Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Friday 27th January
Friday 27th January
We should still have zoos because I still think some people will still enjoy just watching the
animals. Even though there might still be arguments it is still important because over half of
the extinct animals lived longer in zoos. But if we wish to keep any real measure of
biodiversity we may lean on zoos.
Against:
We should not have zoos why because if we were to let a tiger for example (the largest cat)
go without a clue what to do it would be up for grabs by poachers. Humans should not have
the right to confine such majestic creatures like flamingos. Plus they can force a creature like
a tiger to breed with a different gender they do not no.
For:
Species like pandas, tigers and eagles. You can see exotic animals without the need of
travelling and raises awareness on environmental problems.
Against:
The first reason why zoos should be banned because is that zoos do not offer sufficient spaces
for large animals like elephants. Unless you give it a reasonable amount of space and food
they can take care of themselves.
Noah
Pros:
Cons:
Rayel
Zoos shouldn't be banned because we need to keep fatal animals like tigers, gorillas and lions
in a cage because if we don't, they could go rouge and go on a rampage. If we don't have
zoos, people who work for them won't get paid and eventually become homeless. Animals
like tigers could breed more in zoos since they are extremely close to extinction, even the
same for kakapos, there are only 252 left In the world and there population in actually
increasing because of where they are (zoos).
Against:
Zoos should be banned because animals aren't supposed to be kept in captivity, they shouldn't
be captured and be Locked in a cage but instead be free into the wild where they belong,
animals like tigers can get distressed from being away from there natural habitat, some
animals can even die from being stressed which isn't increasing the animal population but
actually could be decreasing it.
Mohammed
Pros:
Some would believe that zoos protect endangered animals from becoming more
extinct.
Zoos should not be banned because they educate people about animals while seeing
them in real life rather than on television.
Zoos encourage animals to breed as they provide food and zoos also help them live
longer.
Cons:
After staying in the wild, a animal can not be able to stay in its natural habitat
because it does not know how to fend for itself.
Zoos can cause depression for animals and cause stress for them.
Zoos sometimes use there animals for shows and train them for the purpose of
entertainment and no choice.
Zoos can make animals vulnerable to poachers as animals will lose there natural fear
of humans.
Osaru
Pros
Cons
- After staying in zoos they would not be able to stay in there habitat because they don't know
how to hunt because they were in zoos for a long time and they were in cages do nothing.
-Zoos should be banned because there is not that much space in the world and there are
eight-billion people in the world
- Zoos are not keeping the public update about the animals
Tex
Pros:
- some animals are put in zoo so they can breed and increased the numbers of that animal
The main points of a zoo is for research, education and recreation. breeding animals in
captivity so they don't become extinct. Zoos also work out in the wild conserving animals in
their natural habitats.
Cons:
- Monkeys can live up to 40 years in the wild, but in zoos they live 25-30 years in zoo
Animals are slowly haunting us and are taking over our habitat
- some animals like Wales are used to having all the sea to swim in but in zoos the only have
a minimum amount of space
- it has Been shown that polar bear suffer the most in zoos
Kaysha
Pros
Zoos provide animals with food and a habitat that resembles their natural habitat. It
encourages them to breed due to the amount of food they have.
Also, most zoos have educational programmes that teach children how to identify them.
Zoos help fight extinction and they protect animals from leaving the Earth forever.
Zoos preserve biodiversity (genetic and species) that might be threatened or at times
even 'extinct in the wild'.
Even when animals are never introduced to the wild, putting them under human care
can help them live longer lives then their wild counterparts.
Cons
Animals suffer in captivity due to the fact that they are away for their family, alone with
no company and treated with no care. All the cages in the world can't stop an animal
from going extinct because we need to take care of it, not store it in a zoo.
Keeping them in zoos doesn't help because even if they are healthy, they still die because
of depression. This is because they are forced to do gruesome tricks to impress the
public, but it isn't good for the animals mental wellbeing. Carnivores like polar bears,
lions, cheetahs didn't cope well with captivity because they were too used to the wild
and hunting for itself. In the zoo, the food was given to them, no hard work required.
According to researchers, the more time an animal spent in the wild, the worse it fares
in captivity. When animals are never introduced to the wild, they don't survive due to
the fact that they have never been in the wild and are soft compared to the others.
The animals in zoos suffer, they get depressed, psychologically disturbed, frustrated,
they fight and go hungry.
Keifer
Friday 27 January
Should we have zoos?
Pros
All the Cages in the World Won't Stop Animals From Going Extinct
Dawar
Propositions:
- Certain animals (tigers) will die after released to the wild because of zoos
Zoos should be banned since animals cannot rely on zoos to escape starvation, habitat loss
and predators. Instead, animals should be in the wild, where they can cope with
their suitable environment. Also, zoos do not actually educate people that much, and the
human interaction is causing them to be depressed, making it difficult to breed. Lastly, when
certain animals (like tigers) were released into the wild, they quickly die due to its loss of
survival instinct.
Opposition:
- Zoos entertain people and let people see animals before they are gone
Zoos should not be banned since animals needed a place safe from poachers. Zoos also,
although very slowly, help recover population decrease of certain animals. Simultaneously,
80% of mammals live longer in zoos, and zoos also let people see exquisite animals that may
be gone forever. And finally, zoos help researchers find ways to help the animals. All
reasons explained why zoos should not be banned.
Joelle
I think most of the zoo keepers had look after the animals.
Some of are having a cub with baby cub on it with some percent.
Most of the animals are teaching the cubs that how to be a real hunters.
Junia
Friday 27 January
Proposition:
Annaleigh
- Zoos can help save endangered species by keeping them in a safe environment.
- Zoos keep animals away from poachers, habitat loss and predators.
- Most of the time, animals in zoos lead very unhappy lives. This is because they are taken to
small and limited spaces to live in.
-Zookeepers also often may forget or will not care about their healthcare needs.
- Animals suffer permanent frustration because they have no freedom or choice for
themselves and cannot behave as they would do in their natural environment.
Awisi
For:
- Some Tigers can die from being over dosed with gas/ being tranquilized / drugs.
- an Orca can live up to a 100 years old in the wild but when in captivity they live around 30
to 20 years old.
Jacob
Friday 27 January 2023
For:
We should have zoos because they have been helping the animals
Their really help full when comes to taking care of animals close to extinction!
Rehabilitation
Against:
Some animals for the ocean are used to the huge ocean
Tigers and lions have around 18,000 times less space in zoos than they would in the wild.
Polar bears have one million times less space
Erick
For: We should have zoos because the people who works there take care of the animals. We
should have zoos because people help them breed so their not endangered. We should have
zoos because zoo keepers are helping them from extinction. We should not ban zoos because
animals are in good care in zoos. We should not ban animals because children need to learn
more about these mysterious creatures. If there was no zoos animals would
be endangered from earth.
Against: We shouldn't have zoos because if animals are kept in zoos they might not know
how to take care of themselves if they get kicked out of the zoo. If animals are kept in zoos it
might be harmful because they might get kicked and don't know what to do because of being
kept in zoos. Zoos should be banned because animals might break out of there cage and kill
people. They might escape and cause a terrible disaster in the country. We shouldn't have
zoos because animals suffer in zoos.
Emily