Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abnormalities and Failures of Rolling Mill Rolls - SRSC
Abnormalities and Failures of Rolling Mill Rolls - SRSC
Rolls are changing parts of a rolling mill which are used to reduce the cross section
and shape of the material being rolled. They are highly stressed parts of a rolling mill and
are subject to wear. They are used both in the flat product mills as well as in the long
product mills. The rolls are the most critical part of the rolling mills and the performance of
the rolling mill depends very much on the quality and the performance of the rolls.
The rolls operate in severe conditions and their application demand an optimum
combination of several properties such as wear resistance, and toughness etc. During
rolling, rolls are under high load and the contact area between the roll and material being
rolled suffers wear. Also rolls are to be capable to withstand both mechanical and thermal
fluctuations to which they are generally exposed during rolling.
Hence, rolls have a limited campaign life. After the campaign life is over, rolls are
required to be changed for continuation of rolling. The state of the surface is one of the
criteria determining the roll change.
Rolls which are removed from rolling mill are dressed in roll turning/roll grinding shop
and are made ready for another rolling campaign in the mill. Rolls are discarded when
their diameter reaches minimum discard diameter.
Rolling mills are increasingly demanding rolls which are capable to maintain the
shape and profile much longer with the aim to extend the length of the rolling campaigns.
Normally, life of rolls of any rolling mill is limited by planned roll discard.
However, despite careful attention given by the roll supplier and also given during
the operation of the rolling mill, abnormalities and roll failures do take place in service.
A roll failure is a big catastrophe in rolling mill which not only leads to partial or total loss
of the rolls, also necessitates removal of resulting cobble in the mill, causes mill stoppage
and damage to rolling mill equipment. All these affect the mill performance adversely.
Hence, roll failures are to be avoided.
There can be several reasons for the roll abnormalities and failures. Some of the
reasons are attributable to the roll manufacturer while some other reasons are attributable
to the rolling mills. Roll failures can also take place due to the reasons attributable to both
the roll manufacturers and the rolling mills.
Reasons attributable to the rolls manufacturer are the internal defects of rolls which
include non-uniform hardness, excessive residual stress, unreasonable micro-structure,
low material strength, structure transformation to form internal stress, or loose shrinkage
to decrease effective loading area etc. Reasons for roll failure can also include improper
cooling system which causes thermal stress in the roll leading to barrel breakage.
Rolling abnormalities can also cause roll breakage. Other reasons for roll failures
include unreasonable design of rolls and the roll grooves, excessive single pass
deformation, deep fire cracks, fatigue and spalling etc.
Some of the important reasons for roll abnormalities and failures are described below.
1 / 11
Roll defects and abnormalities
Pinholes and porosities are the defects which can appear on the surface, or can be
subsurface. Holes can be circular or irregular in outline, with or without a shiny interior.
They are randomly dispersed on the roll barrel of chill cast rolls.
A shiny interior is more often seen in subsurface defects and indicates trapped gas
with no exposure to air to allow oxidation to take place. The gas can come from the mould
coating or even from fire-cracks in the chill mould. Alternative causes of similar defects,
normally known as porosity, are a lack of inter-dendritic feeding during solidification or
possibly gas development coming from the melt.
In some cases for static cast iron rolls the holes are ‘filled in’ with residual liquid and
are seen as hard spots with a circular outline. This feature causes surface quality
problems but rarely, if ever, leads to catastrophic failure. These defects are considered as
a roll fault.
Non-metallic inclusions are a roll abnormality. Non-metallic inclusion can be of
different size and appearance. Different sources are possible for non-metallic inclusions
such as slag or flux entrapment or foreign particles coming from the mould or casting
equipment. This is a roll abnormality and affects surface quality but does not normally
lead to massive roll failures.
Hard and soft spots on the rolls are surface and/or subsurface defects. These defects
appear as circular or semicircular, white or grey spots within the shell material and are
either harder or softer than the surrounding base metal. They normally do not appear as a
localized single defect but generally affect a large part of the roll body. This occurrence is
limited to spun cast rolls for which different explanations can be given.
Hard spots show a concentration of segregated iron carbides where as soft spots
show carbide depleted or graphite enriched areas. One cause is probably the segregation
effect caused by a gas bubble, which is pushed by centripetal force, through the shell
metal just before final solidification. The gas originates from sudden decomposition of the
water of crystallization contained in the binder of the coating material.
Other reasons can be linked to excessive vibration of the mould during spin casting
which influences segregation during solidification at the solid/liquid interface. This is a roll
abnormality which can result in surface marking of the material being rolled but not severe
failures in service.
Residual stresses
Rolls normally have residual stresses. These residual stresses are two dimensional
at the surface and three dimensional in the volume. At the surface the radial stress is zero
and the longitudinal stress (axial) is also zero at the barrel edge. At the main part of the
barrel, axial and circumferential (tangential) are equal in sign and size.
At the centre line, close to the axial area of the roll, tangential and radial stresses are
equal in size and sign. Here the relation of longitudinal to tangential/radial stress is given
by the relation of roll diameter to length. Which stress exceeds the material strength of the
roll, causes a spontaneous breakage of the roll. The fracture can be perpendicular to the
axial direction in case the longitudinal stress is too high first, or the fracture can occur in
axial direction if the tangential/radial stress is too high first.
Residual stress has a high impact on the strength of the rolls. Compression strength
increases the fatigue strength, reduce crack propagation, and reduce shear stress at the
roll barrel surface and work hardening. Tensile residual stress may cause roll breakage.
Compression and tensile residual stresses in a roll compensate each other over the cross
section of the roll. The right level of residual stresses is required to be controlled in rolls.
3 / 11
The temperature difference can be induced by a high heating rate of the roll surface
arising from poor roll cooling or even a break-down of roll cooling or a high throughput at
the beginning of the rolling campaign.
This temperature difference between the outer zone and the inner part of the roll
initiates thermal stresses which are superimposed on the existing residual stresses in the
roll. As an example, a difference in temperature of 70 deg C between the outer surface
and the axis of the roll causes additional thermal stresses in the longitudinal direction of
around 1,100 kg/sq cm during the critical phase after start-up of the rolling campaign.
Once the total longitudinal tensile stresses in the core exceed the ultimate strength of
the core material, a sudden thermal breakage is induced. This can be either a mill fault or
a roll fault.
In fact, there are three factors which are important for thermal breakage. These are
(i) thermal gradient, (ii) strength and integrity of material of the core, and (iii) residual
stresses. Actually, lower is the strength of core material of the roll; higher is the risk of
thermal breakage.
Residual stress has a high impact on the thermal breakage. Residual stresses are
always compression stress outside and tensile stress in the inner part of the roll. These
stresses are reduced in all the areas where grooves are machined into the roll but remain
high in the areas between the grooves. When these rolls are heated up during the rolling
process thermal stress is added to residual stress and when the total tensile stress (at a
maximum between the grooves) reaches the strength limits of the material, thermal
breakage takes place between the grooves.
5 / 11
Sometimes due to the abnormalities in the rolling mill, a large torque moment is build
up by the driving motors. The large moment build up takes place since the motors are
always strong and powerful part of the mill. Due to the build-up of the huge torque
moment, the Roll neck failure takes place since roll neck is usually the weakest part of the
whole system. When roll neck breaks, it shows a typical structure of a fast, brittle burst
with the fractured area normally inclined at 45 degree to the axial direction. However,
fatigue-torsional failures of roll necks are rare during normal rolling.
The journal of the roll can suffer a cross sectional failure. It generally starts at the
bottom of the radius adjacent to the barrel. The fracture face follows the radius and then
continues into the side of the barrel, and shears away a portion of the barrel end face.
Under shock load conditions the peak load can exceed the ultimate bending strength
of the core material and fracture occurs, usually at the most highly stressed cross
sectional area. In the case where a roll has been miss-handled by being dropped or by
incorrect use of the porter bar during roll changes, roll necks can either crack or more
often fail by fracture.
The fact that a piece of the barrel is attached to the journal indicates a misuse failure.
This is a mill fault.
The failure of the journal can take place due to the bending fracture. Fracture lines
start from the outside and spread over the whole cross section, particularly starting in the
fillet area and very often after fatigue crack propagation. This failure arises from high
bending loads which exceed either the ultimate bending strength or fatigue strength of the
journal. It is generally limited to 2-Hi work rolls of any grade in hot rolling mill stands.
This kind of breakage can be caused by:
High rolling loads combined with a weak roll design
Rolling abnormalities with extreme bending forces
Inadequate roll quality as far as journal strength is concerned,
A notch effect as a consequence of too small a fillet radius, circumferential
grooves, and fatigue cracks induced by corrosion etc. This is either a mill or roll
fault.
In case of journal failure from drive end torque, the fracture face is inclined to the roll
axis and can show a complete shear fracture, which quite often forms a cone shaped
break. This type of fracture occurs at the drive end initiating from the weakest section,
which is often the split ring recess, propagating to the centre of the neck, or from the root
of the spade end radius.
This happens when the torque on the drive end has exceeded the torsional strength
of the journal material. The strength of the journal is also get affected by the notch effect
of sharp radii, i.e. in the split ring recess, or any other stress raisers such as radial bore-
holes. The load can be normal for the design and operation of the mill, in which case the
roll material requires upgrading or the load can be in excess of standard mill operation,
which in turn is higher than the torsional resistance of the roll material.
Overloads can be experienced through a variety of conditions such as: (i) a mill stall
due to a sticker, (ii) rolling abnormalities such as welding of material being rolled, wrong
pre-set of the roll gap etc., and (iii) incorrect drive shaft fitting, either by the rolling mill, or
by incorrect machining of the drive end. This is generally a mill fault.
The failure of journal can also be due to the worn and seized bearings. Score marks
or deep scratches can occur on the journal in the area of the bearing, either along the
6 / 11
axis or in the circumferential direction. There can also be indentations and inclusions of
fragments of mill scale or other extraneous materials.
Other damage can include oxidation and erosion of the ground surface underneath
the bearing. Rotational marks and fire-cracks can be evident in the bearing area and in
extreme cases thermal breakage of the neck can result.
Cracks can also propagate from the oil injection holes. Inadequate, damaged or
even missing seals allow intrusion of water, scale and other foreign particles into the gap
between the inner bearing race and the journal. The deep scratches along the axis are
caused by debris between the bearing and the journal digging into the surface when the
bearing is removed for roll grinding.
Grease viscosity which is too low and wrong clearance between bearing and journal
together with foreign particles can cause surface damage and wear when the inner
bearing ring moves around the roll journal due to micro slippage. This can even induce
cold welding and cohesion between the journal and the bearing plus blockage of
lubrication holes. The result can include high frictional loads, fire-cracks from the heat
produced and a seized bearing.
Excess wear on the journal, lack of lubrication, elliptical machining or incorrect fitting
of the neck ring or any other lack of sealing can allow the mill cooling water to penetrate
under the bearing and cause corrosion. This is a mill fault.
Fire cracks
Fire cracks are thermo-shock cracks which form under a very sharp cooling rate on
the roll surface. When the heated roll surface with a thermal gradient perpendicular to the
roll surface during the revolution of the roll is quenched by the cooling water, surface
tensile stress is build up. When the tensile stress reaches the tensile strength of the roll
material, then cracks (fire cracks) are initiated. These cracks are only formed under
tensile stress.
A fire crack pattern on the surface of rolls used for hot rolling with water cooling of
rolls is quite normal. It helps in improving the roll bite. However, fire cracks can develop
into deeper crack to cause roll failure due to spalling. The fire crack pattern is dependent
on the strength of the roll material. Higher is the strength of the roll material, the wider is
the fire crack network and deeper are the fire cracks.
The worst type of fire cracks take place when the mill stops with the hot material
between the rolls and water cooling remains on. The effect is more severe in the roughing
group of stands. In a sudden mill stoppage with big cobble, it is necessary to stop the roll
cooling immediately and allow the roll to cool in a normal way without quenching to avoid
deep fire cracks. Also, in a sudden mill stoppage with big cobble, it is advisable to inspect
the roll surface for deep cracks before restarting the mill.
There are usually three types of fire cracks:
band fire-cracks,
ladder fire-cracks,
localized fire-cracks.
Band fire-cracks correspond to the width of the material being rolled and to the
contact arc between work roll and the material being rolled. The appearance of these
cracks is the usual mosaic type, but it is of larger mesh size than a conventional fire-
crazing pattern. In the case of a mill stop, the material being rolled can remain in contact
with the work rolls for a considerable time.
7 / 11
The temperature of the roll surface increases rapidly in the contact area and heat
penetrates deeper into the roll body. The thermal stresses induced exceed the hot yield
strength of the roll material. When the material being rolled is removed and the rolls lifted,
the roll surface cools down and due to the contraction of this localized area, the surface
starts cracking. The severity of the cracks is dependent upon the contact time and the
rate of cooling. This is a mill fault.
Ladder fire-cracks (Fig 1) are within a circumferential band on the barrel of the roll.
These are longitudinal oriented cracks which propagate in radial planes. This type of fire-
cracks can be initiated due to a lack of cooling, for example by blocked cooling nozzles.
Due to pronounced heat penetration into the roll body, these fire-cracks are much deeper
than usual fire-crazing. This is a mill fault.
In case of localized fire-cracks the barrel shows local areas of fire-cracks, sometimes
together with indentations or even local spalling. These cracks occur when the
combination of mechanical and thermal stresses within these local areas pass over the
yield strength of the barrel material and are exaggerated during subsequent cooling.
Mill abnormalities such as a bruise through impact, welding of material being rolled,
crimping (pinching) of edge or tail end of material being rolled are possible reasons for
this kind of damage. The combination of fire-cracks and pressure cracks makes this
damage very dangerous as it may induce ribbon fatigue (Fig 1) or even immediate
spalling. This is a mill fault.
Roll fatigue
Rolls are also damaged because of fatigue. The damage due to fatigue can start at
the surface or the sub-surface. The problem of fatigue in the rolls can arise due to high
loads in the mills. Typical example of the fatigue failures are the barrel of the section mill
rolls (Fig 2). Corrosion fatigue can also be a problem.
With corrosion fatigue, there is no safe operation at all, and there is no fatigue limit.
Corrosion fatigue can be reduced by reducing the nominal stresses by optimizing the roll
design and high residual compression stresses.
8 / 11
One another point connected with the corrosion fatigue is that there is no safe
operation at all and there is no fatigue limit. Corrosion fatigue breakage is because of
alternating stress and time.
Sometimes, after a cooling problem in the mill, roll shows some circumferential fire-
cracks, which with some depth really reduce the cross-section of the roll, and due to high
load the roll can break under the condition of low cycle fatigue.
Fig 2 – Fatigue type roll failure and saddle shaped spall in rolls
Spalling
Spalling can be another reason for roll failure. There are two different kind of spalls in
the rolls. One starts at an initial surface crack while the other kind starts at the sub-
surface. Surface cracks are normally caused by local overload, and all types of rolling
abnormalities including abnormal rolling conditions. When the plastic deformation on the
roll surface is greater than the material of the roll allows then a crack starts.
Spalls which are fatal roll damages always tend to happen with relatively low number
of revolutions. This means crack initiation, crack propagation, and final spall failure can
develop in one single rolling campaign.
There are five types of spalls:
Saddle spalls
Pressure cracks and ribbon fatigue spalls
Shell/core interface-bond related spalls
Spalls due to insufficient shell depth
Barrel edge spalls
9 / 11
Saddle shaped fatigue spalls (Fig 2) originate in the core material below the
shell/core interface and break out to the barrel surface. Variable intensity of fatigue lines
can be seen in the deep areas of the spall indicating the propagation direction from the
core to the barrel surface. These spalls occur in work rolls with flake graphite iron core
and are predominantly located in the centre of the barrel. Spalling is caused by high cyclic
loads due to large reductions when rolling thin gauge and hard materials.
These loads induce high alternating stresses on the core material, beyond the
fatigue limit, and many micro cracks begin to form causing a progressive weakening of
the core material. In the next stage these micro cracks join together and propagate to and
through the shell to the barrel surface giving rise to the large and typical saddle spall.
High residual tensile stresses which are thermally induced in the core during manufacture
favour this type of roll damage.
In case of pressure cracks and ribbon fatigue spalls (Fig 1), initially, one or more
pressure cracks is formed in an area of local overload, at or near to the barrel surface.
Such a crack is usually oriented parallel to the roll axis but propagates in a non-radial
direction. In the next stage, a fatigue, cat’s tongue like fracture band propagates
progressively in a circumferential direction running more or less parallel to the barrel
surface. The direction of propagation is opposite to the direction of roll rotation.
Propagation develops within the working surface of the roll, gradually increasing in depth
and width followed by a large surface spall of the overlying barrel surface. High local
loads at leading edges, cobbles or doubling of the end of the material being rolled,
exceed the shear strength of the shell material and initiate the crack. Subsequent rolling
fatigues the material and the crack propagates until a massive spontaneous spall occurs.
In case of shell/core interface-bond related spalls, usually ocured at double poured
rolls, a large area of shell material separates from the core following the weakly bonded
interface until an area of full metallurgical bond is reached. At this point the fracture
propagates rapidly towards the barrel surface resulting in a large spall.
During the casting of a roll, the aim is to achieve the full metallurgical bond between
the shell and the core metal. Disbonding of the shell from the core during operation is
favoured by any reason which reduces the strength of the bond such a:
(i) residuals of oxide layer between shell and core,
(ii) presence of flux or slag at the interface,
(iii) excess of carbides, micro-porosities, graphite flakes or non-metallic inclusions
such as sulphides etc.
Other reasons for separation of the shell and core can be the excessive local
overload during mill abnormalities initiating a local disbonding which continues to grow by
fatigue crack propagation following the shell/core interface until a critical size is attained.
This leads to a spontaneous secondary big spalling. This kind of damage can happen
even if there is no metallurgical defect in the bonding zone.
Excessive radial tensile stresses in the bonding zone due to abnormal heating
conditions (failure of the roll cooling system, sticker etc.) can also be a reason for
separation of the shell and core. This is normally a roll fault if bonding defects are
present.
Spalls due to insufficient shell depth takes place when the interface between the
shell metal and the core is completely welded but the depth of shell is insufficient to reach
scrap diameter. The core material which contains more graphite and lesser alloy is much
softer than the shell material and shows as grey in colour.
10 / 11
As the interface follows the solidification front of the shell metal, the areas of soft
core metal showing at the barrel surface, are patchy and not continuous. The depth of
shell depends upon a number of factors which controls the centrifugal casting process
such as metal weight, casting temperatures, and time base etc. It is when one of these
critical parameters has not been met then insufficient shell depth is obtained. This is a roll
fault.
Surface and/or subsurface cracks and associated spalls form on the work roll barrel
in case of flat mills around 100 mm to 300 mm from the end of the barrel in a
circumferential direction. These cracks are extended towards the freeboard of the barrel
surface. In extreme cases, these cracks can enter into the neck radius.
This cracked edge either can stick to the roll body or break out as a large spall.
Excessive pressure on the end of the work roll barrel, reinforced by positive work roll
bending, lack of barrel end relief of the back up roll, poor shape of the strip, thick edges
(dog bone shape) or wrong set-up process induces a local overload which exceeds the
shear strength of the work roll material.
Excessive wear profiles due to long campaigns can cause localized overloads at the
barrel ends which favour the initial crack. Continued rolling propagates the crack, exiting
at the freeboard and failure then occurs. This is a mill fault.
11 / 11