Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gas Tanker
Gas Tanker
GAS CARRIERS
Transportation of Liquefied Gases by Sea - General
For economical marine transportation, gas is carried in a liquefied state. As a liquid, the
volume to weight ratio at atmospheric pressure is in the range of 650 times less than in the
gaseous state. That means we can carry 650 times more cargo in liquid state as compared to
carriage in gaseous state.
The temperature at which a gas condenses is a function of its pressure. The combination of
pressurising and cooling is therefore fundamental to gas carrier design. Some ships carry
gases liquefied under pressure & others under refrigeration. The relative densities of gases
are low and vary between 0.42 (methane) and 0.97 (VCM). The cargo carrying capability is
therefore more related to volume capacity of the ship than deadweight capacity, and the
cargo capacity is usually quoted in cubic metres cargo tank volume.
The Cargoes
The most significant cargoes in terms of tonnages moved are methane/LNG, LPG (butane,
propane and mixtures of these), and ammonia. Other cargoes of commercial significance are
butadiene, butylene, ethylene, propylene, and vinyl chloride. Apart from ethylene and
methane/LNG, all these gases can exist as liquids at normal ambient temperatures. They
may therefore be transported in pressurised cargo containment systems at any temperature
up to the highest expected ambient temperature.
The critical temperatures for ethylene and methane/LNG are below normal ambient
temperatures. Above the critical temperature the gas cannot be transformed into a liquid at
any pressure and must therefore be refrigerated for shipboard carriage. Carriage of
ethylene, ethane and methane/LNG requires semi‐pressurised or fully refrigerated cargo
containment. These considerations lead to the following options for carriage conditions:
Boiling Point
The temperature at which the vapour pressure of a liquid is equal to the pressure on its
surface (the boiling point varies with pressure)
Cargo Area
That part of the ship which contains the cargo containment system, cargo pumps and
compressor rooms, and includes the deck area above the cargo containment system. Where
fitted, cofferdams, ballast tanks and void spaces at the after end of the aftermost hold space
or the forward end of the forwardmost hold space are excluded from the cargo area.
Gas-Safe Space
A space on a ship not designated as a gas‐dangerous space.
Hold Space
The space enclosed by the ship's structure in which a cargo containment system is situated.
Interbarrier Space
The space between a primary and a secondary barrier of a cargo containment system,
whether or not completely or partially occupied by insulation or other material.
Primary Barrier
This is the inner surface designed to contain the cargo when the cargo containment system
includes a secondary barrier.
Secondary Barrier
The liquid‐resisting outer element of a cargo containment system designed to provide
temporary containment of a leakage of liquid cargo through the primary barrier and to
prevent the lowering of the temperature of the ship's structure to an unsafe level
Tank dome
It is not permitted for a cargo pump room to be placed below the upper deck, nor may cargo
pipelines be run beneath deck level; therefore, deepwell or submersible pumps must be
used for cargo discharge. Pipelines to cargo tanks must be taken through a cargo tank dome
which penetrates the deck.
CARGO HAZARDS
Personnel Hazards
Broadly, the personnel hazards of liquefied gases or their vapours may be five‐fold. :
• Flammability
• Toxicity (poisoning)
• Asphyxia (suffocation)
• Low temperature (frostbite)
• Chemical burns
OTHER HAZARDS – REACTIVITY
A liquefied gas cargo may react in a number of ways: with water to form hydrates, with
itself, with air, with another cargo or with other materials.
Reaction with Water- Hydrate Formation
Some hydrocarbon cargoes will combine with water under certain conditions to produce a
substance known as a hydrate resembling crushed ice or slush. The water for hydrate
formation can come from purge vapours with an incorrect dew point, water in the cargo
system or water dissolved in the cargo. Care should be taken to ensure that the dew point of
All LNG ships have double hulls throughout their cargo length which provide adequate
space for ballast.
Ships fitted with the membrane systems have a full secondary barrier and tanks of the
Type 'B' design have drip‐pan type protection.
A characteristic common to all LNG ships is that they burn cargo boil‐off as fuel.
Hold spaces around the cargo tanks are continuously inerted, except in the case of
spherical Type 'B' containment where hold spaces may be filled with dry air provided that
there is an adequate means for inerting such spaces in the event of cargo leakage.
Most LNG carriers have steam turbine propulsion plants.
CARGO CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
A cargo containment system is the total arrangement for containing cargo including, where
fitted:
A primary barrier (the cargo tank),
Secondary barrier (if fitted),
Associated thermal insulation,
Any intervening spaces, and
Adjacent structure, for the support of these elements.
For cargoes carried at temperatures between ‐10°C and ‐55°C the ship's hull may act as the
secondary barrier and in such cases it may be a boundary of the hold space. The basic cargo
tank types utilized on board gas carriers are in accordance with the list below:
Compiled by : Gursimranjit Randhawa Page 151
Mates Orals Notes Function 2 - Cargo
Independent tanks
Independent tanks are completely self‐supporting and do not form part of the ship's hull
structure. Moreover, they do not contribute to the hull strength of a ship. As defined in the
IGC Code, and depending mainly on the design pressure, there are three different types of
independent tanks for gas carriers: these are known as Types 'A', 'B' and 'C'.
Figure shows a section through this type of tank as found on a fully refrigerated LPG carrier.
This is a self‐supporting prismatic tank which requires conventional internal stiffening. In
this example the tank is surrounded by a skin of foam insulation. Where perlite insulation is
used, it would be found filling the whole of the hold space.
The material used for Type 'A' tanks is not crack propagation resistant. Therefore, in order to
ensure safety, in the unlikely event of cargo tank leakage, a secondary containment system
is required. This secondary containment system is known as a secondary barrier and is a
feature of all ships with Type 'A' tanks capable of carrying cargoes below ‐10°C.
For a fully refrigerated LPG carrier (which will not carry cargoes below ‐55°C) the secondary
barrier must be a complete barrier capable of containing the whole tank volume at a
defined angle of heel and may form part of the ship's hull, as shown in the figure. By this
means appropriate parts of the ship's hull are constructed of special steel capable of
withstanding low temperatures. The alternative is to build a separate secondary barrier
Compiled by : Gursimranjit Randhawa Page 152
Mates Orals Notes Function 2 - Cargo
around each cargo tank. The IGC Code stipulates that a secondary barrier must be able to
contain tank leakage for a period of 15 days.
On such ships, the space between the cargo tank (sometimes referred to as the primary
barrier) and the secondary barrier is known as the hold space. When flammable cargoes are
being carried, these spaces must be filled with inert gas to prevent a flammable atmosphere
being created in the event of primary barrier leakage.
Figure above shows Type 'C' tanks as fitted in a typical fully pressurised gas carrier. With
such an arrangement there is comparatively poor utilisation of the hull volume; however,
this can be improved by using intersecting pressure vessels or bi‐lobe type tanks which may
be designed with a taper at the forward end of the ship.
Initially, the Moss system was more popular, but higher Suez toll fees due to their higher
gross tonnage made Moss vessels less attractive for trades involving the Suez Canal.
Recently Moss has staged a comeback and currently there are about 30 Moss vessels on
order against 100+ membrane vessels. A fourth LNG containment system joined the ranks of
the large marine LNG cargo tank designs in the early 1990's; the Japanese IHI SPB (Self‐
supporting Prismatic shape IMO type‐B) system. With only two orders for LNG carriers in the
1990's, this system seemed to be inaccessible due to its high price. However, in 2014 four
vessels were ordered with the SPB system, bringing it back as a credible alternative to the
membrane systems and the Moss system.
Membrane systems
After years of competition, Gaztransport and Technigaz merged to form GTT, which has
been developing and promoting both membrane type containment systems in parallel. GTT
has licensed these systems to all major LNG carrier builders around the world. The main
advantage of the membrane type containment systems is their prismatic shape, which
allows these systems to use the space available within the hull of the LNG carrier to a very
high degree. With the cargo tanks recessed deep inside the hull under a low trunk deck,
membrane type LNG carriers do not need a high deck house to have good visibility. This
results in the typical "squat" silhouette of this type of vessels. In France, GTT proposed
membrane type LNG fuel tanks for the proposed newbuilding ferry for Brittany Ferries.
Unfortunately this project was put on hold for the time being for non‐technical reasons.
Both membrane systems have one traditional weakness; their vulnerability for sloshing
damage. Sloshing is the motion of the LNG cargo in the tanks as a result of the motion of the
vessel due to the effect of waves and wind. In certain circumstances, waves occur in the LNG
cargo which upon impact on the tank walls can cause damage to the primary barrier and the
boxes supporting the primary membrane. To counter the risk of sloshing damage, GTT
advises the operators of membrane ships to operate their ships with tank levels of more
than 90% or less than 10%. For applications that require part load operations, such as LNG
Floating Storage and Regas Units (LNG FSRU), membrane systems with specially reinforced
boxes have been developed.
Technigaz designed a membrane type LNG containment system with a corrugated stainless
steel primary membrane supported by wooden boxes filled with insulation material.
Above Pictures: Prismatic Membrane Tank being installed into Ships Hold
The Moss spherical LNG containment system does not have these sloshing issues. Its
aluminum spheres have sufficient structural strength to withstand LNG wave impact due to
the interaction between the cargo and the ship's motion. The Moss system doesn't need a
full secondary barrier like the membrane system; there is only a small drip tray below the
spheres to catch any liquid leaking. The design philosophy behind the Moss system is that
the tank should be designed to be strong enough so that cracks should not develop in the
tanks over the lifetime of the vessel. The structural strength of the containment system is
exactly the reason why old Moss vessels are very popular candidates for conversion to LNG
FSRU's or even floating LNG production plants.
The only true disadvantage of the Moss vessels is the fact that the containment system has
a very low hull space utilization rate. The sheers are mounted on the deck of the vessel by
way of an equatorial ring, which means that half the sphere protrudes above the deck.
While this makes for the characteristic silhouette of the Moss carrier, it also necessitates a
high deck house to ensure adequate line of sight from the bridge. The low hull space
utilization means that a Moss carrier has a higher GT rating than membrane carriers of
similar cargo capacity, which translates in higher port and fairway dues and higher tonnage
taxes.
The fourth LNG cargo containment system, the IHI (now JMU) SPB system manages to
combine the advantages of the membrane system and the Moss system and addresses the
disadvantages of both systems too. The prismatic shape of the tanks ensures a high hold
space utilization rate and a low air draft, while the solid aluminum construction with a
centerline bulkhead and transverse swash bulkheads reduces liquid motion in the tanks and
minimizes the risk for sloshing damage, even in part load conditions. The high price of this
system originally prevented wide spread adoption but in 2014 JMU, the successor to SPB
designer IHI, secured orders for tanks for four 165,000 m3 LNG carriers and it has been
addressing the only true disadvantage of this system; its price tag. With possible licensing
overseas, the SPB system could become a very serious contender in the LNG containment
system arena. In Japan, JMU has already carried out a study with a shipyard into the
feasibility of SPB tanks as LNG fuel tanks.
A SPB Tank designed by IHI Japan SPB Tank being installed into Ships Hold
Integral tanks
Integral tanks form a structural part of the ship's hull and are influenced by the same loads
which stress the hull structure. Integral tanks are not normally allowed for the carriage of
liquefied gas if the cargo temperature is below ‐10°C. Certain tanks on a limited number of
Japanese‐built LPG carriers are of the integral type for the dedicated carriage of fully
refrigerated butane.
Internal insulation tanks
Internally insulated cargo tanks are similar to integral tanks. They utilise insulation materials
to contain the cargo. The insulation is fixed inside ship's inner hull or to an independent
load‐bearing surface. The non‐self‐supporting system obviates the need for an independent
tank and permits the carriage of fully refrigerated cargoes at carriage temperatures as low
as ‐55°C. Internal insulation systems have been incorporated in a very limited number of
fully refrigerated LPG carriers but, to date, the concept has not proved satisfactory in
service.
Assuming a gas carrier comes directly from a shipbuilder or drydock, the general sequence
of cargo handling operations is as follows.
LNG as a fuel
LNG carriers have long been using the boil‐off gas from their cargo tanks as fuel for their
engines. In 2000, the Norwegian passenger ferry Glutra became the first non‐LNG carrier to
Note: Attention should also be paid to Chapter 16 of the IGC Code, Regulation II‐2/15.1 of
the SOLAS Convention, IMO recommendations concerning the use of low flashpoint cargoes
as fuel e.g. IMO Resolution A565(14), and to classification requirements.
On the high sea, cargo vapour may provide the main fuel, though oil pilot burners are also
required. In the case of steam plants, cargo vapour may also be burnt when propulsion
machinery is not in operation provided that means for steam‐dumping are installed.
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner