Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhythm in West African Tone Languages A Study of Ibibio, Anyi and Ega
Rhythm in West African Tone Languages A Study of Ibibio, Anyi and Ega
Ega
French, Telugu and Yoruba, which is deviation of these intervals, and the
contradictory to expectations. standard deviation of the consonantal
Second, syllable length in stress-timed intervals. By comparing carefully selected
and syllable-timed languages does not read sentences by four speakers each of 7
differ significantly. Roach (1982) different languages along the axes of the
calculated the standard deviation of percentage of vowels and the standard
syllable durations in English, Russian, deviation of the consonantal intervals
Arabic and French, Telugu and Yoruba. Ramus et al. succeed in grouping some
No significant difference was found: languages similarly to the originally
English 86ms, Russian 77ms, Arabic suggested groups of stress-timing and
76ms; French 75.5ms, Telugu 66ms and syllable-timing. English, Polish and
Yoruba 81ms. Dutch, all presumed stress-timed
languages, group together with a relatively
Dauer (1983) suggested that low vocalic proportion (around 39%) and
“rhythmic differences […] between a relatively high standard deviation of
languages […] are more a result of consonantal intervals. French, Italian,
phonological, phonetic, lexical, and Spanish and Catalan group together at a
syntactic facts about that language than higher %V (about 44%) and lower delta C.
any attempt on the part of the speaker to Japanese, finally, differs from those two
equalize interstress or intersyllable groups by having an even higher vocalic
intervals” (p. 55). In Dauer’s view, speech proportion (53%) and even lower
rhythm reflects variety of syllable consonantal standard deviation.
structures, phonological vowel length
distinctions, absence/presence of vowel Grabe & Low (2001) measure the
reduction and lexical stress. Whereas difference in duration between successive
languages classified as stress-timed such vowel durations and between successive
as English show a variety of different consonantal intervals. Both approaches
syllable structures (CV (30% frequency), succeed in classifying languages that show
CVC (34%), VC (15%), V (8%), CVCC mixed phonological properties as
(6%)), languages classified as syllable- suggested by Dauer (1983), e.g. vowel
timed have a majority of CV syllables reduction but small variation in syllable
(58% for Spanish). Since syllables structure.
increase in length when segments are With the exception of Roach (1982),
added and closed syllables are longer than the speech rhythm of West African
open ones (Delattre 1966), speech rhythm languages has not been investigated yet. In
measured in syllable duration differences this paper, we selected three of these
reflects syllable structure distribution. languages, Anyi (Kwa), Ega (putative
Equally, differences in rhythm between Kwa) and Ibibio (Benue Congo: Lower
languages reflect whether a language has Cross). Our hypothesis is that they have a
vowel reduction or not; those classified as syllable-timed rather than stress-timed
stress-timed usually do. In addition, rhythm and that their phonological
syllable-timed languages either do not features such as absence/presence of
have lexical stress or accent is realized by phonemic vowel length, syllable structure,
variations in pitch contour. Conversely, and tone system correlate with their
stress-timed languages realize word level speech rhythm.
stress by a combination of length, pitch,
loudness and quality changes, which result
in clearly discernible beats. 3. Languages
This approach is partly reflected in 3.1 Anyi
recent measurements of the acoustic Anyi is spoken in the Eastern part of Ivory
correlates of speech rhythm. Ramus, Coast where according to an inventory by
Nespor & Mehler (1999) segment speech Burmeister (in prep.) 10 varieties exist. In
into vocalic and consonantal parts and Ghana, two additional varieties of Anyi
compute the proportion of the vocalic are spoken. According to the classification
intervals of a sentence, the standard by Stewart (1989), Anyi belongs to the
TAPS Proceedings Gut,Urua,Adouakou,Gibbon
syllable structures occur in Anyi: V, CV, is the syllabic prefix, which may be either
N, CVV, C1C2V where C2 is a semivowel, a vowel or a syllabic nasal consonant,
and CLV where L is a liquid. Anyi has usually homorganic to the following
four phonological tones: Two level tones, consonant. Consonant clusters are hardly
H and L, and two contour tones, rising LH attested and where they occur, are usually
and falling HL. The appearance of a mid restricted to only C or CG. The G is
tone is due to the effect of tone sandhi either a palatal or labial-velar glide (Cy or
rules. Cw) which arise from deletion or other
phonological processes in the language.
3.2 Ega The is an alveolar tap arising from two
/ (m − 1)
d
RR = 100∑k =1
m −1 i
4.2 Data dj
The Anyi speaker told a story of 1.42
minutes length. The Ega speaker spoke an
where di=dk and dj=dk+1 if di is smaller
address to the elders of his home village
than dj and dj=dk and di=dk+1 if di is not
lasting about 3 minutes. The Ibibio
smaller than dj. In other words, for each
speaker read a formal address to the elders
pair of adjacent syllables, the shorter is
of her village of about two minutes length.
divided by the longer. The average of all
For all three speakers 12 sentences were
these ratios is calculated and multiplied by
selected which had been spoken without
100. Thus, if the RR equals 100 we have
hesitation or repairs and restarts and which
perfect syllable-timing. The lower the
had a minimum length of 8 syllables.
degree of syllable-timing the lower the RR
value. Unlike the RI, the RR does not
calculate absolute differences in length
between adjacent units but computes their
ratio. Also unlike the RI, the RR
TAPS Proceedings Gut,Urua,Adouakou,Gibbon
Stress. In: L. Waugh & C. van Stewart, (1989). “Kwa”. In Benda, S., The
Schooneveld, The melody of language, Niger-Congo languages. A
Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. classification and description of
71-79. Africa’s largest language family.
Gibbon, D. & Gut, U. (2001). Measuring Ianhan: University Press of America.
speech rhythm. Proceedings of Uldall, E. (1971). Isochronous Stresses in
Eurospeech, Aalborg. R.P.. In: L. Hammerich, R. Jacobson &
Gibbon, D., E. E. Urua & U. Gut (2000). E. Zwirner, Form and substance,
How low is the floating Low tone in Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag,
Ibibio. Paper presented at the 30th pp.205-210.
Colloquium on African Languages and Urua, E. E. (2000). Ibibio phonetics and
Linguistics, Leiden, August 2000. phonology. Cape Town, South Africa:
Grabe, E. & Low, E.-L. (2001). Durational Centre for Advanced Studies of African
Variability in Speech and the Rhythm Society.
Class Hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Williamson, K. (1989). Benue-Congo
Phonology. overview. Niger-Congo languages.
Hérault, G. (1982). Atlas des langues kwa Bendor-Samuel, J. (ed.), Lanham:
de Côte d'Ivoire. Tome 1. Abidjan: University Press of America, 247-274.
Institut de Linguistique Appliquée &
Agence de Cooperation Culturelle et
Technique.
Hill, D., Jassem, W. & Witten, I. (1979).
A statistical approach to the problem of
isochrony in spoken British English. In:
pp. 285-294.
Hoequist, C. (1983). Durational Correlates
of Linguistic Rhythm Categories.
Phonetica 40, 19-31.
Hoequist, C. (1983). Syllable Duration in
Stress-, Syllable- and Mora-Timed
Languages. Phonetica 40, 203-237.
Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony reconsidered.
Journal of Phonetics 5, 253-263.
Low, E.-L. & Grabe, E. (1995). Prosodic
patterns in Singapore English.
Proceedings of the International
Congress of Phonetic Sciences,
Stockholm, 3, 636-639.
O’Connor, J. (1965). The Perception of
Time Intervals. Progress Report 2,
Phonetics Laboratory, UCL, 11-15.
Pike, K. (1945). The Intonation of
American English. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J.
(1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm
in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 3:
265-292.
Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction
between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-
timed’ languages. In: D. Crystal (ed.),
Linguistic controversies, Essays in
linguistic theory and practice, London:
Edward Arnold, pp. 73-79.