Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C H Cooley
C H Cooley
Aspects of self
Development of Self
Charles Horton Cooley (1922a) the American sociologist is best known for his
concept of the “looking glass self”.
The looking-glass self, first coined by Charles Cooley, 1902, in his work,
Human nature and the Order, describes how one’s self or social identity is
dependent on one’s appearance to others.
According to him, children develop a concept of their selves with the help
of others around them. She/he forms an idea about oneself based on the
opinions of others about her/him. The kind of social self that develops out
of an imagination of how one appears to the other person and the kind of
feeling about one’s self can be referred to as “looking glass self” or
“reflected self”.
The question often asked is whether the individual is free or a mere piece
of society. For Cooley, heis free, but it is an organic freedom, which
he works out in cooperation with others, not a freedom to do things
independently of society. It is teamwork. He has the freedom to function in
his own way, like the quarter back, but, in one way or another, he has to
play the game as life brings him into it.
Symbolic interaction
According to Cooley (1902), the human mind is social and mental. This
means that the mental processes occurring in the human mind are the
direct result of social interaction.
The comparison with a looking glass hardly suggests the second element,
the imagined judgement, which is quite essential.
The thing that moves to pride or shame is not the mere mechanical
reflection of ourselves, but an imputed sentiment, the imagined effect of
this reflection upon another’s mind.
As a result, in our imagination we form an opinion about ourselves through
the other person’s perceptions and may get positively or negatively affected
by it.
For example, a child who is in the mood to create some mischief might
want to lie to her/his parents. However, before creating the mischief the
child might reflect over and think that if his lie is caught that will have a
bad impression on her/his parents about her/him.
MIND
The first component in Mead's trilogy is termed mind Mead's conception of
mind is a "social phenomenon arising and developing within the social
process, within the empirical matrix of social interactions.
The mind emerges through such exchanges; thus, its nature is that of an
internal process of communication grounded in the utilization of
significant symbols.
Therefore, the mind is processually formed through self-conversation and
interactions with others Shared symbols, dominate the process Our most
vital and distinctive symbolic communication is language.
In Mead's words, "out of language emerges the field of mind. For Mead and
later symbolic interactionists language is the distinguishing criterion for
being human.
Mead believed that if one's actions evoke the same response in others, then
the meaning of symbols is no longer private but a behavioral reality that
can be studied.
SELF
The second component in Mead's trilogy is termed self. The self also "arises
in social experience" and can be thought of as an object to itself," possessing
a "social structure".
Individuals can conceive of their own being and convert that identity into a
form of consciousness. So conceived, the self can be the recipient of both
definition and emotion.
Symbolic communication is crucial to the development of answers to the
question. Who am I? Mead argued that the self is best thought of as a
process, and he traced its genesis developmentally.
The development of the self is dependent on learning to take the role of the
other. Role taking requires that we imagine how our behavior will be
defined from the standpoint of others (as in Cooley’s “looking glass self”).
For Mead, role taking occurs throughout the developmental process by
which the self is constructed and refined. This process consists of three
distinctive phases.
From a period of imitation, without meaning for infants; through the play,
acting world of children; and finally, to the phase of the generalized other,
the self-expands, changes, and comes into being.
For the very young, role playing is simply a matter of doing what others do
(Imitation). In time, however, the child begins to play " roles such as parent,
sibling, even the imaginary friend.
In the course of switching identities and imaginary conversations, the self
through play becomes both separate and defined.
The child is learning to see a unique self from the various perspectives of
other role players (Role Playing).
When egocentric play gives way to the rules and " of games, the individual
learns that the behaviors of other players are somewhat fixed, impersonal,
and predictable.
In playing the multiple and interlocking roles of the game, and other
organized endeavours, self-control emerges.
Through such play, one develops and internalizes a group of perspectives
on the self that Mead termed the Generalized Other. As this collective frame
of reference matures, the player becomes a social being who will
demonstrate some consistency in future behavior.
Thus, the inner voice of the generalized other continues to whisper the
complex requirements of being "human.
SOCIETY
The process of forming the self, according to mead occurs in three distinct
stages:
‘Me’
‘I’
1. Mead says that two parts of the self are in constant interaction. The ‘I’ holds
attitudes about “me”. and the me reflects the judgments of others towards “I”.
2. This dialogue is the basic part of the conscious and unconscious mental life
of every individual.
3. The self has characteristics that it can be the object and subject to itself.
4. Self is introspective.
5. Self is reflective.
6. The self arises in the process internal conversation between I and Me.
WILLIAM JAMES
William James was born in a well-to-do New England family on January 11,
1842.
MAJOR CONCEPTS
The Self
The self is that personal continuity that we all recognize each time we
awaken. It is more than personal identity; it is the place from which all our
mental processes originate and through which all our experiences are
filtered.
James described several layers of the self, which, like consciousness, he
saw, paradoxically, as simultaneously continuous and discrete.
THE BIOLOGICAL SELF. The biological self is our physical, corporal being. It
is our hereditary makeup, our physical features, our physiological processes. It
is everything to do with our biological functions. It is the vehicle that
transports us physically from birth to death, that exists in the physical world.
It is this unique heart that is mine; this unique brain, just this hand, just
this foot, just this tongue—the physicalness of personal identity that is me
and no other person. It can be taken as a subset of the material self.
THE MATERIAL SELF. In addition to the biological self, the material self
includes those specific items in the physical world with which we personally
identify. It is the total world of objects that we own. The material self
encompasses the sum total of our home, possessions, friends, and family.
In its widest possible sense, however, a man’s Self is the sum total of all that
he CAN call his, not only his body and his psychic powers, but his clothes
and his house, his wife and children, his ancestors and friends, his
reputation and works, his lands and horses, and yacht and bank-account.
All these things give him the same emotions. If they wax and prosper, he
feels triumphant; if they dwindle and die away, he feels cast down,—not
necessarily in the same degree for each thing, but in much the same way
for all.
THE SOCIAL SELF. We willingly or unwillingly accept any and all roles. A
person may have few or many social selves.
THE SPIRITUAL SELF. The spiritual self is the individual’s inner and
subjective being. It is an active element in all consciousness.
According to James, it is “the most enduring and intimate part of the self”. It
is not where we experience pleasure or pain but that part of us that
pleasure and pain affect. It is the source of effort, attention, and the will.
That simultaneously highest, deepest, and most all-encompassing
dimension of personality. The active element in all consciousness, the
individual’s inner and subjective being. It is also the place from which the
decisions of the will emanate and the source of attention and effort.
The spiritual self is of a different order of feeling from the other selves, and
while it is hard to define, it can be experienced. One expression of this self
is exemplified in religious experiences, which James saw as coming from a
region more central than the area of ideas or of intellect.
But James also said that while all of our various selves could be unified in the
experience of mystical awakening, this unification is never complete. We may
be permitted to see the possibility of unity, but its actualization remains the
great task of living.
ERIK ERIKSON
Erik Erikson is the most widely read and influential post-Freudian theorist,
both in psychology and in the popular press.
He made three major contributions to the study of personality: (1) that along
with Freud’s psychosexual developmental stages, the individual
simultaneously goes through psychosocial and ego-development stages, (2)
that personality development continues throughout life, and (3) that each
stage of development can have both positive and negative outcomes.
Caregivers who are sensitive and responsive to their baby’s basic needs, such
as food and shelter, help their baby develop a sense of security. When these
babies learn that they will receive the care they need when they need it, they
begin to feel safe and learn to trust the people around them.
On the other hand, caregivers who are unresponsive to their baby’s needs can
cause their baby to view this “new world” as unreliable and unpredictable.
These babies may develop a sense of anxiety and mistrust, which will affect
how they interact with others as they grow up.
The virtue that is developed upon a healthy resolution of the crisis at this stage
is “hope”. This is manifested by a deep faith and conception that everything
will turn out to be okay.
2) Autonomy versus shame and doubt is Erikson’s second stage. This stage
occurs in late infancy and toddlerhood (1 to 3 years). After gaining trust in
their caregivers, infants begin to discover that their behavior is their own.
They start to assert their sense of independence or autonomy. For
example, they can play with their toys, feed themselves, go potty by
themselves and even dress themselves.They realize their will. If infants and
toddlers are restrained too much or punished too harshly, they are likely to
develop a sense of shame and doubt.
Children at this ages like to act out various family scenes and roles, such as
teachers, police officers, doctors, as they see on TV. They make up stories with
toys to demonstrate what they believe is the adult world. They also begin to
explore their environment and ask a lot of “why” questions.
Success at this phase of the Erikson stages will lead to the virtue of purpose,
which is demonstrated by how the children make decisions, come up with new
ideas, as well as work and play with others.
If they don’t measure up, they feel inferior. The negative outcome is that the
child may develop a sense of inferiority—feeling incompetent and
unproductive.
People who succeed at this stage develop a strong sense of identity. When they
come across challenges and problems, they can commit to their principles,
ideals and beliefs. Those who fail to establish their own identity at this stage
tend to be confused about themselves and about their future. They may end up
following other people’s ideas.
Erikson’s theory suggests that young people who succeed at resolving the crisis
at this stage develops the virtue of “fidelity”. This is characterized by the self-
esteem and self-confidence that are requisite to associating freely with people
and beliefs on the basis of their value, loyalty, and integrity.
The virtue that is developed upon resolving the crisis at this stage is “love”.
Young adults develop the capacity to offer love, both physically and
emotionally, and to accept love in return.
Failure to resolve the crisis at this stage may lead people to experience
stagnation. They become uninterested in their environment and the people
around them. The feeling of having done nothing to help the next generation is
stagnation.
By successfully resolving the crisis at this stage, people develop the virtue of
“care”. They are able to offer unconditional support for their children, their
community and the society.
8) Integrity versus despair is Erikson’s eighth and final stage of
development, which individuals experience in late adulthood. They are
typically retirees in this stage. It is important for them to feel a sense of
fulfilment knowing that they have done something significant and made
meaningful contributions to the society during their younger years. During
this stage, a person reflects on the past. If the person’s life review reveals a
life well spent, integrity will be achieved.
People who are unsuccessful at this stage experience despair. They feel that
they have wasted their lives and experience many regrets, Erikson described.
Resolving the crisis at this stage successfully, people develop the virtue of
“wisdom”. These elderly people are likely to reflect on their lives positively
even in the face of imminent death.
KOHLBERG’S THEORY
MORAL DEVELOPMENT: Involves changes in thoughts, feelings and
behaviours regarding standards of right and wrong.
• Stage 4: Social systems morality is the fourth stage. at this stage, moral
judgements are based on understanding the social order, law, justice, and
duty. For example, adolescents may reason that in order for a community to
work effectively, it needs to be protected by laws that are adhered to by its
members.
• Stage 5: Social contract or utility and individual rights is the fifth stage. At
this stage individual reason that values, rights and principles undergird or
transcend the law. A person evaluates the validity of actual laws, and social
systems can be examined in terms of the degree to which they preserve and
protect fundamental human rights and values.
• Stage 6: Universal ethical principles is the sixth and highest stage. at this
stage, the person has developed amoral standard based on universal human
rights. When faced with a conflict between laws and conscience, the person
will follow conscience, even though the decision might involve personal risk.
Kohlberg emphasized that peer interaction and perspective taking are
critical aspects of the social stimulation that challenges children to change
their moral reasoning.
Whereas adults characteristically impose rules and regulations on children,
the give-and-take among peers gives children an opportunity to take the
perspective of another person and to generate rules democratically.
Kohlberg stressed that in principle, encounters with any peers can produce
perspective-taking opportunities that may advance a child’s moral
reasoning.
Some theorists and researchers argue that Kohlberg did not adequately
distinguish between moral reasoning and social conventional reasoning.
Social conventional reasoning focuses on conventional rules that have
been established by social consensus in order to control behavior and
maintain the social system. The rules themselves are arbitrary, such as
using a fork at meals and raising your hand in class before speaking.
In contrast, moral reasoning focuses on ethical issues and rules of morality.
Unlike conventional rules, moral rules are not arbitrary. They are
obligatory, widely accepted, and somewhat impersonal. Rules pertaining to
lying, cheating, stealing, and physically harming another person are moral
rules because violation of these rules affronts ethical standards that exist
apart from social consensus and convention.
Moral judgments involve concepts of justice, whereas social conventional
judgments are concepts of social organization.
KAREN HORNEY
The psychoanalytic social theory of Karen Horney (pronounced Horn-eye) was
built on the assumption that social and cultural conditions, especially
childhood experiences, are largely responsible for shaping personality.
Horney (1950) believed that each person begins life with the potential for
healthy development, but like other living organisms, people need
favorable conditions for growth.
These conditions must include a warm and loving environment yet one that
is not overly permissive.
Children need to experience both genuine love and healthy discipline. Such
conditions provide them with feelings of safety and satisfaction and permit
them to grow in accordance with their real self.
Unfortunately, a multitude of adverse influences may interfere with these
favorable conditions.
Primary among these is the parents’ inability or unwillingness to love their
child. Because of their own neurotic needs, parents often dominate, neglect,
overprotect, reject, or overindulge. If parents do not satisfy the child’s
needs for safety and satisfaction, the child develops feelings of basic
hostility toward the parents.
However, children seldom overtly express this hostility as rage; instead,
they repress their hostility toward their parents and have no awareness of
it. Repressed hostility then leads to profound feelings of insecurity and a
vague sense of apprehension.
This condition is called basic anxiety, which Horney (1950) defined as “a
feeling of being isolated and helpless in a world conceived as potentially
hostile”.
Neurotic Needs
Neurotic Trends
As her theory evolved, Horney began to see that the list of 10 neurotic
needs could be grouped into three general categories, each relating to a
person’s basic attitude toward self and others.
In 1945, she identified the three basic attitudes, or neurotic trends, as (1)
moving toward people, (2) moving against people, and (3) moving away
from people.
Some children move toward people by behaving in a compliant manner as
a protection against feelings of helplessness; other children move against
people with acts of aggression in order to circumvent the hostility of others;
and still other children move away from people by adopting a detached
manner, thus, alleviating feelings of isolation.
Intrapsychic Conflicts
As neurotics come to believe in the reality of their idealized self, they begin
to incorporate it into all aspects of their lives—their goals, their self-
concept, and their relations with others. Horney (1950) referred to this
comprehensive drive toward actualizing the ideal self as the neurotic
search for glory.
2) Neurotic Claims
A second aspect of the idealized image is neurotic claims. In their search for
glory, neurotics build a fantasy world—a world that is out of sync with the
real world.
Believing that something is wrong with the outside world, they proclaim
that they are special and therefore entitled to be treated in accordance with
their idealized view of themselves. Because these demands are very much
in accord with their idealized self-image, they fail to see that their claims of
special privilege are unreasonable.
3) Neurotic Pride
The third aspect of an idealized image is neurotic pride, a false pride based
not on a realistic view of the true self but on a spurious image of the
idealized self. Neurotic pride is qualitatively different from healthy pride or
realistic self-esteem.
Genuine self-esteem is based on realistic attributes and accomplishments
and is generally expressed with quiet dignity. Neurotic pride, on the other
hand, is based on an idealized image of self and is usually loudly
proclaimed in order to protect and support a glorified view of one’s self.
b. Self-Hatred
People with a neurotic search for glory can never be happy with
themselves because when they realize that their real self does not match
the insatiable demands of their idealized self, they will begin to hate and
despise themselves.
Horney (1950) recognized six major ways in which people express self-
hatred.
First, self-hatred may result in relentless demands on the self, which are
exemplified by the tyranny of the should. These people continue to push
themselves toward perfection because they believe they should be perfect.
The second mode of expressing self-hatred is merciless self-accusation. Self-
accusation may take a variety of forms—from obviously grandiose
expressions, such as taking responsibility for natural disasters, to
scrupulously questioning the virtue of their own motivations.
Third, self-hatred may take the form of self-contempt, which might be
expressed as belittling, disparaging, doubting, discrediting, and ridiculing
oneself.
A fourth expression of self-hatred is self-frustration. Self-frustration stems
from self-hatred and is designed to actualize an inflated self-image.
Fifth, self-hatred may be manifested as self-torment, or self-torture.
Although self-torment can exist in each of the other forms of self-hatred, it
becomes a separate category when people’s main intention is to inflict
harm or suffering on themselves.
The sixth and final form of self-hatred is self-destructive actions and
impulses, which may be either physical or psychological, conscious or
unconscious, acute or chronic, carried out in action or enacted only in the
imagination. Overeating, abusing alcohol and other drugs, working too
hard, driving recklessly, and suicide are common expressions of physical
self-destruction.
HENRY MURRAY
Henry Murray designed an approach to personality that includes conscious
and unconscious forces; the influence of the past, present, and future; and
the impact of physiological and sociological factors.
Principles of Personology
The first principle in Murray’s personology, his term for the study of
personality, is that personality is rooted in the brain. The individual’s
cerebral physiology guides and governs every aspect of the personality.
A second principle in Murray’s system involves the idea of tension
reduction. Murray agreed with Freud and other theorists that people act to
reduce physiological and psychological tension, but this does not mean we
strive for a tension-free state. It is the process of acting to reduce tension
that is satisfying, according to Murray, rather than the attainment of a
condition free of all tension.
A third principle of Murray’s personology is that an individual’s personality
continues to develop over time and is constructed of all the events that
occur during the course of that person’s life. Therefore, the study of a
person’s past is of great importance.
Murray’s fourth principle involves the idea that personality changes and
progresses; it is not fixed or static.
Fifth, Murray emphasized the uniqueness of each person while recognizing
similarities among all people. As he saw it, an individual human being is
like no other person, like some other people, and like every other person.
The Id
Murray divided personality into three parts, using the Freudian terms id,
superego, and ego, but his concepts are not what Freud envisioned.
Like Freud, Murray suggested that the id is the repository of all innate
impulsive tendencies.
As such, it provides energy and direction to behavior and is concerned with
motivation.
The id contains the primitive, amoral, and lustful impulses Freud
described.
However, in Murray’s personology system the id also encompasses innate
impulses that society considers acceptable and desirable.
The Superego
Murray defined the superego as the internalization of the culture’s values
and norms, by which rules we come to evaluate and judge our behavior
and that of others.
The substance of the superego is imposed on children at an early age by
their parents and other authority figures.
Other factors may shape the superego, including one’s peer group and the
culture’s literature and mythology.
According to Murray, the superego is not rigidly crystallized by age 5, as
Freud believed, but continues to develop throughout life.
While the superego is developing, so is the ego-ideal, a component of the
superego that contains the moral or ideal behaviors for which a person
should strive.
The ego-ideal represents what we could become at our best and is the sum
of our ambitions and aspirations.
The Ego
Types of Needs
Primary needs (viscerogenic needs) arise from internal bodily states and
include those needs required for survival (such as food, water, air, and
harmavoidance), as well as such needs as sex and sentience.
Secondary needs (psychogenic needs) arise indirectly from primary
needs, in a way Murray did not make clear, but they have no specifiable
origin within the body. They are called secondary not because they are less
important but because they develop after the primary needs. Secondary
needs are concerned with emotional satisfaction and include most of the
needs on Murray’s original list.
Characteristics of Needs
Needs differ in terms of the urgency with which they impel behavior, a
characteristic Murray called a need’s prepotency. For example, if the
needs for air and water are not satisfied, they come to dominate behavior,
taking precedence over all other needs.
Some needs are complementary and can be satisfied by one behavior or a
set of behaviors. Murray called this a fusion of needs. For instance, by
working to acquire fame and wealth, we can satisfy the needs for
achievement, dominance, and autonomy.
The concept of subsidiation refers to a situation in which one need is
activated to aid in satisfying another need. For example, to satisfy the
affiliation need by being in the company of other people, it may be
necessary to act deferentially toward them, thus invoking the deference
need. In this case, the deference need is subsidiary to the affiliation need.
Murray recognized that childhood events can affect the development of
specific needs and, later in life, can activate those needs. He called this
influence press because an environmental object or event presses or
pressures the individual to act a certain way.
Because of the possibility of interaction between need and press, Murray
introduced the concept of thema (or unity thema). The thema combines
personal factors (needs) with the environmental factors that pressure or
compel our behavior (presses).
The thema is formed through early childhood experiences and becomes a
powerful force in determining personality. Largely unconscious, the thema
relates needs and presses in a pattern that gives coherence, unity, order,
and uniqueness to our behavior.
Complexes
Drawing on Freud’s work, Murray divided childhood into five stages, each
characterized by a pleasurable condition that is inevitably terminated by
society’s demands.
Each stage leaves its mark on our personality in the form of an unconscious
complex that directs our later development.
According to Murray, everyone experiences these five complexes because
everyone passes through the same developmental stages. There is nothing
abnormal about them except when they are manifested in the extreme, a
condition that leaves the person fixated at that stage. The personality is
then unable to develop spontaneity and flexibility, a situation that
interferes with the formation of the ego and superego.
Stages of Development
a) The claustral stage. The fetus in the womb is secure, serene, and
dependent, conditions we may all occasionally wish to reinstate.
The simple claustral complex is experienced as a desire to be in small,
warm, dark places that are safe and secluded. For example, one might long
to remain under the blankets instead of getting out of bed in the morning.
People with this complex tend to be dependent on others, passive, and
oriented toward safe, familiar behaviors that worked in the past.
The insupport form of the claustral complex centers on feelings of
insecurity and helplessness that cause the person to fear open spaces,
falling, drowning, fires, earthquakes, or simply any situation involving
novelty and change.
The anti-claustral or egression form of the claustral complex is based on a
need to escape from restraining womblike conditions. It includes a fear of
suffocation and confinement and manifests itself in a preference for open
spaces, fresh air, travel, movement, change, and novelty.
MARTIN SELIGMAN
Martin Seligman is a pioneer of Positive Psychology (the term itself was
coined by Abraham Maslow), not simply because he has a systematic
theory about why happy people are happy, but because he uses
the scientific method to explore happiness.
Positive Psychology was introduced as an initiative of Martin Seligman in
1998, then president of the American Psychological Association, positive
psychology is the scientific study of strengths, well-being, and optimal
functioning
Seligman is credited as the father of Positive Psychology and its efforts to
scientifically explore human potential. In Authentic Happiness (2002), he
explains that his journey towards this new field in psychology started off in
a study on learned helplessness in dogs.
Positive psychology shifts traditional ideas of psychology away from fixing
what is 'wrong', instead focusing on what works for us, on our strengths,
skills, and on enhancing the positives in our lives.
a. The first domain, the pleasant life, concerns positive emotion about the
past, present, and future. Positive emotion about the past includes
contentment, satisfaction, and serenity. Positive emotion about the present
includes the somatic pleasures (i.e., immediate but momentary sensory
delights) and the complex pleasures (i.e., pleasures that require learning
and education).
Positive emotion about the future includes optimism, hope, and faith. The
pleasant life is a life that maximizes positive emotions and minimizes pain
and negative emotion. This captures what is usually intended by the class
of hedonic theories of happiness.
An individual leading a life of pleasure can be seen as maximizing positive
emotions, and minimizing negative emotions.
b. The second domain is the engaged life, which consists of using positive
individual traits, including strengths of character and talents. An individual
leading a life of engagement constantly seeks out activities that allow her to
be in flow.
By strengths of character, we mean qualities considered virtuous across
cultures and historical eras (e.g., valor, leadership, kindness, integrity,
originality, wisdom, and the capacity to love and be loved).
Strengths are distinguished from talents insofar as they appear more
malleable and subject to volition, and insofar as they are worthy ends in
themselves and not just means to a greater end.
A life led around these traits comes close to what Aristotle called
“eudaimonia” or the “good life, because the wise deployment of strengths
and talents leads to more engagement, absorption, and flow, we call this
life the “engaged life.”
PERMA model
This element has the most apparent connection to the overall concept of
happiness.
A focus on positive emotion isn’t just the act of smiling our way through
each day (regardless of we may actually feel inside); it is more based
around finding the ability to stay optimistic and to view the events and
circumstances that life presents us in a way that is constructive and
positive.
There are several types of positive emotion that all of us have felt at one
time or another - Joy, Gratitude, Hope, Pride, Amusement, Inspiration, Awe,
Love.
Once you have a clearer picture of the aspects of your life that bring these
positive emotions out in you, you can spend time trying to focus your
thinking towards making these aspects of your life a priority.
The more difficult aspect of dealing with positive emotion is that as we are
all aware, life is not always easy, things change and emotions are not
always positive.
To this end, a massively important part of discussing positive emotion is the
concept of acceptance.
By accepting that something negative may have happened to us in the past
or may well be ongoing as we speak (a bad day in work, the breakdown of a
relationship or a global pandemic, for example!) then we equip ourselves
with the abilities to be optimistic and constructive when moving forward
with whatever our present and future may hold.
b) Engagement
We have all heard the expression ‘time flies when you’re having fun’ – this
is because when we are actively engaged in doing something that we enjoy,
our bodies become actively flooded with endorphins and hormones that
elevate our sense of well-being and create a ‘flow’ of immersion that
absorbs us in the activity.
Flow can be defined as “being completely involved in an activity for its own
sake. The ego falls away. Time flies. Every action, movement, and thought
follows inevitably from the previous one, like playing jazz. Your whole
being is involved, and you’re using your skills to the utmost.”
The most important aspect of this is recognizing what activities in our lives
bring us to this state of flow, where our bodies are flushed with positive
endorphins and serotonin and to ensure that these activities are being
given the necessary importance and time to be able to feature regularly in
our lives.
c) Relationships
For us to feel that our lives have meaning, we have to feel that our actions
are worthwhile and valuable; that we are contributing to something bigger
than just ourselves.
We all want to feel that our lives and our actions matter. Something as
simple as supporting someone to try something new, assisting someone in
carrying out a task that brings them joy or helping them take steps towards
their independence can all be incredibly rewarding and brings joy to both
the individual in question and the person working to support them.
Many of us will have experienced at some point the positive emotion that
altruism (the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to
the welfare of others) can bring us in our role.
‘We who lived in concentration camps can remember the men who walked
through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They
may have been few in number, but they offer sufficient proof that everything
can be taken from a person but one thing: the last of the human freedoms — to
choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own
way.’ – Victor Frankl.
ROLLO MAY
Existentialism
Basic Concepts
The two basic concepts of existentialism, for May, namely, being-in-the-
world and nonbeing
Being-in-the-World
Guilt
Love
“[Love is] a delight in the presence of the other person, and an affirming of his
value and development as much as one’s own”.
The Daimonic
According to May, our motives include innate urges that are both benign
and illicit.
Among the former are sex, passion and eros, and procreation; whereas the
latter include hostility, rage, cruelty, and the quest for power.
Any of these aspects has the potential to dominate one’s personality.
May refers to them as the daimonic, after an ancient Greek word for both
the divine and diabolical.
To achieve psychological health, we must consciously accept and attempt to
control the daimonic.
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT
ROBERT KEGAN
Constructive developmental theory concerns itself with regular,
progressive changes in how individuals make meaning or “know”
epistemologically.
Kegan indicated that the “deep structure of any principle of mental
organization is the subject-object relationship”.
He considered those things “object” that people could “reflect on, handle,
look at, be responsible for, relate to each other, take control of, internalize,
assimilate, or otherwise operate on”.
He considered those things “subject” that people were “identified with, tied
to, fused with, or embedded in”.
People thus lack awareness of or behave automatically in relationship to
those things to which they are subject.
A shift from one order of consciousness to another involves a shift in what
is subject and what is object.
As meaning-making evolves, thinking becomes less rigid, exclusive, simple,
and dogmatic and more flexible, open, complex, and tolerant of differences.
INCORPORATIVE BALANCE
During the incorporative balance of the first 18 months of life, babies are
embedded in reflexes, sensing, and moving.
Newborns exist in an “objectless world” in which everything around them
is merely an extension of themselves and in which anything that leaves
their immediate surrounding no longer exists.
They are only aware of their own immediate needs and are unaware of the
“other.”
They are dependent on and merged with the mother or caretaker.
To support or match infants developmentally, caregivers need to hold them
and offer them close physical contact, comfort, protection, and eye contact.
Infants at this stage learn how to comfort themselves from how they are
comforted when anxious.
Kegan thus urges parents to respond to the infant in their experience of the
anxiety rather than trying to relieve the anxiety.
IMPULSIVE BALANCE
Children between the ages of 2 and 7 operate primarily from the impulsive
order of consciousness.
From Kegan‟s perspective, they are subject to their impulses and
perceptions but can make their reflexes related to sensing and moving
object.
They may have a hard time sitting still for any length of time, may
continually move around with little predictability, and will display a short
attention span, particularly related to others‟ needs or desires.
Their use of language will be only one, and perhaps a tangential, means of
communication, and life will be filled with fantasy.
These children exhibit some difficulty distinguishing between fantasy and
reality and demonstrate magical thinking.
They make decisions about right and wrong based on what the authority
figures in their lives deem to be right and wrong.
Although impulsive children realize that there is a world separate from
themselves, they confuse their impulses with their family members‟
impulses, needs, and desires.
IMPERIAL BALANCE
INTERPERSONAL BALANCE
People operating in this stage are able to see needs as object and thus
regulate competing needs, but they are embedded in or subject to
relationships, roles, and rules.
They have moved ahead from the imperial balance in that they are good
and productive citizens, are trustworthy and employable, take others into
account, have the capacity for insight and consciousness, think before
acting, exercise common sense, consider the long-term consequences of
their choices, have friends, and develop a meaningful life based on clear
ideals.
They are fully socialized, that is, they have internalized the values of
society or their surroundings.
Those operating from this order of consciousness are able to achieve such
behaviors because they understand another’s point of view, even when it
might be different from their own.
They can subordinate their own point of view to the relationship and to
another‟s point of view.
This interpersonal way of knowing says, “Whatever happens, the bond that
I have with this person is more important than what will happen to me.”
INSTISTUTIONAL BALANCE
INTERINDIVIDUAL BALANCE
ANNA FREUD
Anna Freud was the daughter of the founder of psychoanalysis,
Sigmund Freud.
She was born in Vienna on 3rd December 1895, when her father’s radical
theories of sex and the mind were starting to make him famous across
Europe.
Although Anna Freud may have been an unplanned baby,she became the
only one of Sigmund Freud’s six children to follow his path.
An unhappy child, Anna was jealous of the older sister favored by her
mother and was ignored by her other siblings. She recalled “the experience
of being . . . only a bore to them, and of feeling bored and left alone”.
Anna was not ignored by her father. She became his favorite child and by
the age of 14 was dutifully attending meetings of his psychoanalytic group,
listening attentively to the case histories being presented and discussed.
At 22, Anna began 4 years of psychoanalysis conducted by her father, who
was later sharply criticized for analyzing his daughter. To analyze one’s
child was a serious violation of Freud’s rules for the practice of
psychoanalysis; the situation with Anna was kept secret for many years.
Anna Freud joined the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, presenting a paper
entitled Beating Fantasies and Daydreams.
She devoted her life to the care of her father and to his system of
psychoanalysis.
Whereas the elder Freud had worked only with adults, attempting to
reconstruct their childhood by eliciting their recollections and analyzing
their fantasies and dreams, Anna worked only with children.
Child Psychology
She became a school teacher and then a psychoanalyst and pioneered
the treatment of children, establishing clinics and nurseries for children
who were war victims, survivors of the holocaust or just generally
troubled by their lives.
She established a clinic and a center to train analysts in the building next
door to her father’s London home. In 1927 she published Four Lectures on
Child Analysis.
Anna Freud was not primarily a theoretician. Her interests were more
practical, and most of her energies were devoted to the analysis of
children and adolescents, and to improving that analysis. Her father,
after all, had focused entirely on adult patients. Although he wrote a great
deal about development, it was from the perspectives of these adults. What
do you do with the child, for whom family crises and traumas and
fixations are present events, not dim recollections?
First, the relationship of the child to the therapist is different. The child's
parents are still very much a part of his or her life, a part the therapist
cannot and should not try to usurp. But neither can the therapist pretend to
be just another child rather than an authority figure. Anna Freud found
that the best way to deal with this "transference problem" was the way
that came most naturally: be a caring adult, not a new playmate, not a
substitute parent.
Another problem with analyzing children is that their symbolic abilities
are not as advanced as those of adults. The younger ones, certainly, may
have trouble relating their emotional difficulties verbally. Even older
children are less likely than adults to bury their problems under complex
symbols. After all, the child's problems are here-and-now; there hasn't
been much time to build up defenses. So the problems are close to the
surface and tend to be expressed in more direct, less symbolic,
behavioural and emotional terms.
Most of her contributions to the study of personality come out of her work
at the Hampstead Child Therapy Clinic in London, which she helped to
set up. Here, she found that one of the biggest problems was
communications among therapists: Whereas adult problems were
communicated by means of traditional labels, children's problems could
not be. Because children's problems are more immediate, she
reconceptualized them in terms of the child's movement along a
developmental timeline. A child keeping pace with most of his or her
peers in terms of eating behaviours, personal hygiene, play styles,
relationships with other children, and so on, could be considered
healthy. When one aspect or another of a child's development seriously
lagged behind the rest, the clinician could assume that there was a
problem and could communicate the problem by describing the particular
lag.
Ego Psychology
Freud had spent most of his efforts on the id and the unconscious side of
the psychic life.
Anna Freud substantially revised orthodox psychoanalysis by expanding
the role of the ego, arguing that the ego operates independently of the id.
She rightly pointed out that ego is the seat of observation from which we
observe the work of the id and the superego, and the unconscious generally
and that it deserves study in its own right.
This was a major extension of the Freudian system, one that involved a
fundamental and a radical change.
In The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense, published in 1936, she
clarified the operation of the defense mechanisms.
The book received widespread praise and is considered a basic work on
ego psychology. The standard defense mechanisms owe their full
development and articulation to Anna Freud.
We instinctively try to protect our ego (our acceptable picture of who we
are) with a variety of defences. The problem is that in the act of defending
ourselves against pain in the immediate term, we harm our long-term
chances of dealing with reality and therefore of developing and maturing
as a result.
Defense Mechanisms
Strategies the ego uses to defend itself against the anxiety provoked by
conflicts of everyday life.
Narcissistic-Psychotic Defenses
Immature Defenses
Neurotic Defenses
Mature Defenses