Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Batch

Assignment Name

ENGLISH (PRECIS & COMPOSITION)


TIME ALLOWED: THREE HOURS PART-I (MCQS): MAXIMUM MARKS = 20
PART-I (MCQS): MAXIMUM 30 MINUTES PART-II MAXIMUM MARKS = 80
NOTE: (i) Part-II is to be attempted on the separate Answer Book.
(ii) Attempt ALL questions from PART-II
(iii) All the parts (if any) of each Question must be attempted at one place instead of at different places.
(iv) Candidate must write Q.No. in the Answer Book in accordance with Q.No. in the Q.Paper.

PART-II
Q.2 Make a précis of the following passage and suggest a suitable title. (20)
One of the fundamental facts about words is that the most useful ones in our language have many
meanings. That is partly why they are so useful; they work overtime….. Think of all the various things
we mean by the word “foot” on different occasions: one of the lower extremities of all human body, a
measure of verse, the ground about a tree, twelve inches and the floor in front of the stair. The same is
true of nearly every common noun or verb.
Considering the number of ways of taking a particular word, the task of speaking clearly being
understood would seem pretty hopeless if it were not for another very important face about language.
Though a word may have many senses, these senses can be controlled, up to a point, by the context in
which the word is used. When we find the word in a particular verbal setting, we can usually decide
quite definitely which of the many senses of the word is relevant. If a poet says his verse has three feet,
it doesn’t occur to you that he could mean it’s yard long or is three legged (unless perhaps you are a
critic planning to puncture the poet with a pun about his “lumping verse”). The context rules out these
maverick senses quite decisively.
Q.3 Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. (20)
Recently the mass media, formerly subsequent to the medical profession, have become
increasingly restive, and occasionally hostile. In Germany, in particular, the newspapers and television
have given great deal of time and space to the complaints against the medical profession. In Britain on
BBC radio and television, the medical practical have come under sharp and aggressive criticism.
Is this antagonism to the profession justified? And if so why? I have fried to answer that question
by looking at the way it deals with some of the diseases of our civilization, including the most lethal,
heart attack and cancer. If what emerges is an indictment of the profession, then I would rebut the charge
that I am anti-doctor. Montaigne said: I honor physicians not for their services but for themselves. That
goes for me too. (Brian Ingles)
Questions:
(a) What do you understand by the mass media?
(b) What is Brian Ingles stance towards the medical profession?
(c) What is a lethal disease?
(d) Is there a radical change in presentation of the art of healing by the mass media?

You might also like