Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Embiid Case Study
Embiid Case Study
#3194047
Rafael Onilla
VISA-3016-501
Dr. Elizabeth Cavaliere
February 13, 2024
2
3
For this assignment, I will be analysing a billboard relating to basketball player Joel
Embiid of the Philadelphia 76ers. This billboard was made during the 2022-2023 NBA season
and was made in response to that year’s MVP race, with Joel Embiid being a frontrunner for the
award. In this analysis, I will be diving into this advertisement’s significance, and it’s influence
towards the viewers seeing it, and it’s overall effectiveness. I will be using a plethora of theories
and philosophies to further help me with this study, with particular emphasis being towards the
This picture of the ad itself was located at Philadelphia Pennsylvania and was specifically
housed inside the baseball stadium that hosts that cities baseball team, the Philadelphia Phillies,
with a rather obvious hint of the location being the large “Phillies” sign hanging above the left-
hand side of the massive rectangular billboard. The cream-colored billboard consists of two
parts, to the left of the billboard is an image of Joel Embiid, dressed up in a white dress shirt and
a blue overcoat, with a red bowtie. He is also seen wearing a dark blue headband with white stars
wrapped around it, and because of this, we also see his exposed afro fade haircut that helps add
to the overall height and size of the headshot. Because of the shape of the headshot, and the sheer
size of it, this leads to one’s eyes to gravitate towards Embiid when first seen, before
transitioning towards the text, effectively going from left to right. Embiid’s attire is reminiscent
of the outfit worn by the character Uncle Sam, who adorned this outfit on the famous 1917 US
Army ad by JM Flagg known as “I Want You!” Embiid is even gesturing towards the viewer in a
similar manner to Uncle Sam, by pointing his right index finger directly at the viewer and giving
off a rather serious facial expression, so as to “physically” tell the viewer to do something.
Essentially a forceful call to vote. On the right side of the billboard is a series of texts, the first is
4
inside a red rectangular border and engraved in an equally colored and capitalized font. The text
reads “Joel Embiid for MVP” with the “for MVP” portion being sandwiched between two dark
blue stars, creating further emphasis on the award, thus allowing further intentionality and
importance towards the reason behind this call to action. Underneath in an equally capitalized
font, that is also colored in the same blue as the stars reads additional text saying, “Not up for
debate.” This text is effectively this billboards slogan, the saying associated with the agenda of
getting Joel Embiid an MVP award, whilst also being direct enough for viewers to remember and
follow towards that agenda. Two distinct insignias/logos are also placed just below the slogan,
though due to the camera angle and the size of these respective insignias/logos, I can’t discern
the specifics behind the pair. I can only assume that they could be associated with the city of
Philadelphia, or the Sixers organization. The color palette in this billboard is Red, White, Cream,
Brown, Black and Blue, distinctly reminiscent of the aforementioned “I Want You!” Poster,
which had a similar color palette, though it used that palette in different ways, most notably in
the skin color, hair color, and font color of the two advertisements.
Semiotically speaking, the signifier and signified are quite apparent in this ad. The
signified in this ad is an MVP calibre player, with the signifier being Joel Embiid, in name and
image. Going further, according to Roland Barthes, in his exploration into the relationship
between text and the photograph, he was able to discern three distinct messages, the linguistic,
the coded iconic, and the non-coded iconic. Firstly with the linguistic, It is quite clear that there
is a symbiotic relationship between text and photography in the Embiid ad, and thus I will be
using these messages to help break down this ad further. Starting with the linguistic, the slogan
and the text above the slogan make the message apparent as a clear call to action, or in this case a
5
call to vote. The text is all capitalized, symbolizing a level of both importance, emphasis, and an
apparent vocal volume towards the viewer, as if the billboard is screaming towards the viewer
who should be MVP, and that no one else comes close, or to quote the ad itself, that there is no
debate. Roland further adds that there are two kinds of functions within these linguistic
messages, anchorage, and relay. The former is classified for its usage of specificity to anchor
meanings within in image, based on the text used within that image. The latter is classified for a
more open ended, free flowing approach between text and image. It is used to expand into other
ideas instead of limiting towards just a single, primary idea. When looking at this billboard, the
ad primarily uses anchorage. When combining the graphical and typographic boldness and
abrasiveness of the text -the colors being deep and rich, and the font being big, bold, and
capitalized – the resulting message is quite clear bold, abrasive, and expressive. You look at the
text and find that it defiantly wants you to select Embiid as MVP, that he is without question the
MVP of the league and that this matter shouldn’t be argued or talked about because he is the one.
This ad might be related to sports, yet the design of the message shrouded in messaging akin to a
political election. This ad after all is a call to vote which helps in that connection, yet it’s also a
parody of an advertisement that is associated with wartime propaganda, that being the JM Flaggs
1917 ad featuring Uncle Sam. You could even argue that this ad could be classified as
propaganda when you consider that Embiid had a season that was statistically inferior in various
aspects compared to other players that season, yet the ad linguistically doesn’t mention that. It
barely scratches the surface for why Embiid’s season was even MVP worthy in the first place, it
just tells the viewer that Embiid is the MVP. Thus, this gives the text a bold and brash exterior,
but carrying an almost forceful and delusional interior. Secondly is the coded iconic message,
6
and this message can be easily identified by the attire Embiid wears, and the colors that Embiid
wears as well. The red, white, and blue reminiscent of both the colors of the Sixers themselves,
but also reminiscent of the American flag, made even more so by Embiid’s star-spangled
headband. This therefore gives a notion of americana, a sense of patriotism when seeing this ad.
The ad itself therefore wants to tell the viewer that perhaps another reason as to why there is no
debate, is because of the fact that this is not just the choice of sixer fans, or even Philadelphians,
but the choice of America as a whole. With that in mind, we look at the final message, the non-
coded iconic. In a literal sense, viewers will quickly catch on that this is a parody of JM Flaggs
“I Want You!” ad. The colors reminiscent of the American flag, the attire reminiscent of Uncle
Sam’s wardrobe, the text reminiscent of the text used in Flaggs advertisement, the gesturing, the
facial expressions, and even the cream-colored background are all reminiscent of what Flagg
used. It isn’t a full-on replication, but it is easy to guess what this ad is parodying. Considering
how both of these ads not only had a plethora of similarities between them, but were also
successful in their respective agendas, I wouldn’t be surprised to see another ad that parody’s
I also want to bring into this study, Umberto Eco’s a photograph. In it, Eco discusses the