that their teachers most of
the time, 22.8% male and 20.9% female students that their teachers always looks
7. 5.3 % male and 2.3% female students their teachers never give me assignments
which require the use of internet, 8.8% male and 4.7% female students that their
teachers sometimes, 21.1 % male and 16.3% female students that their teachers
often, 36.8% male and 32.6 % female students that their teachers most of the time,
28.1 % male and 44.2 % female students that their teachers always give me
8. 10.5%male and 11.6 % female students their teachers never use of the interactive
lessons and educational games., 19.3% male and 7.0 % female students that their
teachers sometimes, 15.8% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers
often, 33.3 %male and 34.9% female students that their teachers most of the time,
21.1% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers always use of the
9. 35.1%male and 37.2 % female students their teachers never communicates online
with parents, 14.0% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers
sometimes, 12.3% male and 14.0% female students that their teachers often,
22.8% male and 27.9% female students that their teachers most of the time, 15.8%
male and 9.3% female students that their teachers always communicates online
with parents.
10. 19.3% male and 25.6%female students their teachers use what’s app to provide
feedback on assignments, 10.5% male and 18.6 %female students that their
teachers sometimes, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers
often, 35.1 % male and 25.6% female students that their teachers most of the
42
time , 15.8% male and 18.6% female students that their teachers use what’s app to
11. 3.5% male and 4.7% female students they never record teacher lecture in cell
male and 18.6% female students that they sometimes , 31.6% male and 30.2%
female students that they often , 35.1% male and 20.9% female students that they
most of the time,14.0%male and 25.6 % female students that they always record
teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and share with
my classmates
12. 0.0%male and 4.7% female students they never use to share my presentation with
my classmate using social media sites, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that
they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3% female students that they often, 47.4 %
male and 32.6% female students that most of the time ,38.6% male and 51.2%
female students that they always use to share my presentation with my classmate
13. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use digital learning material
provided by teacher, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes ,
12.3% male and 9.3 % female students that they often , 38,6% male and 46.5 %
female students that they most of the time , 47.4 % male and 39.5 % female
students that they always use digital learning material provided by teacher
14. % male and 7.0% female students they sometimes use relevant video clips as a
resource for learning, 12.3% male and 7.0 % female students that they often,
42.1% male and 41.9% female students that they most of the time, 45.6% male
and 44.2 % female students that always use relevant video clips as a resource for
learning.
43
15. 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they sometimes use multimedia for giving
presentations, 0.0% male and 4.7% female students that they often, 40.4% male
and 53.5 % female students that they most of the time , 59.6% male and 37.2%
female students that they always use multimedia for giving presentations
16. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use cell phone dictionary for
searching relevant meanings during lessons, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students
that they sometimes, 7.0% male and 7.0 % female students that they often, 35.1%
male and 39.5 % female students that they most of the time, 56.1% male and
48.8% female students that they always use cell phone dictionary for searching
17. 3.5% male and 7.0% female students they often use cell phone for quick reference
in classroom for learning purposes, 45.6% male and 51.2% female students that
they most of the time , 50.9% male and 41.9% female students that they always
use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes
18. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use laptop during lecture for the
0.0% female that they sometimes , 1.8% male and 0.0% female students that they
often , 38.6% male and 51.2% female students that they most of the time , 57.9%
male and 41.9% female students that they always use laptop during lecture for the
19. 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they never use the internet only for the sake
of learning purposes,8.8% male and 7.0% female students that they often, 36.8%
male and 46.5% female students that they most of the time , 54.4% male and
41.9% female students that they always use the internet only for the sake of
learning purposes
44
20. 0.0% male and 2.3 % female students they never use internet daily for completing
my assignments, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that they often , 42.1 %
male and 46.5% female students that they most of the time , 56.1% male and
48.8% female students that they always use internet daily for completing my
assignments
5.3 CONCLUSION
about their teacher’s use of internet for teaching except for preparing everyday
lesson, in which more male students believe that their teachers use internet
ii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
iii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
iv. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
about their own use of multimedia for learning more male are they using
vi. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
vii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
viii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students
45
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
ii. The administration of the University of Haripur may ensure equal excess of
iii. Provision of ICT lab in every department may help and prove the use of ICT
46
REFERENCES
Al-Ansari, H. (2006). Internet use by the faculty members of Kuwait University. The
Electronic Library Vol.24, No. (6), Pp; 791-803.
Alexander, J.O. (1999). Collaborative design, constructivist learning, information
technology immersion, & electronic communities: a case study.
Interpersonal
Andersson Sven, B., 2006. Newly qualified teachers’ learning related to their use of
information and communication technology: a Swedish perspective;
British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5): 665-682.
B. Reedy, 2008. PowerPoint, interactive whiteboards, and the visual culture of
technology in schools; Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(2):
143-162
Bach, E.; Forés, A. (2007). E-mociones: Comunicar y educar a través de la red.
Barcelona: CEAC.
Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 3-18.
Barron, A. (1998). Designing Web-based training. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 29(4), 355-371
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it
isn't happening. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(4), 519.
Berge, Z. (1998). Guiding principles in Web-based instructional design. Education
Media International, 35(2), 7276
Bourne, J., Harris, D.A, & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online Engineering Education:
Learning Anywhere, Anytime; Journal of Engineering Education Vol.
94, No. 1; January 2005.
Cardean (2006). Carden University. http://www.cardean-mba-online.com/, Accessed
last on May 8, 2006.
Chapter 2
Collis, B. (2002). Information technologies for education and training. In
Adelsberger, H., Collis, B, & Pawlowski, J. (Eds.) Handbook on
Technologies for Information and Training. Berlin: Springer Verlag
Colorado (2006). Colorado Technical University Online.
http://www.ctudegreeonline.com, Accessed last on May 8, 2006.
47
Daniels, L. (1995). Audio vision: Audio-visual interaction in desktop multimedia. In
Beauchamp, D.G., Braden, R.A., and Griffin, R.E. (Eds.). Imagery and
visual literacy: Selected readings from the annual conference of the
international visual literacy association (26th, Tempe, Arizona, October
12-16, 1994). (ERIC Document No. ED380056, pp. 57-63).
Davis, N.E., & Tearle, P. (Eds.). (1999). A core curriculum for telematics in teacher
training.
Davis, Preston Christina and Sahin Ismail, 2008. ICT teacher training: Evidence for
multilevel evaluation from a national initiative; British Journal of
Educational Technology
Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Pupil perspectives on the
contribution of information and communication technology to teaching
and learning in the secondary school. Research papers in education,
18(2), 141-165.
Douglas Graeme, 2001. ICT, Education, and Visual impairment; British journal of
Educational Technology 32(3): 353-364.
Duffy, T. C., & Cunningham, D. (1996). D. (1996): Constructivism: Implications for
the design and delivery of instruction. Handbook of Research for
Educational Communications and Technology. MacMillan Library. New
York.
Duta, N. (2012). El papel de las TIC en la Educación Superior-un estudio empírico
sobre las necesidades formativas del profesorado universitario. Available
at http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/dret_tic2012/pdf/2.3.duta-nicoleta.pdf
Ellis, T. (2004). Animating to Build Higher Cognitive Understanding: A Model for
Studying Multimedia Effectiveness in Education, Journal of Engineering
Education, Vol. 93, No. 1, 2004, pp. 59–64.
Grose, T. K. (2003). Can Distance Education be Unlocked? Prism, Vol. 12, No. 8,
April 19–23, 2003. Available from
http://www.prismmagazine.org/april03/unlocked.cfm
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). ICT usage in higher education: A case study on preservice
teachers and instructors. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 7(1).
48
Jonassen, D. & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as
cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research
Educational on Educational Communications and Technology (pp 693-
719). New York: Macmillan
Jonassen, D. H. (1999).Computers as mind tools for schools: Engaging critical
thinking (second Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jubany, J. (2012). Connecta’t per aprendre. Aprenentatge social i personalitzat.
Barcelona: Rosa Sensat
Kennedy, D. & McNaught, C.(1997). Design elements for interactive multimedia.
Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 1-22.
Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. V., Krivosheina, I. V., & Tomei, C. (2005). New limits on
spin-dependent weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) nucleon
coupling. Physics Letters B, 609(3-4), 226-231.
Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in
secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator. British journal
of educational technology, 35(4), 461-475.
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five
principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology, Research and
Development, 41(3), 4-16.
Lemke, C., & Coughlin, E.C. (1998). Technology in American schools.
Littlejohn, A., Suckling, C., Campbell, L. & McNicol, D. (2002). The amazingly
patient tutor: students’ interactions with an online carbohydrate
chemistry course. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33
No.(3), Pp;313-321.
Machin Stephen, McNally Sandra and Olmo. Silva, 2007. NEW TECHNOLOGY IN
SCHOOLS: IS THERE A PAYOFF?; The Economic Journal, 117:
1145-1167.
McCarthy, B. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT’s learning styles. Educational
Leadership , 54 (6), 46-52.
McCausland, H.,Wache, D. & Berk, M. (1999). Computer literacy; its implications
and outcomes. A case study from the Flexible Learning Centre.
University of South Australia.
49
Meiring Lynne and Norman Nigel, 2005. How can ICT contribute to the learning of
foreign languages by pupils with SEN? ; Support for Learning, 20(3):
129-134
New Media Consortium (2007).”Horizon Report, retrieved July 1, 2007 from
www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf.
Oliver, R. & Short, G. (1996). The Western Australian Telecentres Network: A
model for enhancing access to education and training in rural areas.
International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(4), 311-328.
Oliver, R. & Towers, S. (2000). Benchmarking ICT literacy in tertiary learning
settings. In R. Sims, M. O’Reilly & S. Sawkins (Eds). Learning to
choose: Choosing to learn. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE
Conference (pp 381-390). Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University
Press
Oliver, R. (2000). Creating Meaningful Contexts for Learning in Web-based Settings.
Proceedings of Open Learning 2000. (Pp; 53-62).Brisbane: Learning
Network, Queensland.
Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—the hopes and the reality.
British journal of educational technology, 34(2), 151-167.
Riding, R., & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi‐
media materials in 11‐year‐old children. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 30(1), 43-56.
Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-
users of computers. Poetics, 34(4-5), 273-292.
Selwyn, Neil., Potter John and Sue. Cranmer, 2008. Primary pupils’ use of
information and communication technologies at school and home. ;
British Journal of Educational Technology.
Soloway, E. & Pryor, A. (1996). The next generation in human-computer interaction.
Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 16-18.
Starr, L. (2001). Same time this year. [on-line]. Available at http://www.education-
world.com/a_tech/tech075.shtml [Accessed July 2002].
Susman, E. B. (1998). “Co-operative learning: a review of factors that increase the
effectiveness of computer-based instruction”. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, Vol.18 No.(4), Pp;303–322.
50
Tawalbeh Mohammad, 2001. The policy and management of information technology
in Jordanian schools; British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2):
133-140.
Tearle Penni, 2003. ICT implementation: what makes the difference?; British Journal
of Educational Technology, 34(5): 567-583
Tondeur, J., M. Valcke and J. Van Braak, 2008. A multidimensional approach to
determinants of computer use in primary education: teacher and school
characteristics; Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the
development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-
efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of research on
technology in education, 36(3), 231-250.
Yusuf, M.O. (2005). Information and communication education: Analyzing the
Nigerian national policy for information technology. International
Education Journal Vol. 6 No. (3), Pp; 316-321
51
Annexure I
PERSONAL INFORMATION:
Gender: Male / female Department: -------------.
76%
Non 51%
1%- 26%- -
S. e of -
STATEMENTS ABOUT 25% 50% 100
n the 75%
TEACHERS teac teach %
o teac teach
her er teach
her er
er
My teachers create his /her own digital
1
learning materials for students.
My teacher record instructions in cell
phone in audio format during
2 presentation and upload these
recordings to a class room blog or
university websites.
My teachers use topic relevant movie as
3 an instructional tools by using
multimedia.
4 My teacher use internet every day to
52
prepare his /her lesson.
My teacher Post home work for students
5
on the university website.
My teacher looks for online professional
6
development opportunities.
My teachers give me assignments which
7
require the use of internet.
Teachers make use of the interactive
8
lessons and educational games.
My teacher communicates online with
9
parents.
1 My teacher use what’s app to provide
0 feedback on assignments.
Som Most
S. Nev Ofte Alwa
etim of
N STATEMENTS ABOUT STUDENTS er n ys
es the
O
time
I record teacher lecture in cell phone in
1
audio format during presentation and
1
share with my classmates.
I use to share my presentation with my
1
classmate using Social Media Sites
2
(what’s app, Facebook, email).
1 I use digital learning material provided
3 by teacher.
1 I use relevant video clips as a resource
4 for learning.
1 I use multimedia for giving
5 presentations.
1 I use cell phone dictionary for searching
6 relevant meanings during lessons.
1 I use cell phone for quick reference in
7 classroom for learning purposes
I use laptop during lecture for the sake
1
of enhancement of knowledge by using
8
different websites
1 I use the internet only for the sake of
9 learning purposes.
2 I use internet daily for completing my
0 assignments.
Thanks for your co-operation
Research Scholar
53