Two elderly couples were in a nursing home. The husband suffered a heart attack and died before his wife could be brought to see him. To spare the wife pain, the nursing staff lied and told her that her husband was still alive but his breathing was getting weaker, and that he seemed to be waiting for her before passing away. When the wife left, she was glad he waited for her to see him one last time. This violated the principles of veracity, beneficence, and fidelity, by lying to the wife, causing her psychological harm, and undermining the nurse-patient trust relationship.
Two elderly couples were in a nursing home. The husband suffered a heart attack and died before his wife could be brought to see him. To spare the wife pain, the nursing staff lied and told her that her husband was still alive but his breathing was getting weaker, and that he seemed to be waiting for her before passing away. When the wife left, she was glad he waited for her to see him one last time. This violated the principles of veracity, beneficence, and fidelity, by lying to the wife, causing her psychological harm, and undermining the nurse-patient trust relationship.
Two elderly couples were in a nursing home. The husband suffered a heart attack and died before his wife could be brought to see him. To spare the wife pain, the nursing staff lied and told her that her husband was still alive but his breathing was getting weaker, and that he seemed to be waiting for her before passing away. When the wife left, she was glad he waited for her to see him one last time. This violated the principles of veracity, beneficence, and fidelity, by lying to the wife, causing her psychological harm, and undermining the nurse-patient trust relationship.
Two elderly couples had been in a nursing home. The husband has a heart attack and the wife is brought from the other floor. Before she can get to the other room, the husband dies, but to spare the woman the pain, the staff allows her to think that he is still alive when she gets to the room. In that she is frail and feeble, with poor eyesight, she does not know that he is dead. The woman is then told that her husband’s respiration is growing weaker and that he appeared to have been waiting for her before he died. As she leaves the room, she tells the staff that she is so glad he waited for her so that she could see him alive one more time.
Which Universal Principle/s is/are applicable in this case?
Based on the given situation, the universal principles that are applicable in this case are the principles of veracity, beneficence, and fidelity. Firstly, the principle of veracity was violated in this case because the nurse failed to maintain a sense of truthfulness and honesty toward her client. Clearly, the nurse lied about the old woman's husband's true situation in the scene. Indeed, the nurse implies to the elderly woman that her husband was still alive but suffering from a deteriorating respiratory condition. What is even more upsetting to the client when she discovers the truth is that the nurse made up a story about the husband still waiting for her, which gives the old woman false hope and foolish expectation. Secondly, the principle of beneficence was violated in the case due to psychological harm. As defined, beneficence is the obligation to perform actions that are beneficial to our individual clients while causing no harm to them. With this in mind, what the nurse told the old woman clearly gives the client false hope, as the old woman expresses her joy upon hearing that her husband is waiting for her. Given that she was feeble and frail due to her age, the nurse's action will undoubtedly cause distress to the client if she knows the truth. In the worst-case scenario, even a small amount of distress can deteriorate her condition. With that being said, the nurse was manifesting non-beneficial actions that might eventually harm the client. Lastly, since the nurse was acting incompetently, the nurse's sense of fidelity has been undermined. Given that we need to establish an appropriate or therapeutic nurse- client relationship, in the given case, the nurse violated the client’s trust. As a result, similar to the consequences if beneficence is not promoted, the situation will eventually cause the client distress, which contradicts the nurse's duty to provide quality care to a client. There is a strong possibility that the nurse's actions will cause the elderly woman's condition to deteriorate and, in the worst-case scenario, result in her death. In general, we clearly need to be truthful in all aspects because a course of action and the governance of care for a patient requires nothing less than truthful information. In connection to this, the provision of truthful information, unless done therapeutically, is one way to enable them to make correct decisions that might benefit their overall health.