Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stoicism Hippo Hobbes Mill Kant Amartya Sen P 240204 150432
Stoicism Hippo Hobbes Mill Kant Amartya Sen P 240204 150432
STOICISM
STOIC PHILOSOPHERS:
1. SENECA:
He was a Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman and a tutor and advisor to Nero.
He was forced to take his own life for allegations in a conspiracy to assassinate
Nero, though he was likely to have been innocent.
His stoic and calm suicide has become the subject of numerous paintings.
As a tragedian, he is best known for his works Medea and Thyestes.
2. EPICTETUS:
He was born a slave in about AD 55 in the Roman Empire. With permission from
his owner, he studied stoic philosophy under master Gaius Musonius Rufus.
He founded a philosophical school teaching Stoicism in Greece. One of his
students Marcus Aurelius later became the emperor of Rome.
3. MARCUS AURELIUS:
STOIC ETHICS
The goal of Stoicism is freedom from “passion” through the pursuit of reason and
“apatheia” or apathy. However, the meaning of these words has changed a lot since
their original coinage.
It means both in the sense of the laws of the universe and of man’s own essential nature
i.e. reason. Since everything in universe operates according to natural laws and reason,
living according to nature also means living virtuously.
iv) Moral restraint and self- discipline are the means by which one becomes free from
suffering.
4. Importance of Wisdom:
It involves improving the individual’s ethical and moral well- being by having a will
which is in agreement with Nature. They believed that the chief virtue from which all
virtues arise is wisdom. All four cardinal values, i.e. courage, prudence, self- control and
justice originate from wisdom.
5. Egalitarian Society:
They believe that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and even encouraged the
acceptance of slaves as equals on the grounds that all are “Sons of God”. They also
denied the importance of external differences such as rank and wealth in social
relationships.
Stoicism holds that we are often driven by the necessity to follow the laws of the world.
However, we should not merely obey the law, but follow the law consciously and
deliberately by knowing its purpose and beneficiary effect on an individual and the
society. This is possible only when we think objectively, rationally and logically.
Seneca had said that anger is not just an irrational outburst over which we have no
control. He saw anger as a philosophical problem and therefore amenable to treatment
by philosophical argument. Anger arises from holding overly optimistic ideas about the
world which leads to unrealistic expectations. He therefore advocated a more pessimistic
attitude so that one is mentally prepared for the bad things that might happen, which
then prevent an angry outburst.
www.crackgradeb.com | info@crackgradeb.com | 9310558455
Crack Grade B 4
Stoic asserts that senses are constantly receiving sensations which pass from objects
through the senses to the mind, where they leave an impression. The mind is able to
approve or reject an impression and differentiate it and tell us if it was the true
representation of reality or not.
9. Concept of God:
Universe is a material but reasoning substance, which can be called God or Nature, may
be divided into two classes, the passive (matter) and the active (living, which acts on the
passive matter). The souls of people and animals emanate from this primordial fire
(God). The world was once fire and would become fire again.
10. Materialism:
All things are material, including words and God. Emotions, too, are material because
they have physical manifestations like smiling. The mind or soul is material because the
body produces thoughts or sense of impressions in the soul. For example, if we are
hungry, we have anger.
11. Monism:
They believed that all the world is one, issuing from one principle (Monism) and that a
divine reality pervades the whole universe. Thus, the universe is like a giant living body,
with its own leading part, but all these parts are interconnected so that what happens in
one part, affects all others as well.
MEDIEVAL PERIOD
NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI
Literary Contributions: Beyond The Prince, Machiavelli was a prolific writer who
produced plays, poems, historical works, and other political treatises. His writing is
known for its wit, clarity, and directness.
THOMAS HOBBES
Natural Law: Hobbes rejected the notion of God-given morality and instead
proposed a set of natural laws derived from human nature and self-
preservation. These laws, like seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, are not
inherently moral but guide individuals towards actions necessary for survival in a
pre-societal state.
State of Nature: In his famous state of nature concept, Hobbes describes life
without government as "nasty, brutish, and short." He depicts a world of constant
conflict and fear, where individuals compete for resources and security.
Social Contract: To escape the brutal state of nature, Hobbes argues that
individuals enter into a social contract, surrendering some of their natural
liberties to a strong central authority (the sovereign) in exchange for peace and
security. This sovereign has absolute power to enforce the laws and maintain
order.
Theseus, the mythical Greek hero, sails his trusty ship through countless adventures.
Over time, the ship's wooden parts wear out and need replacing. Each plank, sail, and
oar is eventually swapped for a new one, until no original piece remains. Is this still the
same ship of Theseus?
Hobbes takes the paradox a step further. He asks, what if the old planks are preserved
and used to build a second ship? Now we have two ships:
This paradox has puzzled philosophers for centuries, sparking debates about the
essence of things, the relationship between parts and wholes, and the very meaning of
identity. There's no easy answer, and different thinkers have proposed various solutions:
The Materialist View: This perspective argues that the ship's physical
matter determines its identity. So, Ship A, despite having all new parts, remains
the original because it possesses the same material makeup.
The Formist View: This view focuses on the ship's form or shape. Since both ships
retain the same design and function, both could be considered the Ship of
Theseus, depending on how you define "ship."
The Functionalist View: This perspective emphasizes the ship's purpose or role. If
both ships can still sail and fulfill the function of a ship, then either or even both
could be considered the true Ship of Theseus.
In this work because of the Political Turmoil in context of exclusion crisis in England,
where parliament attempted to exclude James II, a Catholic, from the throne. Locke
opposed this on constitutional grounds, arguing that Parliament couldn’t arbitrarily
remove a rightful king.
However, the "Treatise of Civil Government" (part of the Two Treatises) also served as a
response to the absolutist theories justifying divine right of kings, particularly Robert
Filmer's Patriarcha. Locke wanted to challenge the idea that monarchs had
absolute power inherited from God.
His most famous work, “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding” which he
had started while in France.
Locke challenged the notion of innate ideas, arguing that the mind at birth is a tabula
rasa (blank slate) upon which experience writes. All knowledge, he believed, originates
from our senses and interactions with the world.
Through sensation and reflection on our sensations, we form ideas and build our
understanding of the world.
Locke identified three main types of ideas: simple ideas (derived directly from the
senses), complex ideas (formed by combining simple ideas), and modes (ideas of
relationships between other ideas). This mean that the experiences creates simple
ideas (based on the senses, reflection, and sensation) and as these simple ideas
combine, they become more complex (through comparison, abstraction and
combination) and form knowledge. Ideas can also be divided into two categories:
1. Primary: Which cannot be separate from the matter and are present
regardless of whether a person sees them or not- for example size, shape,
and motion.
2. Secondary: Which are separate from the matter and are only perceived
when the matter is observed – for example taste and Odor.
He explored the limitations of human knowledge, arguing that some things are
beyond our comprehension, such as the nature of substance or God. This focus on
epistemology (the study of knowledge) remains relevant in philosophical
discussions today.
IMMANUEL KANT
Immanuel Kant
Immanuel Kant worked as a lecturer at the University of Konigsberg for 15 years until
finally in 1770 he became a professor in logic and metaphysics.
He was the starting point and inspiration for German idealism movement in the late
18th and early 19th centuries.
He accordingly believed that man has a self- legislating capacity. Kant’s main
arguments are:
In his book, Kant detailed how the human mind organizes experiences in two
ways: how the world appears and how one thinks about the world.
Epistemology in philosophy means the theory of knowledge, especially with
regard to its methods, validity and scope and the distinction between justified
belief and opinion.
Kant’s epistemology started with the traditional distinction between “truths of
reason” and “truths of fact”.
Truths of Reason: These are called “analytic propositions” by Kant, which are
true simply by virtue of their meaning or explain words e.g. “all bachelors are
unmarried”.
Truths of Facts: These are called “synthetic propositions”, which claims beyond
the meaning e.g. “all bachelors are happy”.
****FACT: In 1792, the king of Prussia barred Immanuel Kant from writing about and
teaching religious subjects which Kant obeyed until the King’s death 5 years later.
There were two opposing schools of thought in the time of Kant that opposed to each
other:
Kant argued that, while reason can be a helpful tool, it must be properly controlled so
that we do not accept things for which we have no evidence. He called the “critical
method” viz. a philosophical approach that allows people to discover which questions
can be answered by reasons and which cannot.
It is, however possible that the same experience is interpreted by two people differently.
Transcendental Idealism
Phenomena: are the realities or appearances that are interpreted from our minds.
Noumena: are the things that exist regardless of our mind’s interpretations.
Kant claims that we only have the ability to know the world that is presented to us from
our minds and that the external world can never truly be known. In other words, the
only knowledge that we know and will ever know is knowledge of Phenomena. This
means that knowledge of Noumena will always be unknown.
The word “Deontology” has Greek roots in the words Deon (duty) + logos (reasons). It
means that an action is moral if it can be considered a duty with the reason that is
universally acceptable.
Kant’s emphasis was on doing the right act irrespective of the consequence. He thus said
that consequences have nothing to do with moral duty. A moral action have nothing to
do with moral duty.
A moral action may lead to bad as well as good consequences. The result of action does
not determine the moral value of an action.
For example, demolition of an illegal property may be a moral action though it may have
negative consequences for the person who was living in such property.
The ethical theory of John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) is most extensively articulated in his
classical text “Utilitarianism”. Its goal is to justify the utilitarianism principal as the
foundation of morals.
The principle says “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote overall
human happiness”.
Therefore, the focus of the Mill was on consequences of actions and not on rights nor
ethical sentiments.
His first book was “The Birth of Tragedy”. The book was praised by Richard Wagner
(his idol, famous music composer), while met negative criticism particularly by Ulrich
von Wilamowitz- Molendroff, who would go on to become one of the leading German
philologists of the time.
His book “Human, All-Too-Human” marks the shift in his philosophical style (and
the end of his friendship with Wagner, whose anti- Semitism and German nationalism
disgusted Nietzsche).
1. Nihilism: Nietzsche said that science is nihilism, the abandonment of any and all
beliefs, that will come to replace the moral code set forth by Christianity.
Nietzsche is most famous for his quote, “God is dead”. During 19th century, with
the rise of the German state and advancements in science, many German
philosophers viewed their present- day life with great optimism. Nietzsche on the
other hand viewed these as troubling times marked by a fundamental crisis in
values.
Also, he was a critic of Christianity and even larger critic of Atheism.
stronger than the will to survive and it can appear in different ways. For him soul
or ego is basically a grammatical fiction.
3. Role of Man: There are animals, humans, and then the overman. When humans
learned to control their intinctions and natural impulses in order to attain greater
gains, they stopped being animals. Our will to power shifted from outward
(controlling others) to Inward (controlling self).
4. Truth: He believed that “truth” the idea that there can only be one correct way to
consider something, is proof that our thought process has become inflexible.
According to Nietzsche, being flexible and recognizing that there can be more than
one way to consider a matter is a sign of a healthy mind, and to have an inflexible
mind is to say “no” to life.
6. Eternal Recurrence: His most intricate theory was his metaphysical theory of
eternal recurrence. While complex, the core of his theory, like the rest of his work,
revolves around an affirmation of life.
The idea of eternal recurrence has been around for centuries. A classic depiction
of eternal recurrence from the Renaissance Era is the “Ouroboros”, a dragon or
snake eating its own tail.
The one part of this theory states that time is cyclical, meaning people will live each
moment of their life over and over an endless amount of times, and each time will be the
same.
The second part of theory says that “being” does not exist because everything is
changing- therefore, everything is constantly “Becoming”. He asserts that reality is
intertwined and that we cannot distinguish “things” from other “things” due to the fact
that everything is constantly changing.
AMARTYA SEN
Amartya Sen, the renowned Indian economist and philosopher has made significant
contributions to the field of ethics, particularly in areas of Social justice, Human Rights
and Development.
1. The Capability Approach: Sen is best known for his development of the capability
approach, a framework for assessing human well-being and development.
It moves beyond simply focusing on income or resources (like utilitarianism or
resourcism) and instead emphasizes people's freedom to choose and achieve the
kind of lives they have reason to value.
This includes things like being in good health, having access to education and
employment, participating in social and political life, and maintaining meaningful
relationships
2. Rethinking Poverty and Hunger: Sen has been a vocal advocate for human
rights and social justice. He argued that justice requires not just the fair
distribution of resources but also the expansion of individual freedoms and
capabilities. This includes ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to
participate in society and achieve their full potential.
5. Justice and Human Rights: Sen has been a vocal advocate for human rights and
social justice. He argued that justice requires not just the fair distribution of
resources but also the expansion of individual freedoms and capabilities. This
includes ensuring that everyone has equal opportunities to participate in society
and achieve their full potential.
So basically, the contribution of Amartya Sen to ethics have had profound impact on
development policy, human rights advocacy and philosophical debated about justice and
well- being.