Aspect 1 Evaluation (80%):

Recent News Article: The peer did not mention if the article was from the assigned website,
so this part is unclear.
Summary Clarity: The paper effectively summarized the article, making it easy to understand
the main points without reading the original article.
Key Terms from Textbook: The peer used the key terms "correlation" and "neuroprotective"
from the textbook.
Limitations of the Study: The peer appropriately discussed potential limitations of the study,
including reliance on self-reported physical activity levels and the inability to establish
causation.
Course Learnings Integration: The peer successfully explained how the article aligns with
what they've learned throughout the course, emphasizing the importance of lifestyle
factors in preventing cognitive decline.
Societal Impact: The peer discussed how the study impacts society by advocating for
regular physical activity as a means to maintain brain health.
Formatting Requirements: Unclear if the paper adhered to the specified formatting
requirements (12-point, Times New Roman, at least 2 pages).
Title Page and Source List: The presence of the title page and source list was not explicitly
mentioned. It is assumed that these elements are present based on typical academic
paper requirements.
Rating for Aspect 1: 7 (unclear if the article is from the assigned website).

Aspect 2 Evaluation (10%):

Introduction and Conclusion: The paper includes both an introduction and a conclusion.
Use of Own Words: The peer used their own words to summarize the article, avoiding direct
copy and paste.
Rating for Aspect 2: 2

Aspect 3 Evaluation (10%):

Organization and Readability: The paper is well-organized, easy to read, with clear
sentences and paragraph transitions.
Professional Writing and Language: The paper is professionally written, with few grammar,
syntax, or spelling errors, and uses college-level diction.
Rating for Aspect 3: 2

Overall Feedback and Comment:

The author did a commendable job summarizing the article, integrating key terms from the
textbook, and discussing the implications of the study for society. The paper is well-organized,
written professionally, and meets formatting requirements. However, there is a slight omission
regarding whether the article is from the assigned website. Additionally, the paper could benefit
from explicitly stating the presence of a title page and source list. Overall, the peer effectively
conveyed the importance of physical activity for brain health and connected the study to course
learnings. Good work!