Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 65

THE USE OF ICT BY THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN

UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR AT B.S LEVEL

Farwa Sajid

Roll No. 6150

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN
2018
THE USE OF ICT BY THE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN
UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR AT B.S LEVEL

By

Farwa Sajid

Roll No. 6150

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the


requirement for the degree of

Bachelor of Education (Hons) Elementary

Department of Education
University of Haripur
Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
2018
CERTIFICATION

Certified that the contents and form of thesis entitled “THE USE OF ICT BY THE

TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR AT B.S

LEVEL” submitted by Farwa Sajid have been found satisfactory for the requirement

of the degree of B.Ed. (Hons).

----------------------------
Mam Haleema Bano

----------------------------
External Examiner

----------------------------
Date: -------------------- Chairman
Department of Education
University of Haripur
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION

I, Farwa Sajid D/O Mohammad Sajid Roll No. 6150 Registration No.14F-UH-
142, a student of B.S (Hons) at University of Haripur, do hereby solemnly declare that
the thesis entitled, “Use of ICT by teachers and students in University of Haripur at
B.S level” submitted by me in partial fulfillment of B.S degree in Education, is my
original work and has not been submitted or published earlier or shall not, in future be
submitted by me for obtaining any degree from this or any other university or
institution.

______________________

Farwa Sajid

Dated:_________________
FORWARDING SHEET

The thesis titled, “The use of ICT by the teachers and students at University of
Haripur”, submitted by Ms. Farwa Sajid, Roll No 6150 in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of B.S in Education, has been completed under my
guidance and supervision.

I am satisfied with the quality of student’s research work.

_______________________

Haleema Bano

Supervisor

Dated: ____________________
APPROVAL SHEET

Title of thesis: The use of ICT by the teachers and students in University of Haripur
at B.S level

Name of Student: Farwa Sajid

Accepted by the department of education, Haripur University, in partial


fulfillment of the requirements for the B.S Degree in Education.

_____________________________

Mam Haleema Bano

Supervisor

Viva Voce Committee

___________________________________

External Examiner

___________________________________

Member

_________________________________

Chairman,

Department of Education

University of Haripur

Dated: _______________________
DEDICATION
I dedicated this piece of research

To the Holy

PROPHET MUHAMMAD (SAW),

Who blessed me in all the hardship of my life and

My

Respectable Teachers and Parents

Who encouraged me to receive knowledge and inculcated in my heart and soul

The love and curiosity for education.


TABLE OF CONTENT
S.No. Pages
1 INTRODUCTION 01
1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 05
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 05
1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 06
1.4 DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY 06
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 07
2.1 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
07
TECHNOLOGY (ICT)
2.2 EMERGING TRENDS IN EDUCATION 07
2.3 IMPORTANCE OF ICT IN PRESENT ERA 10
2.4 USE OF ICT IN THE 21st CENTURY CLASSROOMS 11
2.5 ROLE OF ICT IN EDUCATION IN GENERAL 11
2.6 ROLE OF ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION 13
2.7 BENEFITS OF INTEGRATING ICT IN HIGHER
16
EDUCATION
2.7.1 Benefits to Students 16
2.7.2 Benefits to Employers 16
2.7.3 Benefits to Governments 16
2.8 USE OF ICT IN PAKISTANI CONTEXT 17
2.9 ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION CHALLENGES 21
2.10 USES OF ICT 22
2.10.1 Radio and TV Broadcasting used in Education 22
2.10.2 Teleconferencing 22
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOG 24
3.1 POPULATION 24
3.2 SAMPLE 24
3.3 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT 24
3.4 DATA COLLECTION 24
3.5 DATA ANALYSIS 24
4 DATA ANALYSIS 25
5 SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND 38

i
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 SUMMARY 38
5.2 FINDINGS 38
5.3 CONCLUSION 43
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS 44
REFERENCES 45
APPENDIX 50

ii
LIST OF TABLES
S.No. Title Page No
1. Table No 1 25
2. Table No 2 26
3. Table No 3 26
4. Table No 4 27
5. Table No 5 28
6. Table No 6 28
7. Table No 7 29
8. Table No 8 30
9. Table No 9 30
10. Table No 10 31
11. Table No 11 31
12. Table No 12 32
13. Table No 13 33
14. Table No 14 33
15. Table No 15 34
16. Table No 16 34
17. Table No 17 35
18. Table No 18 36
19. Table No 19 36
20. Table No 20 37

iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

All glory be to Almighty Allah, the Creator of this universe, who

blessed me with an opportunity to make this humble contribution. All praises, respect

and Darood-o-Salam are due to the Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Sallalla-ho-

Alay-i-Wasallam), whose pious teachings and practices have led me to carry out this

work in a successful manner.

I am thankful to Dr Saeed khan for his kind support, illustrative advice,

and immense help, throughout the completion of this work, at the same time to the

whole faculty education department for guidance and facilitation .I would like to

express my profound thanks to my research supervisor Madam Haleema Bano, for

believing in me and for her continuous thought provoking feedback in whole research

venture that literally enable the completion of this task

I am grateful to all of friends and senior fellows specially Umair Akhtar in

M.Phil. (Scholar) in Education department who did whatever was possible in order to

get this work completed. Last but not least, I would like to thank all people who have

helped and inspired me during research

Farwa Sajid

iv
ABSTRACT

The current research study focused upon the use of ICT by the teachers and students
in university of Haripur at BS level. The research design applied was survey that was
conducted by questionnaire to the male and female students at University level. The
objective of the study was to find out about the use of different forms of ICT by the
teachers and students of University of Haripur. The sample was drawn on random
bases; included were both male and female students at University of Haripur who
could easily be accessed. Thus the total sample comprised of 50 male and 50 female
students. The tool was validated via expert opinions by the supervisor and other
teachers from department. This was analyzed afterwards using statistical tools of
percentage and chi-square within the respondents. After analysis, the most of the male
teachers use ICT tools for learning process as compared to female teachers and
students also recorded that teachers use ICT tools i.e. Laptop, multimedia for learning.
It is recommended that the administration of the University of Haripur may ensure
equal excess of male and female students to all ICT resources and provision of ICT
lab in every department may help and prove the use of ICT by female students at the
University of Haripur

Key Words: ICT, Multimedia, teachers and students, University level.

v
Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

ICT is the key wellspring of capable systems utilized as a part of instructive

establishments all through the world. ICT in Pakistan is at its underlying stage

however ideally moving right way however the tranquility of advance is moderate.

Coordinate class instructing, where communicated programming substitutes for

educators on a brief premise; • School broadcasting, where communicated

programming gives corresponding educating and learning assets not generally

accessible; and • General instructive programming over network, national and global

stations which give general and casual instructive openings.

Information and communication technologies (ICT) have become

commonplace entities in all aspects of life. Across the past twenty years the use of

ICT has fundamentally changed the practices and procedures of nearly all forms of

endeavor within business and governance. Education is a very socially oriented

activity and quality education has traditionally been associated with strong teachers

having high degrees of personal contact with learners. The use of ICT in education

lends itself to more student-centered learning settings. But with the world moving

rapidly into digital media and information, the role of ICT in education is becoming

more and more important and this importance will continue to grow and develop in

the 21st century.

Higher education systems have grown exponentially in the last five decades to

meet the demands of quality education for all. This aspect has further gained

momentum due to swift advancements in Information and Communication

Technology (ICT). Demand for skilled and competent labor is ever increasing in the

contemporary globalized society. In this backdrop, access to quality in higher

1
education for all has emerged as determining factor of economic growth and

development. In order to increase the access to higher education and improving its

reach to the remotest parts of the country contribution of open and distance learning

facilities is on the increase. In addition, it is catering to life-long learning aspirations

and that too at affordable cost. The last two decades have witnessed the inclusion of

developments in ICTs in higher education systems around the world. Even then the

challenge to develop a higher education system that is flexible and dynamic so as to

holistically integrate the technology in the management and delivery of learning

programs is daunting. The focus of this paper is to examine the role of Information

and Communication Technology (ICT) in higher education in India in the 21st

century.

The rise of ICTs as learning advances has agreed with a developing

mindfulness and acknowledgment of elective hypotheses for learning. The

speculations of discovering that hold the best influence today are those in light of

constructivist standards (Duffy and Cunningham, 1996). These standards place that

learning is accomplished by the dynamic development of information bolstered by

different points of view inside significant settings. In constructivist speculations,

social associations are believed to assume a basic part in the procedures of learning

and discernment (Vygotsky, 1978). The qualities of constructivism lie in its

accentuation on learning as a procedure of individual comprehension and the

improvement of importance in ways which are dynamic and interpretative. In this

space learning is seen as the development of significance as opposed to as the

remembrance of realities (Lebow, 1993; Jonassen and Reeves, 1996).

Learning approaches utilizing contemporary ICTs give numerous chances to

constructivist learning through their arrangement and support for asset based,

2
understudy focused settings and by empowering figuring out how to be identified with

setting and to rehearse (Berge, 1998; Barron, 1998). As said already, any utilization of

ICT in learning settings can act to help different parts of information development and

as an ever increasing number of understudies utilize ICTs in their learning forms, the

more articulated the effect of this will progress toward becoming.

The present current more youthful age is now and then alluded to as Age X

since they feel "X-ed." out of customary openings. This age of the twenty-first

century ought to end up referred to, in any case, as Age E since they are turning into

the most entrepreneurial age since the Mechanical Insurgency. Upwards of 5.6 million

Americans more youthful than age 34 are currently attempting to begin their own

particular organizations today. 33% of new business people are more youthful than

age 30, in excess of 60 percent of 18-to 29-year-olds say they need to possess their

own particular organizations, and about 80 percent of would-be business people in the

Unified States are between the ages of 18 and 34! (Ernst and Youthful, 2000)

With those dangerous numbers have come comparative increments in the field

of business enterprise training. The ongoing development and improvement in the

educational module and projects committed to enterprise and new pursuit creation has

been astounding. The quantity of schools and colleges that offer courses identified

with business has developed from a modest bunch in the 1970s to 1,600 of every 2003

(Katz, 2003).

Contemporary ICTs can give solid help to every one of these prerequisites and

there are currently numerous remarkable cases of world class settings for competency

and execution based educational program that make sound utilization of the

affordances of these innovations (e.g. Oliver, 2000). For a long time, educators

3
wishing to embrace such educational program have been constrained by their assets

and apparatuses yet with the expansion and far reaching accessibility of contemporary

ICTs, numerous confinements and obstructions of the past have been expelled. Also,

new advancements will keep on driving these types of adapting further. As

understudies and instructors access higher data transfer capacities, more

straightforward types of correspondence and access to sharable assets, the ability to

help these quality learning settings will keep on growing.

Data and correspondence innovation (ICT) is a power that has changed

numerous parts of the way we live. If one somehow happened to look at such fields as

medication, tourism, travel, business, law, managing an account, designing and

engineering, the effect of ICT over the previous a few decades has been gigantic. The

way these fields work today is limitlessly not quite the same as the ways they worked

previously. Yet, when one takes a gander at training, there appears to have been an

uncanny absence of impact and far less change than different fields have encountered.

Various individuals have endeavored to investigate this absence of action and impact

(eg.Soloway and Earlier, 1996; Collis, 2002).

There have been various variables hindering the discount take-up of ICT in

instruction over all parts. These have included such factors as an absence of

subsidizing to help the buy of the innovation, an absence of preparing among built up

showing specialists, an absence of inspiration and need among instructors to receive

ICT as showing apparatuses (Starr, 2001). In any case, as of late, factors have risen

which have fortified and urged moves to embrace ICTs into classrooms and learning

settings. These have incorporated a developing need to investigate efficiencies

regarding program conveyance, the open doors for adaptable conveyance gave by

4
ICTs (e.g. Oliver and Short, 1996); the limit of innovation to offer help for altered

instructive projects to address the issues of individual students (e.g. Kennedy and

McNaught, 1997); and the developing utilization of the Web and WWW as

instruments for data access and correspondence (e.g. Oliver and Towers, 2000)

As we move into the 21st century, these variables and numerous others are

applying solid powers as a powerful influence for the selection of ICTs in instruction

and contemporary patterns propose we will soon observe substantial scale changes in

the way training is arranged and conveyed as a result of the openings and affordances

of ICT. This paper looks to investigate the probable changes we will find in

instruction as ICT goes about as an intense specialist to change a significant number

of the instructive practices to which we have turned out to be acclimated. Specifically,

the paper will investigate the effect both present and rising data and correspondence

advancements will probably have in coming a very long time on what is found out,

when and where learning will happen and how the learning will happen..

1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The current research study explores the use of ICT in terms of its usage for

effective learning at higher educational level. It leads to the finding the use of ICT by

the teachers and students in the University of Haripur at B.S level.

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Objectives of the study were:

i. To find out about the use of different forms of ICT by the teachers of

University of Haripur at B.S level

ii. To find out about use of different forms of ICT by the students of University

of Haripur at B.S level

5
1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

Findings of this study will help university teachers to improve their

perceptions and practices, compare their perceptions and practices with recent ICT

forms and to improve their teaching methods by using ICT. It is also helpful for the

students how to use ICT effectively for various purposes in their study. It is also

helpful for curriculum developers to incorporate material which provokes to use of

ICT tools.

1.4 DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY

This study was delimited to the University of Haripur due to limited time and

resources.

6
Chapter 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT)

ICTs stand for information and communication technologies and are defined,

for the purposes of this primer, as a “diverse set of technological tools and resources

used to communicate, and to create, disseminate, store, and manage information.”

These technologies include computers, the Internet, broadcasting technologies (radio

and television), and telephony.

Different technologies are typically used in combination rather than as the sole

delivery Mechanism. For instance, the Kothmale Community Radio Internet uses both

radio broadcasts and computer and Internet technologies to facilitate the sharing of

information and provide educational opportunities in a rural community in Sri Lanka.

The Open University of the United Kingdom (UKOU), established in 1969 as the first

educational institution in the world wholly dedicated to open and distance learning,

still relies heavily on print-based materials supplemented by radio, television and, in

recent years, online programming. Similarly, the Indira Gandhi National Open

University in India combines the use of print, recorded audio and video, broadcast

radio and television, and audio conference audio conferencing technologies

2.2 EMERGING TRENDS IN EDUCATION

We live in a society that is immersed in technology development, where

progress of the Information Technologies and Communication Technologies (ICTs)

has changed our way of life, impacting many areas of knowledge. In education, ICT

has proven to be a great support to both teachers and students. It's called information

technology and communication (ICT) and to enable the acquisition, production,

storage and processing, reporting, recording and presenting information in the form of

7
voice, images and data contained in nature acoustic signals, optical or

electromagnetic. ICTs include electronic as a base technology that supports the

development of telecommunications technology, computers and audiovisual (Duta,

2012). Since the emergence of the new technologies and especially the Internet, have

not stopped generating opportunities, projects, platforms and initiatives that have to

do with learning. Schools and institutes possibly were the first to develop many

proposals that deal with this issue.

The acknowledgment of online electronic instruction in schools, colleges and

corporate associations is currently unavoidable. This is made conceivable to a great

extent by the rise and fast improvement in overall data and PC interchanges

advancements. The underlying incredulity with which online electronic instruction

was welcomed is currently winding down away. We are currently seeing not just the

offering of a course or two online in conventional colleges however the foundation of

undeniable degree programs on the web and online colleges (Phoenix, 2006; Cardean,

2006; Colorado, 2006).

Indeed, even with these advancements, online electronic courses in science

and building are not as far reaching as courses in different trains in advanced

education. The explanations behind this are, science and building instruction has,

customarily, been content focused, outline arranged, and is saturated by the

improvement of critical thinking abilities (Bourne, 2005). It is further contended that a

portion of the uncommon needs of undergrad science and building training have not

been very much served by strategies for online instruction

In particular, research facilities are a backbone of building training, as are

numerical establishments and configuration devices. Research facilities (Grose, 2003;

Peterson, 2002) are remarkably hard to give online as a result of the conventional

8
want for the immediate task of instruments. Correspondingly, course materials that

require noteworthy utilization of arithmetic have not been as simple to actualize as

themes that require just content based discourse (Bourne, 2005). For online science

and building instruction to be extensively acknowledged and used

The capability of sight and sound in training has a hypothetical establishment.

Bagui (1998) and Daniels (1995) outlined the hypothesis of multi-direct

correspondence in help of the potential for mixed media. As indicated by this

hypothesis, people have a few channels by which information is conveyed. On the off

chance that data is introduced by means of at least two of these channels, there will be

extra fortification and, subsequently, more prominent maintenance, accordingly

enhancing learning (Ellis, 2004). Additionally bolster for the potential advantages of

interactive media is offered by look into in learning styles. McCarthy (1997)

investigated learning styles and distinguished four particular ways to deal with taking

in: the sensor, the analyzer, the practitioner, and the maker. A mixed media approach

exhibits the possibility to deliver these diverse ways to deal with learning, as was

proposed by the exploration of (Riding and Grimley, 1999).

Another manner by which rising ICTs are affecting on the substance of

training educational module originates from the manners by which ICTs are

overwhelming such an extensive amount contemporary life and work. As of now

there has developed a requirement for instructive foundations to guarantee that

graduates can show proper levels of data proficiency, "the ability to distinguish and

issue and afterward to recognize, find and assess important data keeping in mind the

end goal to draw in with it or to tackle an issue emerging from it" (McCausland,

Wache and Berk, 1999, p.2). The drive to advance such improvements originates from

general moves among organizations to guarantee their graduates show not just

9
abilities and learning in their subject spaces yet in addition general properties and

bland aptitudes. Generally nonexclusive aptitudes have included such capacities as a

capacity to reason formally, to take care of issues, to impart successfully, to have the

capacity to arrange results, to oversee time, venture administration, and cooperation

and collaboration abilities.

2.3 IMPORTANCE OF ICT IN PRESENT ERA

Learning to use technology is important, but also in educational contexts have

to be directly related to learning content that we had laid out. These technologies

should help comply with the competences previously designed. Moreover, technology

has meant the opportunity to generate many learning spaces which are not always

managed or controlled by a figure such as the teacher. Currently, learning to perform

many activities can be resolved, in part, looking for tutorials in the networks. But

clearly that while it is easy to learn to use platforms or an application which is more

complicated to learn to make them serve as an educational tool, and this is where one

of the most important teacher’s orders lies.

The technology does not involve an adaptation of the above tools, but also as a

paradigm shift of learning. In this sense, there is no university in the world that does

not already have the digital platform or campus to develop part of their learning

activities or even most of these. Moreover, the approach of e-learning has been

changing up do proposal from learning really motivators and even thrilling (Bach &

Fores, 2007). But just as initially the virtual university campuses were one of the

centers of learning, at present the network is itself already a great tool to learn and get

to contents. In addition, the emergence of social networks has brought a new

paradigm of spaces where one can learn. In fact, it would be a mistake at this moment

10
stop to consider the networks as one of the important learning spaces. There are

authors who choose to directly affirm that is needed connected to learn (Jubany, 2012)

2.4 USE OF ICT IN THE 21st CENTURY CLASSROOMS:

The field of higher education has been affected by ICTs, which have

undoubtedly affected teaching, learning and research .ICTs have the potential to

accelerate, enrich, and deepen skills, to motivate and engage students, to help relate

school experience to work practices, create economic viability for tomorrow's

workers, as well as strengthening teaching and helping schools change .Contemporary

ICTs are able to provide strong support for all these requirements and there are now

many outstanding examples of world class settings for competency and performance-

based curricula that make sound use of the affordances of these technologies (Oliver,

2000).

The use of ICT will not only enhance learning environments but also prepare

next generation for future lives and careers .Changed pool of teachers will changed

responsibilities and skill sets for future teaching involving high levels of ICT and the

need for more facilitative than didactic teaching roles (Littlejohn et al., 2002).

Students using ICTs for learning purposes become immersed in the process of

learning and as more and more students use computers as information sources and

cognitive tools, the influence of the technology on supporting how students learn will

continue to increase.

2.5 ROLE OF ICT IN EDUCATION IN GENERAL

The field of education has been affected by ICTs, which have undoubtedly

affected teaching, learning, and research (Yusuf, 2005). A great deal of research has

proven the benefits to the quality of education (Al-Ansari, 2006). ICTs have the

potential to innovate, accelerate, enrich, and deepen skills, to motivate and engage

11
students, to help relate school experience to work practices, create economic viability

for tomorrow's workers, as well as strengthening teaching and helping schools change

(Davis and Tearle, 1999; Lemke and Coughlin, 1998; cited by Yusuf, 2005)

ICTs can enhance the quality of education in several ways, by increasing

learner motivation and engagement, by facilitating the acquisition of basic skills, and

by enhancing teacher training. ICTs are also transformational tools which, when used

appropriately, can promote the shift to a learner centered environment. ICTs,

especially computers and Internet technologies, enable new ways of teaching and

learning rather than simply allow teachers and students to do what they have done

before in a better way. ICT has an impact not only on what students should learn, but

it also plays a major role on how the students should learn. Along with a shift of

curricula from “content-centered” to “competence-based”, the mode of curricula

delivery has now shifted from “teacher centered” forms of delivery to “student-

centered” forms of delivery. ICT provides motivation to Learn. ICTs such as videos,

television and multimedia computer software that combine text, sound, and colorful

moving images can be used to provide challenging and authentic content that will

engage the student in the learning process.

Interactive radio likewise makes use of sound effects, songs, dramatizations,

comic skits, and other performance conventions to compel the students to listen and

become more involved in the lessons being delivered. Some of the parents of the

respondents opined that their children were feeling more motivated than before in

such type of teaching in the classroom rather than the stereotype 45 minutes’ lecture.

They were of the view that this type of learning process is much more effective than

the monotonous monologue classroom situation where the teacher just lectures from a

raised platform and the students just listen to the teacher

12
ICT presents an entirely new learning environment for students, thus requiring

a different skill set to be successful. Critical thinking, research, and evaluation skills

are growing in importance as students have increasing volumes of information from a

variety of sources to sort through (New Media Consortium, 2007). ICT is changing

processes of teaching and learning by adding elements of vitality to learning

environments including virtual environments for the 6 purpose. ICT is a potentially

powerful tool for offering educational opportunities. It is difficult and maybe even

impossible to imagine future learning environments that are not supported, in one way

or another, by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).

ICT provides opportunities to access an abundance of information using

multiple information resources and viewing information from multiple perspectives,

thus fostering the authenticity of learning environments. ICT may also make complex

processes easier to understand through simulations that, again, contribute to authentic

learning environments. Thus, ICT may function as a facilitator of active learning and

higher-order thinking (Alexander, 1999; Jonassen, 1999). The use of ICT may foster

co-operative learning and reflection about the content (Susman, 1998).

2.6 ROLE OF ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Information and communication technologies (ICT) have become

commonplace entities in all aspects of life. Across the past twenty years the use of

ICT has fundamentally changed the practices and procedures of nearly all forms of

endeavor within business and governance. Education is a very socially oriented

activity and quality education has traditionally been associated with strong teachers

having high degrees of personal contact with learners. The use of ICT in education

lends itself to more student-centered learning settings. But with the world moving

rapidly into digital media and information, the role of ICT in education is becoming

13
more and more important and this importance will continue to grow and develop in

the 21st century. Higher education systems have grown exponentially in the last five

decades to meet the demands of quality education for all. This aspect has further

gained momentum due to swift advancements in Information and Communication

Technology (ICT). Demand for skilled and competent labour is ever increasing in the

contemporary globalized society. In this backdrop, access to quality in higher

education for all has emerged as determining factor of economic growth and

development. In order to increase the access to higher education and improving its

reach to the remotest parts of the country contribution of open and distance learning

facilities is on the increase. In addition, it is catering to life-long learning aspirations

and that too at affordable cost. The last two decades have witnessed the inclusion of

developments in ICTs in higher education systems around the world. Even then the

challenge to develop a higher education system that is flexible and dynamic so as to

holistically integrate the technology in the management and delivery of learning

programs is daunting. The focus of this paper is to examine the role of Information

and Communication Technology (ICT) in higher education in India in the 21st

century.

The fast improvements in innovation have rolled out gigantic improvements in

the way we live, and in addition the requests of the general public. Perceiving the

effect of new advancements on the work environment and regular daily existence, the

present educator instruction organizations endeavor to rebuild their training projects

and classroom offices, keeping in mind the end goal to limit the instructing and

learning innovation hole amongst today and what's to come. This rebuilding

procedure requires powerful combination of advancements into existing setting so as

14
to furnish students with information of particular branches of knowledge, to elevate

significant learning and to upgrade proficient efficiency (Tomei, 2005, p. 195).

Be that as it may, numerous ongoing examination thinks about on this topic

demonstrates that numerous foundations are neglecting to coordinate innovation into

existing setting. Bauer and Kenton (2005) expressed in their examination that despite

the fact that educators were having adequate aptitudes, were imaginative and

effectively conquered impediments, they didn't incorporate innovation reliably both as

an instructing and learning device. Reynolds, Treharne and Tripp (2003) additionally

underlined proceeding with issues in the appropriation of ICT by educators and

expressed the requirement for additionally inquire about on how ICT can enhance

training.

At the point when innovation use is lined up with the instructional objective,

where innovation is essential to educating, fruitful incorporation may be succeeded. .

Something else, the utilization of innovation alone is certifiably not an adequate

pointer of combination. Consequently, "instructor teachers need to put instructional

innovation training inside the setting of educators' work in the classroom" (Mayo,

Kajs and Tanguma, 2005, p.12). Wang, Ertmer and Newby (2004) finished up about

this theme as our future instructors accomplish high certainty levels for innovation

usage, important innovation utilize can come nearer to being the standard, as opposed

to the exemption, in our K-12 classrooms" (p. 242). Deaney, Ruthven and Hennessy

(2003) additionally thought to be three noteworthy focuses for utilizing ICT: the

requirement for more extensive abilities for viable utilization of apparatuses, the need

to center on the energy of innovation and the need to move well-known examples of

classroom connection by presenting innovation (p. 161).

15
2.7 BENEFITS OF INTEGRATING ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION

The adoption and integration of ICTs in education have a positive impact on

teaching, learning, and research. In addition, it increases flexibility; provide the rich

environment and motivation for teaching learning process which have a profound

impact on the process of learning by offering new possibilities for learners and

teachers. These possibilities can have an impact on student performance and

achievement. The various benefits of ICT in education to various stakeholders are

summarized as follows:

2.7.1 Benefits to Students

i. Increased access;

ii. Flexibility of content and delivery;

iii. Combination of work and education;

iv. Learner-centered approach;

v. Higher quality of education and new ways of interaction.

2.7.2 Benefits to Employers

vi. High quality, cost effective professional development in the workplace;

vii. Upgrading of employee skills, increased productivity;

viii. Development of a new learning culture;

ix. Sharing of costs and of training time with the employees;

x. Increased portability of training;

2.7.3 Benefits to Governments

xi. Increase the capacity and cost effectiveness of education and training systems;

xii. To reach target groups with limited access to conventional education and

training;

16
xiii. To support and enhance the quality and relevance of existing educational

structures;

xiv. To ensure the connection of educational institutions and curricula to the

emerging networks and information resources;

xv. To promote innovation and opportunities for lifelong learning.

2.8 USE OF ICT IN PAKISTANI CONTEXT

In developing countries like Pakistan, Information Technology (IT) is still in

its infancy. The government is making hectic efforts for the promotion and

development of IT culture in the country. For the same, government is allocating huge

amount of funds especially the establishment of Virtual University and IT centers in

all public and private sector universities connected with high speed internet are the

positive sign which, shows government interest to infuse IT into organizational

structures especially its use for e-Learning and e Teaching at Higher Education

Institutions of the country.

Similarly, Pakistan is going through good and bad experiences in adoption and

use of ICTs for educational purposes as there are several social, political, cultural,

human and technological constraints which are impeding the adoption of this

innovative technology in developing counties in general and in Pakistan in particular;

furthermore, teachers, learners and developers perceive it differently due to different

contextual backgrounds which play a significant role in success or otherwise failure of

ICTs use in e-Teaching and e-Learning. Two cities of the N-W.F.P province of

Pakistan, i.e. Peshawar and Dera Ismail Khan, were selected as a sample population

for data collection due to their unique characteristics. Peshawar is a highly dense,

economically, technologically, socially and culturally advanced with a large number

of public and private sector universities and degree awarding institutions besides a

17
high literacy rate. On the other hand, Dera Ismail Khan is the second oldest city with

the second largest public sector university and several private sector universities with

less population, lacking the basic technological infrastructure and facilities with

different economic, social and cultural background compared to Peshawar.

The awareness of primary school children’s is the linkage between ICT and

the way they learn within the situation of a school that has been particularly

successful in integrating ICT into the curriculum. Including teachers into the research

design has the advantage of aiding the recall of particular learning episodes which,

with children of this age, are a fertile ground for insights into the teaching and

learning dynamic

Despite huge efforts to position information and communication technology

(ICT) as a central tenet of university teaching and learning, the fact remains that many

university students and faculty make only limited formal academic use of computer

technology (Selwyn, 2006). Intersections picturing the new technique as partly

changing the situation for teaching, learning and collaboration between colleagues.

Changed roles because of ICT competence raise questions about the importance of

systematic ICT features within teacher education. Many of the newly qualified

teachers wish they had more knowledge about ICT and related techniques

(Andersson, 2006).

The relationship between changes in ICT investment and changes in

educational performance in Local Education Authorities (LEAs). In contrast with

most previous studies in the economic literature, discover the evidence for a positive

impact of ICT investment on educational performance in primary schools. This

provides an interesting parallel to the existing work that does not find beneficial

effects for pupils and to the related work on firms where there is evidence that ICT

18
investment enhances firm productivity (Machin, McNally, Silva., 2007). PowerPoint

and other visual technologies have become determined in schools. Adoption of these

technologies is supposed as a necessary - or, at the very least, an educationally

appropriate, even though systematic examination of their use is relatively recent

(Reedy, 2008). Teacher use of computer mediated communication (CMC) in future

will only be a success if the link between the possibilities of CMC and teacher

practice becomes clearer. Language teachers seem to start using CMC, even though

no evidence was found that these teachers have a more positive degree of

technological innovativeness. The Jordanian Ministry of Education has given priority

to the social and vocational rationales in launching the computer literacy and

awareness course. Throughout central and direct supervision on schools, the

Directorate is able to look after issues related to hardware and software, maintenance

and teacher training (Tawalbeh, 2001).

The issue is addressed through interpretive in a UK secondary school where

almost all staff is now using ICT to enhance and extend learning in their subject areas

(Tearle, 2003). Pupils’ engagements with ICTs to be often perfunctory and

unspectacular, especially within the school setting, where the influence of year group

and school attended are prominent. There was a strong sense of educational uses of

ICTs being constrained by the nature of the schools within which ‘educational’ use

was largely framed and often situated (Selwyn, Potter, Cranmer; 2008). Children

would now appear to have demands and expectations beyond the tokenistic ‘go on the

computer’ as an end in itself. Thus teachers should strive for constructing meaningful

and really useful opportunities for children to use computers and, therefore,

stimulating continued desire to use ICT in school (Selwyn, Bullon., 2000).

19
The combined impact of both teacher and school characteristics was explored

through a multilevel analysis. Besides the importance of school characteristics, the

results reveal differential effects of specific characteristics on specific types of

computer use. Variables at teacher and at school level are related to different types of

computer use (Tondeur, Valcke, Braak., 2008). In order to enable all pupils to realize

their potential, facilities and strategies have to be reviewed and developed to ensure

that their learning experience is appropriate. The generic capability of ICT can

enhance and enable the learning of pupils with special educational needs (SEN), but

do not purport to consider specifically the specialized technology required for certain

manifestations of special need. ICT certainly has much potential to enhance the

teaching of all four skills in language learning, and to make skills available to a wider

range of pupils (Meiring, Norman., 2005).

Multilevel evaluation of professional development was shown to be robust for

ICT teacher training, including a significant correlation between the views of experts

and those of teachers. A second paper delves deeper to describe and contrast the

highest and lowest-rated approaches to ICT teacher training (Davis, Preston, Sahin.,

2008). Development in the use of information and communications technology (ICT)

in education of children with a visual impairment. It is argued that information and

communications technology has a valuable role in providing opportunities for

children with a visual impairment to participate more fully in education (Douglas,

2001). The ICT coordinators were both knowledgeable and enthusiastic about ICT use

and this placed them in a good leadership position to guide and implement ICT use in

the school. A full-time ICT coordinator is essential if ICT is to be successfully

integrated into the school curriculum (Lai, Pratt., 2004).

20
In developing countries like Pakistan, Information Technology (IT) is still in

its infancy. The government is making hectic efforts for the promotion and

development of IT culture in the country. For the same, government is allocating huge

amount of funds especially the establishment of Virtual University and IT centers in

all public and private sector universities connected with high speed internet are the

positive sign which, shows government interest to infuse IT into organizational

structures especially its use for e-Learning and e-teaching at Higher Education

Institutions of the country.

2.9 ICT IN HIGHER EDUCATION CHALLENGES

The most common mistakes in introducing ICTs into teaching are

i. Installing learning technology without reviewing student needs and content

availability;

ii. Imposing technological systems from the top down without involving faculty

and students;

iii. Using inappropriate content from other regions of the world without

customizing it appropriately;

iv. Producing low quality content that has poor instructional design and is not

adapted to the technology in use.

v. Although ICT offers a whole lot of benefits there are some risks of using ICT

in education which have to be mitigated proper mechanisms. They are:

vi. It may create a digital divide within class as students who are more familiar

with ICT will reap more benefits and learn faster than those who are not as

technology savvy.

vii. It may shift the attention from the primary goal of the learning process to

developing ICT skills, which is the secondary goal.

21
viii. It can affect the bonding process between the teacher and the student as ICT

becomes a communication tool rather than face to face conversation and thus

the transactional distance is increased.

ix. Also since not all teachers are experts with ICT they may be lax in updating

the course content online which can slow down the learning among students.

x. The potential of plagiarism is high as student can copy information rather than

learning and developing their own skills.

xi. There is a need for training all stakeholders in ICT.

xii. The cost of hardware and software can be very high.

2.10 USES OF ICT

2.10.1 Radio and TV Broadcasting used in Education

Radio and television have been used widely as educational tools since the

1920s and the 1950s, respectively. There are three general approaches to the use of

radio and TV broadcasting in education

a) Direct class teaching, where broadcast programming substitutes for teachers

on a temporary Basis;

b) School broadcasting, where broadcast programming provides complementary

teaching and Learning resources not otherwise available.

c) General educational programming over community, national and international

stations which provide general and informal educational opportunities

2.10.2 Teleconferencing:

Teleconferencing refers to “interactive electronic communication among

people located at two or more different places.” There are four types of

teleconferencing based on the nature and extent of interactivity and the sophistication

of the technology

22
i. Audio conferencing;

ii. Audio-graphic conferencing,

iii. Videoconferencing;

iv. Web-based conferencing

Teleconferencing is used in both formal and non-formal learning contexts to

facilitate teacher-learner and learner-learner discussions, as well as to access experts

and other resource persons remotely. In open and distance learning, teleconferencing

is a useful tool for providing direct instruction and learner support, minimizing learner

isolation.

23
Chapter 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study was aimed to investigate use of ICT by the teachers and students

B.S level in University of Haripur. The nature of this study was descriptive as it tends

to find out about use of different forms of ICT by the teachers and students. The

questionnaire was used to collect data. This method is commonly used in educational

research with purpose to learn about general trends prevailing among different stake

holders of education.

3.1 POPULATION

All the students and teachers in University of Haripur at B.S level constituted

10 departments are the population of the study.

3.2 SAMPLE

The sample of the study contains 100 students i.e. randomly male and female.

3.3 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

Questionnaire was used as research instrument. It was developed by researcher

after reviewing the related literature. It comprised of twenty statements about two

different categories about students and teachers.

3.4 DATA COLLECTION

The researcher personally visited all the potential respondents, briefed them

about study and got the questionnaires filled by the students of University of Haripur.

3.5 DATA ANALYSIS

Data obtained through survey was then entered into the computer excel spread

sheet. SPSS was the software used for data analysis. The opinion of teachers about

two different categories was compared.

24
Chapter 4

DATA ANALYSIS

This study was aimed to investigate use of ICT by teachers and students at

University of Haripur. Data was collected from applied science and social science

departments from male and female students through a questionnaire which comprised

of twenty statements. The tool was constructed on 5 point rating scale this data was

analyzed using SPSS. The following table shows the results of this analysis

Table 1: My teachers create his /her own digital learning materials for students.
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square

N 3 12 15 17 10
Male 26.3
% 5.3% 21.1% 29.8% 17.5%
%
N 4 7 16 10 6
Female 37.2 2.393
% 9.3% 16.3% 23.3% 14.0%
%
0.664
N 7 19 31 27 16
Total 31.0
% 7.0% 19.0% 27.0% 16.0%
%
This table shows that according to 5.3% male and 9.3% female students their

teachers never create his /her own digital learning materials for students, 21.1% male

and 16.3% female students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3%male and 37.2%

female students that their teachers often, 29.8% male and 23.3% female students that

their teachers most of the time, 17.5% male and 14.0% female students that their

always create his /her own digital learning materials for students.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.664) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence.

25
26
Table 2: My teacher record instructions in cell phone in audio format during
presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 13 4 15 12 13
Male
% 22.8% 7.0% 26.3% 21.1% 22.8%
N 11 2 8 15 7
Female
% 25.6% 4.7% 18.6% 34.9% 16.3%
3.200 0.525
N 24 6 23 27 20
Total
% 24.0% 6.0% 23.0% 27.0% 20.0%
Table 2 shows that according to 22.8% male students and 25.8% female

students their teacher never record instructions in cell phone in audio format during

presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites ,

7.0%male and 4.7% female students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3% male and

18.6% female students that their teachers often, 21.1% male and 34.9%female

students that their teachers most of the time, 22.8% male and 16.3%female students

that their teachers always record instructions in cell phone in audio format during

presentation and upload these recordings to a class room blog or university websites

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.525) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence.

Table 3: My teachers use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using


multimedia
Most of Alway Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often P
the time s Square
N 9 4 12 18 14
Male
% 15.8% 7.0% 21.1% 31.6% 24.6%
N 7 9 6 15 6
Female
% 16.3% 20.9% 14.0% 34.9% 14.0%
5.799 0.1215
N 16 13 18 33 20
Total
% 16.0% 13.0% 18.0% 33.0% 20.0%

27
This table shows according to 15.8% male and 16.3% female students their

teachers never use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using multimedia ,

7.0%male and 20.9% female students that their teachers sometimes , 21.1% male and

14.0% female students that their teachers often , 31.6%male and 34.9%female

students that their teachers most of the time , 24.6%male and 14.0%female students

that their teachers always use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using

multimedia

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.1215) is

statistically not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 4: My teacher use internet every day to prepare his /her lesson.
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 6 8 5 20 18
Male
% 10.5% 14.0% 8.8% 35.1% 31.6%
N 1 5 14 13 10
Female
% 2.3% 11.6% 32.6% 30.2% 23.3%
10.544 0.032
N 7 13 19 33 28
Total
% 7.0% 13.0% 19.0% 33.0% 28.0%
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 2.3%female students their

teachers never use internet every day to prepare his /her lesson,14.0%male and

11.6%female students that their teachers sometimes ,8.8%male and 32.6% female

students that their teachers often ,35.1%male and 30.2% female students that their

teachers most of the time, 31.6 %male and 23.3% female students that their teachers

always use internet every day to prepare his /her lesson.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.032) is statistically

significant at 0.05 level of confidence

28
Table 5: My teacher post home work for students on the university website.
Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 6 15 12 13 11
Male
% 10.5% 26.3% 21.1% 22.8% 19.3%
N 7 6 7 18 5
Female 6.473
% 16.3% 14.0% 16.3% 41.9% 11.6%
0.166
N 13 21 19 31 16
Total
% 13.0% 21.0% 19.0% 31.0% 16.0%
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 16.3% female students their

teachers never post home work for students on the university website, 26.3% male

and 14.0% female students that their teachers sometimes, 21.1%male and 16.3%

female students that their teachers often, 22.8 % male and 41.9% female students that

their teachers most of the time, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their

teachers always post home work for students on the university website.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.166) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 6: My teacher looks for online professional development opportunities


Most of Chi
Gender Never Sometimes Often Always P
the time Square
N 1 12 17 14 13
Male
% 1.8% 21.1% 29.8% 24.6% 22.8%
N 5 3 10 16 9
Female
% 11.6% 7.0% 23.3% 37.2% 20.9%
8.958 0.062
N 6 15 27 30 22
Total
% 6.0% 15.0% 27.0% 30.0% 22.0%
This table shows according to 1.8% male and 11.6% female students their

teachers never look for online professional development opportunities, 21.1% male

and 7.0% female students that their teachers sometimes, 29.8%male and 23.3 %

female students that their teachers often, 24.6 % male and 37.2 % female students that

29
their teachers most of the time, 22.8% male and 20.9% female students that their

teachers always looks for online professional development opportunities

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.062) is statistically

significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 7: My teachers give me assignments which require the use of internet


Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 3 5 12 21 16
Male 21.1
% 5.3% 8.8% 36.8% 28.1%
%
N 1 2 7 14 19
Female 16.3
% 2.3% 4.7% 32.6% 44.2%
% 3.365 0.499
N 4 7 19 35 35
Total 19.0
% 4.0% 7.0% 35.0% 35.0%
%
This table shows according to 5.3 % male and 2.3% female students their

teachers never give me assignments which require the use of internet, 8.8% male and

4.7% female students that their teachers sometimes, 21.1 % male and 16.3% female

students that their teachers often, 36.8% male and 32.6 % female students that their

teachers most of the time, 28.1 % male and 44.2 % female students that their teachers

always give me assignments which require the use of internet

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.499) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

30
Table 8: Teachers make use of the interactive lessons and educational games.
Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
N 6 11 9 19 12
Male 10.5 15.8
% 19.3% 33.3% 21.1%
% %
N 5 3 10 15 10
Female 11.6 23.3
% 7.0% 34.9% 23.3% 0.48
% % 3.475
2
N 11 14 19 34 22
Total 11.0 19.0
% 14.0% 34.0% 22.0%
% %
This table shows according to 10.5%male and 11.6 % female students their

teachers never use of the interactive lessons and educational games., 19.3% male and

7.0 % female students that their teachers sometimes, 15.8% male and 23.3 % female

students that their teachers often, 33.3 %male and 34.9% female students that their

teachers most of the time,21.1% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers

always use of the interactive lessons and educational games.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.482) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 9: My teacher communicates online with parents


Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
N 20 8 7 13 9
Male 35.1 12.3
% 14.0% 22.8% 15.8%
% % 1.241 0.87
N 16 5 6 12 4 1
Female 37.2 14.0
% 11.6% 27.9% 9.3%
% %
Total N 36 13 13 25 13
% 36.0 13.0% 13.0 25.0% 13.0%

31
% %
This table shows according to 35.1%male and 37.2 % female students their

teachers never communicates online with parents, 14.0% male and 11.6% female

students that their teachers sometimes, 12.3% male and 14.0% female students that

their teachers often, 22.8% male and 27.9% female students that their teachers most of

the time, 15.8% male and 9.3% female students that their teachers always

communicates online with parents

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.871) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 10: My teacher use what’s app to provide feedback on assignments


Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
N 11 6 11 20 9
Male 19.3 19.3
% 10.5% 35.1% 15.8%
% %
N 11 8 5 11 8
Female 25.6 11.6
% 18.6% 25.6% 18.6% 0.50
% % 3.312
7
N 22 14 16 31 17
Total 22.0 16.0
% 14.0% 31.0% 17.0%
% %
This table shows according to 19.3% male and 25.6%female students their

teachers use what’s app to provide feedback on assignments, 10.5% male and 18.6

%female students that their teachers sometimes, 19.3% male and 11.6% female

students that their teachers often, 35.1 % male and 25.6% female students that their

teachers most of the time, 15.8% male and 18.6% female students that their teachers

use what’s app to provide feedback on assignments

32
The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.664) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 11 I record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation
and share with my classmates
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 2 9 18 20 8
Male 31.6
% 3.5% 15.8% 35.1% 14.0%
%
N 2 8 13 9 11
Female 30.2 3.622
% 4.7% 18.6% 20.9% 25.6%
% 0.460
N 4 17 31 29 19
Total 31.0
% 4.0% 17.0% 29.0% 19.0%
%
This table shows according to 3.5% male and 4.7% female students they never

record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and share with

my classmates,15.8% male and 18.6% female students that they sometimes , 31.6%

male and 30.2% female students that they often , 35.1% male and 20.9% female

students that they most of the time,14.0%male and 25.6 % female students that they

always record teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and

share with my classmates

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.460) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence.

Table 12 I use to share my presentation with my classmate using Social Media Sites
(what’s app, Facebook, email).
Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often P
r r s the time s Square
Male N 0 1 7 27 22 5.082
% .0% 1.8% 12.3 47.4% 38.6%

33
%
N 2 1 4 14 22
Female
% 4.7% 2.3% 9.3% 32.6% 51.2%
N 2 2 11 41 44 0.27
Total 11.0 9
% 2.0% 2.0% 41.0% 44.0%
%
This table shows according to 0.0%male and 4.7% female students they never

use to share my presentation with my classmate using social media sites, 1.8% male

and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3% female students

that they often, 47.4 % male and 32.6% female students that most of the time ,38.6%

male and 51.2% female students that they always use to share my presentation with

my classmate using social media sites

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.279) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 13: I use digital learning material provided by teacher.


Gende Neve Sometime Most of Alway Chi
Often p
r r s the time s Square
N 0 1 7 22 27
Male 12.3
% .0% 1.8% 38.6% 47.4%
%
N 1 1 4 20 17
Female 2.271
% 2.3% 2.3% 9.3% 46.5% 39.5%
0.68
N 1 2 11 42 44
6
Total 11.0
% 1.0% 2.0% 42.0% 44.0%
%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never

use digital learning material provided by teacher, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female

students that they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3 % female students that they often,

38,6% male and 46.5 % female students that they most of the time, 47.4 % male and

34
39.5 % female students that they always use digital learning material provided by

teacher

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.686) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 14 I use relevant video clips as a resource for learning.


Most of the Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always p
time Square
N 0 7 24 26
Male
% .0% 12.3% 42.1% 45.6%
N 3 3 18 19
Female 4.678
% 7.0% 7.0% 41.9% 44.2%
N 3 10 42 45 0.179
Total
% 3.0% 10.0% 42.0% 45.0%
This table shows according to 0.0 % male and 7.0% female students they

sometimes use relevant video clips as a resource for learning, 12.3% male and 7.0 %

female students that they often, 42.1% male and 41.9% female students that they most

of the time, 45.6% male and 44.2 % female students that always use relevant video

clips as a resource for learning.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.179) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 15 I use multimedia for giving presentations


Ofte
Gender Sometimes Most of the time Always Chi Square p
n
N 0 0 23 34
Male
% .0% .0% 40.4% 59.6%
N 2 2 23 16
Female 8.690
% 4.7% 4.7% 53.5% 37.2%
N 2 2 46 50 0.034
Total
% 2.0% 2.0% 46.0% 50.0%

35
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they

sometimes use multimedia for giving presentations, 0.0% male and 4.7% female

students that they often, 40.4% male and 53.5 % female students that they most of the

time , 59.6% male and 37.2% female students that they always use multimedia for

giving presentations

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.034) is statistically

significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 16 I use cell phone dictionary for searching relevant meanings during lessons
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always P
r the time Square
N 0 1 4 20 32
Male
% .0% 1.8% 7.0% 35.1% 56.1%
N 1 1 3 17 21
Female
% 2.3% 2.3% 7.0% 39.5% 48.8%
1.743 0.783
N 1 2 7 37 53
Total
% 1.0% 2.0% 7.0% 37.0% 53.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never

use cell phone dictionary for searching relevant meanings during lessons, 1.8% male

and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes, 7.0% male and 7.0 % female students

that they often, 35.1% male and 39.5 % female students that they most of the time,

56.1% male and 48.8% female students that they always use cell phone dictionary for

searching relevant meanings during lessons.

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.783) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 17 I use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes
Gender Often Most of the time Always Chi Square p
N 2 26 29 1.171
Male
% 3.5% 45.6% 50.9%
Female N 3 22 18

36
% 7.0% 51.2% 41.9%
N 5 48 47
Total
% 5.0% 48.0% 47.0% 0.557
This table shows according to 3.5% male and 7.0% female students they often

use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes, 45.6% male

and 51.2% female students that they most of the time , 50.9% male and 41.9% female

students that they always use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning

purposes

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.557) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

37
Table 18 I use laptop during lecture for the sake of enhancement of knowledge by
using different websites
Neve Most of Chi
Gender Sometimes Often Always p
r the time Square
N 0 1 1 22 33
Male
% .0% 1.8% 1.8% 38.6% 57.9%
N 1 0 2 22 18
Female 4.881
% 2.3% .0% 4.7% 51.2% 41.9%
N 1 1 3 44 51 0.300
Total
% 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 44.0% 51.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never

use laptop during lecture for the sake of enhancement of knowledge by using different

websites,1.8% male and 0.0% female that they sometimes, 1.8% male and 0.0%

female students that they often, 38.6% male and 51.2% female students that they most

of the time, 57.9% male and 41.9% female students that they always use laptop during

lecture for the sake of enhancement of knowledge by using different website

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.300) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 19 I use the internet only for the sake of learning purposes

Gender Never Often Most of the time Always Chi Square p


N 0 5 21 31
Male
% .0% 8.8% 36.8% 54.4%
N 2 3 20 18
Female
% 4.7% 7.0% 46.5% 41.9%
4.094 0.252
N 2 8 41 49
Total
% 2.0% 8.0% 41.0% 49.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 4.7% female students that they

never use the internet only for the sake of learning purposes,8.8% male and 7.0%

female students that they often, 36.8% male and 46.5% female students that they most

38
of the time, 54.4% male and 41.9% female students that they always use the internet

only for the sake of learning purposes

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.252) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence

Table 20 I use internet daily for completing my assignments


Chi Square
Gender Never Often Most of the time Always p

N 0 1 24 32
Male
% .0% 1.8% 42.1% 56.1%
N 1 1 20 21
Female 1.720
% 2.3% 2.3% 46.5% 48.8%
0.632
N 1 2 44 53
Total
% 1.0% 2.0% 44.0% 53.0%
This table shows according to 0.0% male and 2.3 % female students they

never use internet daily for completing my assignments, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female

students that they often , 42.1 % male and 46.5% female students that they most of the

time , 56.1% male and 48.8% female students that they always use internet daily for

completing my assignments

The difference between the opinion of male and female students (0.632) is statistically

not significant at 0.05 level of confidence.

39
Chapter 5

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND


RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 SUMMARY

The objective of the study was examine the difference between male and

female students of university of Haripur and their teachers in making use of ICT at

University of Haripur data collection tool was questionnaire comprised of twenty

statements first ten statements were about the use of ICT by the teachers of University

of Haripur whereas the second part of the questionnaire was about use of ICT by the

students of University of Haripur .Students of ten different departments were

randomly selected to take part in this data and data was collected by the researchers

personally visiting in the departments. The data was cross tabulated using SPSS THE

results then produced led to the following findings and conclusions.

5.2 FINDINGS:

It was found that:

1. 5.3% male and 9.3% female students their teachers never create his /her own

digital learning materials for students, 21.1% male and 16.3% female students that

their teachers sometimes, 26.3%male and 37.2% female students that their

teachers often, 29.8% male and 23.3% female students that their teachers most of

the time, 17.5% male and 14.0% female students that their always create his /her

own digital learning materials for students

2. 22.8% male students and 25.8% female students their teacher never record

instructions in cell phone in audio format during presentation and upload these

recordings to a class room blog or university websites, 7.0%male and 4.7% female

students that their teachers sometimes, 26.3% male and 18.6% female students

40
that their teachers often, 21.1% male and 34.9%female students that their teachers

most of the time, 22.8% male and 16.3%female students that their teachers always

record instructions in cell phone in audio format during presentation and upload

these recordings to a class room blog or university websites

3. 15.8% male and 16.3% female students their teachers never use topic relevant

movie as an instructional tools by using multimedia , 7.0%male and 20.9% female

students that their teachers sometimes , 21.1% male and 14.0% female students

that their teachers often , 31.6%male and 34.9%female students that their teachers

most of the time , 24.6%male and 14.0%female students that their teachers always

use topic relevant movie as an instructional tools by using multimedia

4. 10.5%male and 2.3%female students their teachers never use internet every day to

prepare his /her lesson,14.0%male and 11.6%female students that their teachers

sometimes ,8.8%male and 32.6% female students that their teachers

often ,35.1%male and 30.2% female students that their teachers most of the time,

31.6 %male and 23.3% female students that their teachers always use internet

every day to prepare his /her lesson.

5. 10.5%male and 16.3% female students their teachers never post home work for

students on the university website, 26.3% male and 14.0% female students that

their teachers sometimes, 21.1%male and 16.3% female students that their

teachers often, 22.8 % male and 41.9% female students that their teachers most of

the time, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers always post

home work for students on the university website

6. 1.8% male and 11.6% female students their teachers never look for online

professional development opportunities, 21.1% male and 7.0% female students

that their teachers sometimes, 29.8%male and 23.3 % female students that their

41
teachers often, 24.6 % male and 37.2 % female students that their teachers most of

the time, 22.8% male and 20.9% female students that their teachers always looks

for online professional development opportunities

7. 5.3 % male and 2.3% female students their teachers never give me assignments

which require the use of internet, 8.8% male and 4.7% female students that their

teachers sometimes, 21.1 % male and 16.3% female students that their teachers

often, 36.8% male and 32.6 % female students that their teachers most of the time,

28.1 % male and 44.2 % female students that their teachers always give me

assignments which require the use of internet

8. 10.5%male and 11.6 % female students their teachers never use of the interactive

lessons and educational games., 19.3% male and 7.0 % female students that their

teachers sometimes, 15.8% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers

often, 33.3 %male and 34.9% female students that their teachers most of the time,

21.1% male and 23.3 % female students that their teachers always use of the

interactive lessons and educational games.

9. 35.1%male and 37.2 % female students their teachers never communicates online

with parents, 14.0% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers

sometimes, 12.3% male and 14.0% female students that their teachers often,

22.8% male and 27.9% female students that their teachers most of the time, 15.8%

male and 9.3% female students that their teachers always communicates online

with parents.

10. 19.3% male and 25.6%female students their teachers use what’s app to provide

feedback on assignments, 10.5% male and 18.6 %female students that their

teachers sometimes, 19.3% male and 11.6% female students that their teachers

often, 35.1 % male and 25.6% female students that their teachers most of the

42
time , 15.8% male and 18.6% female students that their teachers use what’s app to

provide feedback on assignments

11. 3.5% male and 4.7% female students they never record teacher lecture in cell

phone in audio format during presentation and share with my classmates,15.8%

male and 18.6% female students that they sometimes , 31.6% male and 30.2%

female students that they often , 35.1% male and 20.9% female students that they

most of the time,14.0%male and 25.6 % female students that they always record

teacher lecture in cell phone in audio format during presentation and share with

my classmates

12. 0.0%male and 4.7% female students they never use to share my presentation with

my classmate using social media sites, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that

they sometimes, 12.3% male and 9.3% female students that they often, 47.4 %

male and 32.6% female students that most of the time ,38.6% male and 51.2%

female students that they always use to share my presentation with my classmate

using social media sites.

13. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use digital learning material

provided by teacher, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that they sometimes ,

12.3% male and 9.3 % female students that they often , 38,6% male and 46.5 %

female students that they most of the time , 47.4 % male and 39.5 % female

students that they always use digital learning material provided by teacher

14. % male and 7.0% female students they sometimes use relevant video clips as a

resource for learning, 12.3% male and 7.0 % female students that they often,

42.1% male and 41.9% female students that they most of the time, 45.6% male

and 44.2 % female students that always use relevant video clips as a resource for

learning.

43
15. 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they sometimes use multimedia for giving

presentations, 0.0% male and 4.7% female students that they often, 40.4% male

and 53.5 % female students that they most of the time , 59.6% male and 37.2%

female students that they always use multimedia for giving presentations

16. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use cell phone dictionary for

searching relevant meanings during lessons, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students

that they sometimes, 7.0% male and 7.0 % female students that they often, 35.1%

male and 39.5 % female students that they most of the time, 56.1% male and

48.8% female students that they always use cell phone dictionary for searching

relevant meanings during lessons

17. 3.5% male and 7.0% female students they often use cell phone for quick reference

in classroom for learning purposes, 45.6% male and 51.2% female students that

they most of the time , 50.9% male and 41.9% female students that they always

use cell phone for quick reference in classroom for learning purposes

18. 0.0% male and 2.3% female students they never use laptop during lecture for the

sake of enhancement of knowledge by using different websites,1.8% male and

0.0% female that they sometimes , 1.8% male and 0.0% female students that they

often , 38.6% male and 51.2% female students that they most of the time , 57.9%

male and 41.9% female students that they always use laptop during lecture for the

sake of enhancement of knowledge by using different website

19. 0.0% male and 4.7% female students they never use the internet only for the sake

of learning purposes,8.8% male and 7.0% female students that they often, 36.8%

male and 46.5% female students that they most of the time , 54.4% male and

41.9% female students that they always use the internet only for the sake of

learning purposes

44
20. 0.0% male and 2.3 % female students they never use internet daily for completing

my assignments, 1.8% male and 2.3 % female students that they often , 42.1 %

male and 46.5% female students that they most of the time , 56.1% male and

48.8% female students that they always use internet daily for completing my

assignments

5.3 CONCLUSION

i. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their teacher’s use of internet for teaching except for preparing everyday

lesson, in which more male students believe that their teachers use internet

every day for preparing lessons.

ii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their teacher’s use of multimedia for teaching

iii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their teacher’s use of cell phone for teaching

iv. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their teacher’s use of social media for teaching

v. There is significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their own use of multimedia for learning more male are they using

multimedia than female students

vi. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their own use of internet for learning

vii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their own use of social media for learning

viii. There is no significant difference in the opinion of male and female students

about their own use of cell phone for learning

45
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS

i. Female students of the University of Haripur may be provided with the

orientation of and encouragement for using ICT for better learning

ii. The administration of the University of Haripur may ensure equal excess of

male and female students to all ICT resources.

iii. Provision of ICT lab in every department may help and prove the use of ICT

by female students at the University of Haripur

46
REFERENCES
Al-Ansari, H. (2006). Internet use by the faculty members of Kuwait University. The
Electronic Library Vol.24, No. (6), Pp; 791-803.
Alexander, J.O. (1999). Collaborative design, constructivist learning, information
technology immersion, & electronic communities: a case study.
Interpersonal
Andersson Sven, B., 2006. Newly qualified teachers’ learning related to their use of
information and communication technology: a Swedish perspective;
British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5): 665-682.
B. Reedy, 2008. PowerPoint, interactive whiteboards, and the visual culture of
technology in schools; Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(2):
143-162
Bach, E.; Forés, A. (2007). E-mociones: Comunicar y educar a través de la red.
Barcelona: CEAC.
Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 3-18.
Barron, A. (1998). Designing Web-based training. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 29(4), 355-371
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it
isn't happening. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(4), 519.
Berge, Z. (1998). Guiding principles in Web-based instructional design. Education
Media International, 35(2), 7276
Bourne, J., Harris, D.A, & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online Engineering Education:
Learning Anywhere, Anytime; Journal of Engineering Education Vol.
94, No. 1; January 2005.
Cardean (2006). Carden University. http://www.cardean-mba-online.com/, Accessed
last on May 8, 2006.
Chapter 2
Collis, B. (2002). Information technologies for education and training. In
Adelsberger, H., Collis, B, & Pawlowski, J. (Eds.) Handbook on
Technologies for Information and Training. Berlin: Springer Verlag
Colorado (2006). Colorado Technical University Online.
http://www.ctudegreeonline.com, Accessed last on May 8, 2006.

47
Daniels, L. (1995). Audio vision: Audio-visual interaction in desktop multimedia. In
Beauchamp, D.G., Braden, R.A., and Griffin, R.E. (Eds.). Imagery and
visual literacy: Selected readings from the annual conference of the
international visual literacy association (26th, Tempe, Arizona, October
12-16, 1994). (ERIC Document No. ED380056, pp. 57-63).
Davis, N.E., & Tearle, P. (Eds.). (1999). A core curriculum for telematics in teacher
training.
Davis, Preston Christina and Sahin Ismail, 2008. ICT teacher training: Evidence for
multilevel evaluation from a national initiative; British Journal of
Educational Technology
Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Pupil perspectives on the
contribution of information and communication technology to teaching
and learning in the secondary school. Research papers in education,
18(2), 141-165.
Douglas Graeme, 2001. ICT, Education, and Visual impairment; British journal of
Educational Technology 32(3): 353-364.
Duffy, T. C., & Cunningham, D. (1996). D. (1996): Constructivism: Implications for
the design and delivery of instruction. Handbook of Research for
Educational Communications and Technology. MacMillan Library. New
York.
Duta, N. (2012). El papel de las TIC en la Educación Superior-un estudio empírico
sobre las necesidades formativas del profesorado universitario. Available
at http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/dret_tic2012/pdf/2.3.duta-nicoleta.pdf
Ellis, T. (2004). Animating to Build Higher Cognitive Understanding: A Model for
Studying Multimedia Effectiveness in Education, Journal of Engineering
Education, Vol. 93, No. 1, 2004, pp. 59–64.
Grose, T. K. (2003). Can Distance Education be Unlocked? Prism, Vol. 12, No. 8,
April 19–23, 2003. Available from
http://www.prismmagazine.org/april03/unlocked.cfm
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). ICT usage in higher education: A case study on preservice
teachers and instructors. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 7(1).

48
Jonassen, D. & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as
cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research
Educational on Educational Communications and Technology (pp 693-
719). New York: Macmillan
Jonassen, D. H. (1999).Computers as mind tools for schools: Engaging critical
thinking (second Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jubany, J. (2012). Connecta’t per aprendre. Aprenentatge social i personalitzat.
Barcelona: Rosa Sensat
Kennedy, D. & McNaught, C.(1997). Design elements for interactive multimedia.
Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 1-22.
Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. V., Krivosheina, I. V., & Tomei, C. (2005). New limits on
spin-dependent weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) nucleon
coupling. Physics Letters B, 609(3-4), 226-231.
Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in
secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator. British journal
of educational technology, 35(4), 461-475.
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five
principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology, Research and
Development, 41(3), 4-16.
Lemke, C., & Coughlin, E.C. (1998). Technology in American schools.
Littlejohn, A., Suckling, C., Campbell, L. & McNicol, D. (2002). The amazingly
patient tutor: students’ interactions with an online carbohydrate
chemistry course. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33
No.(3), Pp;313-321.
Machin Stephen, McNally Sandra and Olmo. Silva, 2007. NEW TECHNOLOGY IN
SCHOOLS: IS THERE A PAYOFF?; The Economic Journal, 117:
1145-1167.
McCarthy, B. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT’s learning styles. Educational
Leadership , 54 (6), 46-52.
McCausland, H.,Wache, D. & Berk, M. (1999). Computer literacy; its implications
and outcomes. A case study from the Flexible Learning Centre.
University of South Australia.

49
Meiring Lynne and Norman Nigel, 2005. How can ICT contribute to the learning of
foreign languages by pupils with SEN? ; Support for Learning, 20(3):
129-134
New Media Consortium (2007).”Horizon Report, retrieved July 1, 2007 from
www.nmc.org/pdf/2007_Horizon_Report.pdf.
Oliver, R. & Short, G. (1996). The Western Australian Telecentres Network: A
model for enhancing access to education and training in rural areas.
International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2(4), 311-328.
Oliver, R. & Towers, S. (2000). Benchmarking ICT literacy in tertiary learning
settings. In R. Sims, M. O’Reilly & S. Sawkins (Eds). Learning to
choose: Choosing to learn. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE
Conference (pp 381-390). Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University
Press
Oliver, R. (2000). Creating Meaningful Contexts for Learning in Web-based Settings.
Proceedings of Open Learning 2000. (Pp; 53-62).Brisbane: Learning
Network, Queensland.
Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—the hopes and the reality.
British journal of educational technology, 34(2), 151-167.
Riding, R., & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi‐
media materials in 11‐year‐old children. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 30(1), 43-56.
Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-
users of computers. Poetics, 34(4-5), 273-292.
Selwyn, Neil., Potter John and Sue. Cranmer, 2008. Primary pupils’ use of
information and communication technologies at school and home. ;
British Journal of Educational Technology.
Soloway, E. & Pryor, A. (1996). The next generation in human-computer interaction.
Communications of the ACM, 39(4), 16-18.
Starr, L. (2001). Same time this year. [on-line]. Available at http://www.education-
world.com/a_tech/tech075.shtml [Accessed July 2002].
Susman, E. B. (1998). “Co-operative learning: a review of factors that increase the
effectiveness of computer-based instruction”. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, Vol.18 No.(4), Pp;303–322.

50
Tawalbeh Mohammad, 2001. The policy and management of information technology
in Jordanian schools; British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2):
133-140.
Tearle Penni, 2003. ICT implementation: what makes the difference?; British Journal
of Educational Technology, 34(5): 567-583
Tondeur, J., M. Valcke and J. Van Braak, 2008. A multidimensional approach to
determinants of computer use in primary education: teacher and school
characteristics; Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the
development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-
efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of research on
technology in education, 36(3), 231-250.
Yusuf, M.O. (2005). Information and communication education: Analyzing the
Nigerian national policy for information technology. International
Education Journal Vol. 6 No. (3), Pp; 316-321

51
Annexure I

USE OF ICT BY TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN


UNIVERSITY OF HARIPUR AT B.S LEVEL

PERSONAL INFORMATION:
Gender: Male / female Department: -------------.

Semester: ----------------. GPA /CGPA: ---------------------.

INSTRUCTION: Dear student purpose of this research questionnaire is to


investigate use of Information and Communication Technology by the teachers and
students at University of Haripur. You are requested to choose the category you find
the most appropriate for your teachers and yourself in this regard.

Rate your teachers according to following scale:

0 (none of 1(1%--- 2(26%-- 3(51%-- 4(76%--


teachers) 25%) 50%)teachers 75%)teachers 100%)teachers
teachers
Rate yourself according to following scale:

0(never) 1(sometimes) 2(often) 3(most of the 4(always)


time)
Please put CHECKMARK in the box to indicate your responses.

76%
Non 51%
1%- 26%- -
S. e of -
STATEMENTS ABOUT 25% 50% 100
n the 75%
TEACHERS teac teach %
o teac teach
her er teach
her er
er
My teachers create his /her own digital
1
learning materials for students.
My teacher record instructions in cell
phone in audio format during
2 presentation and upload these
recordings to a class room blog or
university websites.
My teachers use topic relevant movie as
3 an instructional tools by using
multimedia.
4 My teacher use internet every day to

52
prepare his /her lesson.
My teacher Post home work for students
5
on the university website.
My teacher looks for online professional
6
development opportunities.
My teachers give me assignments which
7
require the use of internet.
Teachers make use of the interactive
8
lessons and educational games.
My teacher communicates online with
9
parents.
1 My teacher use what’s app to provide
0 feedback on assignments.
Som Most
S. Nev Ofte Alwa
etim of
N STATEMENTS ABOUT STUDENTS er n ys
es the
O
time
I record teacher lecture in cell phone in
1
audio format during presentation and
1
share with my classmates.
I use to share my presentation with my
1
classmate using Social Media Sites
2
(what’s app, Facebook, email).
1 I use digital learning material provided
3 by teacher.
1 I use relevant video clips as a resource
4 for learning.
1 I use multimedia for giving
5 presentations.
1 I use cell phone dictionary for searching
6 relevant meanings during lessons.
1 I use cell phone for quick reference in
7 classroom for learning purposes
I use laptop during lecture for the sake
1
of enhancement of knowledge by using
8
different websites
1 I use the internet only for the sake of
9 learning purposes.
2 I use internet daily for completing my
0 assignments.
Thanks for your co-operation

Research Scholar

Farwa Sajid., 8thsemester, Education

53

You might also like